CPOOL

Clearpool Price Today & AI Analysis

CPOOLEthereumAnalysis as of Apr 29, 2026

Price

$0.0368

-1.15% 24h

Contract

Live
0x66761fa41377003622aee3c7675fc7b5c1c2fac5

Holders

22.0K

Market cap

$36.84M

Liquidity

$36.03K

Ask Unhosted AI about CPOOL

Continue in chat

More tokens on Ethereum

Clearpool: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-04-29 18:12 UTC

Holder addresses

22,303

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$79,931.79
How concentrated is Clearpool ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 22,303 addresses (2026-04-29 18:12 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Clearpool?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Clearpool liquidity falling?
As of 2026-04-29 18:12 UTC, reported liquidity was $79,931.79. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-04-29 18:12 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Apr 29, 2026, 06:12 PM UTC

Market Cap

$25.39M

24h Volume

$30.81K

Liquidity

$79.93K

FDV

—

Holders

22,303

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Neutral

Clearpool (CPOOL) is a DeFi lending protocol token trading at $0.0254 with a $25.4M market cap. The platform operates a decentralized credit marketplace with $90.9M in total value locked, offering Credit Vaults, Dynamic Pools, and staking mechanisms. While the underlying platform shows meaningful adoption, the token itself faces severe liquidity constraints ($79,931), extreme holder concentration (79% in top 100 addresses), and declining participation metrics that create significant investment risks.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Apr 29, 2026, 06:12 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Decentralized credit marketplace with intelligent lending algorithms and dynamic interest rate voting
  • Cross-chain functionality enabling asset transfers between Ethereum and Polygon
  • Compounding interest mechanisms and staking rewards for token holders

Clearpool AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Neutral

CPOOL shows modest positive momentum with a 3.47% 24-hour gain and 53.1% buy pressure, but extremely thin liquidity ($79,931 total) creates significant volatility risk. The token is trading near recent lows with minimal transaction activity (1 buy/1 sell in the last hour), suggesting consolidation rather than strong directional conviction.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Medium-term outlook is challenged by declining holder count (-129 holders in 30 days, -0.58%) and extreme supply concentration (79% held by top 100 addresses). The $25.4M market cap on a $90.9M TVL platform suggests valuation disconnect, with significant distribution risk if whales begin profit-taking.

Bullish Factors

  • 3.47% 24-hour price gain shows recent positive momentum
  • 53.1% buy pressure exceeds sell pressure by 6.2 percentage points
  • Platform has substantial $90.9M TVL, indicating real user adoption
  • Contract verified and security score of 73/100 is reasonable for DeFi tokens
  • Buy transactions (44) exceed sell transactions (33) in 24-hour period

Bearish Factors

  • Critically low liquidity of $79,931 creates extreme slippage risk and price manipulation vulnerability
  • Holder count declining for 30 consecutive days (-129 holders, -0.58%) signals waning interest
  • Extreme concentration: top 10 holders control 51% of supply, top 100 control 79%
  • Market cap ($25.4M) appears disconnected from platform TVL ($90.9M), suggesting overvaluation
  • Only 18 unique buyers in 24 hours indicates minimal retail participation and liquidity fragmentation

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0x6676...fac5
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Extreme liquidity shortage ($79,931) creates execution risk and vulnerability to manipulation; any meaningful trade size will face severe slippage
  • Critical supply concentration (79% in top 100 holders) creates single-point-of-failure risk; whale exits could trigger price collapse given thin liquidity
  • Declining holder count (-129 in 30 days) indicates waning retail interest and potential loss of confidence in the token or platform
  • Minimal trading activity (77 transactions in 24h, 2 in last hour) suggests the token is essentially inactive and may be abandoned by retail traders

Trading Insight

neutral

Trading sentiment is marginally bullish but undermined by anemic liquidity and participation. The 53.1% buy pressure is offset by the token's inability to attract sustained volume—only 77 total transactions in 24 hours across 34 unique participants indicates a highly illiquid market where price movements are driven by small orders rather than genuine demand.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Neutral

