GOOMS

gooms.fun Price Today & AI Analysis

GOOMSBNB ChainAnalysis as of Sep 27, 2026

Price

$0.000118

+106.60% 24h

Contract

Live
0xf5b9524746a7262e8a17a62d15fe7b3d2dfb63c0

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

837

Market cap

$116.47K

Liquidity

$16.80K

More tokens on BNB Chain

LLVLV$1.21-0.4%MC $2.54MBEMBEMBEM$47.21-9.6%MC $11.50MNNESNesa$0.1700+3.2%MC $2.59MMoolahMoolahMoolah$0.0337-9.8%MC $33.66MDDogczDogcz$0.044424+35.4%MC $43.9Kquqquqquq$0.001609-1.2%MC $1.61M

gooms.fun: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-27 14:15 UTC

Holder addresses

837

Top 10 supply share

31.08%

Reported liquidity

$16,800.00
How concentrated is gooms.fun ownership?
As of 2026-09-27 14:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 31.08% of supply. It reports 837 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling gooms.fun?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 14:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $302,530.00 in buys and $297,267.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is gooms.fun liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +39.02%, from $12,848.24 (2026-09-27 13:00 UTC) to $17,861.39 (2026-09-27 14:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-27 14:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 13:00 UTC$12,848.24
2026-09-27 14:00 UTC$17,861.39

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Sep 27, 2026, 02:15 PM UTC

Market Cap

$116.47K

24h Volume

$599.80K

Liquidity

$16.80K

FDV

—

Holders

837

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about GOOMS

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Neutral

GOOMS is a 1-hour-old BNB Chain token trading on PancakeSwap Infinity with a $116,471 market cap and $16,800 in liquidity. Its stated mechanism ties token minting to GMGN social callouts rather than a traditional mint button, and it currently has 837 holders with the top 10 controlling 31.1% of supply. Given its extreme youth, thin liquidity, and lack of verifiable security or holder-growth data, this is a highly speculative, early-stage token with no established trading history.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Sep 27, 2026, 02:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Mint mechanism triggered by GMGN social callouts rather than a manual mint function
  • No gas-cost minting model as described in the project text
  • Extremely early-stage token (1 hour old) with an already-forming 837-holder base

gooms.fun AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

The token is 1 hour old and the quoted 106.6% '24h' move is simply the entire trading history compressed into an hour — not a meaningful trend signal. The only real signal is the most recent 5-minute candle, which shows a sharp -19.3% drop, suggesting the initial pump is already reversing.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

With only ~1 hour of trading history, no 30d/90d trend can be established. Extremely new, low-liquidity tokens on fast-moving DEX launch platforms like this typically see rapid volatility and high failure rates within days, so the base-case skews bearish absent sustained volume.

Bullish Factors

  • 24h buy/sell transaction counts are roughly balanced (4,055 buys vs 3,685 sells) with buy volume ($302,530) slightly exceeding sell volume ($297,267), indicating no immediate one-sided dumping
  • 837 holders have accumulated within the first hour, showing meaningful initial distribution/interest

Bearish Factors

  • The most recent 5-minute price action shows a -19.3% decline, indicating the initial pump is fading fast
  • Total liquidity is only $16,800 against a $116,471 market cap/FDV, a thin liquidity base that makes the token highly susceptible to slippage and sharp price swings
  • Token is 1 hour old with no track record, no verified contract security data, and no OHLC history to validate any trend

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

GOOMS call history

Full track record →

Sep 27bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0xf5b9...63c0
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Extremely new token (1 hour old) with no established price or holder-growth history to validate any trend
  • Thin liquidity ($16,800) relative to market cap creates high slippage and exit risk for holders
  • No verifiable contract security, audit, or deployer forensics data available on this chain
  • Recent 5-minute price action (-19.3%) suggests the initial launch pump may already be reversing

Trading Insight

neutral

24h buy and sell pressure are nearly balanced (50.4% buy vs 49.6% sell), and transaction counts are similarly close (4,055 buys vs 3,685 sells), suggesting a two-sided, actively traded market rather than a one-directional rush. However, given the token's 1-hour age, this entire '24h' window is effectively the token's whole trading history.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

The reported 1h/4h/24h changes are all identical (106.6%), confirming they simply reflect the token's entire trading history since launch rather than a genuine multi-period trend. The only incrementally newer data point, the 5-minute change of -19.3%, points to a short-term downturn from initial highs.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

With no OHLC history and only a single-hour trading window, standard momentum indicators (RSI, MACD, etc.) cannot be reliably computed; the sharp 5-minute pullback suggests fading momentum from the launch spike.

