NOM

Nomina Price Today & AI Analysis

NOMEthereumAnalysis as of Sep 5, 2026

Price

$0.001970

-0.15% 24h

Contract

Live
0x6e6f6d696e61decd6605bd4a57836c5db6923340

Chain

Ethereum

Holders

9.4K

Market cap

$14.42M

Liquidity

$15.79K

At a $50M market cap, $NOM would be $0.006832 (3.47x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is NOM a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 20

No red flags

No red flags so far, though the contract test was not conclusive.

Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about NOM

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Ethereum

RLPRLPResolv Liquidity Provider Token$0.0883-0.7%MC $141.0KFEARNOTFEARNOTFEAR NOT$0.066037-1.9%MC $254.0KCCORNUnicorn$0.058170+49.4%MC $8.2KWYNNWYNNAnita Max Wynn$0.000342+0.2%MC $3.4KMSTRxMSTRxMicroStrategy xStock$144.76+1.5%MC $19.25MPYUSDPYUSDPayPal USD$0.9999-0.0%MC $1.85B

Nomina: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-05 04:31 UTC

Holder addresses

9,438

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$11,509.00
How concentrated is Nomina ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 9,438 addresses (2026-09-05 04:31 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Nomina?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Nomina liquidity falling?
As of 2026-09-05 04:31 UTC, reported liquidity was $11,509.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-05 04:31 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Sep 5, 2026, 04:31 AM UTC

Market Cap

$6.41M

24h Volume

$5.55K

Liquidity

$11.51K

FDV

—

Holders

9,438

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bullish

Nomina (NOM) is an Ethereum-based token described as the governance and utility token for a unified perpetual futures DEX trading terminal, used for transaction fee payment across rollups and validator staking. The token is approximately 12.5 months old and carries a fully diluted valuation of ~$16.1 million against a circulating market cap of ~$6.4 million, implying meaningful unlocked supply overhang. Price action over the past 30 days is constructive (+32.2%), but the token trades at just 9% of its 62-day range, reflecting a steep prior decline from the $0.01130 high. Critically thin liquidity of $11,509 on Uniswap means this market is highly susceptible to manipulation and large slippage, making it suitable only for participants who understand micro-cap DEX risk.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Sep 5, 2026, 04:31 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Universal gas marketplace concept allowing fee payment on any supported rollup using source-network assets or NOM directly
  • Dual utility as both a transaction fee token and a validator staking asset within the Nomina network
  • Governance rights embedded in NOM, giving holders a formal role in protocol decisions for the perpetual futures terminal

Nomina AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bullish

NOM has posted a 7-day gain of +21.4% and a 30-day gain of +32.2%, establishing a clear multi-week uptrend from the $0.001286 period low. The recent daily close sequence shows a steady staircase from $0.001339 to $0.002209, confirming accumulation momentum. However, the price currently sits at only 9% of the 62-day range, meaning the bulk of the prior high at $0.01130 remains distant overhead resistance.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bullish

The 30-day trend of +32.2% and a consistent pattern of higher daily closes over the past two weeks support a constructive medium-term outlook. If NOM can hold above immediate support at $0.001818 and break through the $0.002737 resistance, the next meaningful target becomes the major resistance at $0.01130. The 36% daily volatility means drawdowns of 20–40% are statistically normal within an uptrend, so position sizing must account for this.

Bullish Factors

  • 7-day price appreciation of +21.4% and 30-day appreciation of +32.2% confirm a sustained multi-week uptrend, not a one-day spike
  • Daily close sequence from $0.001339 to $0.002209 over 14 sessions shows a staircase pattern of higher lows and higher closes
  • 24-hour buy pressure stands at 62.9% ($3,494 buy volume vs. $2,057 sell volume), indicating net demand in the most recent full day

Bearish Factors

  • Current price at only 9% of the 62-day range ($0.001286–$0.01130) means the token has already retraced sharply from its period high of $0.01130, signalling prior distribution at scale
  • Total liquidity of $11,509 is critically shallow — a sell order of a few thousand dollars would cause severe slippage and could collapse the price
  • Only 9 unique buyers in 24 hours against 15 unique sellers indicates the seller base is broader than the buyer base, a fragile demand structure

