Is Universal Credit Income (UCI) a scam?

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own. There is very little liquidity in the pool. Checked Nov 6, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

How concentrated is Universal Credit Income ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 107 holder addresses (2026-05-02 09:30 UTC).

Are large holders selling Universal Credit Income?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is Universal Credit Income liquidity falling?

One reading so far, $20,305.94 (2026-05-02 09:30 UTC): not enough to show a trend.

What is Universal Credit Income (UCI) and what does it do?

Universal Credit Income (UCI) is a cryptocurrency token. Visit our token page for detailed analytics, holder information, and trading data.

What is the current price of Universal Credit Income (UCI)?

The latest available price of Universal Credit Income is $2.5683e-6 USD. The reported 24-hour change is +0.00%. This is a saved or indexed observation, not a live execution quote.

What is the market cap of Universal Credit Income?

Universal Credit Income has a market capitalization of $2.57K USD. Market cap is calculated by multiplying the current price by the circulating supply.

Is Universal Credit Income (UCI) a good investment?

Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance. Our AI risk assessment currently rates Universal Credit Income as very high risk. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct thorough due diligence before investing.

How many addresses hold Universal Credit Income?

Universal Credit Income currently has 84 holder addresses as of our latest on-chain snapshot.

What is the liquidity of Universal Credit Income?

Universal Credit Income has a total liquidity of $149.00 USD across decentralized exchanges. Higher liquidity generally means lower slippage when trading.

Universal Credit Income Price Today & AI Analysis

UCIEthereumAnalysis as of May 2, 2026

$0.0₅2568

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live

0xd491956b9e498a8a54d037658f6f2beb6d0e71df

Chain

Ethereum

Holders

Market cap

$2.57K

Liquidity

$149.00

At a $1M market cap, $UCI would be $0.001000 (389x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

UCI support and resistance today

From 1-hour candles

UCI trades at $0.000002568 as of Nov 8, 10:47 UTC, +0.0% in 24 hours. No trade has moved the price in 7 days, so there is no fresh support or resistance to mark.

Is UCI a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 6

Caution

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own.

There is very little liquidity in the pool.

Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way.

Ask Unhosted AI about UCI

3 free answers a day

Universal Credit Income: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-02 09:30 UTC

Holder addresses

107

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$20,305.94

How concentrated is Universal Credit Income ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 107 holder addresses (2026-05-02 09:30 UTC).
Are large holders selling Universal Credit Income?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is Universal Credit Income liquidity falling?: One reading so far, $20,305.94 (2026-05-02 09:30 UTC): not enough to show a trend.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-02 09:30 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from May 2, 2026, 09:30 AM UTC

Market Cap

$55.35K

24h Volume

$14.69K

Liquidity

$20.31K

FDV

—

Holders

107

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

Universal Credit Income (UCI) is an unverified utility token launched 7 days ago on Ethereum (Uniswap v4) with a current market cap of $55,353 and critically shallow liquidity of $20,305. The token exhibits classic early-stage pump characteristics: a 33.98% 24-hour price surge followed by transaction collapse (zero activity in the last hour), extreme holder concentration (76 whales controlling 39% of supply), and complete absence of project fundamentals, community, or security verification. This combination of factors suggests UCI is a high-risk speculative asset with significant potential for value destruction.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — May 2, 2026, 09:30 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

Unverified smart contract with no security audit or verification
Extreme holder concentration with 76 whales and zero retail participation
Critically shallow liquidity creating severe slippage and manipulation risk
Complete absence of project information, roadmap, or community engagement

Universal Credit Income AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

UCI shows a 33.98% 24-hour gain but exhibits critical warning signs: zero transactions in the last hour and only 1 buy transaction in the past 4 hours indicate momentum has stalled significantly. The 56.8% buy pressure is offset by extremely shallow liquidity ($20,305 total), making any price movement highly susceptible to reversal and manipulation.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Medium-term outlook is heavily constrained by fundamental weaknesses: unverified contract, zero project description, no social presence, and extreme holder concentration (76 whales holding 39% of supply). Without meaningful development catalysts or community engagement, the token faces significant downward pressure as early buyers likely take profits.

