utility

utility token Price Today & AI Analysis

utilityBNB ChainAnalysis as of Aug 12, 2026

Price

$0.000178

-4.76% 24h

Contract

Live
0xede00776439f9c49c592e43eee34777a51847777

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

5.5K

Market cap

$177.79K

Liquidity

$33.43K

More tokens on BNB Chain

MGCMGCMeta Games Coin$2.99+0.9%MC $299.04BTaiJiTaiJiTaiJi$0.1801-1.5%MC $3.78M黄金时代黄金时代Golden Age$0.041774+6.3%MC $17.7KDOYRDOYRDOYR$0.000391-0.7%MC $391.4KCOLDCOLDCold Brew$0.041510+130.5%MC $15.1Kquqquqquq$0.001560+0.2%MC $1.56M

utility token: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-12 13:15 UTC

Holder addresses

1,326

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$80,385.09
How concentrated is utility token ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,326 addresses (2026-08-12 13:15 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling utility token?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is utility token liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-12 13:15 UTC, reported liquidity was $80,385.09. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-12 13:15 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 12, 2026, 01:15 PM UTC

Market Cap

$742.36K

24h Volume

$2.23M

Liquidity

$80.39K

FDV

—

Holders

1,326

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about utility

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

G9B is a BSC-based token (contract 0xede00776…) that launched approximately 1 hour ago with a fully diluted market cap of $742,360 and $80,385 in liquidity. The project has no disclosed description, category, or use case, and its smart contract remains unverified with a security score of 43/100. Early trading shows high transaction counts but net sell-side dominance, while multiple top whale wallets received supply via direct transfer at genesis rather than purchasing on the open market. The combination of an unverified contract, unlabelled deployer funding, zero-cost-basis whale allocations, and thin liquidity places this token firmly in the very-high-risk category.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 12, 2026, 01:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extremely early stage — only 1 hour old — with all 1,326 holders acquired within that single hour, making this a live launch event rather than an established token
  • Unusually high transaction count (17,162 total transactions) for a 1-hour-old token, suggesting either genuine viral interest or coordinated wash-trading activity
  • Multiple top whale wallets with zero cost basis (received supply via transfer at genesis) represent a structurally bearish overhang that distinguishes this from tokens where whales paid market prices

utility token AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

G9B is only 1 hour old with no OHLC price history to establish a trend, but the structural signals lean bearish in the immediate term. Sell pressure dominates at 53.1% of volume, the largest recent trades are predominantly sells, and the contract is unverified with a security score of 43/100. Multiple top whale wallets received supply via transfer rather than market buys, creating latent sell-side overhang.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Without a verified contract, a disclosed use case, or any project description, G9B lacks the fundamental foundation needed to sustain price appreciation over 30–90 days. The deployer wallet was funded by an unlabelled wallet and made no prior contract deployments in its first 100 transactions, a pattern consistent with a disposable-deployer setup. Unless the team discloses a credible roadmap and gets the contract verified, sustained selling from transfer-allocated whale wallets is the most probable medium-term outcome.

Bullish Factors

  • High transaction activity in the first hour — 9,242 buys and 7,920 sells from 1,843 unique buyers signals genuine early market interest rather than a ghost launch
  • Top-10 holder concentration is only 18% of supply, and the largest single non-protocol holder controls just 2.07%, limiting the immediate dump impact from any single wallet
  • The deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8) has been active since July 2024 — 772 days old — suggesting it is not a brand-new throwaway address, which is a marginal positive relative to same-day-created deployers

Bearish Factors

  • Sell volume ($1.187M) exceeds buy volume ($1.046M) in the first hour, with sell pressure at 53.1%, indicating net capital outflow from the very start of trading
  • Three of the top individual whale wallets (holding 2.07%, 1.98%, and 1.68% of supply) acquired their positions via transfer rather than market buys, meaning they have zero cost basis and face no loss selling at any price
  • The contract is unverified and scores only 43/100 on security assessment, making it impossible for independent researchers to audit the code for hidden mint functions, backdoors, or fee manipulation
  • The deployer (0xe2ce6ab8) was funded by an unlabelled wallet (0x4deaae93), a classic disposable-deployer funding pattern that raises rug-pull risk
  • Total liquidity of only $80,385 against a $742K market cap creates a liquidity-to-mcap ratio of roughly 10.8%, meaning even modest sell pressure will cause severe price slippage

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

utility call history

Full track record →

Aug 12bearish
24h-100.0%
7d—
30d-100.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0xede0...7777
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: unverified contract + deployer funded by unlabelled wallet + zero-cost-basis pre-allocations to multiple wallets = a profile consistent with tokens designed to exit-scam after initial liquidity accumulation
  • Liquidity collapse risk: the $80K pool has already processed $2.23M in volume in one hour; if the deployer or pre-allocated wallets sell their combined ~15.9% genesis allocation into this pool, the price impact would be catastrophic
  • Information asymmetry risk: with no project description, unverified contract, and no disclosed team, retail buyers are operating with near-zero fundamental information while insiders with pre-allocated supply have full knowledge of the project's actual nature

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite a near-flat 24-hour price change of +0.17%, the underlying flow data is net negative: sell volume exceeds buy volume by approximately $140,600, and unique sellers (2,251) outnumber unique buyers (1,843). The largest individual trades captured on-chain are predominantly sells, with the biggest single transaction being a $606 sell, reinforcing the distributional character of early trading.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Neutral

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

With only 1 hour of price history and a recorded 24-hour price change of +0.17%, there is no meaningful trend to characterize — the token has essentially traded flat since launch. The identical 1h, 4h, and 24h price change figures confirm all price movement occurred in a single window, making any trend designation speculative. The sideways classification reflects the absence of directional data rather than genuine consolidation.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

No multi-period OHLC data exists to compute RSI, MACD, or other momentum indicators. The raw flow data (53.1% sell pressure, net outflow of ~$140K) provides a weak bearish momentum signal, but this is insufficient to classify the token as technically overbought or oversold without historical price context.

