ASIC

Application Specific Internet Coin Price Today & AI Analysis

ASICEthereumAnalysis as of Jun 20, 2026

Price

$0.002102

+5.28% 24h

Contract

Live
0x347a96a5bd06d2e15199b032f46fb724d6c73047

Chain

Ethereum

Holders

4.6K

Market cap

$25.29K

Liquidity

$692.00

More tokens on Ethereum

AARGOArgo$0.064888+18.9%MC $489CREAMCREAMC.R.E.A.M.$0.4153+1.8%MC $3.74MGOBLINGOBLINGoblin$0.046240-3.0%MC $26.3KDUCKYDUCKYDucky$0.073290-0.5%MC $13.8KCCORNUnicorn$0.041315-6.5%MC $13.1KUSDSUSDSUSDS$0.9998+0.0%MC $6.54B
Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Ask Unhosted AI about ASIC

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since report

report from Jun 20, 2026, 08:30 AM UTC

Market Cap

$177.83K

24h Volume

$31.99K

Liquidity

$121.82K

FDV

—

Holders

4,507

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

Application Specific Internet Coin (ASIC) is a 44-month-old ERC-20 token on Ethereum, associated with the PulseBitcoin project — a self-described faster, more energy-efficient Bitcoin alternative operating on the PulseChain network. Despite its age, ASIC has a micro-cap market capitalization of approximately $177,826 and total liquidity of just $121,818 on Uniswap v3, placing it firmly in the speculative micro-cap category. The token is experiencing a severe short-term correction, having fallen 46.1% over the past 7 days from a 15-day high of $0.1986 to a current price of $0.0284, sitting at just 7% of its recent range. Holder concentration is extreme — the top 10 addresses control 81% of supply — and all tracked active traders have realized losses, painting a challenging near-term picture.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 20, 2026, 08:30 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Cross-chain positioning: ASIC is an ERC-20 token on Ethereum that claims native compatibility with the PulseChain ecosystem, giving it a dual-chain narrative that distinguishes it from pure Ethereum-native tokens.
  • Bitcoin-mirroring tokenomics: With a total and fully diluted supply of ~7.5 million tokens and a halving cycle mechanic, ASIC deliberately mirrors Bitcoin's scarcity model within a DeFi-compatible framework.
  • Extreme age-to-liquidity disparity: At 44 months old with only $121,818 in liquidity and a $177,826 market cap, ASIC has failed to scale meaningfully despite its longevity — a notable differentiator from projects that grow liquidity over time.

Application Specific Internet Coin AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

ASIC has shed 46.1% over the past 7 days and currently sits at just 7% of its 15-day trading range ($0.01495–$0.1986), signalling a dominant downtrend with sellers firmly in control. The 1-hour spike of +47% followed by a 4-hour reversal of -29% reveals extreme intraday volatility and a lack of sustained buying conviction. With sell pressure at 58.8% and every tracked smart-money wallet in negative realized PnL, the path of least resistance remains downward toward immediate support.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The 31-day holder trajectory shows a net loss of 47 holders (4,554 → 4,507), and 30d/90d price history is unavailable, meaning the only multi-window trend signal is the severe 7-day decline of -46.1%. With 52.7% of supply held by dumpable individual whale wallets and no profitable smart-money participants on record, sustained selling pressure is the most probable medium-term scenario. A recovery toward major resistance at $0.1986 would require a fundamental catalyst — none is currently visible in the on-chain data.

Bullish Factors

  • Buyer count heavily outnumbers sellers in recent windows: 66 unique buyers vs. 21 unique sellers in 24h, and 64 vs. 14 in the 4-hour window, suggesting broad retail interest despite net sell volume.
  • Price is sitting at only 7% of its 15-day range, meaning the token is near its recent floor ($0.01495 major support), which historically attracts bargain buyers and reduces incremental downside from current levels.
  • The largest whale (0xf89013…, 13.30% of supply) has an average buy price of $0.01688 — below current price — suggesting this holder is not yet underwater and has limited incentive to panic-sell at current levels.

