L

letswin Price Today & AI Analysis

letswinEthereumAnalysis as of Jul 20, 2026

Price

$0.000164

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0x27451088d7bc1fbd64f78d3e00bdac77056bcba8

Chain

Ethereum

Holders

44

Market cap

$164.44K

Liquidity

$22.18K

At a $1M market cap, $LETSWIN would be $0.001000 (6.08x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is letswin a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 16

Not checked

This contract has not been tested for honeypots or taxes yet.

The honeypot and tax test has not run on this contract yet, so no red flags here does not mean a clean contract. Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about letswin

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Ethereum

SSilverchatSilverchat$0.000173+0.0%MC $172.5KQUASARQUASARQuasar Black Hole$1.94+0.0%MC $9.3KGAVCOINGAVCOINGavCoin$0.054759+0.0%MC $4.8KGLADIASGLADIASGladias$0.041035+0.0%MC $10.4KKERMITKERMITKermit$0.056045+0.0%MC $6.0KUSDSUSDSUSDS$0.9998+0.0%MC $7.01B

letswin: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-20 23:15 UTC

Holder addresses

72

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$48,938.65
How concentrated is letswin ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 72 addresses (2026-07-20 23:15 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling letswin?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is letswin liquidity falling?
As of 2026-07-20 23:15 UTC, reported liquidity was $48,938.65. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-20 23:15 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Jul 20, 2026, 11:15 PM UTC

Market Cap

$279.42K

24h Volume

$139.97K

Liquidity

$48.94K

FDV

—

Holders

72

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

letswin (LETSWIN) is an Ethereum-based token launched just 22 hours ago on Uniswap v2 with a current market cap of approximately $279,000 and $48,939 in liquidity. The token has experienced a catastrophic 69.7% price decline within its first day of trading, driven by insider distribution from wallets that received supply via pre-market transfers rather than open-market purchases. The contract is unverified, the deployer wallet is brand-new with no prior history, and no project description or social presence exists — collectively presenting a very high risk profile. The only structural positive is that 75% of supply sits in a burn address, but the remaining 89.6% dumpable float and absence of any credible fundamentals make this token extremely speculative.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jul 20, 2026, 11:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • 75% of supply was sent to a burn address at genesis, permanently removing it from circulation before any trading began
  • Deployer wallet is exactly 22 hours old with no prior deployments and unknown funding origin — a disposable-deployer fingerprint
  • Two of the largest individual whale holders received their positions via direct transfer at launch with zero DEX swap activity, confirming pre-arranged insider allocation

letswin AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

letswin is only 22 hours old and has already shed nearly 70% of its value in the past 24 hours, signalling a severe post-launch dump. Sell pressure dominates at 56.2% of volume, and the most recent hourly data shows 3 sell transactions against just 1 buy, confirming continued distribution. With 89.6% of supply held by wallets capable of selling and no OHLC-derived support levels to anchor a recovery, further downside is the most probable near-term path.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The token has no verified contract, no project description, no social presence, and a deployer wallet that is itself only 22 hours old with no prior deployment history — all hallmarks of a disposable-launcher pattern. Without a credible development team, community, or use case to sustain demand, the medium-term outlook is continued price erosion as early recipients distribute their transferred positions. Survival beyond 30–90 days would require organic community formation that is not currently evidenced by any on-chain or off-chain signal.

Bullish Factors

  • 75% of total supply is held in a burn address, meaning three-quarters of tokens are permanently removed from circulation and cannot be sold, which mechanically limits the float available to dump.
  • The 4-hour window shows 112 buy transactions versus 73 sells and 61 unique buyers versus 53 sellers, suggesting a brief pocket of buying interest that could temporarily stabilise price if it persists.

