QI

Quantum Inu Price Today & AI Analysis

QIEthereumAnalysis as of Oct 9, 2026

Price

$0.000162

+6419.84% 24h

Contract

Live
0xbc5aacfa37dabd92af8606c9eef307714aa995f5

Holders

209

Market cap

$152.03K

Liquidity

$20.36K

Ask Unhosted AI about QI

3 free answers a day

More tokens on Ethereum

Quantum Inu: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-10-09 20:31 UTC

Holder addresses

208

Top 10 supply share

16.90%

Reported liquidity

$19,567.00
How concentrated is Quantum Inu ownership?
As of 2026-10-09 20:31 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 16.90% of supply. It reports 208 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Quantum Inu?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-10-09 20:31 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $56,536.00 in buys and $39,440.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Quantum Inu liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +451.78%, from $3,546.17 (2026-10-09 18:00 UTC) to $19,567.20 (2026-10-09 20:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-10-09 20:31 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-10-09 18:00 UTC$3,546.17
2026-10-09 19:00 UTC$14,681.56
2026-10-09 20:00 UTC$19,567.20

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Oct 9, 2026, 08:31 PM UTC

Market Cap

$141.68K

24h Volume

$95.98K

Liquidity

$19.57K

FDV

—

Holders

208

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Neutral

Quantum Inu (QI) is an Ethereum token trading on Uniswap, 2 hours old, with a price of about $0.00015 and a market cap of roughly $141,677. It has surged about 5,976% since launch on only $19,567 of liquidity. No project description or category is available, and the only listed social link is Twitter. At this stage it is a speculative launch with very limited verifiable information.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Oct 9, 2026, 08:31 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extremely new: contract created 2 hours ago
  • Entire 1B supply counted as circulating, with FDV of $150,808 close to market cap
  • Thin liquidity of $19,567 relative to a $141,677 market cap

Quantum Inu AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

The token is only 2 hours old and has risen about 5,976% since launch, so the 'trend' is a single price-discovery spike rather than an established trend. In the last hour, buys (149) and sells (151) were nearly equal, which suggests the initial momentum is stalling. After a move this extreme on thin liquidity, mean reversion is the more probable path, though sharp volatile bounces remain possible.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Most tokens that launch with a vertical spike and about $19.6K liquidity lose a large share of the initial gain as early buyers take profits and attention fades. With no description, only a Twitter link and no price history, there is no fundamental anchor supporting a sustained uptrend. This call rests on launch-pattern base rates, not on a measured trend.

Bullish Factors

  • 24h buy volume of $56,536 exceeds sell volume of $39,440 (58.9% buy share), showing net buying demand since launch
  • 206 unique buyers against 109 unique sellers indicates participation from a reasonably broad set of wallets

Bearish Factors

  • The roughly 5,976% gain in 4 hours on $19,567 liquidity leaves the price highly vulnerable to reversal
  • Last-hour transactions turned slightly sell-heavy (151 sells vs 149 buys), a sign momentum is fading
  • Market cap of $141,677 is about 7x the liquidity, so exiting larger positions would be hard
  • No project description, category or security data is available to support the valuation

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

QI call history

Full track record →

Oct 9bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0xbc5a...95f5
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Parabolic launch spike on thin liquidity is highly prone to sharp reversal
  • Unknown liquidity lock, deployer history and launch allocation could allow insider exits
  • No project information beyond a Twitter link makes fundamental valuation impossible

Trading Insight

neutral

Over 24h, buying outweighed selling at 58.9% to 41.1% by volume, but the last hour was almost perfectly balanced in transaction count. Because the token is only 2 hours old, the 24h and 4h figures are identical and describe a single launch burst.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

The token has risen sharply since launch, so the short-term direction is up, but it is only 2 hours old. There is no 7d/30d/90d history, so no medium-term trend can be established and 'sideways' is a placeholder reflecting lack of data.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

A 645% gain in 1 hour and 5,976% in 4 hours is extremely stretched by any standard. The 5-minute gain of 4.07% is small by comparison, hinting at decelerating momentum. No RSI or similar indicators can be computed without OHLC data.

Volume Analysis

Buy

58.9%

Sell

41.1%

Volume Trend

Stable

There is no historical volume series to compare. The 24h total of roughly $96K versus $19.6K liquidity means the pool has turned over several times, which is high activity for its size. Latest-hour transactions were evenly split.

Recent Price Action

A near-vertical launch spike with a slowing rate of gain in the latest minutes.

Such parabolic openings on thin liquidity commonly retrace sharply as early buyers realize profits, though some tokens consolidate if new demand arrives.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

92/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A 5,976% move in hours shows extreme volatility, and sharp reversals are common after such spikes.

  • LiquidityHigh

    With $19,567 liquidity against a $141,677 market cap, even modest sells can cause large price impact and exits may be difficult.

  • ConcentrationMedium

    The top 10 hold 16.9% in aggregate, but holders are unclassified, so the dumpable share is unknown. Rated medium for lack of data, not as an assessment of low risk.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    Uncategorized meme-style tokens with no stated utility face general regulatory uncertainty, with no specific jurisdictional data available.

Key Risks

  • Parabolic launch spike on thin liquidity is highly prone to sharp reversal
  • Unknown liquidity lock, deployer history and launch allocation could allow insider exits
  • No project information beyond a Twitter link makes fundamental valuation impossible

Mitigating Factors

  • Buy volume exceeded sell volume over 24h (58.9% vs 41.1%)
  • Top-10 aggregate concentration of 16.9% is not extreme

Investor Suitability

Only suitable for experienced, high-risk-tolerance speculators who can afford a total loss and who verify the contract independently.

QI is a 2-hour-old speculative launch with a very large initial gain and little verifiable substance. The risk/reward is dominated by liquidity and information gaps.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

New buyers continue arriving, liquidity is added and the community builds around the project, supporting the price near current levels or higher.

  • Sustained buy-side participation beyond the launch burst
  • Growth in liquidity and holder count

Base Case

Volatile retracement from the launch spike with erratic bounces and declining volume over the following days.

  • Typical post-launch behavior for tokens with similar liquidity profiles
  • No major new catalyst or liquidity injection

Bear Case

High probability

Early buyers take profits, momentum fades and thin liquidity amplifies a deep retracement, or an insider exit occurs.

  • Exhausted launch momentum, as seen in the balanced last-hour flow
  • Shallow liquidity relative to market cap

Analysis Details

Generated

Oct 9, 2026, 08:31 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-10-09 20:31 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000150807626215

Market Cap

$141.7K

24h Volume

$96.0K

Holders

208

Liquidity

$19,567.00

Data Sources

Codex DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)Daily OHLC price historyAggregate holder count and top-10 concentration

Limitations

  • Holder-growth, whale-transaction, and contract-security data were unavailable for this analysis
  • No OHLC history exists for this 2-hour-old token, so key levels and multi-window trends could not be computed
  • Smart-money, deployer and launch-allocation forensics were unavailable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Questions about QI?