Y

영끌 Generation Price Today & AI Analysis

YEONGBNB ChainAnalysis as of Aug 14, 2026

Price

$0.053551

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0xf502c4b744dfa5262c3d45c819ad7d7d6b0d7777

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

130

Market cap

$3.55K

Liquidity

$3.08K

Ask Unhosted AI about YEONG

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on BNB Chain

JJUBJUBJubjub$0.054805+0.0%MC $4.8K最初的梦想最初的梦想最初的梦想$0.043898+0.0%MC $39.0K仓仓仓$0.054001+0.0%MC $4.0K币安太子币安太子币安用户就是太子$0.055522+0.0%MC $5.5KKIOKIOKio The Lion Prince$0.053048+0.0%MC $3.0Kquqquqquq$0.001609+3.2%MC $1.61M

영끌 Generation: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-14 14:17 UTC

Holder addresses

575

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$26,457.08
How concentrated is 영끌 Generation ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 575 addresses (2026-08-14 14:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling 영끌 Generation?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is 영끌 Generation liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-14 14:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $26,457.08. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-14 14:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 14, 2026, 02:17 PM UTC

Market Cap

$36.86K

24h Volume

$386.39K

Liquidity

$26.46K

FDV

—

Holders

575

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Neutral

SK4B is a BSC-based token launched approximately 1 hour ago with no disclosed project description, no social presence, an unverified smart contract, and a security score of 41/100. The token has generated notable early trading activity — over 4,400 transactions from roughly 2,000 unique wallets — but this activity is occurring against a critically shallow liquidity pool of $26,457. Multiple top whale wallets received supply via transfer at genesis rather than through market purchases, and the deployer pre-allocated 141 million tokens to a single address before trading began, indicating a structured insider distribution. The combination of these factors places SK4B firmly in the very-high-risk category appropriate only for highly speculative participants who understand the possibility of a near-total loss.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 14, 2026, 02:17 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Unusually high transaction count (4,476 total) for a token less than 1 hour old, suggesting either coordinated bot activity or a pre-existing community migrating to a new contract.
  • Deployer wallet is 774 days old with zero prior contract deployments in its first 100 transactions, an atypical profile that does not fit the standard serial-launcher pattern but also provides no track record of successful projects.
  • Dumpable supply is relatively contained at 16.9% despite 30% top-10 concentration, because the largest single holder (17.71%) is a non-dumpable protocol/contract.

영끌 Generation AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

SK4B is only 1 hour old with no OHLC history to establish a trend, making any directional call speculative. However, the combination of an unverified contract, a security score of 41/100, multiple whale wallets that received supply via transfer rather than market buys, and a deployer funded by an unlabelled wallet all point to elevated dump risk in the immediate term. Sell pressure marginally exceeds buy pressure (50.2% vs 49.8%), and the token's $26,457 liquidity pool is extremely thin relative to $386,000+ in 24h combined volume.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Without a verified contract, no project description, no social presence, and no identifiable use case, SK4B has none of the fundamental building blocks required for sustained medium-term appreciation. The deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8…) pre-allocated 141 million tokens (~14.1% of supply) to a single address (0xce8197…) at genesis before any trading began, representing a significant insider overhang. Unless the team discloses identity, verifies the contract, and establishes a credible use case, the medium-term trajectory is structurally bearish.

Bullish Factors

  • High transaction activity for a 1-hour-old token: 2,271 buys and 2,205 sells from 978 unique buyers and 1,064 unique sellers suggest genuine early market interest rather than wash trading by a handful of wallets.
  • The largest single holder (17.71%) is classified as a protocol/contract, meaning that position is not dumpable whale supply — dumpable supply is contained to 16.9% across individual whale wallets.
  • The deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8…) has been active since 2024-07-01 (774 days old), suggesting it is not a freshly created disposable deployer, which is a marginal positive signal relative to serial-launcher patterns.

