ROOK

Robinhook Price Today & AI Analysis

ROOK
Ethereum·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 15, 2026

$0.000399

+0.00%24h
LiveContract:0xaebb159c997a36d6de9efe1da4bf8262060899b3Chain:EthereumHolders:500Market cap:$387.28KLiquidity:$0.00

More tokens on Ethereum

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about ROOK

Movement since reportreport from Jun 15, 2026, 04:03 PM UTC
Market Cap

$373.06K

24h Volume

$106.60K

Liquidity

$70.88K

FDV

Holders

156

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

AI Executive Summary

Robinhook (ROOK) is an unverified Ethereum token launched approximately 7 hours ago on Uniswap v4, with a current market cap of ~$373,055 after a 9,173% price surge from its initial level. The token has no published description, no social presence, and no verified contract, making its fundamental value proposition entirely opaque. Its genesis pattern — full supply minted, routed through intermediary wallets, and partially burned — combined with a 12-hour-old deployer wallet funded by an unlabelled source, raises serious concerns about insider control and potential exit-liquidity dynamics. While early trading shows genuine buyer participation (190 unique buyers, 65.8% buy pressure), the structural red flags place this firmly in the speculative/high-risk category.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ranJun 15, 2026, 04:03 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: bullish
Extreme launch-day price appreciation of 9,173% within 7 hours, driven entirely by speculative momentum with no fundamental anchor
Deployer wallet is only 12 hours old with 5 prior deployments, funded by an unlabelled wallet — a disposable-deployer fingerprint
93% of holders received tokens via transfer rather than market purchase, indicating a heavily insider-distributed supply structure

Robinhook AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

Robinhook launched just 7 hours ago and has already surged ~9,173% from its initial price, a near-vertical move that is almost entirely driven by launch-day speculation rather than organic demand. With 35.2% of supply held by individual whales who received their positions via transfer rather than market buys, the risk of coordinated selling into this momentum is acute. The 4h and 24h transaction counts being identical confirms all trading activity occurred within the last few hours, meaning there is no established price floor.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

Without a verified contract, no project description, no social presence, and a deployer wallet only 12 hours old funded by an unlabelled wallet, there is no fundamental basis to sustain the current valuation over a 30–90 day horizon. The token's genesis shows the entire 1 billion supply was minted, transferred through intermediary wallets, and partially burned in a pattern consistent with liquidity-pool seeding by insiders rather than a transparent launch. Unless the team discloses identity, verifies the contract, and demonstrates real utility, the medium-term trajectory is strongly bearish.

Bullish Factors
  • +Buy pressure is 65.8% of 24h volume ($70,172 buys vs $36,432 sells), indicating more capital entering than exiting in the launch window
  • +332 buy transactions from 190 unique buyers in the first 7 hours suggests broad initial interest rather than a single actor pumping the price
  • +Uniswap v4 listing provides permissionless, verifiable on-chain liquidity of $70,880, giving traders a real exit venue
Bearish Factors
  • -The deployer wallet (0xd89b5044…) was created only 12 hours ago, funded by an unlabelled wallet, and has 5 contract deployments in its first 100 transactions — a classic disposable-deployer / serial-launcher pattern associated with elevated rug risk
  • -All three audited top whale wallets (0xc876dc… at 7.23%, 0xe817be… at 4.04%, 0x2164a9… at 3.35%) received their supply via transfer with zero indexed DEX swaps, meaning they were handed insider allocations and face zero cost basis — any price is profit for them
  • -The contract is unverified (security score 53/100), meaning the source code cannot be independently audited for hidden mint, pause, or blacklist functions
  • -145 of 156 holders (93%) acquired tokens via transfer rather than swap, indicating the holder base is largely insider-distributed rather than organically purchased
  • -No project description, no social links, and an 'Uncategorized' classification leave the token with no identifiable use case or community to sustain demand

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

ROOK call history

Full track record →
Jun 15bearish
24h+117.4%
7d+117.4%
30d+117.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainEthereum
Contract0xaebb...99b3
Total Supply
Decimals

Key Risks

Rug pull / exit liquidity risk: The deployer's disposable-wallet pattern, unverified contract, and 35.2% insider-held dumpable supply create conditions where the operators could drain liquidity or dump tokens with minimal warning, leaving retail buyers with near-worthless positions
Zero-cost-basis insider selling: All three audited top whales received supply via transfer at zero market cost — they face no loss at any price, removing the normal incentive alignment between large holders and retail investors
Liquidity collapse under sell pressure: The $70,880 pool cannot absorb the ~$131,315 in dumpable supply at current prices; a coordinated or even sequential sell by 2–3 top whales would cause a price collapse of 70–90% before any retail investor could exit

Trading Insight

bullish

Short-term market sentiment is net-positive by transaction count and volume, with 65.8% buy pressure and a 2.3:1 buy-to-sell transaction ratio in the first 7 hours. However, this sentiment is entirely launch-day speculation — the identical 4h and 24h transaction counts confirm all activity is compressed into a single trading session, and the sentiment score is moderated heavily by the structural insider risks that could reverse momentum instantly.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bullish
Medium-Term (30d):
Neutral

The short-term trend is technically an uptrend by definition — the token launched and immediately surged 9,173% — but this is a launch spike, not a sustainable trend. There is no medium-term price history to establish a directional trend; the token is 7 hours old. Any medium-term assessment defaults to sideways pending the establishment of a real trading range.