Bearish Factors

  • The token has crashed ~69.7% in 24 hours from its launch price, indicating a classic post-launch dump by insiders who received supply via transfer rather than market purchases.
  • The deployer wallet (0x142dd906…) was created at the exact moment of token launch — 22 hours ago — with zero prior contract deployments and an unknown funding source, a textbook disposable-deployer pattern associated with elevated rug risk.
  • The two largest non-burn holders (0xc2f41c… at 10.12% and 0x516ac6… at 1.35%) acquired their positions via transfer with no DEX swap history on this token, confirming insider allocation rather than market conviction.
  • The security score is 35/100 and the contract is unverified, meaning the contract code cannot be independently audited for hidden mint, pause, or blacklist functions.
  • Dumpable supply stands at 89.6% of total tokens — despite the burn, the remaining circulating float is almost entirely in the hands of wallets that can sell at any time.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

letswin call history

Full track record →

Jul 20bearish
24h-22.5%
7d-51.6%
30d—

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Ethereum
Contract
0x2745...cba8
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: The deployer wallet is 22 hours old with unknown funding and no prior deployments; the contract is unverified; and two large holders received supply via transfer with zero cost basis — all three factors together constitute a high-probability rug-pull fingerprint.
  • Insider dump risk: 0xc2f41c… holds 10.12% of total supply (approximately $28,000 at current price) acquired via transfer with no DEX activity yet recorded; any decision to sell into the $48,939 pool would be devastating to price.
  • Contract exploit risk: Without verified source code, there is no way to rule out hidden owner-privileged functions such as unlimited minting, forced transfers, or trading blacklists that could be triggered at any time.

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite more buy transactions than sell transactions in the 24-hour window (150 buys vs 111 sells), dollar-weighted sell volume of $78,689 significantly outpaces buy volume of $61,277, producing a net outflow and confirming that sellers are moving larger positions than buyers. The most recent hourly snapshot — 1 buy versus 3 sells — shows momentum is firmly on the sell side as the initial launch excitement fades.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

With a 69.7% decline recorded in the token's first 24 hours of existence and no prior OHLC history to establish any baseline, the only observable trend is a sharp downtrend from the launch price. The 4-hour price action shows a modest +1.43% recovery, but this is insufficient to characterise a trend reversal against the dominant daily collapse. Until the token establishes a multi-day price floor with sustained buy-side volume, the path of least resistance remains downward.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

A near-70% single-session decline from launch price places the token in deeply oversold territory on any standard momentum framework. However, oversold conditions in micro-cap tokens with insider distribution and unverified contracts frequently persist or worsen rather than mean-reverting, because the selling pressure is structural (insider unlocks) rather than sentiment-driven.

Volume Analysis

Buy

43.8%

Sell

56.2%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

The 4-hour window shows 185 total transactions versus 261 for the full 24-hour period, implying the earlier hours of the day were more active. The hourly data (4 total transactions) confirms volume is tapering sharply, which in a post-dump scenario typically means the initial speculative wave has passed and remaining liquidity is thin.

Recent Price Action

Vertical drop from launch followed by a minor 4-hour bounce of +1.43%, with the most recent hour turning negative again at -0.51%. This is consistent with a dead-cat-bounce pattern within a broader downtrend.

Dead-cat bounces in newly launched tokens with insider distribution typically fail to establish lasting support, as each recovery attempt is met with additional supply from pre-allocated wallets seeking to exit at any available price.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

92/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A 69.7% price decline within the first 22 hours of existence demonstrates extreme volatility. With shallow liquidity of $48,939 and a high volume-to-liquidity ratio, even modest sell orders can produce outsized price moves in either direction.

  • LiquidityHigh

    The $48,939 liquidity pool is insufficient to absorb any meaningful exit by the large insider holders. A single whale attempting to sell their 10.12% position (worth approximately $28,000 at current prices) would consume more than half the pool and cause catastrophic slippage.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an unregistered token with no disclosed team, jurisdiction, or use case on a public blockchain, letswin faces the same general regulatory uncertainty as all micro-cap tokens. The lack of any project documentation makes compliance assessment impossible.