Bearish Factors

  • The 7-day price decline of -46.1% with daily volatility of 33.6% confirms a steep, sustained downtrend with no technical evidence of a reversal.
  • Every tracked smart-money wallet (6 addresses) has realized a loss of -$298 (-7%) across 25 trades each, meaning even the most active traders have failed to profit — a strong signal of poor price discovery and weak demand.
  • Dumpable supply stands at 52.7% held by individual whale wallets, creating persistent overhead sell pressure; the largest individual whale (0xf89013…) has already realized -$4,086 in losses across 22 trades, indicating a distressed holder who may seek to exit.
  • Holder count has declined steadily over 31 days (-47 net), reflecting gradual but consistent community attrition rather than a one-off event.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

ASIC call history

Full track record →

Jun 20bearish
24h-25.3%
7d+15.0%
30d-68.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0x347a...3047
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Whale dump risk: 52.7% of supply in dumpable individual wallets, with the largest (13.30%) already in significant realized losses — a distressed holder with strong incentive to exit at any price recovery, creating a persistent ceiling on upside.
  • Liquidity trap: At $121,818 total liquidity, any coordinated exit by even one mid-sized whale would collapse the price; retail participants who entered during the recent pump face severe slippage on exit.
  • Structural demand failure: All six tracked smart-money wallets have negative realized PnL, and the holder base has declined for 31 consecutive days — there is no evidence of new demand sufficient to absorb existing supply.

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite buyers outnumbering sellers roughly 3:1 by transaction count (105 buys vs. 36 sells in 24h), sell volume dominates at 58.8% ($18,809 sold vs. $13,186 bought), indicating that sellers are executing larger average trades than buyers. This divergence — many small buyers against fewer but larger sellers — is a classic distribution pattern where larger holders are offloading into retail demand.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

The 7-day price decline of -46.1% is unambiguous: ASIC is in a confirmed short-term downtrend. The daily close sequence over 15 days shows a peak near $0.1100 followed by a sharp collapse through $0.09412, $0.04020, and now $0.02840 — a staircase of lower closes. With 30d and 90d data unavailable, the medium-term trend is extrapolated from this 15-day pattern, which shows no base-building or reversal structure.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

With the price sitting at just 7% of its 15-day range and having declined 46.1% in 7 days, momentum indicators would be deeply oversold by any standard measure. The 1-hour +47% spike is consistent with an oversold bounce rather than a genuine trend reversal, as it was immediately followed by a -29% 4-hour retracement back toward prior lows.

Volume Analysis

Buy

41.2%

Sell

58.8%

Volume Trend

Stable

The 24-hour volume of ~$31,994 is modest relative to the $121,818 liquidity pool, representing roughly 26% of available liquidity traded in a single day — high enough to cause meaningful price impact on larger orders. The burst of 96 buy transactions in the 4-hour window during the pump suggests volume is episodic and event-driven rather than sustained.

Recent Price Action

Sharp pump-and-dump intraday pattern: +47% in 1 hour followed by -29% over 4 hours, occurring within a broader 7-day downtrend of -46.1%. The 15-day close sequence shows a peak at $0.1100 on day 11, followed by three consecutive lower closes ($0.09412 → $0.04020 → $0.02840).

This pattern — a brief oversold bounce into a continuation of the downtrend — is characteristic of a token in distribution phase where temporary demand spikes are absorbed by larger sellers. The inability to hold gains above $0.04020 (the prior close) reinforces bearish momentum.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.02086

Major support

$0.01495

Immediate resistance

$0.03971

Major resistance

$0.1986

Immediate support at $0.02086 is approximately 26% below current price and represents the nearest OHLC swing low — a breach would open the path to major support at $0.01495 (the 15-day absolute low, ~47% below current price). On the upside, immediate resistance at $0.03971 is ~40% above current price and aligns with the prior support zone that broke down; reclaiming it would be the first technical signal of trend stabilization. Major resistance at $0.1986 — the 15-day high — is effectively a ceiling that would require a 6x move from current levels and is not a near-term realistic target given the prevailing downtrend.

Holder Metrics

Total Holders

4,507

24h Change

-8

Growth Rate

-0.18%

The 31-day trajectory of 4,554 → 4,507 (net -47 holders) is a slow but unbroken decline, indicating that the token is not attracting new participants at a rate sufficient to replace those exiting. This is a meaningful bearish signal for a 44-month-old token — sustained holder attrition at this stage suggests fading community conviction rather than a temporary dip.

