Is Gaia Token (GAIA) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks. The contract owner has not given up control. Control of the contract can be handed to another wallet. Checked Nov 10, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

How concentrated is Gaia Token ownership?

The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 22,681 holder addresses (2026-05-13 08:30 UTC).

Are large holders selling Gaia Token?

Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.

Is Gaia Token liquidity falling?

Not measured: this report has no liquidity reading.

What is Gaia Token (GAIA) and what does it do?

Gaia Token (GAIA) is a cryptocurrency token. Visit our token page for detailed analytics, holder information, and trading data.

What is the current price of Gaia Token (GAIA)?

The latest available price of Gaia Token is $1.5435e-3 USD. The reported 24-hour change is -0.48%. This is a saved or indexed observation, not a live execution quote.

What is the market cap of Gaia Token?

Gaia Token has a market capitalization of $154.55K USD. Market cap is calculated by multiplying the current price by the circulating supply.

Is Gaia Token (GAIA) a good investment?

Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance. Our AI risk assessment currently rates Gaia Token as high risk. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct thorough due diligence before investing.

How many addresses hold Gaia Token?

Gaia Token currently has 23,319 holder addresses as of our latest on-chain snapshot.

What is the liquidity of Gaia Token?

Gaia Token has a total liquidity of $25.51K USD across decentralized exchanges. Higher liquidity generally means lower slippage when trading.

Gaia Token Price Today & AI Analysis

GAIABNB ChainAnalysis as of May 13, 2026

$0.001544

-0.48% 24h

Contract

Live

0xd715cc968c288740028be20685263f43ed1e4837

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

23.3K

Market cap

$154.55K

Liquidity

$25.51K

At a $1M market cap, $GAIA would be $0.009988 (6.47x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is GAIA a scam?

Unhosted check · Nov 10

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks.

The contract owner has not given up control.
Control of the contract can be handed to another wallet.

Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way.

Ask Unhosted AI about GAIA

3 free answers a day

Gaia Token: holders, selling & liquidity

Saved with the report, 2026-05-13 08:30 UTC

Holder addresses

22,681

Top 10 supply share

Not in this report

Reported liquidity

Not available

How concentrated is Gaia Token ownership?: The top-10 share isn't in this report; it counted 22,681 holder addresses (2026-05-13 08:30 UTC).
Are large holders selling Gaia Token?: Not measured: this report has no buy/sell totals or wallet history.
Is Gaia Token liquidity falling?: Not measured: this report has no liquidity reading.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-13 08:30 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from May 13, 2026, 08:30 AM UTC

Market Cap

$1.82M

24h Volume

$0.00

Liquidity

—

FDV

—

Holders

22,681

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Neutral

Gaia is an AI infrastructure token launched in April 2024 that enables developers to operate customized inference systems and manage agent workflows. The project demonstrates impressive operational metrics with 750,000 nodes, 1.6 million connected wallets, and 3 trillion processed AI tasks, suggesting real network utility. However, the token market is severely underdeveloped relative to network activity, with only 22,681 holders and 98% supply concentration in top 10 addresses, creating a significant disconnect between operational scale and token distribution.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — May 13, 2026, 08:30 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

Modular architecture separating compute, data management, and governance for precise workflow customization
One-click deployment tools and integration with popular developer frameworks reducing barriers to entry
Massive operational scale (750K nodes, 3T tasks) relative to market cap suggests either undervaluation or utility-token mismatch
Multi-chain deployment across EVM-compatible networks increasing accessibility

Gaia Token AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Neutral

The token shows minimal holder growth (0.13% in 24h) and declining 30-day trends (-0.2%), suggesting consolidation rather than strong directional momentum. With 98% of supply concentrated in top 10 holders, price movements are likely driven by whale activity rather than organic market demand. Current market cap of $1.82M relative to the project's operational scale (750K nodes, 1.6M wallets, 3T tasks processed) suggests potential undervaluation, but extreme concentration limits retail participation.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bullish

The fundamental metrics suggest medium-term bullish potential if the project can convert its operational scale into token utility adoption. With 100+ projects building on Gaia and 1.6M connected wallets, network effects could drive token demand as the ecosystem matures. However, this depends critically on whether token holders can diversify beyond the current 98% top-10 concentration and whether the governance/utility mechanisms drive genuine demand.