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: The deployer wallet is 22 hours old with unknown funding and no prior deployments; the contract is unverified; and two large holders received supply via transfer with zero cost basis — all three factors together constitute a high-probability rug-pull fingerprint.
  • Insider dump risk: 0xc2f41c… holds 10.12% of total supply (approximately $28,000 at current price) acquired via transfer with no DEX activity yet recorded; any decision to sell into the $48,939 pool would be devastating to price.
  • Contract exploit risk: Without verified source code, there is no way to rule out hidden owner-privileged functions such as unlimited minting, forced transfers, or trading blacklists that could be triggered at any time.

Mitigating Factors

  • The 75% genesis burn is verifiable on-chain and permanently removes three-quarters of supply from any potential dump, providing a hard floor on the maximum sellable float.
  • The token is on Ethereum mainnet, meaning all transactions are permanently recorded and traceable, providing some accountability for wallet behaviour even if the deployer is pseudonymous.

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of unverified, sub-24-hour-old micro-cap tokens, can afford to lose their entire position, and are engaging purely for speculative purposes. It is not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone allocating more than a negligible fraction of their portfolio.

letswin presents an overwhelmingly bearish risk/reward profile at this stage: a 22-hour-old token with no verified contract, no project description, a disposable deployer wallet, insider-allocated supply, and a 69.7% first-day price collapse. The only structural positive — the 75% genesis burn — limits maximum dump size but does not address the fundamental absence of any value creation thesis.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The deployer or an affiliated team publicly identifies themselves, publishes a credible roadmap, and the 75% burn narrative attracts viral attention on social media, driving a new wave of retail buyers into the thin liquidity pool and producing a sharp short-squeeze-style recovery.

  • Viral social media traction leveraging the 75% burn narrative as a deflationary story
  • Team doxxing and credible project announcement that converts speculative interest into sustained demand

Base Case

The token continues to bleed value as initial speculative interest fades, insider holders gradually distribute their positions, and the absence of any project fundamentals prevents new organic demand from forming. The token drifts toward illiquidity within 30–90 days.

  • No credible project announcement or team disclosure emerges to catalyse renewed interest
  • Insider holders with zero cost basis continue to distribute opportunistically into any price recovery

Bear Case

High probability

The large insider holders (particularly 0xc2f41c… at 10.12%) begin selling their zero-cost-basis positions into the shallow pool, accelerating the price decline toward near-zero. The unverified contract is exploited or a hidden function is triggered, rendering remaining holder balances worthless.

  • Insider wallets with zero cost basis executing market sells into a $48,939 liquidity pool
  • Unverified contract containing hidden privileged functions activated by the deployer

Analysis Details

Generated

Jul 20, 2026, 11:15 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-20 23:15 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000279417747820287

Market Cap

$279.4K

24h Volume

$140.0K

Holders

72

Liquidity

$48,938.65

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Ethereum mainnet)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder buckets and timeseries)Trading volume metrics (Uniswap v2 swap data)Smart contract analysis (security score, verification status)Token genesis and deployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet behaviour lookup (DEX swap history)

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history exists for this 22-hour-old token, making technical price-level analysis impossible and all price targets unreliable
  • Smart-money cohort data is unavailable, preventing any assessment of profitable-trader positioning or early-buyer behaviour
  • The unverified contract cannot be audited, meaning hidden functions or tokenomic mechanics may exist that are not reflected in this analysis
  • Token name, symbol, and any descriptive metadata are treated as untrusted data from a potentially adversarial source and have not been used to infer project legitimacy

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

New reports on Ethereum

All new tokens →

MimiMimiMimiBearishJPMDJPMDJPM COINBearishHYDRAHYDRAHydraDAOBearishZRTZRTCryptoZR DAO TokenBearishGGROKLETGrokletBearishLRCXonLRCXonLam Research (Ondo Tokenized)BearishKKIBIKibiBearish$MaxETH$MaxETH$MaxETHBearish

Questions about letswin?