CAP

Cap Price Today & AI Analysis

CAPEthereumAnalysis as of Jun 26, 2026

Price

$0.0471

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0x99991c6aabba5a096f24f250b73580f5179b9999

Chain

Ethereum

Holders

999

Market cap

$470.95M

Liquidity

$276.00

More tokens on Ethereum

TTAMATamaSwap$0.0126080+0.0%MC $077The 7 Wanderers$0.091112+0.0%MC $1.1KPENGUPENGUPengu Legacy$0.055594+0.0%MC $5.6KDAOFDAOFThe Dao Fund$0.000122+0.0%MC $12.2KSPLSPLSPL VPN$0.001390+0.0%MC $29.2KUSDSUSDSUSDS$0.9999+0.0%MC $6.59B

Cap: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-26 13:03 UTC

Holder addresses

378

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$71,462.06
How concentrated is Cap ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 378 addresses (2026-06-26 13:03 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Cap?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Cap liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-26 13:03 UTC, reported liquidity was $71,462.06. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-26 13:03 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Jun 26, 2026, 01:03 PM UTC

Market Cap

$271.14M

24h Volume

$135.54K

Liquidity

$71.46K

FDV

—

Holders

378

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about CAP

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bullish

Cap (CAP) is a 49-day-old Ethereum-based DeFi token describing itself as a covered credit application combining a digital dollar, a credit platform, and a financial guarantee market for institutional lending. At a current price of $0.0271, it carries a stated fully diluted valuation of $271M — a figure that is entirely unsupported by its $71K liquidity pool, 378 holders, and unverified smart contract. The token's security score of 30/100 and lack of contract verification are serious structural concerns that overshadow the project's ambitious DeFi lending narrative. While early holder growth is rapid and dumpable supply is low at 2.8%, the token remains in an extremely high-risk, pre-validation stage.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 26, 2026, 01:03 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Described credit architecture combining a protocol-backed digital dollar, institutional credit lines, and a financial guarantee market — a more complex DeFi primitive than simple lending protocols
  • 84.5% of supply locked in protocol/contract addresses, keeping dumpable whale supply to just 2.8% of total tokens outstanding
  • Listed on Bybit (1.18%), KuCoin (0.44%), and Coinbase (0.20%) as exchange custodians, suggesting some degree of CEX-level due diligence has occurred despite the unverified contract

Cap AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bullish

CAP is 49 days old and has accumulated 378 holders entirely within that window, with the holder base growing 96% in the last 24 hours alone — a sign of rapid early adoption momentum. The 10.56% price gain recorded across the 1h, 4h, and 24h windows reflects a single sustained move rather than intraday noise, and buy transactions (127) outnumber sell transactions (99) with 51.3% buy pressure reinforcing the directional bias. However, the token's extreme youth, unverified contract, and thin liquidity mean this momentum is fragile and highly susceptible to reversal.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Over a 30–90 day horizon, the structural risks dominate: the contract is unverified, the security score is 30/100, liquidity stands at only ~$71K against a $271M stated market cap, and the holder base of 378 is embryonic. The 100% holder growth in 7 and 30 days reflects the token's launch phase rather than organic accumulation, and without a verified contract or meaningful liquidity depth, any sustained price appreciation is unlikely to hold. Unless the project delivers verifiable protocol milestones — live credit platform, audited contracts, and real institutional borrower activity — the medium-term trajectory leans bearish.

Bullish Factors

  • Holder base grew by 362 wallets (+96%) in a single 24-hour period, indicating a sharp acceleration in early adoption that is unusual even for new tokens
  • Buy transactions (127) outnumber sell transactions (99) and buy volume ($69,583) exceeds sell volume ($65,961), producing a net inflow and 51.3% buy pressure on the day
  • 84.50% of supply is held by a protocol/contract address, meaning the effective dumpable supply from individual whales is only 2.8% — genuine sell-side pressure from insiders is structurally limited

