B

eNAT Burn Price Today & AI Analysis

bENATEthereumAnalysis as of May 3, 2026

Price

$0.6627

-2.37% 24h

Contract

Live
0x56d06158bb8d2e42a6c5994a9a12a5c6d642f064

Holders

1.9K

Market cap

$2.28M

Liquidity

$223.30K

At a $10M market cap, $BENAT would be $2.9 (4.38x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is bENAT a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 22

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks.

Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about bENAT

3 free answers a day

More tokens on Ethereum

eNAT Burn: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-03 02:00 UTC

Holder addresses

1,202

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$54,258.49
How concentrated is eNAT Burn ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,202 addresses (2026-05-03 02:00 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling eNAT Burn?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is eNAT Burn liquidity falling?
As of 2026-05-03 02:00 UTC, reported liquidity was $54,258.49. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-03 02:00 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from May 3, 2026, 02:00 AM UTC

Market Cap

$427.27K

24h Volume

$92.43K

Liquidity

$54.26K

FDV

—

Holders

1,202

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

bENAT (eNAT Burn) is a micro-cap utility token trading at $0.343 with a market cap of $427,267 on Uniswap v4. The token exhibits severe distress signals including catastrophic holder attrition (-980% over 7 days), extremely shallow liquidity ($54,258), and an unverified smart contract with a 71/100 security score. With no project fundamentals, social presence, or community engagement, combined with highly concentrated supply (73% in top 100 holders), this token represents a high-risk speculative asset with significant downside potential.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — May 3, 2026, 02:00 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Burn mechanism in token name suggests deflationary model, though functionality is unverified
  • Deployed on Uniswap v4, the latest DEX iteration, though this provides no fundamental advantage
  • Extremely low liquidity creates both opportunity for volatility trading and severe slippage risk

eNAT Burn AI Price Analysis

Medium Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

bENAT is experiencing significant downward pressure with a -17.04% decline over 24 hours despite modest 4-hour gains of 8.36%. The token shows nearly balanced buy/sell pressure (49.2% vs 50.8%), but declining transaction activity in the 1-hour window (0 buys, 2 sells) suggests momentum is fading. The shallow liquidity pool of $54,258 creates substantial slippage risk and amplifies price volatility.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Medium-term outlook is challenged by severe holder attrition (-330% in 24 hours, -980% over 7 days) indicating mass exodus and potential death spiral dynamics. The token's lack of project fundamentals, unverified contract, and concentrated supply (73% held by top 100 addresses) create structural headwinds. Recovery would require significant new capital inflow and community rebuilding, which appears unlikely given current trajectory.

Bullish Factors

  • 4-hour price action shows +8.36% recovery, suggesting potential bounce from oversold conditions
  • Buy transaction count (196) slightly exceeds sell count (190) over 24h, indicating some buyer interest
  • Unique buyers (97) represent 47% of unique sellers (109), showing retail participation hasn't completely collapsed
  • Burn mechanism in token name suggests potential deflationary tokenomics if functional

Bearish Factors

  • Catastrophic holder decline of -330% in 24 hours and -980% over 7 days indicates mass liquidation and loss of confidence
  • Sell pressure (50.8%) exceeds buy pressure (49.2%), with sell volume ($46,987) exceeding buy volume ($45,441)
  • Unverified smart contract with security score of only 71/100 creates significant trust deficit
  • Extremely shallow liquidity ($54,258) creates severe slippage risk and price manipulation vulnerability
  • No project description, social links, or community presence suggests abandoned or low-effort project
  • Market cap of only $427,267 with 1.24M supply indicates micro-cap with extreme volatility
  • Top 10 holders control 31% of supply and top 100 control 73%, creating massive concentration risk
  • Recent 1-hour activity shows zero buy transactions and only 2 sell transactions, indicating dead trading volume

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0x56d0...f064
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Catastrophic holder attrition (-980% over 7 days) indicates death spiral dynamics and potential for complete collapse
  • Unverified smart contract creates unknown code risks and potential for hidden rug-pull mechanisms
  • Extreme supply concentration (73% in top 100 holders) creates vulnerability to coordinated whale exits
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($54,258) creates severe slippage risk and price manipulation vulnerability

Trading Insight

bearish

Market sentiment is bearish with slight sell-side dominance (50.8% vs 49.2% buy pressure). The 24-hour decline of -17.04% combined with collapsing holder count indicates panic selling and loss of investor confidence. Recent 1-hour inactivity (zero buys, only 2 sells) suggests the market has largely abandoned the token, with only residual liquidation occurring.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

The token is in a clear downtrend with -17.04% decline over 24 hours, though the 4-hour window shows a +8.36% bounce suggesting potential oversold conditions. However, this bounce lacks conviction given the collapsing trading volume and holder count. The medium-term trend is decisively bearish with no signs of stabilization or accumulation.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

The extreme 24-hour decline combined with near-zero 1-hour trading activity suggests oversold conditions. However, oversold conditions on a token with no fundamentals and collapsing holder base may not lead to typical mean-reversion bounces. The momentum is negative and deteriorating.

Volume Analysis

Buy

49.2%

Sell

50.8%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

Trading volume is collapsing across all timeframes. The 24-hour volume of $92,428 ($45,441 buys + $46,987 sells) represents significant activity for a $427K market cap token, but the 1-hour window shows near-zero volume (only 2 sell transactions), indicating rapid volume deterioration. This suggests the market is losing interest and liquidity is drying up.

