$NGP

$NGP Price Today & AI Analysis

$NGPBNB ChainAnalysis as of May 30, 2026

Price

$0.001571

-0.11% 24h

Contract

Live
0xd1852cede98aaa8c11efe8600509e51fe5194132

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

61.0K

Market cap

$1.57M

Liquidity

$546.96K

At a $10M market cap, $$NGP would be $0.0100 (6.37x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Ask Unhosted AI about $NGP

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on BNB Chain

奶龙奶龙奶龙$0.000102-2.9%MC $101.7K黑洞黑洞Black Hole $0.001228+2.4%MC $1.23MBbananas只是一根香蕉$0.056157+15.8%MC $6.2K彩彩礼币彩礼币$0.057647-2.5%MC $7.6KCUDISCUDISCUDIS$0.000904+0.4%MC $519.6KUUSDUUSDUnity USD$0.9992-0.0%MC $99.92M

$NGP: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-30 14:30 UTC

Holder addresses

51,028

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is $NGP ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 51,028 addresses (2026-05-30 14:30 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling $NGP?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is $NGP liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-30 14:30 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from May 30, 2026, 02:30 PM UTC

Market Cap

$116.81M

24h Volume

$0.00

Liquidity

—

FDV

—

Holders

51,028

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

This is a BSC-based utility token with a $116.8M market cap and 1 billion total supply, currently held by 51,028 addresses. The token exhibits severe structural red flags: 88% of all supply is concentrated in just 10 wallets, with 97% held by the top 100 holders, leaving only 3% for retail investors. The project lacks any public description, social media presence, or verified smart contract, suggesting either an early-stage project with minimal marketing or a potentially abandoned token. While holder growth has been positive (9.3% over 30 days), this cannot overcome the fundamental concentration risk and lack of project legitimacy.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — May 30, 2026, 02:30 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extreme holder concentration creates unique dump risk profile not typical of established tokens
  • Transfer-based distribution (97.2% of holders) rather than swap-based suggests insider allocation model
  • Complete absence of project identity (no description, no socials) is highly unusual for a $116M market cap token
  • Unverified contract despite respectable security score indicates developer may be avoiding transparency

$NGP AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

The token faces significant headwinds in the short term due to extreme holder concentration (88% in top 10 holders) and unverified smart contract, creating substantial dump risk. Positive holder growth of 2.1% in 24h and 9.3% over 30 days suggests some retail interest, but this is insufficient to offset the structural risks. Early buyers and whales hold overwhelming supply advantage, making price discovery difficult and vulnerable to sudden liquidation.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Medium-term outlook remains challenged by the token's fundamental structure: 97% of supply concentrated in top 100 holders creates a precarious situation where any coordinated selling could trigger cascading liquidations. The lack of project description, social presence, and unverified contract suggests this may be an abandoned or low-effort project. Unless significant development activity, community building, or use case clarification emerges, the token faces continued downward pressure.

Bullish Factors

  • Holder growth of 9.3% over 30 days indicates expanding retail interest despite concentration risks
  • 51,028 total holders shows the token has achieved some market penetration and awareness
  • Security score of 77/100 is respectable, suggesting the contract has passed basic security checks despite being unverified
  • Utility/Project token classification suggests intended functionality beyond pure speculation

Bearish Factors

  • Extreme concentration: 88% of supply in top 10 holders creates catastrophic dump risk and prevents organic price discovery
  • 97% of supply in top 100 holders means only 3% is held by retail, indicating massive power imbalance
  • Unverified smart contract despite 77/100 security score raises questions about transparency and developer commitment
  • Complete absence of project description, social links, and community presence suggests abandoned or low-effort project
  • Only 1,472 holders acquired via swap (2.8%) vs 49,556 via transfer (97.2%) indicates this is primarily a transfer/distribution token, not organic trading
  • No airdrops recorded despite 51,028 holders suggests concentrated initial distribution to insiders

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0xd185...4132
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Extreme concentration (88% in top 10 holders) creates catastrophic dump risk and price manipulation vulnerability
  • Unverified smart contract combined with zero project transparency raises rug pull and hidden supply risks
  • Complete absence of social media, project description, or community engagement suggests project abandonment or developer evasion
  • Transfer-based distribution model (97.2%) indicates insider allocation rather than organic adoption, suggesting early buyers lack conviction

Trading Insight

bearish

Market sentiment is decidedly bearish due to structural concentration risks overwhelming any positive holder growth metrics. The 2.1% holder growth in 24 hours and 9.3% over 30 days shows some retail accumulation, but this is occurring in an environment where 88% of supply is held by 33 whales and 2 sharks. Trading patterns suggest this is primarily a transfer/distribution token rather than an actively traded asset, with 97.2% of holders acquiring via transfer rather than swap.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Neutral

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

Without historical price data, traditional technical analysis cannot be performed. However, the holder distribution pattern suggests the token has likely been in a sideways consolidation phase, with price discovery suppressed by extreme concentration. Any price movement would likely be driven by whale decisions rather than technical patterns, making traditional technical analysis unreliable for this token.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

Momentum indicators cannot be assessed without price history and volume data. The positive holder growth (9.3% over 30 days) could suggest building momentum among retail investors, but this is offset by the structural concentration that prevents meaningful price appreciation without whale participation.