Holder Distribution

Concentration Risk: Critical

Top 10 Holders

81%

Top 100 Holders

100%

Retail Holders

0.0%

The top 10 holders control 81% of supply, and the top 100 control the entirety — retail holders hold effectively 0%. However, applying the classification framework: position 1 (31.36%) is a protocol/contract, position 2 (13.64%) is a burn address (permanently removed from circulation), and position 8 (2.49%) is a PulseChain protocol contract. Adjusting for these non-dumpable positions, the dumpable supply figure of 52.7% — held by individual whale wallets — remains critically high and represents the genuine concentration risk. The burn address holding 13.64% is a positive tokenomics signal, but it does not offset the whale overhang.

Whale Activity

Sentiment: Mixed
  • BUY $799 and $728 by 0x95480d… — the same wallet executed two consecutive buys totalling $1,527, the largest single-wallet accumulation in the recent trade window, suggesting targeted accumulation at current depressed prices.
  • SELL $578 by 0xdce5b9… and $558 by 0xb9332b… — two separate wallets selling in the same window, consistent with the broader distribution pattern observed in the 24h volume data.

The largest recent on-chain swaps are modest in absolute dollar terms: the biggest single trade was a $799 buy by 0x95480d…, followed by a $728 buy by the same wallet and a $675 buy by 0xd7e123…. The largest sells were $578 by 0xdce5b9… and $558 by 0xb9332b…. All trades are sub-$800, consistent with the token's micro-cap liquidity profile.

Recent whale-level trades are all sub-$800, reflecting the shallow liquidity environment. The mix of two consecutive buys from one wallet against two separate sell transactions from different wallets is consistent with the 'mixed' sentiment classification — no dominant directional conviction from large holders in the immediate term.

Smart Money Indicators

Confidence

Low

Profit-Taking Risk

Low

All six tracked smart-money wallets (0xc9ec55…, 0x1d58d2…, 0x05429d…, 0xa7dd7c…, 0x56de51…, 0x1a78b3…) have each realized exactly -$298 (-7%) across 25 trades, an unusual uniformity that may indicate these are related wallets or a systematic trading strategy that has consistently failed to profit.

The complete absence of profitable smart-money activity on this token is a significant bearish signal. When even the most active traders cannot generate positive returns across 25 trades each, it indicates structural price weakness and poor liquidity conditions for active trading. The identical PnL figures across all six wallets warrant scrutiny — this pattern could indicate wash trading, bot activity, or related-party wallets rather than independent market participants.

Liquidity Analysis

Total Liquidity

$121,817.87

Depth

Shallow

Slippage Risk

High

At $121,818 in total Uniswap v3 liquidity against a $177,826 market cap, the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio of ~68% is relatively high for a micro-cap, but the absolute dollar depth is extremely shallow. A single $10,000 trade would represent ~8.2% of the entire liquidity pool, causing severe slippage. The 24-hour volume of ~$31,994 representing 26% of the liquidity pool in one day confirms that this token is highly susceptible to price manipulation through relatively small capital deployment.

Overall Risk

Very high

Risk Score

82/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    Daily return standard deviation of 33.6% is extreme — this implies that a one-standard-deviation daily move would shift the price by roughly a third. The 15-day range of $0.01495 to $0.1986 (a 13x spread) and the intraday +47%/-29% swing confirm that ASIC is among the most volatile micro-cap tokens observable.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Total liquidity of $121,818 on a single Uniswap v3 pool means any trade above ~$5,000 will cause material slippage. Exit risk for the largest whale wallets (holding millions of dollars in notional value at higher prices) is severe — they cannot exit without catastrophically moving the price against themselves.

  • ConcentrationHigh

    Dumpable supply of 52.7% is held by individual whale wallets. The largest individual whale (0xf89013…, 13.30%) is already in a -$4,086 realized loss position, creating potential distressed-seller dynamics. The third-largest individual whale (0x04fb6c…, 4.06%) received its position via transfer with no swap history, making its behavior entirely unpredictable.

  • Smart ContractMedium

    The contract is verified and has operated for 44 months without a known exploit, which is a meaningful positive. However, the security score of 67/100 indicates unresolved risk factors. Without a published independent audit, medium risk is the appropriate classification.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    The token's 'Stablecoins' metadata classification — despite clearly not being a stablecoin — could attract regulatory scrutiny if interpreted as misrepresentation. Additionally, PulseChain-associated tokens have faced questions about their regulatory status given the nature of the PulseChain launch. Standard ERC-20 regulatory risks apply.