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

Short-term price action shows consolidation with a modest 3.47% 24-hour gain, but the 4-hour chart shows minimal movement (+0.12%), suggesting the daily gain occurred on very low volume. Medium-term trend is bearish given the 30-day holder decline and lack of sustained buying pressure. The token appears to be in a distribution phase rather than accumulation.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

Momentum indicators are neutral to slightly negative. While buy pressure (53.1%) exceeds sell pressure (46.9%), the margin is narrow and the absolute transaction volumes are too low to indicate strong directional momentum. The declining hourly transaction count (2 in last hour) suggests momentum is actually weakening.

Volume Analysis

Buy

53.1%

Sell

46.9%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

Volume is declining sharply across all timeframes: 77 transactions in 24h, 8 in 4h, 2 in 1h. This compression indicates the market is losing interest and liquidity is drying up. The $16,366 buy volume in 24 hours is minimal for a $25.4M market cap token, representing only 0.064% of market cap daily turnover—far below healthy levels.

Recent Price Action

Price has risen 3.47% in 24 hours but with declining volume and transaction count, suggesting the move is not backed by conviction. The 4-hour chart shows near-flat movement (+0.12%), indicating the daily gain concentrated in specific hours rather than sustained buying.

This pattern typically indicates a dead-cat bounce or minor profit-taking reversal rather than the start of a new uptrend. The lack of volume confirmation is a red flag for sustainability.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.0245

Major support

$0.0235

Immediate resistance

$0.0265

Major resistance

$0.0275

Support levels are based on recent price action and the 24-hour low implied by the 3.47% gain from current levels. Resistance is minimal given the token's low price and lack of established trading history. The wide bid-ask spread typical of illiquid tokens means these levels are approximate and subject to significant slippage.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

78/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    Extreme illiquidity ($79,931 total) creates severe volatility. Small trades can move the price significantly, and the token is vulnerable to flash crashes or pump-and-dump schemes. Historical volatility data is not available, but the thin order book suggests price swings of 10-20% on modest volume are likely.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Critical liquidity shortage means large positions cannot be exited without severe slippage. A $100,000 position would likely face 20-30% slippage to exit. The token is essentially illiquid for institutional investors and risky for retail traders with positions >$5,000.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    DeFi lending protocols face increasing regulatory scrutiny globally. Potential regulatory action against the Clearpool protocol could impact token utility and value. Regulatory clarity could go either direction (positive or negative) for the token.

Key Risks

  • Extreme liquidity shortage ($79,931) creates execution risk and vulnerability to manipulation; any meaningful trade size will face severe slippage
  • Critical supply concentration (79% in top 100 holders) creates single-point-of-failure risk; whale exits could trigger price collapse given thin liquidity
  • Declining holder count (-129 in 30 days) indicates waning retail interest and potential loss of confidence in the token or platform
  • Minimal trading activity (77 transactions in 24h, 2 in last hour) suggests the token is essentially inactive and may be abandoned by retail traders
  • Disconnected valuation: $25.4M market cap on $90.9M TVL suggests either overvaluation of the token or underutilization of the platform
  • DeFi protocol risks including smart contract vulnerabilities, oracle manipulation, liquidation cascades, and regulatory intervention

Mitigating Factors

  • Platform has achieved $90.9M TVL, indicating real user adoption and platform viability
  • Contract is verified and has reasonable security score (73/100), reducing smart contract risk
  • Cross-chain functionality on Polygon provides redundancy and reduces single-chain risk
  • Decentralized governance structure (interest rate voting) provides some protection against centralized decision-making

Investor Suitability

CPOOL is suitable only for highly sophisticated investors with high risk tolerance, small position sizes (<$5,000), and deep understanding of DeFi protocols. The token is NOT suitable for: (1) Risk-averse investors, (2) Retail traders seeking liquid assets, (3) Institutional investors requiring deep liquidity, (4) Investors seeking stable value preservation, (5) Leveraged traders (extreme slippage risk). This token is appropriate only for speculative traders willing to accept the possibility of total loss.

