A

apM Fashion Price Today & AI Analysis

APMEthereumAnalysis as of Sep 17, 2026

Price

$0.063658

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0x8511c2b2770e66c192ee491e0d2bc8da614de9fb

Holders

42

Market cap

$365.81K

Liquidity

$0.00

At a $1M market cap, $APM would be $0.060000 (2.73x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is APM a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 29

Caution

Unhosted found some red flags. None proves a scam on its own.

  • There is very little liquidity in the pool.
  • The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.

Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about APM

3 free answers a day

More tokens on Ethereum

apM Fashion: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-17 02:16 UTC

Holder addresses

39

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$63,368.00
How concentrated is apM Fashion ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 39 addresses (2026-09-17 02:16 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling apM Fashion?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is apM Fashion liquidity falling?
As of 2026-09-17 02:16 UTC, reported liquidity was $63,368.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-17 02:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Sep 17, 2026, 02:16 AM UTC

Market Cap

$808.12K

24h Volume

$311.08K

Liquidity

$63.37K

FDV

—

Holders

39

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bullish

apM Fashion (APM) is a 25-hour-old ERC-20 token trading on Uniswap with a $808,124 market cap (equal to its fully diluted valuation, implying the full 1 trillion token supply is already circulating) and just $63,368 in liquidity. The token has no project description, no category classification, and no social presence, so its purpose and use case cannot be determined from available data. Price has pulled back roughly 9.7% from its brief post-launch high, and holder concentration is elevated with only 39 total holders controlling supply, 79% of which sits with the top 10 wallets.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Sep 17, 2026, 02:16 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • No verifiable project description, category, or social presence exists to distinguish this token
  • Token is extremely early-stage at 25 hours old with only 39 total holders
  • No security, genesis, or deployer forensics are available, leaving its legitimacy unverified

apM Fashion AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

Daily closes fell from $8.948e-7 to the current $8.081e-7 (about -9.7%) after an initial parabolic launch move to a period high of $9.205e-7. Price now sits at 88% of the 2-day range, and short-term intraday momentum (-2.79% over 1h, -4.05% over 5m) confirms continued cooling from that peak. With only 25 hours of trading history, this looks like post-launch profit-taking rather than a sustained advance.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Neutral

The token is only 25 hours old, so 7d, 30d, and 90d trend data are all reported as not available - there is genuinely no medium-term history to extrapolate from. Whether the current pullback from the launch high resolves into further downside or a base-building phase will depend on whether liquidity and holder count grow beyond their current nascent levels.

Bullish Factors

  • Buy-side transaction flow currently dominates: 148 buys vs 76 sells (59.2% vs 40.8% volume pressure) in the past 24 hours
  • Unique buyers (37) modestly exceed unique sellers (33) over 24h, suggesting some net new demand rather than pure churn

Bearish Factors

  • Daily closes show a ~9.7% decline from $8.948e-7 to $8.081e-7, pulling back from the period high of $9.205e-7
  • Top 10 holders control 79.0% of the 1 trillion token supply across only 39 total wallets, with no data available to classify these wallets as protocol, team, or organic holders
  • Liquidity of $63,368 against an $808,124 market cap (~7.8% ratio) is thin, creating meaningful slippage risk for anything beyond small trades
  • Token is only 25 hours old with no security audit, contract verification, or extended trading history to validate

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

APM call history

Full track record →

Sep 17bearish
24h+235.5%
7d-54.7%
30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0x8511...e9fb
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • The token is only 25 hours old with a single day of price history, providing no meaningful track record for trend validation
  • Liquidity of $63,368 is thin relative to the $808,124 market cap, exposing traders to high slippage and limiting exit capacity for larger positions
  • Top 10 holders control 79.0% of supply across only 39 wallets, with no visibility into whether this concentration reflects insiders or organic accumulation, since genesis and whale forensics are unavailable
  • No contract security, audit, or verification data is available, so mint authority, ownership, or backdoor risks cannot be ruled out

Trading Insight

bullish

24-hour trading shows a clear buy-side skew: 148 buy transactions versus 76 sell transactions, and 59.2% buy volume pressure versus 40.8% sell pressure. This skew is consistent across shorter windows (23 buys vs 12 sells in 4h; 6 buys vs 3 sells in 1h), suggesting persistent, if modest, net demand rather than a distribution event.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

The only two available daily closes show a decline from $8.948e-7 to $8.081e-7, and current price sits at 88% of the 2-day range after retreating from a high of $9.205e-7. Negative 1h (-2.79%) and 5m (-4.05%) moves reinforce that the token is currently cooling from its post-launch peak despite a positive 4h reading (+5.01%).

Momentum

Status

Overbought

Price remains near the top of its short trading range (88th percentile) after a parabolic move from a low of $4.790e-9 to a high of $9.205e-7, even as it pulls back. This positioning is consistent with an overbought condition still working off the initial launch spike rather than confirmed oversold or neutral footing.