Momentum

Status:
Overbought

A 9,173% move in under 4 hours from a zero baseline is by any measure an extreme overbought condition. Without RSI or MACD data (no OHLC history), the qualitative assessment based on the magnitude of the move and the compressed timeframe strongly indicates exhaustion-level momentum. Mean reversion pressure is high.

Volume Analysis

Buy 65.8%Sell 34.2%

Volume Trend: Increasing

All $106,604 in combined volume occurred within the token's first 7 hours of existence, making 'increasing' the only technically accurate descriptor. The buy-to-sell volume ratio of 1.93:1 shows buyers are paying up aggressively, which in a new token with insider-distributed supply often reflects retail FOMO being absorbed by pre-allocated insider wallets.

Recent Price Action

Vertical launch spike: price rose 9,173% from inception within the first 4 hours, with the 5-minute reading of +164.9% indicating the move was still accelerating at the time of data capture.

Vertical launch spikes of this magnitude in unverified, no-description tokens with insider-distributed supply historically precede sharp retracements once early holders begin distributing into retail buy pressure. The pattern is consistent with a 'pump and distribute' dynamic, though this cannot be confirmed without smart-money data.

Holder Metrics

Total Holders156
24h Change+156
Growth Rate+100%

All 156 holders were acquired within the token's 7-hour lifespan, so the 100% growth figure is a launch artifact rather than an organic growth signal. The accelerating holder trajectory noted in the 31-day timeseries is entirely a function of the launch event. Meaningful holder trend analysis will only be possible after several days of post-launch data.

Holder Distribution

Top 10 Holders39%
Top 100 Holders95%
Retail Holders5.0%
Concentration Risk:
Critical

With 10.05% held by the Uniswap protocol contract (non-dumpable liquidity), the remaining 28.95% of the top-10 is held entirely by individual whales — all of whom received supply via insider transfer. The dumpable supply figure of 35.2% represents a critical concentration risk: if even half of these wallets sell simultaneously, the $70,880 liquidity pool would be catastrophically insufficient to absorb the pressure without a 70–90% price collapse.

Whale Activity

Sentiment:
Mixed

The largest recent trades are modest in absolute terms: the biggest buy was $3,680 (0xc876dc…, also the 7.23% top whale) and the largest sell was $2,338 (0x8579b5…). No single transaction has yet tested the liquidity pool's depth at scale.

  • BUY $3,680 by 0xc876dc… — the top individual whale (7.23% supply) is actively trading, suggesting this insider is selling into or adding to their pre-allocated position
  • SELL $2,338 by 0x8579b5… and SELL $1,896 by 0x5e3e56… — early sell-side activity from wallets that may have received insider allocations is already present within the first 7 hours

The presence of both buys and sells from large wallets within the first 7 hours indicates mixed whale sentiment. The fact that the top whale (0xc876dc…) is the source of the largest buy is ambiguous — it could represent genuine conviction or a price-support action to attract more retail buyers before a larger distribution event.

Smart Money Indicators

Confidence:
Low
Profit-Taking Risk:
High

Smart-money data is unavailable for this token; no profitable-trader cohort analysis can be performed.

Smart-money data is unavailable. Given that the top three audited whales all hold zero-cost-basis insider allocations (acquired via transfer, not market buys), the profit-taking risk is assessed as high by default — any price above zero is pure profit for these wallets, removing the typical cost-basis anchor that limits selling pressure.

Liquidity Analysis

Total Liquidity$70,880
Depth:
Shallow
Slippage Risk:
High

A $70,880 liquidity pool on Uniswap v4 is shallow for a token with a $373,055 market cap — the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio is approximately 19%, meaning large trades will cause significant slippage. The 35.2% dumpable supply at current prices represents roughly $131,315 in potential sell pressure against a pool that cannot absorb it without catastrophic price impact. Any trade above ~$5,000–$7,000 will likely move the price materially.

Overall Risk:
Very High
91/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

A 9,173% price move in 7 hours establishes this as one of the most volatile assets observable. With no price history, no established range, and no fundamental anchor, price swings of 50–90% in either direction within 24 hours are entirely plausible.

Liquidity
High

$70,880 in total liquidity against $373,055 market cap means the pool can be drained or severely impacted by relatively small sell orders. The 35.2% dumpable supply (~$131,315 at current prices) vastly exceeds the pool's absorption capacity.

Concentration
High

While the Uniswap contract holds 10.05% (non-dumpable), the remaining top holders are all individual whales with zero-cost-basis insider allocations totalling 28.95% of supply. Combined with the broader 35.2% dumpable supply figure, concentration risk is critical.