Volume Analysis

Buy

46.9%

Sell

53.1%

Volume Trend

Stable

All $2.23M in combined volume was generated within the token's first hour of existence. The volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 27.7x in a single hour is extremely elevated, indicating the pool is being heavily utilized relative to its depth. This level of turnover in shallow liquidity typically results in significant price impact per trade and elevated slippage risk for any position of meaningful size.

Recent Price Action

Near-flat price action (+0.17%) despite $2.23M in combined trading volume over the first hour, suggesting buy and sell pressure are roughly offsetting each other at current price levels.

Price stability in the face of high volume on a newly launched token can indicate either genuine price discovery equilibrium or active price support by insiders — given the zero-cost-basis whale allocations and unverified contract, the latter cannot be ruled out.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

87/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    The token is 1 hour old with no price history, an $80K liquidity pool, and $2.23M in first-hour volume. This combination guarantees extreme price volatility — any moderate-sized sell order will cause disproportionate price impact given the shallow pool depth.

  • LiquidityHigh

    At $80,385, the liquidity pool is severely undercapitalized relative to the $742K market cap (10.8% ratio). Exiting a position of more than a few hundred dollars will incur significant slippage, and a coordinated sell from pre-allocated whale wallets could drain the pool rapidly.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an unclassified BSC token with no disclosed jurisdiction, team, or use case, G9B faces standard DeFi regulatory uncertainty. The lack of transparency increases the probability that the token could be classified as an unregistered security in relevant jurisdictions.

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: unverified contract + deployer funded by unlabelled wallet + zero-cost-basis pre-allocations to multiple wallets = a profile consistent with tokens designed to exit-scam after initial liquidity accumulation
  • Liquidity collapse risk: the $80K pool has already processed $2.23M in volume in one hour; if the deployer or pre-allocated wallets sell their combined ~15.9% genesis allocation into this pool, the price impact would be catastrophic
  • Information asymmetry risk: with no project description, unverified contract, and no disclosed team, retail buyers are operating with near-zero fundamental information while insiders with pre-allocated supply have full knowledge of the project's actual nature

Mitigating Factors

  • Deployer wallet age of 772 days reduces (but does not eliminate) the probability of a same-day throwaway rug-pull setup
  • 100% circulating supply means no future scheduled unlock events that could create additional sell pressure beyond what already exists

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of interacting with unverified contracts on BSC, can afford to lose their entire position, and are treating any allocation as a speculative micro-cap gamble rather than an investment. It is not suitable for risk-averse investors, beginners, or anyone allocating meaningful capital.

G9B presents a highly speculative, asymmetric risk profile: the upside is limited by shallow liquidity and the absence of any fundamental narrative, while the downside includes total loss of capital from a potential rug pull or liquidity collapse. The structural evidence — unverified contract, unlabelled deployer funding, zero-cost-basis whale allocations, and net sell-side flow from launch — tilts the probability distribution firmly toward the bear case.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The team verifies the contract, publishes a credible whitepaper and roadmap, and the high first-hour transaction count (17,162 transactions) reflects genuine viral organic demand that sustains into a growing holder base. Liquidity deepens as the project gains visibility, and the 43/100 security score improves post-audit.

  • Contract verification and independent security audit that resolves the 43/100 score and builds trader confidence
  • Sustained holder growth beyond the initial launch hour, demonstrating retention rather than speculative flipping

Base Case

G9B trades with high volatility for 24–72 hours as initial speculative interest fades, then gradually loses volume and liquidity as no fundamental narrative emerges. The token drifts lower as early holders take profits and the holder count stagnates or declines, eventually becoming illiquid.

  • No rug pull occurs but no meaningful project development is disclosed either, leaving the token in a fundamental vacuum
  • The shallow liquidity pool gradually loses depth as liquidity providers withdraw, further reducing tradability over time

Bear Case

High probability

The deployer or pre-allocated wallets (holding ~15.9% of supply at zero cost basis) sell into the shallow $80K liquidity pool, triggering a price collapse. The unverified contract enables a hidden function to be executed (e.g., minting additional supply or disabling sells), resulting in total loss for retail holders.

  • Zero-cost-basis genesis allocations to multiple wallets create immediate sell incentive at any positive price
  • Unverified contract with 43/100 security score leaves the door open for malicious contract functionality to be triggered at the deployer's discretion

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 12, 2026, 01:15 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-12 13:15 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$18.939968448043419613

Market Cap

$742.4K

24h Volume

$2.23M

Holders

1,326

Liquidity

$80,385.09

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BSC, contract 0xede00776…)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)Trading volume metrics (24h buy/sell volume and transaction counts)Smart contract security assessment (43/100 score, verification status)Token genesis and deployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet behavioral lookup (DEX swap history)Notable recent on-chain swap data

Limitations

  • Zero OHLC price history available — all technical analysis is based on single-point price data and volume flows rather than multi-period candlestick patterns
  • No project documentation, whitepaper, or team disclosure available — fundamental analysis is limited to on-chain observable data only
  • Smart-money cohort data unavailable — cannot assess whether sophisticated traders are net buyers or sellers beyond the notable recent trades
  • The 1-hour token age means all metrics represent a single compressed trading session; patterns may change materially within hours of this analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. G9B in particular exhibits multiple very-high-risk characteristics including an unverified smart contract. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions. Never invest more than you can afford to lose entirely.

Track utility