Bearish Factors

  • The contract is unverified and carries a security score of 30/100, placing it in the bottom tier of on-chain safety and making it unsuitable for risk-averse capital
  • Total liquidity is only ~$71,462 against a stated fully diluted valuation of $271M — a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of roughly 0.026%, meaning even modest sell orders will cause severe slippage
  • The largest recent on-chain swaps are all sub-$1,100, confirming that no meaningful institutional or whale buying has occurred via open-market DEX activity; the token's price action is driven by very small retail flows

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

CAP call history

Full track record →

Jun 26bullish
24h+21.1%
7d-21.1%
30d-19.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0x9999...9999
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Unverified smart contract with a 30/100 security score: the source code cannot be audited, and the protocol/contract holding 84.5% of supply may have admin keys, minting functions, or withdrawal capabilities that are entirely opaque to outside observers
  • Extreme liquidity-to-FDV mismatch: $71K in liquidity supporting a $271M stated valuation means the market cap figure is largely notional — it cannot be realized through actual selling without catastrophic price impact
  • Transfer-dominated holder acquisition (298 of 378 holders via transfer): the majority of the holder base received tokens without paying market price, creating a large cohort of zero-cost holders with no economic incentive to hold and every incentive to sell into any price strength

Trading Insight

bullish

Current sentiment is mildly bullish based on a slight buy-side edge: 127 buy transactions versus 99 sells, $69,583 in buy volume against $65,961 in sell volume, and 65 unique buyers versus 76 unique sellers. The fact that unique sellers outnumber unique buyers while buy volume still leads suggests a small number of buyers are absorbing supply from a larger number of small sellers — a pattern consistent with early accumulation by a few participants rather than broad retail enthusiasm.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

The short-term trend is technically upward based on the 10.56% price gain recorded across the 1h/4h/24h windows, which represents a single directional move rather than sustained multi-session momentum. No OHLC history exists to assess a medium-term trend, so the medium-term classification defaults to sideways given the absence of confirmatory data. The token is too young (49 days) and has too little trading history to establish a reliable trend structure.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

A 10.56% single-session move on a token with only $71K in liquidity and 226 total transactions suggests the price is being moved by very thin order flow. In the absence of RSI or MACD data, the combination of a sharp single-hour price spike, identical transaction counts across all time windows, and a 96% single-day holder surge points to a momentum condition that is stretched relative to the token's underlying liquidity and trading depth.

Volume Analysis

Buy

51.3%

Sell

48.7%

Volume Trend

Increasing

All $135K of recorded 24-hour volume was generated within the most recent hour, representing a sharp volume spike from what appears to have been a near-zero baseline. While the absolute volume figure is modest, it is large relative to the $71K liquidity pool — a volume-to-liquidity ratio above 1.0x in a single session indicates significant price impact per dollar traded and elevated slippage risk for larger orders.

Recent Price Action

Single-session vertical spike of 10.56% concentrated entirely within the most recent hour, with no prior OHLC history to contextualize the move against historical ranges or prior support/resistance.

Vertical price spikes on low-liquidity tokens with no trading history are frequently associated with launch events, coordinated buys, or bot activity. Without follow-through volume in subsequent sessions, such moves tend to retrace partially or fully as early recipients of transferred tokens begin to sell.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

85/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A 10.56% price move driven by sub-$1,100 individual transactions on a $71K liquidity pool demonstrates extreme price sensitivity to small order flow. With no OHLC history and all volume concentrated in a single hour, volatility is structurally very high.

  • LiquidityHigh

    At $71,462 total liquidity against a $271M FDV, the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~0.026%. Any order above a few thousand dollars will cause meaningful slippage, and a coordinated exit by even the smallest individual whales (0.50% of 10B tokens) would overwhelm the pool.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryHigh

    The described protocol — a digital dollar backed by regulated money market funds, institutional credit lines, and financial guarantees — sits squarely in the regulatory crosshairs of securities law, banking regulation, and stablecoin legislation across multiple jurisdictions. If the protocol is genuine, regulatory compliance risk is material.

