INFECT

Infect Price Today & AI Analysis

INFECTEthereumAnalysis as of Jun 19, 2026

Price

$0.009332

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0x30f64a102d46bb1c3ca195b4c055e8e6e19e60cc

Chain

Ethereum

Holders

84

Market cap

$6.20K

Liquidity

$400.00

At a $1M market cap, $INFECT would be $1.51 (161x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is INFECT a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 1

Not checked

This contract has not been tested for honeypots or taxes yet.

Launch wallets hold

0.01%2 bundlers still holding

The honeypot and tax test has not run on this contract yet, so no red flags here does not mean a clean contract. Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about INFECT

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Ethereum

UTRUMPUTRUMPuTRUMP$0.3150+0.0%MC $3.1KWAACWAACWrapped AyeAyeCoin$0.5463+0.0%MC $3.18MPA1PT-apyUSD-18JUN2026PT apyUSD 18JUN2026$0.7206+0.0%MC $3.39MSHITSHITShitToken$41.33+0.0%MC $6.2KINCOGNITOINCOGNITOIncognito69420$0.048579+0.0%MC $85.8KPYUSDPYUSDPayPal USD$0.9999+0.0%MC $1.82B

Infect: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-19 16:03 UTC

Holder addresses

210

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$23,238.01
How concentrated is Infect ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 210 addresses (2026-06-19 16:03 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Infect?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Infect liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-19 16:03 UTC, reported liquidity was $23,238.01. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-19 16:03 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Jun 19, 2026, 04:03 PM UTC

Market Cap

$51.67K

24h Volume

$233.07K

Liquidity

$23.24K

FDV

—

Holders

210

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

INFECT (INFECT) is an Ethereum-based token launched on Uniswap v4 approximately 5 hours ago with a total supply of 664,302 tokens and a market cap of roughly $51,670. The token has no published description, no verified contract, and its deployer wallet was created only 6 hours ago and funded from Binance — a high-risk disposable-deployer profile. The 24-hour price action shows a +1,371% launch spike followed by a -55.5% hourly reversal, consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump pattern. With 180 of 210 holders having received tokens via transfer (not swaps), insider pre-distribution is the dominant structural feature of this token.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 19, 2026, 04:03 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extreme launch-day volatility: +1,371% 24h gain followed by a -55.5% single-hour collapse within the first 5 hours of existence.
  • Disposable-deployer fingerprint: wallet created 6 hours ago, funded from Binance, zero prior deployments — no on-chain history of legitimate project activity.
  • Insider pre-distribution dominance: 180 of 210 holders (86%) received tokens via transfer rather than open-market swaps, indicating coordinated pre-launch allocation.

Infect AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

INFECT is only 5 hours old and has already experienced a -55.5% hourly drawdown following its launch spike of +1,371% in 24 hours, a classic pump-and-dump price signature. The 1-hour sell transaction count (128) has now overtaken buys (126) and unique sellers (107) exceed unique buyers (87), signaling that early recipients are rotating out. With only $23,238 in liquidity backing a $51,670 market cap, even modest sell pressure will cause severe slippage.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The deployer wallet is only 6 hours old, was funded directly from Binance, and has zero prior contract deployments — a textbook disposable-deployer pattern associated with short-lived launch-and-exit projects. All eight individual whale positions (totalling ~26% of dumpable supply) were acquired via transfer rather than market buys, meaning insiders received supply at genesis with no cost basis, creating persistent overhead sell pressure. Without a verified contract, a disclosed use case, or any established community, the probability of sustained medium-term price appreciation is low.

Bullish Factors

  • 24-hour buy volume ($121,493) exceeds sell volume ($111,577), with buy pressure at 52.1%, indicating net inflow on the day of launch.
  • Holder count grew from 32 to 210 (net +178, +85%) in the token's first hours, showing rapid initial distribution and speculative interest.
  • The largest single holder (26.07%) is the Uniswap protocol contract — not a dumpable whale — meaning the top-10 concentration figure overstates actual insider sell risk.