Bullish Factors

Massive operational scale: 750,000 nodes online and 1.6M connected wallets indicate substantial network adoption
High task volume: 3 trillion AI tasks processed demonstrates real utility and usage
Ecosystem growth: 100+ projects actively building on Gaia shows developer confidence
Market cap appears low relative to operational metrics, suggesting potential undervaluation
Verified smart contract and 61/100 security score indicates basic security standards met
Multi-chain deployment (Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks) increases accessibility

Bearish Factors

Extreme concentration risk: 98% of supply held by top 10 addresses creates massive dump risk and limits organic price discovery
Declining holder count: -46 holders over 30 days (-0.2%) suggests waning retail interest despite operational growth
Minimal retail participation: ~0.0% of supply held by retail investors indicates poor market distribution
Weak holder growth: Only 30 new holders in 24h (0.13%) is extremely low for a project claiming 1.6M connected wallets
Security score of 61/100 is below ideal standards for a token managing significant value
Unclear token utility: No specific information on how token value is derived from network activity

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

Chain: BNB Chain
Contract: 0xd715...4837
Total Supply: —
Decimals: —

Key Risks

Extreme concentration risk: 98% supply in top 10 holders creates catastrophic dump risk and prevents fair price discovery
Liquidity crisis risk: Minimal swap volume and shallow order books mean large trades could face 50%+ slippage
Token utility uncertainty: Massive gap between network participants (1.6M wallets) and token holders (22,681) suggests token may not be essential to network operation
Declining adoption: -46 holders over 30 days despite operational growth suggests retail is not adopting token

Trading Insight

neutral

Trading sentiment is cautiously neutral with slight bullish undertones from operational metrics, but tempered by poor holder growth and extreme concentration. The minimal 24-hour holder addition (30 holders) despite claimed 1.6M connected wallets suggests most network participants aren't token holders, indicating weak token-to-network correlation. Whale-dominated trading patterns mean price movements are likely driven by strategic positioning rather than organic market demand.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Neutral

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

Without historical price data, technical trend analysis cannot be reliably performed. However, holder metrics suggest consolidation rather than directional momentum. The flat holder growth (0.13% in 24h) and declining 30-day trend (-0.2%) indicate the market is in a holding pattern, likely waiting for catalysts to drive directional movement.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

Momentum indicators cannot be calculated without price and volume history. However, the minimal holder growth despite massive network activity suggests momentum is weak. The 1,123 swap acquisitions in 24h (if this represents daily volume) would be extremely low for a $1.82M market cap token, indicating low trading momentum.

Volume Analysis

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Volume Trend

Stable

Specific volume data not provided. Based on holder acquisition methods, swap volume appears minimal (1,123 acquisitions) relative to transfer volume (21,521), suggesting low organic trading activity. This indicates either a very illiquid market or that most token movement occurs off-exchange through direct transfers.

Recent Price Action

Unable to determine without historical price data

The holder distribution pattern suggests price action is likely characterized by low-volume consolidation with potential for sharp moves when whales decide to reposition

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

Unable to determine - insufficient price history

Major support

Unable to determine - insufficient price history

Immediate resistance

Unable to determine - insufficient price history

Major resistance

Unable to determine - insufficient price history

Technical levels cannot be established without historical price data. However, the extreme holder concentration suggests that key levels will be determined by whale positioning rather than traditional support/resistance patterns.

AI overall risk

High

Risk Score

72/100

Risk Breakdown

VolatilityHigh
Extreme holder concentration (98% in top 10) creates potential for sharp price swings when whales reposition. Shallow liquidity amplifies volatility. Lack of historical price data prevents volatility calculation, but concentration patterns suggest high volatility is likely.
LiquidityNot assessed
A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Smart ContractNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.
RegulatoryMedium
As an AI infrastructure token, Gaia may face regulatory scrutiny around AI governance and data management. The governance category suggests potential regulatory considerations around decision-making mechanisms.