Recent Price Action

The token shows a sharp -17.04% decline over 24 hours with a partial +8.36% recovery in the 4-hour window. This creates a potential double-bottom or bounce pattern, but the pattern lacks conviction given the collapsing volume and holder count.

This pattern typically indicates capitulation selling followed by potential bounce, but in the context of a token with no fundamentals and mass holder exodus, it more likely represents a dead-cat bounce before further decline. The pattern suggests weak hands liquidating while smart money has already exited.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.30

Major support

$0.25

Immediate resistance

$0.38

Major resistance

$0.42

Immediate support at $0.30 represents the 4-hour low implied by the +8.36% recovery from the 24-hour decline. Major support at $0.25 represents a psychological level and potential capitulation point. Immediate resistance at $0.38 represents the recent 4-hour high, while major resistance at $0.42 represents the pre-decline level. The token's extreme volatility and shallow liquidity mean these levels are fluid and subject to rapid breakdown.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

92/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    The token shows extreme volatility with -17.04% decline in 24 hours and +8.36% recovery in 4 hours. The shallow liquidity ($54,258) amplifies price swings, creating conditions for rapid losses. Volatility is likely to remain extreme given the token's micro-cap nature and lack of fundamental support.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Liquidity is critically shallow at $54,258, creating severe slippage risk and potential for price manipulation. A $10,000 trade could move the price 15-20%, making the token unsuitable for serious trading. Liquidity is deteriorating rapidly as evidenced by collapsing volume.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an uncategorized utility token with no clear use case, regulatory classification is uncertain. The token could face regulatory scrutiny if classified as a security, though the micro-cap nature and lack of investor protection suggests low immediate regulatory risk.

Key Risks

  • Catastrophic holder attrition (-980% over 7 days) indicates death spiral dynamics and potential for complete collapse
  • Unverified smart contract creates unknown code risks and potential for hidden rug-pull mechanisms
  • Extreme supply concentration (73% in top 100 holders) creates vulnerability to coordinated whale exits
  • Critically shallow liquidity ($54,258) creates severe slippage risk and price manipulation vulnerability
  • No project fundamentals, social presence, or community engagement suggests abandoned or low-effort project
  • Collapsing trading volume (near-zero 1-hour activity) indicates market has abandoned the token

Mitigating Factors

  • Deployed on reputable Uniswap v4 platform, reducing counterparty risk
  • Security score of 71/100 is not critically low, suggesting basic contract structure is present
  • Extreme oversold conditions could create short-term bounce opportunity for experienced traders

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for experienced traders with high risk tolerance and capital they can afford to lose completely. It is NOT suitable for: retail investors, long-term holders, risk-averse investors, or anyone seeking stable value preservation. The token should be treated as pure speculation with no underlying value proposition.

bENAT represents a high-risk speculative opportunity with severe downside risks outweighing any upside potential. The token exhibits all characteristics of a failed or abandoned project: no fundamentals, collapsing holder base, unverified contract, and zero community engagement. While extreme oversold conditions create potential for short-term bounces, the structural problems suggest further decline is more likely.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Token experiences short-term bounce from oversold conditions, recovering to $0.40-0.50 as technical traders buy the dip. Project team announces roadmap or partnership, attracting new capital and reversing holder decline. Smart contract verification and security audit restore investor confidence.

  • Technical bounce from oversold conditions
  • Project team announcement or roadmap update
  • Smart contract verification and security audit
  • Major exchange listing improving liquidity

Base Case

Token stabilizes in $0.20-0.30 range as remaining holders establish support. Trading volume remains minimal with occasional volatility spikes. Token becomes a dead asset with no organic adoption or community, eventually delisting from major exchanges.

  • No significant project developments or announcements
  • Continued gradual holder decline at slower pace
  • Liquidity remains shallow but stable
  • Token remains listed on Uniswap but loses exchange support

Bear Case

High probability

Token continues decline to $0.15-0.20 as holder exodus accelerates and liquidity dries up. Whales complete exit positions, triggering cascading liquidations. Token becomes completely illiquid and effectively worthless as community abandons project.

  • Continued holder attrition and mass liquidation
  • Whale exit acceleration
  • Liquidity deterioration and price manipulation
  • Project abandonment confirmation

Analysis Details

Generated

May 3, 2026, 02:00 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-03 02:00 UTC

Model Confidence

Medium

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.343323718413743317

Market Cap

$427.3K

24h Volume

$92.4K

Holders

1,202

Liquidity

$54,258.49

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data from Ethereum mainnet (0x1)Holder distribution analytics and whale trackingTrading volume metrics and price action dataSmart contract analysis and security scoringUniswap v4 liquidity pool data

Limitations

  • Lack of project fundamentals and social presence limits ability to assess true value proposition or team credibility
  • Extreme micro-cap nature and shallow liquidity make price predictions highly unreliable
  • Unverified smart contract prevents full security assessment and code review
  • Limited historical data (appears to be recent launch) restricts trend analysis
  • No information on project team, roadmap, or development status
  • Holder data may not capture all positions held on centralized exchanges
  • Extreme volatility and low volume make technical analysis less reliable than for established tokens

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. bENAT specifically exhibits extreme risk characteristics including unverified smart contracts, collapsing holder base, and lack of fundamentals. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research, understand the risks, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The author assumes no responsibility for losses resulting from investment decisions based on this analysis.

New reports on Ethereum

All new tokens →

Questions about bENAT?