Volume Analysis

Buy

50.4%

Sell

49.6%

Volume Trend

Stable

Buy volume ($302,530) and sell volume ($297,267) are nearly equal over the observed window, with buy pressure at 50.4% and sell pressure at 49.6%, indicating a balanced market without a dominant directional flow so far.

Recent Price Action

A large initial price increase since launch (reflected in the identical 106.6% figures across 1h/4h/24h) followed by a sharp -19.3% pullback in the most recent 5 minutes.

This pattern is typical of new token launches that experience an initial speculative spike followed by profit-taking; it does not yet establish a sustainable trend given the token's 1-hour age.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    The token has already shown a large launch-driven price spike followed by a sharp -19.3% pullback in the last 5 minutes, indicating extreme short-term volatility typical of brand-new low-liquidity tokens.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Total liquidity of $16,800 is very shallow relative to the $116,471 market cap/FDV, meaning even moderate-sized trades could cause significant price slippage.

  • ConcentrationMedium

    Top 10 holders control 31.1% of supply. No per-wallet classification (whale, team, exchange) is available, so this cannot be labeled as dumpable-whale risk specifically, but the aggregate concentration is notable for a token this young.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an unregistered, meme-style token with speculative social-media-driven mechanics, GOOMS could attract regulatory scrutiny in jurisdictions tightening rules on speculative digital assets, though no specific regulatory action is known at this time.

Key Risks

  • Extremely new token (1 hour old) with no established price or holder-growth history to validate any trend
  • Thin liquidity ($16,800) relative to market cap creates high slippage and exit risk for holders
  • No verifiable contract security, audit, or deployer forensics data available on this chain
  • Recent 5-minute price action (-19.3%) suggests the initial launch pump may already be reversing

Mitigating Factors

  • Buy and sell transaction volumes are roughly balanced (50.4%/49.6%), suggesting no immediate one-sided panic selling
  • 837 holders already onboarded within the first hour indicates some initial organic interest

Investor Suitability

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant speculative traders comfortable with total loss of capital; not appropriate for investors seeking stability, established track records, or verified security guarantees.

GOOMS is an extremely early-stage, high-risk speculative token with a novel but unverified social-callout minting mechanic, thin liquidity, and no track record. Any position should be treated as a short-term speculative bet rather than a fundamentals-based investment.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the GMGN-callout minting mechanism drives sustained viral social attention, holder count and trading volume could continue growing rapidly from the current 837-holder, $116,471 market cap base.

  • Continued or renewed social media callout activity driving new mint events
  • Growth in unique holders beyond the initial 837 seen in the first hour

Base Case

The token continues to experience high volatility typical of hour-old launches, with balanced but active two-sided trading; without sustained catalysts, volume and price likely trend downward from launch highs over the coming days.

  • No major new liquidity injections occur in the near term
  • Social-callout mint mechanism does not produce a sustained viral cycle beyond the initial launch window

Bear Case

High probability

The initial launch pump (reflected in the 106.6% same-figure move across all windows) fades as shown by the -19.3% 5-minute drop, liquidity remains thin, and interest dies off as is common for social-mechanic meme tokens shortly after launch.

  • Thin $16,800 liquidity making the token vulnerable to sharp downside on exits
  • Lack of any established security, audit, or long-term holder trend data to support confidence

Analysis Details

Generated

Sep 27, 2026, 02:15 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-27 14:15 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000118262415928

Market Cap

$116.5K

24h Volume

$599.8K

Holders

837

Liquidity

$16,800.00

Data Sources

Codex DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)Daily OHLC price historyAggregate holder count and top-10 concentration

Limitations

  • Token is only 1 hour old, so no meaningful multi-day OHLC trend, 7d/30d/90d change data, or historical price levels exist
  • Holder-growth history, whale-transaction records, smart-money cohort data, and contract-security data were unavailable for this analysis
  • Per-wallet holder classification and genesis/deployer forensics could not be inspected, limiting insider-risk assessment

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track GOOMS