Bearish Factors

  • The deployer pre-allocated 141,085,640 tokens (~14.1% of total supply) to address 0xce8197… at genesis before any trading, representing a direct insider allocation that creates immediate sell-side overhang.
  • The contract is unverified and scores only 41/100 on the security assessment, meaning the code governing all funds in the liquidity pool cannot be independently audited by traders.
  • Three of the top individual whale wallets (0xae988c…, 0x0622ed…, 0xa0e72d…) acquired their positions via transfer rather than market buys, confirming they were handed supply at or near launch — classic sybil/insider distribution.
  • Total liquidity of $26,457 against $386,387 in combined 24h volume implies a liquidity-to-volume ratio of roughly 1:14.6, meaning even modest sell orders will cause severe price impact and slippage.
  • The deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8…) was first funded by an unlabelled wallet (0x4deaae93…), obscuring the origin of capital and preventing assessment of whether this is a repeat bad actor.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

YEONG call history

Full track record →

Aug 14bearish
24h-100.0%
7d—
30d-100.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0xf502...7777
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: the deployer holds an unverified contract, was funded by an unlabelled wallet, and pre-allocated 14.1% of supply to a single address at genesis — all conditions that make a liquidity drain technically and financially feasible at any time.
  • Insider dump risk: at least three top whale wallets (holding a combined ~4.34% of supply) received tokens via transfer with zero cost basis and have not yet executed any DEX swaps, meaning their entire position is unrealized profit that could be liquidated without warning.
  • Liquidity collapse risk: the $26,457 pool is insufficient to absorb even moderate sell pressure; a single whale selling their 1.53% position (~$564 at current price) would represent meaningful pool impact, and a coordinated multi-wallet exit could collapse the price to near zero.

Trading Insight

neutral

Buy and sell pressure are nearly perfectly balanced at 49.8% and 50.2% respectively, with buy volume of $192,390 and sell volume of $193,997 — a net outflow of only $1,607 over 24 hours. This equilibrium is notable for a brand-new token and may reflect automated market-making activity or a coordinated launch strategy rather than organic price discovery. The 24h and 4h and 1h transaction counts are identical, which means all recorded activity occurred within the most recent hour, consistent with the token's 1-hour age.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Neutral

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

With only 1 hour of price history and no OHLC data available, no meaningful trend can be established. The 5-minute price change of +0.36% and the 1h/4h/24h change of +0.92% (all identical, confirming the token's age) represent a single data point rather than a trend. Classifying the trend as sideways reflects the absence of directional evidence, not a genuine consolidation pattern.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

No momentum indicators (RSI, MACD, Bollinger Bands) can be computed without OHLC history. The near-equal buy/sell pressure (49.8% vs 50.2%) provides no momentum signal. Momentum assessment will only become meaningful after several days of price data accumulate.

Volume Analysis

Buy

49.8%

Sell

50.2%

Volume Trend

Stable

All volume data is from a single 1-hour window, making trend classification impossible. The $386,387 gross 24h volume against $26,457 liquidity is a 14.6x turnover ratio, which is extremely high and may indicate bot-driven activity cycling through the pool rather than genuine directional demand.

Recent Price Action

The token launched at an unknown price and currently trades at $170.57 with a +0.92% move recorded across its entire 1-hour existence. No candlestick patterns, swing highs, or swing lows can be identified.

A sub-1% price move in the first hour of a new token's life is insufficient to draw any pattern-based conclusions. The price stability may reflect balanced bot activity rather than organic equilibrium.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    With only 1 hour of price history, no OHLC data, and a liquidity pool of $26,457 against $386,387 in volume, price can move violently on small orders. No historical volatility baseline exists to quantify the range, but structural conditions (thin liquidity, insider overhang, unverified contract) are consistent with extreme volatility.

  • LiquidityHigh

    The $26,457 liquidity pool is critically shallow. A 14.6:1 volume-to-liquidity ratio means the pool is being turned over many times per hour, and any coordinated sell pressure or liquidity removal by the deployer could cause catastrophic price impact with no depth to absorb it.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    BSC-based tokens with anonymous teams, no disclosed use case, and no regulatory registration face standard DeFi regulatory uncertainty. The anonymous deployer and absence of KYC/AML disclosures are consistent with the broader unregulated DeFi landscape rather than a specific regulatory red flag, but investors in jurisdictions with strict crypto regulations should be aware of compliance implications.