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

NOM call history

Full track record →

Sep 5bullish
24h-5.0%
7d-14.1%
30d+21.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0x6e6f...3340
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Exit liquidity failure: with only $11,509 in pool liquidity, any coordinated selling by top holders (who control 43.3% of supply) would collapse the price before most participants could exit at meaningful prices
  • Supply overhang inconsistency: the gap between the $6.4M market cap and $16.1M FDV suggests undisclosed or miscounted supply that could enter circulation and dilute holders without warning
  • Micro-cap manipulation risk: 44 total transactions in 24 hours from only 9 unique buyers means a single actor can dominate price discovery — the 4-hour +52% pump followed by immediate selling is a concrete example of this dynamic

Trading Insight

bullish

Buy pressure at 62.9% over 24 hours reflects a modest net-positive sentiment, but the raw transaction counts tell a more cautious story: 25 sell transactions versus 19 buy transactions, with 15 unique sellers outnumbering 9 unique buyers. The 1-hour window shows a sharp deterioration — 8 sell transactions against only 1 buy — suggesting short-term momentum has stalled after the 4-hour price surge.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bullish

Both the 7-day (+21.4%) and 30-day (+32.2%) windows confirm an uptrend across short and medium timeframes. The daily close sequence over the most recent 14 sessions progresses from $0.001339 to $0.002209 with only two meaningful pullbacks (to $0.001406 and $0.001418), each of which was recovered. The 90-day data is unavailable, so the longer-term structural trend cannot be confirmed.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

The 4-hour candle showing a +52% surge followed by a -13% hourly retracement indicates momentum has peaked in the very short term and is cooling. Over the multi-day trend, momentum remains positive given the consistent higher-close pattern, but the 36% daily volatility means momentum reversals are frequent and sharp. The price sitting at 9% of the 62-day range also implies the token is far from overbought on a structural basis despite the recent run.

Volume Analysis

Buy

62.9%

Sell

37.1%

Volume Trend

Stable

Daily volume of $5,551 is thin and roughly equivalent to 48% of the total liquidity pool, a structurally unhealthy ratio that amplifies price impact per dollar traded. Volume is not meaningfully increasing or decreasing based on available data — the 24-hour and 4-hour transaction counts are nearly identical (44 vs. 43 total), suggesting activity is concentrated in a very short recent window rather than spread across the day.

Recent Price Action

The 14-session daily close sequence shows a gradual ascending channel from $0.001339 to $0.002209, punctuated by two consolidation dips to the $0.001400–$0.001450 zone before resuming higher. The most recent session closed at $0.002209, the highest close in the observed series.

An ascending close pattern with higher lows is classically constructive, but in a token with 36% daily volatility and sub-$12k liquidity, such patterns can reverse violently on minimal selling pressure. The pattern is meaningful as a trend signal but should not be interpreted as a reliable continuation guarantee.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.001818

Major support

$0.001286

Immediate resistance

$0.002737

Major resistance

$0.01130

Immediate support at $0.001818 corresponds to the most recent swing low in the daily close series and represents the first line of defence in any pullback. Major support at $0.001286 is the 62-day period low and a structural floor. Immediate resistance at $0.002737 is the nearest overhead swing high that must be cleared to extend the uptrend. Major resistance at $0.01130 — the 62-day period high — is a distant but significant ceiling that reflects prior peak distribution; reclaiming it would require a ~5x move from current levels.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

82/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    Daily return standard deviation of 36% is extremely high — this implies a statistically normal daily move of ±36%, meaning a 50–70% drawdown over a week is within the range of normal outcomes. The 62-day range spanning $0.001286 to $0.01130 (an 8.8x spread) confirms that extreme price swings are a structural feature of this token, not an anomaly.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Total pool liquidity of $11,509 is critically shallow. A sell order of $2,000–$3,000 would represent 17–26% of the entire liquidity pool, causing severe slippage. Exit liquidity for any position larger than a few hundred dollars is effectively unavailable at quoted prices, making this a high-risk illiquidity trap for larger participants.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    NOM's use case spans perpetual futures trading infrastructure and validator staking, both of which intersect with regulatory frameworks that are actively evolving in major jurisdictions. Perpetual futures DEXs in particular face scrutiny from financial regulators in the US, EU, and Asia, which could impact platform adoption and token utility.