Bullish Factors

56.8% buy pressure exceeds sell pressure (43.2%), indicating net positive sentiment among recent traders
107 holders acquired in just 7 days represents rapid early adoption velocity
13 new holders added in 24 hours (12% growth) shows continued interest despite price volatility
44 buy transactions vs 25 sell transactions in 24h indicates more buyers than sellers engaging

Bearish Factors

Unverified smart contract with 56/100 security score creates significant smart contract risk
Zero transactions in the last hour and only 1 transaction in the last 4 hours indicates momentum collapse
Extreme liquidity shortage ($20,305 total) creates severe slippage risk and price manipulation vulnerability
76 whales hold 39% of supply with top 100 holders controlling 100% - zero retail participation indicates centralized distribution
No project description, social links, or community presence suggests abandoned or low-effort project
101 of 107 holders acquired via transfer (not swap) indicates potential airdrop or distribution scheme rather than organic adoption
Market cap of only $55,353 with 1 billion token supply indicates extreme dilution

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

Chain: Ethereum
Contract: 0xd491...71df
Total Supply: —
Decimals: —

Key Risks

Unverified smart contract with unknown code risk - potential for hidden functions or rug pull mechanisms
Extreme holder concentration (76 whales, 39% of supply) creates crash risk from coordinated selling
Critical liquidity shortage ($20,305) creates severe slippage and illiquidity risk
Transaction collapse (zero activity in last hour) indicates momentum has reversed and downside is likely

Trading Insight

bearish

While buy pressure (56.8%) exceeds sell pressure (43.2%), the sentiment score reflects severe deterioration in trading momentum. The 33.98% 24-hour pump has completely stalled with zero transactions in the last hour, suggesting the initial buying wave has exhausted itself. The 44 buy transactions versus 25 sell transactions masks the critical reality that trading volume is collapsing in real-time.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

Short-term trend has reversed from uptrend to downtrend following the 33.98% 24-hour pump. The complete collapse in transaction volume (zero transactions in the last hour) indicates the uptrend has exhausted itself and buyers have withdrawn. Medium-term trend is sideways given the token's 7-day history, but the direction is clearly toward lower prices as momentum dissipates.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

Despite the 33.98% 24-hour gain, momentum indicators suggest oversold conditions are developing. The extreme buy pressure (56.8%) combined with collapsing transaction volume indicates the move was driven by low-volume buying rather than sustained demand. The zero transactions in the last hour suggest momentum has completely stalled and reversal is likely.

Volume Analysis

Buy

56.8%

Sell

43.2%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

Volume trend is sharply decreasing across all timeframes. 24-hour volume of $14,693.20 is concentrated in the earlier portion of the day, with 4-hour volume showing only 1 transaction and 1-hour volume showing zero. This exponential decline indicates the token has lost trader interest and liquidity is evaporating. The $20,305 total liquidity pool is extremely shallow relative to 24-hour volume, creating severe slippage risk.

Recent Price Action

Classic pump-and-dump pattern: rapid 33.98% 24-hour price increase followed by immediate transaction collapse and zero activity in the most recent hour. The price move appears driven by low-volume buying rather than sustained demand.

This pattern typically indicates the initial buying wave has exhausted itself and the token is entering a distribution phase. Without new catalysts or sustained buying pressure, prices typically decline significantly from these levels.

Key Price Levels

Immediate resistance

$0.000065000

Major resistance

$0.000080000

Immediate support at $0.000040000 represents the midpoint of the 24-hour range. Major support at $0.000030000 represents approximately 45% below current price and would likely be tested if the downtrend accelerates. Immediate resistance at $0.000065000 represents the upper end of recent trading range. Major resistance at $0.000080000 would require sustained buying pressure to overcome given current momentum collapse.

From the report of May 2, 2026. The price has since moved through 2 of its levels, so they are not shown. Today's levels are at the top of the page.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

92/100

Risk Breakdown

VolatilityHigh
33.98% 24-hour price movement combined with shallow liquidity ($20,305) creates extreme volatility. Micro-cap tokens with low liquidity are inherently volatile, and UCI's transaction collapse suggests volatility will increase as liquidity evaporates.
LiquidityHigh
Critical liquidity shortage at $20,305 total creates severe slippage risk. Any position larger than $5,000 would experience extreme slippage. The collapsing transaction volume suggests liquidity is evaporating further, increasing the risk of becoming completely illiquid.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Smart ContractNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.
RegulatoryMedium
As an uncategorized utility token with no clear use case, UCI may face regulatory scrutiny if classified as a security. The lack of project fundamentals and community makes it difficult to argue for utility token classification.