Key Risks

  • Whale dump risk: 52.7% of supply in dumpable individual wallets, with the largest (13.30%) already in significant realized losses — a distressed holder with strong incentive to exit at any price recovery, creating a persistent ceiling on upside.
  • Liquidity trap: At $121,818 total liquidity, any coordinated exit by even one mid-sized whale would collapse the price; retail participants who entered during the recent pump face severe slippage on exit.
  • Structural demand failure: All six tracked smart-money wallets have negative realized PnL, and the holder base has declined for 31 consecutive days — there is no evidence of new demand sufficient to absorb existing supply.

Mitigating Factors

  • 13.64% of supply is permanently burned, reducing the effective circulating supply and providing a structural floor for scarcity-based valuation arguments.
  • The token has survived 44 months without a contract exploit, and the verified contract allows community oversight of any governance changes.

Investor Suitability

ASIC is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders who understand micro-cap DeFi dynamics, can afford to lose their entire position, and have independently verified the smart contract. It is not suitable for risk-averse investors, those seeking stable returns, or anyone allocating more than a negligible fraction of their portfolio. This is not financial advice.

ASIC presents a high-risk speculative thesis built on Bitcoin-mirroring tokenomics within the PulseChain ecosystem, but the current data shows a token in structural decline: falling price (-46.1% in 7 days), shrinking holder base, zero profitable smart-money activity, and 52.7% dumpable whale supply. The bull case requires a PulseChain ecosystem catalyst that does not currently exist in the data; the bear case is supported by nearly every on-chain metric available.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

A significant PulseChain ecosystem development — such as a major protocol integration, exchange listing, or renewed Bitcoin-narrative cycle — drives fresh demand into ASIC. The token's near-floor positioning at 7% of its 15-day range, combined with the 13.64% burned supply and Bitcoin-scarcity mechanics, could attract speculative buyers seeking asymmetric upside. A recovery to immediate resistance at $0.03971 would represent a ~40% gain from current levels.

  • PulseChain ecosystem growth or a major protocol partnership that brings new users to ASIC specifically
  • Bitcoin narrative cycle driving interest in Bitcoin-alternative tokens with similar scarcity mechanics

Base Case

ASIC continues to trade in a compressed range between immediate support ($0.02086) and immediate resistance ($0.03971), with episodic volatility spikes driven by thin liquidity rather than fundamental developments. Holder count continues its gradual decline, and the token maintains a sub-$200,000 market cap with no significant catalyst in either direction over the next 30-90 days.

  • No major PulseChain ecosystem event materially changes ASIC's demand profile
  • The largest whale wallets do not execute large coordinated exits, maintaining the current fragile price equilibrium

Bear Case

High probability

Continued holder attrition and the absence of profitable trading activity accelerate selling pressure. The distressed largest whale (0xf89013…, -$4,086 realized) exits its 13.30% position into thin liquidity, driving the price through immediate support at $0.02086 toward the major support floor at $0.01495. At $121,818 in liquidity, a single large exit could cause a 40-60% price collapse.

  • Distressed whale exit: the largest individual holder is already in significant realized losses and may seek to minimize further losses at any price recovery
  • Structural demand vacuum: declining holders, zero smart-money profitability, and 90%+ transfer-based acquisition suggest no organic buying base to absorb supply

Analysis Details

Generated

Jun 20, 2026, 08:30 AM UTC

Data Freshness

Real-time on-chain data with 15-day OHLC history; 30d and 90d price history unavailable

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.028401019786712257

Market Cap

$177.8K

24h Volume

$32.0K

Holders

4,507

Liquidity

$121.8K

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Uniswap v3 swap history)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)15-day daily OHLC price history with computed swing-level support/resistanceSmart contract security assessment (67/100 score, verified contract status)Whale wallet behavioral forensics (realized PnL, acquisition method, wallet age)Smart money realized PnL tracking (6 wallets, 25 trades each)31-day holder trajectory timeseries

Limitations

  • Only 15 days of OHLC history are available, making 30d/90d trend confirmation impossible and significantly limiting medium-term technical analysis reliability
  • The 'Stablecoins' category classification in the token metadata is inconsistent with observed price behavior and may indicate data quality issues in the source metadata
  • The identical realized PnL figures across all six smart-money wallets ($-298, -7%, 25 trades each) is statistically anomalous and may indicate data aggregation artifacts, related wallets, or wash trading — these figures should be interpreted with caution
  • No independent smart contract audit documentation was available; the 67/100 security score is based on automated analysis only

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track ASIC