RE

Re Protocol Price Today & AI Analysis

REEthereumAnalysis as of Jun 18, 2026

Price

$0.3169

-4.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0x526526528f35ac738177003b8773b402b8df8143

Chain

Ethereum

Holders

10.0K

Market cap

$316.85M

Liquidity

$511.53K

At a $1B market cap, $RE would be $1.0000 (3.16x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is RE a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 31

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, with a few things to know below.

  • The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.
  • The liquidity could not be measured.

Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about RE

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Ethereum

EDELEDELEdel$0.0310-3.1%MC $245.6KQFQFQuantumFusion$0.0333-3.4%MC $332.5KASSETASSETREAL$0.1737-4.3%MC $173.72MRATORATORato The Rat$0.062457+6.0%MC $103.3KAUAUAuryn$0.0159-9.8%MC $1.11MUSDSUSDSUSDS$0.9998+0.0%MC $6.49B

Re Protocol: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-18 13:30 UTC

Holder addresses

606

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$314,190.36
How concentrated is Re Protocol ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 606 addresses (2026-06-18 13:30 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Re Protocol?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Re Protocol liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-18 13:30 UTC, reported liquidity was $314,190.36. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-18 13:30 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Jun 18, 2026, 01:30 PM UTC

Market Cap

$0.00

24h Volume

$938.97K

Liquidity

$314.19K

FDV

—

Holders

606

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

Re Protocol (RE) is a 35-day-old Ethereum token positioning itself as a governance layer for an on-chain reinsurance capital marketplace, categorised under Decentralised Insurance, RWA, and Governance. At $0.461 with $314,190 in liquidity and a reported market cap of $0, the token is in the earliest and most speculative phase of its lifecycle. On-chain forensics reveal that three individual whale wallets received 50% of total supply via internal transfers on a single day, the deployer wallet is 36 days old with no prior deployment history and an unknown funding source, and the smart contract remains unverified — collectively placing this token in the very high risk category. While the project narrative is coherent and the holder base is growing rapidly, the structural insider concentration and security gaps must be resolved before the token can be considered for anything beyond highly speculative exposure.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 18, 2026, 01:30 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • On-chain collateral and reserve verification for fully collateralized reinsurance activity — a novel application of blockchain infrastructure to licensed insurance markets
  • Governance scope is deliberately limited to protocol-layer decisions, with underwriting and regulated operations explicitly reserved for qualified professionals and licensed entities
  • Rapid holder growth from zero to 606 in 35 days, driven almost entirely by transfers (472 of 606 holders) rather than swaps, suggesting an organised distribution campaign rather than organic DEX discovery

Re Protocol AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

RE has shed approximately 10.9% in the past hour and 5.6% over the past 24 hours, signalling sustained selling pressure rather than a brief dip. The token is only 35 days old with no OHLC-derived support floors established, making downside discovery highly unpredictable. With 51.6% of supply held by dumpable individual whale wallets — all of which received their positions via transfer rather than market buys — the path of least resistance remains downward.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Over a 30–90 day horizon, the structural risks dominate: three individual whale wallets collectively hold 50.0% of supply and acquired their positions via internal transfers on the token's launch day, creating a persistent overhang. The unverified contract (security score 41/100) and a deployer wallet funded from an unknown source with zero prior deployments add further uncertainty. Sustained upside would require meaningful retail adoption and transparent whale lock-up commitments, neither of which is evidenced in current on-chain data.

Bullish Factors

  • Holder base grew from 0 to 606 in 35 days on an accelerating trajectory, indicating genuine early-stage community formation
  • 24-hour buy/sell volume is nearly balanced ($470,975 buys vs $467,994 sells, 50.2% buy pressure), suggesting the market has not yet capitulated
  • The project targets a large, underserved niche — on-chain reinsurance capital markets — with a described governance and collateral-verification model that differentiates it from generic DeFi tokens