Key Risks

Unverified smart contract with unknown code risk - potential for hidden functions or rug pull mechanisms
Extreme holder concentration (76 whales, 39% of supply) creates crash risk from coordinated selling
Critical liquidity shortage ($20,305) creates severe slippage and illiquidity risk
Transaction collapse (zero activity in last hour) indicates momentum has reversed and downside is likely
Complete absence of project fundamentals, roadmap, or community suggests abandoned or low-effort project
100% supply already circulating with no vesting or lock-ups creates perpetual dilution pressure
Pump-and-dump pattern (33.98% gain followed by transaction collapse) suggests early buyers are taking profits

Mitigating Factors

Token is deployed on Ethereum mainnet (0x1) rather than a low-security chain
Token is trading on Uniswap v4, a reputable DEX with some security standards
Holder growth of 12% per day suggests some continued interest despite fundamental weaknesses

Investor Suitability

UCI is unsuitable for most investors. This token is only appropriate for highly sophisticated investors with high risk tolerance who are specifically seeking micro-cap speculative opportunities and can afford to lose their entire investment. The combination of unverified contract, extreme holder concentration, collapsing transaction volume, and zero project fundamentals creates a very high probability of significant value loss. Retail investors should avoid this token entirely.

Universal Credit Income (UCI) presents an extremely high-risk speculative opportunity with very limited upside potential and substantial downside risk. The token exhibits classic early-stage pump characteristics (33.98% 24-hour gain followed by transaction collapse) combined with critical fundamental weaknesses (unverified contract, extreme holder concentration, zero project information). The most likely outcome is continued price decline as early buyers complete profit-taking and liquidity evaporates.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

UCI could appreciate if: (1) the project team releases a legitimate whitepaper and roadmap, (2) the smart contract is verified and passes security audit, (3) the token gains listing on major exchanges, (4) a genuine use case emerges that drives organic demand, and (5) retail adoption accelerates. In this scenario, the token could potentially 5-10x from current levels if it successfully transitions from a micro-cap speculative asset to a legitimate utility token.

Official project announcement with credible team and roadmap
Smart contract verification and successful security audit
Exchange listings on major platforms (Coinbase, Kraken, Binance)
Genuine use case development and ecosystem adoption
Community building and social media growth

Base Case

Most likely outcome: UCI continues to decline gradually as early buyers complete profit-taking and transaction volume remains near zero. The token becomes increasingly illiquid and abandoned, eventually trading at near-zero prices as the initial speculative interest fades. The unverified contract and complete absence of project fundamentals prevent any meaningful recovery.

No significant project announcements or developments occur
Smart contract remains unverified and unaudited
Transaction volume remains near zero with no recovery
Whale holders continue to exit positions gradually
No new catalysts emerge to drive renewed interest

Bear Case

High probability

UCI is more likely to decline significantly as: (1) early whale buyers complete profit-taking, (2) transaction volume continues to collapse, (3) liquidity evaporates further, (4) the unverified contract remains unverified (suggesting potential issues), and (5) the complete absence of project fundamentals becomes increasingly apparent. In this scenario, the token could decline 50-90% from current levels as it becomes completely illiquid and abandoned.

Continued transaction volume collapse as early buyers exit
Whale profit-taking and coordinated selling
Liquidity evaporation making the token increasingly illiquid
Failure to release project information or roadmap
Smart contract remaining unverified, suggesting potential issues

Analysis Details

Generated

May 2, 2026, 09:30 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-02 09:30 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000055353162016055

Market Cap

$55.4K

24h Volume

$14.7K

Holders

107

Liquidity

$20,305.94

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data from Ethereum mainnetHolder distribution analytics and whale trackingTrading volume metrics from Uniswap v4Smart contract analysis and security scoringReal-time price and liquidity data

Limitations

Token is only 7 days old with limited historical data for trend analysis
Unverified smart contract prevents detailed code analysis and risk assessment
No project information, whitepaper, or team details available for fundamental analysis
Extreme micro-cap volatility makes price prediction models unreliable
Shallow liquidity creates data distortions where small trades cause large price movements
Lack of social media and community data prevents sentiment analysis
Transaction collapse in recent hours may indicate data anomalies or exchange issues

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. UCI presents extreme risk characteristics including unverified smart contract, extreme holder concentration, critical liquidity shortage, and zero project fundamentals. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research, understand the risks, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The author and publisher assume no responsibility for investment losses resulting from reliance on this analysis.