Smart Contract
High

The contract is unverified (score 53/100), the deployer is a 12-hour-old wallet with 5 prior deployments funded by an unlabelled source. Without source code verification, the existence of owner-privileged functions (mint, pause, blacklist) cannot be ruled out.

Regulatory
Medium

As an unregistered, uncategorized token with no disclosed team or jurisdiction, ROOK faces the same general regulatory uncertainty as all micro-cap tokens. The lack of any utility claim or project description reduces (but does not eliminate) securities classification risk in most jurisdictions.

Key Risks

  • Rug pull / exit liquidity risk: The deployer's disposable-wallet pattern, unverified contract, and 35.2% insider-held dumpable supply create conditions where the operators could drain liquidity or dump tokens with minimal warning, leaving retail buyers with near-worthless positions
  • Zero-cost-basis insider selling: All three audited top whales received supply via transfer at zero market cost — they face no loss at any price, removing the normal incentive alignment between large holders and retail investors
  • Liquidity collapse under sell pressure: The $70,880 pool cannot absorb the ~$131,315 in dumpable supply at current prices; a coordinated or even sequential sell by 2–3 top whales would cause a price collapse of 70–90% before any retail investor could exit

Mitigating Factors

  • Genuine retail participation is visible: 190 unique buyers and 332 buy transactions in 7 hours suggests real market interest, not purely wash-trading, which provides some organic buy-side support
  • Uniswap v4 infrastructure ensures the liquidity pool itself cannot be secretly drained by the deployer (unlike tokens with custom liquidity contracts), providing a minimum floor of transparency for the AMM mechanism

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of sub-$500K market cap tokens with unverified contracts, insider-distributed supply, and no disclosed project fundamentals — and who are prepared to lose 100% of any capital allocated. It is entirely unsuitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone allocating more than a negligible speculative position.

Robinhook presents a highly asymmetric risk profile: the bull case requires sustained speculative momentum and eventual project legitimization, while the bear case — which is structurally better supported by the data — involves insider distribution into retail FOMO followed by liquidity collapse. The absence of any fundamental value proposition means the token's price is entirely a function of speculative demand, which is inherently unstable at this stage.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

The team behind ROOK reveals a legitimate project narrative, verifies the contract, and builds a community around the 'Robinhook' brand. Continued buy pressure from the existing 190-buyer base attracts additional retail attention, liquidity deepens, and the token establishes a stable trading range above current levels before any major insider distribution.

  • +Contract verification and team disclosure within the next 24–48 hours would dramatically reduce perceived risk and could attract new capital
  • +Sustained buy pressure (currently 65.8%) maintaining or growing the holder base past 300–500 wallets would signal genuine organic adoption
Base Case

The token experiences a typical micro-cap launch cycle: initial spike followed by a 60–80% retracement over 24–72 hours as early holders take profits, settling into a low-liquidity, low-volume trading pattern. Without a project narrative or community, it gradually loses trading interest and becomes illiquid within 2–4 weeks.

  • No major coordinated insider dump occurs in the immediate term, allowing a natural price discovery process
  • No project fundamentals emerge to justify a re-rating of the token's value above its speculative launch premium
Bear Case
High

One or more of the top insider whales (holding 7.23%, 4.04%, or 3.35% of supply at zero cost basis) begins selling into the current retail buy pressure. The shallow $70,880 liquidity pool is unable to absorb the sell pressure, triggering a cascade that collapses the price by 70–95% within hours. The deployer, having used a disposable wallet, abandons the project with no recourse for retail holders.

  • -Zero-cost-basis insider allocations totalling 35.2% of dumpable supply create overwhelming incentive to sell at any price
  • -Unverified contract and disposable deployer pattern are consistent with tokens that historically do not survive beyond their launch week

Analysis Details

GeneratedJun 15, 2026, 04:03 PM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data as of analysis timestamp; token is 7 hours old
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.000340004849460690
Market Cap$373.1K
24h Volume$106.6K
Holders156
Liquidity$70.9K

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Ethereum mainnet)
Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)
Trading volume metrics (Uniswap v4 pool data)
Smart contract analysis (security score, verification status)
Deployer wallet forensics (first-active date, funding source, prior deployments)
Whale wallet intel (DEX swap history, acquisition method, first-active dates)
Token genesis transfer sequence analysis

Limitations

  • Token is only 7 hours old — there is no OHLC price history, no established trading range, and no medium-term behavioral data for any wallet or metric; all trend analysis is based on a single trading session
  • Smart-money / profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable, preventing assessment of whether sophisticated investors are accumulating or avoiding this token
  • The unverified contract means the full token mechanics (fee structure, owner privileges, mint functions) cannot be confirmed from on-chain data alone
  • Holder tier thresholds (whale, shark, dolphin, etc.) are Moralis-defined relative tiers with unpublished exact thresholds; dollar-value interpretations of these buckets are not possible

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track ROOK