Clearpool presents a high-risk, speculative opportunity in the DeFi lending space with meaningful platform adoption ($90.9M TVL) but severe token-level challenges including extreme illiquidity, critical supply concentration, and declining holder participation. The investment case hinges on whether the platform can achieve significant growth that drives token utility and demand, offsetting the current structural disadvantages.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Clearpool platform gains significant market share in the decentralized lending space, driving increased demand for CPOOL tokens through governance participation and staking rewards. Platform TVL grows to $500M+ within 12 months, attracting institutional capital and improving token liquidity. Regulatory clarity on DeFi protocols provides tailwind for the sector. Token price appreciates 5-10x as liquidity improves and whale concentration decreases through dilution.

  • Platform TVL growth to $500M+ demonstrating market adoption
  • Significant improvement in token liquidity through exchange listings or market maker participation
  • Regulatory clarity providing confidence in DeFi lending protocols
  • Successful cross-chain expansion increasing platform reach
  • Whale distribution reducing supply concentration risk

Base Case

Clearpool maintains current market position as a mid-tier DeFi lending protocol with $90-150M TVL. Token remains illiquid and concentrated, trading sideways with minimal volume. Holder count stabilizes at current levels. Token price remains range-bound between $0.020-$0.030 with occasional volatility spikes. Platform generates modest revenue for token holders through staking, but token fails to appreciate significantly.

  • Platform maintains current $90.9M TVL without significant growth or decline
  • Token liquidity remains constrained at current levels
  • Regulatory environment remains neutral to slightly negative for DeFi
  • Whale holders maintain current positions without major exits
  • Retail participation stabilizes at current minimal levels

Bear Case

High probability

Clearpool fails to gain meaningful market share against established competitors (Aave, Compound). Platform TVL stagnates or declines as users migrate to larger protocols. Regulatory action against DeFi lending creates headwinds. Whales begin exiting positions, triggering price collapse given thin liquidity. Token becomes abandoned with minimal trading activity and holder count approaching zero.

  • Continued holder count decline indicating loss of retail interest
  • Platform TVL stagnation or decline relative to competitors
  • Whale distribution events triggering price crashes
  • Regulatory action against DeFi lending protocols
  • Inability to improve token liquidity despite platform growth

Analysis Details

Generated

Apr 29, 2026, 06:12 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-04-29 18:12 UTC

Model Confidence

Medium

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.025385959205377603

Market Cap

$25.39M

24h Volume

$30.8K

Holders

22,303

Liquidity

$79,931.79

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data from Ethereum blockchainHolder distribution analytics from blockchain explorersTrading volume and price data from Uniswap v3Smart contract verification status and security scoringPlatform TVL and fundamental metrics from DeFi tracking services

Limitations

  • Analysis is based on limited historical data; longer-term trend analysis would require 6-12 months of historical metrics
  • Token liquidity is so low that price discovery mechanisms are unreliable; quoted prices may not reflect true market value
  • Holder concentration data does not identify whether whale addresses are exchange wallets, protocol contracts, or individual holders
  • Platform TVL data is not independently verified; figures are based on protocol-reported metrics
  • Social media sentiment and community engagement metrics are not quantified due to data limitations
  • Competitive analysis is limited without detailed metrics on competing protocols
  • Regulatory environment is rapidly evolving; analysis reflects current conditions but may become outdated quickly

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell CPOOL tokens. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile, speculative, and carry substantial risk of loss, including the possibility of total loss of invested capital. CPOOL specifically carries extreme risks including illiquidity, supply concentration, and declining adoption metrics. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own thorough research, understand the risks, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The author and publisher assume no responsibility for investment outcomes or losses resulting from reliance on this analysis.

Questions about CPOOL?