Bearish Factors

  • Three individual whale wallets (0xec7086, 0x138561, 0xbc0226) collectively hold 50.0% of supply and received their positions via transfer on 2026-06-18 — the same day — with no DEX swap history, indicating insider allocation rather than market participation
  • The deployer wallet (0xe8860347) was created only 36 days ago, was funded from an unknown source, and executed zero contract deployments in its first 100 transactions — a disposable-deployer pattern associated with elevated rug risk
  • The contract is unverified on-chain (security score 41/100), meaning the token's code cannot be independently audited by the public, a critical red flag for a protocol claiming institutional-grade reinsurance infrastructure
  • Top 10 holders control 97% of supply; even after excluding protocol/contract addresses, dumpable supply stands at 51.6%, meaning a coordinated whale exit could be catastrophic for price

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

RE call history

Full track record →

Jun 18bearish
24h+71.7%
7d+26.1%
30d-12.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0x5265...8143
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Insider dump risk: Three wallets holding 50% of supply received tokens via transfer on 2026-06-18 with zero cost basis — any coordinated or individual sale into the $314,190 pool would cause catastrophic price impact
  • Unverified contract: The absence of source code verification means hidden mint functions, admin withdrawal keys, or transfer restrictions cannot be ruled out — this is an existential risk for token holders
  • Deployer opacity: The mint recipient wallet (0xe8860347) is 36 days old, funded from an unknown source, and has no prior deployment history — this disposable-deployer profile is a documented precursor pattern in rug-pull incidents

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite near-balanced buy/sell volume over 24 hours, the 1-hour price decline of 10.9% and the fact that unique sellers (233) outnumber unique buyers (150) over the same window reveal that selling is concentrated among larger positions while buying is more fragmented. The 4-hour and 24-hour transaction counts being identical suggests all meaningful activity occurred within the most recent 4-hour window, pointing to a sudden burst of trading rather than sustained organic flow.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

With a 10.9% hourly decline and a 5.6% 24-hour decline as the only available price history, the short-term trend is clearly negative. No OHLC data exists to assess a medium-term trend independently, but the absence of established support levels combined with a 35-day token age means price discovery is still in its earliest and most volatile phase. The downtrend designation for medium-term reflects the structural insider overhang rather than chart-based evidence.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

A 10.9% drop within a single hour on a token with only $314,190 in liquidity suggests momentum indicators would read deeply oversold in the short term. However, given the insider-transfer origin of the largest whale positions (zero cost basis), oversold readings do not carry the same mean-reversion reliability they would for a token with organic price discovery history.

Volume Analysis

Buy

50.2%

Sell

49.8%

Volume Trend

Stable

All trading activity appears concentrated in a single 4-hour window, making trend assessment impossible. The $938,969 combined volume represents roughly 3x the pool's liquidity, indicating the pool was heavily utilised during this episode. Buy pressure at 50.2% and sell pressure at 49.8% are statistically indistinguishable, but the price decline during this period confirms sell orders were larger in average size.

Recent Price Action

Sharp intraday decline of 10.9% within one hour following a brief 4.8% spike over 5 minutes, with the 4-hour and 24-hour performance converging at -5.6% — suggesting the 5-minute spike was a brief liquidity event quickly reversed by selling pressure.

The spike-and-reversal pattern on a low-liquidity token with insider whale concentration is consistent with a pump-and-distribute dynamic, where a brief price push attracts retail buyers who are then sold into. This pattern warrants heightened vigilance.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

87/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A 10.9% price drop within a single hour on a 35-day-old token with shallow liquidity demonstrates extreme intraday volatility. With no OHLC history and no established support levels, price swings of 20–50% in either direction within a single day are plausible.

  • LiquidityHigh

    The $314,190 liquidity pool is dwarfed by both the 24-hour trading volume (~$939,000) and the potential sell pressure from insider wallets. Any position above ~$5,000 will experience meaningful slippage, and a large insider sale could drain the pool entirely.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryHigh

    A token explicitly tied to licensed insurance and reinsurance activity operates at the intersection of DeFi and heavily regulated financial services. Regulatory action against the protocol or its licensed-entity partners could render the governance token worthless, and the jurisdictional scope of 'licensed insurance entities' is unspecified in available data.