Volume Analysis

Buy

59.2%

Sell

40.8%

Volume Trend

Stable

Buy-dominant transaction flow is consistent across the 1h (6 buys/3 sells), 4h (23 buys/12 sells), and 24h (148 buys/76 sells) windows, with buy volume ($184,182) outpacing sell volume ($126,902). This steady skew suggests ongoing but not accelerating demand.

Recent Price Action

A parabolic launch-day rally from a low of $4.790e-9 to a high of $9.205e-7 (roughly 192x) has been followed by a mild pullback to the current $8.081e-7, a ~12% retreat from the peak.

Such extreme launch-window spikes on thinly-liquid Uniswap pools typically reflect early speculative positioning rather than durable demand, and often mean-revert sharply as initial buyers take profits, particularly with a concentrated 39-wallet holder base.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    Price moved from a low of $4.790e-9 to a high of $9.205e-7 within the token's short 25-hour life before pulling back roughly 9.7% between the two available daily closes, and recent intraday moves (-2.79% 1h, -4.05% 5m) show the swings remain large and rapid.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Total liquidity of $63,368 against an $808,124 market cap (~7.8% ratio) is thin, meaning even moderate-sized trades can cause significant price impact and slippage.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryLow

    No specific regulatory flags or claims (e.g., yield promises, security-like structures) are evident from the available data, though the absence of any project description limits this assessment.

Key Risks

  • The token is only 25 hours old with a single day of price history, providing no meaningful track record for trend validation
  • Liquidity of $63,368 is thin relative to the $808,124 market cap, exposing traders to high slippage and limiting exit capacity for larger positions
  • Top 10 holders control 79.0% of supply across only 39 wallets, with no visibility into whether this concentration reflects insiders or organic accumulation, since genesis and whale forensics are unavailable
  • No contract security, audit, or verification data is available, so mint authority, ownership, or backdoor risks cannot be ruled out
  • The extreme reported 24h price move (+12,049%) reflects a brand-new, thinly-traded pool rather than a durable trend, and is highly susceptible to sharp reversal

Mitigating Factors

  • Buy-side transaction flow currently outweighs sell-side (148 vs 76 transactions, 59.2% vs 40.8% volume) in the past 24 hours, indicating active demand rather than an ongoing sell-off
  • Trading occurs on Uniswap, a permissionless and non-custodial decentralized exchange

Investor Suitability

Suitable only for highly speculative traders with a strong risk tolerance who can accept potential total loss of capital; unsuitable for conservative or risk-averse investors given the token's 25-hour age, thin liquidity, high holder concentration, and unverifiable contract security.

apM Fashion is a nano-cap, hour-old Uniswap listing where buy-side transaction flow currently dominates, but structural risks - thin liquidity, high holder concentration, and a complete absence of security or project data - outweigh the limited positive signals. Any thesis here is necessarily short-horizon and speculative given the near-total lack of history.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued buy-side dominance and growing unique-trader participation could sustain demand and expand the liquidity/holder base beyond its current nascent state, supporting price stabilization or further gains.

  • Sustained buy-side dominance (59.2% buy pressure, 37 unique buyers vs 33 sellers in 24h)
  • Rising unique participant counts in the earliest trading hours signaling organic interest

Base Case

Price likely continues to exhibit high volatility typical of hour-old, thinly-liquid Uniswap listings, oscillating without a clear sustained direction until liquidity deepens and the holder base broadens beyond 39 wallets.

  • Liquidity and holder count remain low in the near term
  • No new verifiable project information (audit, socials, roadmap) emerges to materially change the risk profile

Bear Case

Medium probability

The current pullback from the launch-day high extends further as concentrated holders (79% held by the top 10 of only 39 wallets) exit into thin liquidity, causing a sharp retracement typical of freshly launched, illiquid tokens.

  • 79% top-10 concentration with no wallet-type visibility raises dump risk
  • Thin $63,368 liquidity magnifies the price impact of even moderate sell orders
  • No security or audit data exists to rule out contract-level exit risk

Analysis Details

Generated

Sep 17, 2026, 02:16 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-17 02:16 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$8.08124474616e-7

Market Cap

$808.1K

24h Volume

$311.1K

Holders

39

Liquidity

$63,368.00

Data Sources

Unhosted DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)Daily OHLC price historyAggregate holder count and top-10 concentration

Limitations

  • Token has only 25 hours of history and two daily closes, insufficient for reliable multi-window trend analysis
  • Holder-growth, per-wallet, whale-transaction, and smart-money cohort data were unavailable for this analysis
  • Contract-security, audit, and verification data were unavailable for this chain, so no security score could be assigned
  • No project description, category, or social data exists to assess fundamentals or community strength

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

New reports on Ethereum

All new tokens →

Questions about APM?