Key Risks

  • Unverified smart contract with a 30/100 security score: the source code cannot be audited, and the protocol/contract holding 84.5% of supply may have admin keys, minting functions, or withdrawal capabilities that are entirely opaque to outside observers
  • Extreme liquidity-to-FDV mismatch: $71K in liquidity supporting a $271M stated valuation means the market cap figure is largely notional — it cannot be realized through actual selling without catastrophic price impact
  • Transfer-dominated holder acquisition (298 of 378 holders via transfer): the majority of the holder base received tokens without paying market price, creating a large cohort of zero-cost holders with no economic incentive to hold and every incentive to sell into any price strength

Mitigating Factors

  • Dumpable supply from individual whales is only 2.8%, meaning the identifiable insider sell pressure is structurally limited in the near term
  • Named exchange custodians (Bybit, KuCoin, Coinbase) hold positions, suggesting the token has passed at least basic exchange listing criteria

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced DeFi participants who fully understand the risks of unverified contracts, micro-liquidity pools, and early-stage token distributions. It is not suitable for risk-averse investors, those allocating meaningful portfolio capital, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire position.

Cap presents an ambitious DeFi credit architecture that, if genuinely implemented and audited, addresses a real institutional lending gap on-chain. However, at 49 days old with an unverified contract, $71K in liquidity, and 378 holders, the token is in a pre-validation stage where the gap between the described protocol and verifiable on-chain reality is the central investment risk.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The Cap protocol delivers a live, audited credit platform with real institutional borrowers generating yield for depositors. Contract verification and a credible audit reduce the security score risk, liquidity deepens as the protocol gains traction, and the holder base grows organically beyond the current transfer-dominated distribution. The DeFi lending narrative attracts institutional capital, and the 2.8% dumpable supply cap prevents insider-driven price crashes.

  • Contract verification and third-party security audit that confirms the described protocol architecture is genuinely implemented
  • Live institutional borrower activity generating real yield, validating the credit platform thesis and driving organic token demand

Base Case

Cap remains a speculative micro-cap DeFi token with a compelling narrative but unverified execution. The holder base grows slowly, liquidity remains thin, and the price trades with high volatility driven by small retail flows. The protocol may eventually verify its contract and publish documentation, but meaningful institutional adoption and liquidity depth remain 6–12 months away at minimum.

  • The project team continues development and eventually verifies the contract, but institutional adoption is slow given the regulatory complexity of the described credit architecture
  • Liquidity grows modestly but remains insufficient to support the stated $271M FDV, keeping the token in high-risk, high-volatility territory

Bear Case

High probability

The unverified contract conceals admin functions or a rug mechanism; the 84.5% protocol/contract holding is eventually drained or redistributed; the 298 transfer-recipient holders sell into any price strength; and the $71K liquidity pool is insufficient to absorb even modest sell pressure. The token fails to attract institutional adoption, the described protocol never launches in verifiable form, and the price collapses toward zero.

  • Continued lack of contract verification prevents independent audit, eroding institutional confidence and keeping the security score at 30/100
  • Transfer-acquired holders with zero cost basis begin selling into the thin $71K liquidity pool, causing cascading price impact

Analysis Details

Generated

Jun 26, 2026, 01:03 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-26 13:03 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.027114239702288597

Market Cap

$271.14M

24h Volume

$135.5K

Holders

378

Liquidity

$71,462.06

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Ethereum mainnet)Holder distribution analytics and wallet classificationTrading volume and order flow metrics (Uniswap v4)Smart contract security assessmentToken genesis and deployer forensicsWhale wallet behavioral lookup

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history exists for this 49-day-old token, making technical support/resistance analysis impossible and limiting trend assessment to a single session's data
  • The unverified smart contract prevents source code review, meaning protocol architecture claims in the token description cannot be independently confirmed on-chain
  • Smart-money profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable, preventing assessment of sophisticated investor positioning
  • Whale wallet forensics are available for only one of three individual whale wallets, leaving the acquisition method and intent of the other two unknown

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track CAP