Key Risks

Extreme concentration risk: 98% supply in top 10 holders creates catastrophic dump risk and prevents fair price discovery
Liquidity crisis risk: Minimal swap volume and shallow order books mean large trades could face 50%+ slippage
Token utility uncertainty: Massive gap between network participants (1.6M wallets) and token holders (22,681) suggests token may not be essential to network operation
Declining adoption: -46 holders over 30 days despite operational growth suggests retail is not adopting token
Whale dependency: Price entirely dependent on whale sentiment and positioning rather than organic market demand
Security concerns: 61/100 security score and lack of audit information create smart contract risk

Mitigating Factors

Massive operational scale (750K nodes, 3T tasks) demonstrates real network utility
100+ projects building on Gaia shows developer confidence in platform
Verified smart contract allows code review and reduces unknown risks
Multi-chain deployment increases accessibility and reduces single-chain risk
Project has operated since April 2024 without reported exploits

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant investors with: (1) deep understanding of concentrated token risks, (2) ability to accept potential total loss, (3) long-term conviction in Gaia's ecosystem development, and (4) capital they can afford to lose. NOT suitable for retail investors, risk-averse investors, or those seeking stable returns. The extreme concentration and liquidity risks make this a speculative position only.

Gaia presents a high-risk, potentially high-reward opportunity based on massive operational scale relative to market cap, but is severely hampered by extreme token concentration and unclear utility mechanisms. Success depends on whether the project can convert network adoption into token demand and whether concentrated holders will distribute tokens to retail participants.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Gaia becomes the dominant AI infrastructure platform, with token adoption accelerating as more enterprises and developers require tokens for network participation. Concentrated holders gradually distribute tokens to retail, improving liquidity and enabling price discovery. Token utility mechanisms drive genuine demand, and the $1.82M market cap proves to be a significant undervaluation relative to operational scale.

Ecosystem expansion to 500+ projects building on Gaia
Implementation of token-based governance that drives genuine utility
Gradual supply decentralization as concentrated holders distribute
Enterprise adoption requiring token holdings for network participation
Major partnerships with AI/ML platforms or cloud providers

Base Case

Token remains in consolidation phase with minimal retail adoption. Operational growth continues but doesn't translate to token demand. Price remains relatively flat or slowly declines as concentrated holders gradually exit. Token becomes a niche asset for ecosystem insiders rather than a widely-adopted infrastructure token.

Token utility remains unclear or limited to specific use cases
Concentrated holders maintain positions but don't actively distribute
Retail adoption remains minimal despite network growth
Liquidity remains shallow, preventing significant price discovery
Project continues operational growth but token value decouples from network metrics

Bear Case

High probability

Token proves to have minimal utility, with network participants able to use Gaia without holding tokens. Concentrated holders eventually exit positions, causing price collapse. Retail never adopts token, and it remains an illiquid insider asset. Competitors with better token distribution capture market share.

Network growth continues without corresponding token adoption
Concentrated holders begin distributing/selling, causing price crash
Regulatory scrutiny on concentrated token structures
Competitors launch with better token distribution models
Lack of clear token utility mechanisms becomes apparent

Analysis Details

Generated

May 13, 2026, 08:30 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-13 08:30 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$Unknown

Market Cap

$1.82M

24h Volume

Holders

22,681

Liquidity

Not available

Data Sources

On-chain holder distribution analyticsToken supply and market cap dataHolder acquisition methods (swap vs transfer)Security assessment and contract verification statusProject fundamentals and operational metricsHolder growth trends (24h, 7d, 30d)

Limitations

No historical price data provided - prevents technical analysis and volatility calculation
No trading volume data - prevents volume analysis and liquidity assessment
No transaction history or whale movement data - limits ability to assess recent positioning
No information on token vesting schedules or lock-ups for concentrated holders
No audit reports or detailed security assessment beyond score
No information on token utility mechanisms or governance implementation
Massive gap between claimed network participants (1.6M wallets) and token holders (22,681) suggests data inconsistency or unclear definitions
No comparable data from competitor projects for relative valuation

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile, speculative, and carry substantial risk of total loss. The extreme holder concentration and liquidity risks in this token create exceptional dangers. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own thorough research, understand the risks, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The author and firm assume no responsibility for investment decisions made based on this analysis.