Bearish Factors

  • The deployer wallet (0xb2fd0ebc…) was created only 6 hours ago, has zero prior contract deployments, and was funded directly from Binance — a disposable-deployer pattern strongly associated with rug-pull operations.
  • All eight individual whale wallets (combined ~26% dumpable supply) received their positions via transfer at genesis, not through market buys, giving them a zero cost basis and no incentive to hold.
  • The contract is unverified (security score 56/100), meaning the token's code cannot be independently audited for hidden mint, pause, or drain functions.
  • Total liquidity of $23,238 against a $51,670 market cap yields a liquidity-to-mcap ratio below 45%, making the pool extremely shallow and vulnerable to catastrophic price impact on any meaningful sell.
  • The -55.5% hourly price collapse following the launch spike confirms the classic pump-and-dump trajectory, with the 1-hour sell count now exceeding buys.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

INFECT call history

Full track record →

Jun 19bearish
24h-89.1%
7d-91.7%
30d-91.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0x30f6...60cc
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: the deployer wallet is 6 hours old, funded from Binance, has zero deployment history, and the contract is unverified — all hallmarks of a disposable launch account designed to be abandoned after extracting liquidity.
  • Insider dump risk: eight individual whale wallets hold 29.5% of dumpable supply with zero cost basis from genesis transfers; wallet 0x3a71c0… is already actively selling ($534 largest recent trade), and the remaining seven wallets have no market-buy cost basis to incentivize holding.
  • Liquidity collapse risk: at $23,238 total liquidity, a coordinated exit by even two or three of the larger whale wallets (e.g., 6.56% + 3.81% = ~10.4% of supply) would drain the pool and render the token effectively untradeable.

Trading Insight

bearish

While the 24-hour aggregate still shows 52.1% buy pressure, the most recent 1-hour window has flipped negative — 128 sells vs. 126 buys and 107 unique sellers vs. 87 unique buyers — indicating that momentum is deteriorating as the launch hype fades. The notable recent trades block is dominated by sells ($534, $483, $423, $408, $306) against a single buy of $380, confirming that the largest individual actors are currently distributing.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

With only 5 hours of price history, the short-term trend is defined entirely by the post-launch trajectory: a violent spike to a peak followed by a -55.5% hourly collapse, with the 4-hour recovery of +7% insufficient to reverse the dominant downward structure. No multi-day OHLC data exists to assess a medium-term trend independently, but the structural conditions — insider distribution, shallow liquidity, unverified contract — make a sustained recovery unlikely, so the medium-term bias is also bearish/downtrend.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

The +1,371% 24-hour price gain, even after the -55.5% hourly reversal, leaves the token trading at a dramatically elevated level relative to any rational fundamental anchor. The shift in the 1-hour order flow to net-sell territory confirms that momentum has peaked and is now rolling over, consistent with an overbought condition following a speculative launch spike.

Volume Analysis

Buy

52.1%

Sell

47.9%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

Transaction velocity is clearly decelerating: 1,008 transactions in the first 4-hour window captured, dropping to 254 in the most recent 1-hour window. This deceleration following a launch spike is typical of pump-and-dump dynamics where early participants exhaust buying interest and begin exiting. The buy/sell ratio has deteriorated from 583:425 (4h) to 126:128 (1h), confirming the volume trend is shifting bearish.

Recent Price Action

Vertical launch spike (+1,371% in 24h) followed by a sharp -55.5% hourly reversal, with a modest +7% 4-hour bounce that has since stalled (-1.75% in the last 5 minutes).

This pattern — a near-vertical launch candle followed by rapid mean reversion — is the canonical signature of a coordinated pump-and-dump. The bounce is likely a dead-cat recovery as remaining retail buyers absorb insider sell pressure before the next leg down.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

91/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A +1,371% 24-hour gain followed by a -55.5% single-hour collapse within the first 5 hours of trading represents extreme volatility. With no price history and a tiny liquidity pool, future price moves of 50%+ in either direction within hours are plausible.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Total pool liquidity of $23,238 is critically shallow relative to the $51,670 market cap. Individual trades of a few hundred dollars already represent meaningful percentages of pool depth, and any coordinated insider exit would cause catastrophic slippage for remaining holders.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an uncategorized, anonymous token with no disclosed use case, INFECT could attract regulatory scrutiny as a potential unregistered security or market manipulation vehicle, particularly given its pump-and-dump price signature.