Key Risks

  • Exit liquidity failure: with only $11,509 in pool liquidity, any coordinated selling by top holders (who control 43.3% of supply) would collapse the price before most participants could exit at meaningful prices
  • Supply overhang inconsistency: the gap between the $6.4M market cap and $16.1M FDV suggests undisclosed or miscounted supply that could enter circulation and dilute holders without warning
  • Micro-cap manipulation risk: 44 total transactions in 24 hours from only 9 unique buyers means a single actor can dominate price discovery — the 4-hour +52% pump followed by immediate selling is a concrete example of this dynamic

Mitigating Factors

  • The token is 12.5 months old, which reduces (but does not eliminate) the probability of an immediate rug pull compared to newly launched tokens
  • Multi-channel social presence (Twitter, Telegram, Discord, Website) and a defined utility narrative (rollup gas abstraction, validator staking) provide a foundation for legitimate project development

Investor Suitability

NOM is suitable only for high-risk-tolerance participants who understand micro-cap DEX dynamics, can afford to lose their entire position, and are sizing their exposure accordingly (i.e., a small speculative allocation). It is not appropriate for risk-averse investors, those seeking liquidity, or anyone who cannot independently verify the smart contract's security properties.

NOM presents a speculative opportunity in the rollup infrastructure and perpetual futures DEX aggregation space, supported by a genuine 30-day uptrend (+32.2%) and a differentiated universal gas marketplace concept. However, the investment case is severely constrained by critically thin liquidity, unverifiable contract security, and a supply structure that raises questions about undisclosed overhang.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The Nomina terminal gains traction as rollup adoption accelerates, driving organic demand for NOM as a fee-payment asset. The 30-day uptrend extends, price breaks through immediate resistance at $0.002737, and improved liquidity depth attracts larger participants. If the platform captures even a small share of the growing perpetual DEX market, NOM's utility demand could justify a significant re-rating toward the $0.01130 prior high.

  • Demonstrated growth in Nomina platform transaction volume, creating real fee-payment demand for NOM
  • Liquidity deepening through additional market makers or protocol-owned liquidity, reducing the current exit-liquidity risk

Base Case

NOM continues to trade in a volatile range between immediate support ($0.001818) and immediate resistance ($0.002737), with periodic pump-and-retrace cycles driven by the thin liquidity environment. Platform development continues but adoption remains limited, keeping the token in micro-cap territory with high volatility and low liquidity for the foreseeable future.

  • Liquidity remains shallow, preventing sustained price discovery above the $0.002737 immediate resistance
  • Platform development continues at a measured pace without a major adoption catalyst in the near term

Bear Case

Medium probability

The recent 30-day price appreciation proves to be a low-liquidity pump with no fundamental demand backing. Top holders (43.3% of supply) begin distributing into the thin $11,509 liquidity pool, triggering a cascade toward the major support at $0.001286 or below. The supply overhang implied by the FDV/market cap discrepancy materialises as additional tokens enter circulation.

  • Concentrated holder base distributing into insufficient liquidity, causing rapid price collapse
  • Failure to grow platform adoption, leaving NOM with no organic fee-payment demand to support its valuation

Analysis Details

Generated

Sep 5, 2026, 04:31 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-05 04:31 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.00220886301475

Market Cap

$6.41M

24h Volume

$5.6K

Holders

9,438

Liquidity

$11,509.00

Data Sources

Unhosted DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)Daily OHLC price historyAggregate holder count and top-10 concentration

Limitations

  • Holder growth history, size-tier distribution, and acquisition-method data were unavailable for this chain, preventing trend and distribution analysis beyond aggregate figures
  • Whale transaction data and smart-money cohort data were unavailable, so individual large-holder behaviour and profitable-trader positioning could not be assessed
  • Contract security data (verification status, audit results, ownership renouncement) was unavailable from this chain's data provider
  • Only 62 days of OHLC history are available and 90-day performance data is absent, limiting long-term trend context
  • The discrepancy between reported circulating supply and the implied FDV supply basis could not be resolved from available data

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

New reports on Ethereum

All new tokens →

SBUXonSBUXonStarbucks (Ondo Tokenized)BullishSSCOREScoreBullishEDELEDELEdelBearishCCCCCBearishUSD3USD3Web 3 DollarBearishWWEFTWeft FinanceBearishJANETJANETJanetBearishPPTPPTPopulous PlatformBullish

Questions about NOM?