Key Risks

  • Insider dump risk: Three wallets holding 50% of supply received tokens via transfer on 2026-06-18 with zero cost basis — any coordinated or individual sale into the $314,190 pool would cause catastrophic price impact
  • Unverified contract: The absence of source code verification means hidden mint functions, admin withdrawal keys, or transfer restrictions cannot be ruled out — this is an existential risk for token holders
  • Deployer opacity: The mint recipient wallet (0xe8860347) is 36 days old, funded from an unknown source, and has no prior deployment history — this disposable-deployer profile is a documented precursor pattern in rug-pull incidents

Mitigating Factors

  • The project has a coherent, differentiated narrative (on-chain reinsurance capital markets) with a publicly stated governance scope that acknowledges regulatory constraints — this is more substantive than typical anonymous meme tokens
  • Buy/sell volume is nearly balanced over 24 hours and the largest individual whale wallets have not yet executed any DEX swaps, suggesting active distribution has not begun

Investor Suitability

RE is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced crypto participants who understand the specific risks of unverified contracts, insider-allocated supply, and nascent-stage tokens. Position sizes should be limited to amounts the investor is fully prepared to lose entirely. This token is not suitable for conservative investors, those unfamiliar with DeFi mechanics, or anyone seeking capital preservation.

RE presents a high-concept value proposition in the RWA/insurance space but is undermined at launch by an unverified contract, a disposable-deployer profile, and 50% of supply in insider hands at zero cost. The investment thesis hinges entirely on whether the team can deliver verifiable protocol milestones and resolve the structural trust deficits before insider wallets begin distributing.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The team publishes a verified contract and third-party audit, announces a live licensed-entity partnership with on-chain collateral evidence, and the three insider whale wallets implement transparent lock-up commitments. Holder growth continues organically past the initial transfer distribution, and the RWA/insurance narrative attracts institutional attention in a favourable macro environment.

  • Contract verification and audit publication that raises the security score above 70/100
  • On-chain evidence of live reinsurance capital deployment through a named licensed entity

Base Case

The token trades sideways to lower over the next 30–90 days as the initial distribution excitement fades, with periodic volatility spikes driven by the shallow liquidity pool. The project makes incremental social/marketing progress but fails to deliver verifiable on-chain protocol milestones within the timeframe, resulting in gradual holder attrition.

  • Insider whale wallets do not immediately dump but gradually reduce positions over weeks
  • No contract exploit occurs, but the unverified status prevents institutional or serious retail participation

Bear Case

High probability

One or more of the three insider whale wallets (holding 50% of supply at zero cost) begins selling into the shallow $314,190 pool, triggering a price collapse. The unverified contract is exploited or an admin function is exercised, or the project is abandoned entirely — consistent with the disposable-deployer pattern observed in the deployer forensics.

  • Zero-cost-basis insider wallets facing no economic incentive to hold as price declines
  • Unverified contract with unknown deployer funding source and no prior deployment history

Analysis Details

Generated

Jun 18, 2026, 01:30 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-18 13:30 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.460974939263773809

Market Cap

$0

24h Volume

$939.0K

Holders

606

Liquidity

$314,190.36

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Ethereum mainnet, contract 0x526526528f35ac738177003b8773b402b8df8143)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)Trading volume metrics (Uniswap v3 pool data)Smart contract security assessment (41/100 score, verification status)Deployer wallet forensics (0xe8860347, first active 2026-05-13)Whale wallet behavioural lookup (0xec7086, 0x138561, 0xbc0226)Token genesis transfer sequence analysis31-day holder trajectory timeseries

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history exists for this token, making all technical price-level analysis impossible and limiting trend assessment to the most recent intraday moves only
  • Smart-money / profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable, preventing assessment of informed-money positioning
  • The project description and social links are supplied by the token creator and cannot be independently verified within this analysis — claimed licensed-entity partnerships and regulatory compliance have not been confirmed on-chain
  • Holder tier bucket thresholds (whale, shark, dolphin, fish, octopus) are defined by Moralis and their exact supply-share boundaries are not published, limiting precise interpretation of tier counts

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

New reports on Ethereum

All new tokens →

MMaccaMacca The GatorBearishPPUTINVladimir Putin CoinBearishPpPEASPea PodBearishwPOKTwPOKTWrapped PocketBearishPppPPPEA,PEA (Weighted)BearishSSNOWMOONSNOWMOONBearishZYPTOZYPTOZypto TokenBearishBALLBALLGame 5 BALLBearish

Questions about RE?