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: the deployer wallet is 6 hours old, funded from Binance, has zero deployment history, and the contract is unverified — all hallmarks of a disposable launch account designed to be abandoned after extracting liquidity.
  • Insider dump risk: eight individual whale wallets hold 29.5% of dumpable supply with zero cost basis from genesis transfers; wallet 0x3a71c0… is already actively selling ($534 largest recent trade), and the remaining seven wallets have no market-buy cost basis to incentivize holding.
  • Liquidity collapse risk: at $23,238 total liquidity, a coordinated exit by even two or three of the larger whale wallets (e.g., 6.56% + 3.81% = ~10.4% of supply) would drain the pool and render the token effectively untradeable.

Mitigating Factors

  • The Uniswap protocol contract holds 26.07% of supply as locked liquidity, providing a baseline pool that cannot be unilaterally withdrawn by the deployer (assuming standard Uniswap v4 mechanics).
  • 24-hour net buy volume ($9,916 inflow) and 929 buy transactions indicate there is active speculative demand, which could temporarily absorb insider sell pressure.

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced traders with a high risk tolerance who fully understand they may lose their entire position. It is not appropriate for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose 100% of their investment. The combination of an unverified contract, disposable deployer, insider pre-distribution, and shallow liquidity places this firmly in the highest-risk category.

INFECT presents an extremely high-risk speculative profile with multiple simultaneous red flags: a 5-hour-old token, unverified contract, disposable deployer, insider pre-distribution across all whale wallets, and a classic pump-and-dump price signature. The only plausible bull case is a continuation of speculative momentum; the bear case — which the current data strongly supports — is an accelerating insider exit into retail buy pressure.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Viral social media traction drives a second wave of retail speculation, temporarily overwhelming insider sell pressure and pushing the price back toward or above the launch-day peak. The deployer publishes a project roadmap and verifies the contract, reducing rug-pull perception and attracting momentum traders.

  • Sustained net buy volume (currently $9,916 positive on the day) continuing into a second trading session.
  • Social media virality converting the 'Infect' branding into a meme-coin narrative that attracts speculative capital.

Base Case

Speculative trading volume decelerates over the next 24-48 hours as the launch hype fades, insider wallets continue gradual distribution, and the price drifts significantly lower from current levels as liquidity thins. The token survives but trades at a fraction of its launch-day peak with minimal activity.

  • No second viral catalyst emerges to reignite retail buying interest.
  • Insider wallets distribute gradually rather than in a single coordinated exit, allowing the price to decline in a staircase pattern rather than a single catastrophic collapse.

Bear Case

High probability

Insider wallets with zero cost basis continue distributing into any remaining retail buy pressure, the liquidity pool is progressively drained, and the token price collapses toward near-zero as the deployer abandons the project. The unverified contract may contain a drain or pause function that accelerates this outcome.

  • All eight individual whale wallets hold genesis-transfer positions with zero cost basis — confirmed active selling already underway by 0x3a71c0….
  • Deployer's disposable-wallet profile (6 hours old, Binance-funded, zero prior deployments) is consistent with a launch-and-exit operation.

Analysis Details

Generated

Jun 19, 2026, 04:03 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-19 16:03 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.077781558907810189

Market Cap

$51.7K

24h Volume

$233.1K

Holders

210

Liquidity

$23,238.01

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Ethereum mainnet)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)Trading volume metrics (Uniswap v4 pool data)Smart contract analysis (security score, verification status)Deployer wallet forensics (first-active date, funding source, deployment history)Whale wallet intel (DEX swap history, acquisition method, first-active date)Token genesis transfer sequence (null-address mint and initial allocation records)Notable recent trades (largest on-chain swaps by USD value)

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history exists for this token (5 hours old), making technical price-level analysis impossible and all trend assessments based solely on intraday data.
  • Smart-money (profitable trader cohort) data is unavailable, preventing assessment of whether sophisticated traders are net long or short.
  • The unverified contract means the token's code cannot be audited, and hidden functions (mint, pause, drain) cannot be confirmed or ruled out.
  • Social media metrics (follower counts, engagement rates) are not available in the data, limiting community strength assessment to on-chain proxies only.

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

New reports on Ethereum

All new tokens →

AAnakinAnakin SkywalkerBearishLlpxCvxLP Pirex CVXBearishAIAIAny InuBullishGALAGALAGalaBearishASMLonASMLonASML Holding NV (Ondo Tokenized)Bearish0xDNX0xDNXWrapped DNXBullishGPUGPUGPUnetBearishMINIMALMINIMALMinimalismBearish

Questions about INFECT?