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: the deployer holds an unverified contract, was funded by an unlabelled wallet, and pre-allocated 14.1% of supply to a single address at genesis — all conditions that make a liquidity drain technically and financially feasible at any time.
  • Insider dump risk: at least three top whale wallets (holding a combined ~4.34% of supply) received tokens via transfer with zero cost basis and have not yet executed any DEX swaps, meaning their entire position is unrealized profit that could be liquidated without warning.
  • Liquidity collapse risk: the $26,457 pool is insufficient to absorb even moderate sell pressure; a single whale selling their 1.53% position (~$564 at current price) would represent meaningful pool impact, and a coordinated multi-wallet exit could collapse the price to near zero.

Mitigating Factors

  • The deployer wallet's 774-day age reduces (but does not eliminate) the probability of a purely disposable rug-pull account, as maintaining a wallet for over two years before a scam is atypical.
  • The largest holder (17.71%) is a non-dumpable protocol/contract, meaning the top-10 concentration figure of 30% overstates the genuine dumpable risk, which is contained to 16.9%.

Investor Suitability

SK4B is suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who specialize in high-risk, newly launched tokens, fully understand the mechanics of BSC rug pulls and honeypots, and are prepared to lose 100% of any capital allocated. It is not suitable for retail investors, risk-averse portfolios, or anyone who cannot independently audit smart contract code.

SK4B presents a high-risk speculative opportunity with no disclosed fundamentals, an unverified contract, and multiple insider pre-allocation signals. The bull case depends entirely on organic community formation and project disclosure materializing rapidly; the bear case — which is structurally more probable given the evidence — involves insider exits and liquidity collapse before any fundamentals emerge.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The project team verifies the contract, publishes a whitepaper or project description, and establishes social channels within the next 24–48 hours. The high early transaction count (4,476 in the first hour) reflects a pre-existing community migrating to a new contract, providing a demand base. If insider wallets do not sell and liquidity deepens, the token could sustain its current price and attract broader attention.

  • Rapid contract verification and security audit publication that resolves the 41/100 security score
  • Disclosure of a credible use case or project narrative that converts the early transaction activity into sustained holder conviction

Base Case

SK4B trades with high volatility and declining volume over the next 24–72 hours as early speculative interest fades. Without project fundamentals or social infrastructure, holder count stabilizes or declines, and the token gradually loses liquidity as market makers withdraw. The token neither collapses immediately nor appreciates meaningfully, eventually becoming illiquid.

  • Insider wallets do not immediately dump but gradually reduce positions over days rather than hours
  • No project information or contract verification is published, preventing new organic demand from forming

Bear Case

High probability

The deployer or insider wallets begin selling their zero-cost-basis positions into the thin $26,457 liquidity pool, causing rapid price decline. Without a verified contract or project narrative, no new buyers emerge to absorb the sell pressure. The liquidity pool is drained or abandoned, leaving remaining holders with illiquid positions worth near zero.

  • Three confirmed insider wallets holding a combined ~4.34% of supply via transfer have zero cost basis and no disclosed lock-up, making any price level a profitable exit
  • The unverified contract could contain a liquidity-drain or honeypot function that prevents retail sells while allowing the deployer to exit

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 14, 2026, 02:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-14 14:17 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$170.567226894961578409

Market Cap

$36.9K

24h Volume

$386.4K

Holders

575

Liquidity

$26,457.08

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BSC)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis)Trading volume metrics (DEX aggregator)Smart contract security scoringDeployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet behavioral analysisToken genesis transfer reconstruction

Limitations

  • Zero OHLC price history: the token is 1 hour old, making all technical analysis, trend identification, and price target computation impossible — all technical conclusions are structural inferences rather than data-derived signals.
  • Unverified contract: without published source code, smart contract risk cannot be quantified and hidden functions (mint, blacklist, fee manipulation, liquidity drain) cannot be ruled out.
  • No project fundamentals: the absence of a project description, use case, team identity, or social presence means fundamental valuation is impossible and the analysis relies entirely on on-chain behavioral signals.
  • Smart-money data unavailable: no profitable-trader cohort data exists for this token, preventing assessment of informed-money positioning.

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Questions about YEONG?