Volume Analysis

Buy

50%

Sell

50%

Volume Trend

Stable

Volume trend cannot be definitively assessed without historical data. The transfer-heavy holder acquisition pattern (97.2% transfers vs 2.8% swaps) suggests historically low swap volume relative to holder count. This indicates potential liquidity challenges and high slippage risk for any trader attempting to exit positions of meaningful size.

Recent Price Action

Unable to determine without price history data

Price action analysis requires historical price data not provided in the on-chain metrics. The holder concentration structure suggests price has likely been artificially suppressed or manipulated by whale activity rather than reflecting organic market sentiment.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

Unable to determine without price history

Major support

Unable to determine without price history

Immediate resistance

Unable to determine without price history

Major resistance

Unable to determine without price history

Key technical levels cannot be established without historical price data. In a token with 88% concentration in top 10 holders, traditional support/resistance levels are less meaningful than whale accumulation/distribution levels, which are not visible in this data.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    The extreme holder concentration (88% in top 10) means price movements will be driven by whale decisions rather than market forces, creating unpredictable and potentially violent price swings. Any whale distribution could trigger cascading selling.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an uncategorized token with no clear utility, regulatory classification is uncertain. If classified as a security, holders could face legal complications. The lack of project documentation makes regulatory compliance assessment impossible.

Key Risks

  • Extreme concentration (88% in top 10 holders) creates catastrophic dump risk and price manipulation vulnerability
  • Unverified smart contract combined with zero project transparency raises rug pull and hidden supply risks
  • Complete absence of social media, project description, or community engagement suggests project abandonment or developer evasion
  • Transfer-based distribution model (97.2%) indicates insider allocation rather than organic adoption, suggesting early buyers lack conviction
  • 100% circulating supply with no burn mechanism means no supply scarcity or future dilution protection
  • Shallow liquidity (inferred from transfer-heavy acquisition) creates high slippage and exit risk for retail holders
  • Regulatory uncertainty due to undefined token category and lack of project documentation

Mitigating Factors

  • Positive holder growth (9.3% over 30 days) suggests some retail interest and market awareness
  • 77/100 security score indicates basic contract structure has passed security checks
  • 51,028 total holders shows the token has achieved some market penetration
  • BSC blockchain is mature and monitored, reducing infrastructure risk

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant investors with: (1) ability to lose entire investment, (2) deep understanding of concentration risks and whale dynamics, (3) willingness to conduct extensive due diligence before investing, (4) no need for liquidity or exit flexibility. This is NOT suitable for: retail investors, risk-averse investors, those seeking stable returns, or anyone unable to afford total loss. The extreme risks make this a speculative position only, not an investment.

The investment thesis for this token is fundamentally challenged by extreme structural risks that outweigh any potential upside. The 88% concentration in top 10 holders, combined with an unverified contract and complete lack of project transparency, creates a risk/reward profile that is unfavorable for most investors. While positive holder growth suggests some retail interest, this cannot overcome the fundamental concentration risk and lack of project legitimacy.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the project team emerges with a clear roadmap, verifies the smart contract, establishes social media presence, and begins building community, the token could benefit from: (1) retail FOMO as awareness spreads, (2) whale accumulation if fundamentals improve, (3) exchange listings on major platforms, (4) partnership announcements or use case clarification. In this scenario, the $116.8M market cap could grow 5-10x if the project gains traction.

  • Project team transparency and communication
  • Smart contract verification and security audit
  • Clear roadmap and utility demonstration
  • Community building and social media engagement
  • Major exchange listings or partnerships

Base Case

Most likely scenario: the token remains in a holding pattern with slow positive holder growth (5-10% monthly) but no significant price appreciation. Whales maintain their 88% concentration and use the token as a speculative position. Retail holders gradually accumulate small positions, but lack of project transparency prevents mainstream adoption. The token trades sideways with occasional whale-driven volatility spikes. Market cap remains in the $100-150M range without significant catalysts.

  • Project team remains inactive or minimally engaged
  • Smart contract remains unverified
  • No major partnerships or exchange listings occur
  • Whale concentration remains stable at 88%
  • Retail holder growth continues at 5-10% monthly rate

Bear Case

High probability

If the project remains abandoned or developers continue avoiding transparency, the token faces: (1) continued whale concentration and dump risk, (2) retail investor losses as early buyers take profits, (3) delisting from exchanges due to lack of trading volume, (4) regulatory scrutiny due to undefined category and lack of documentation. In this scenario, the token could decline 50-90% as retail holders exit and liquidity dries up.

  • Continued lack of project transparency and communication
  • Whale distribution and profit-taking
  • Declining retail interest as project legitimacy questions persist
  • Regulatory action or exchange delisting
  • Liquidity collapse as trading volume declines

Analysis Details

Generated

May 30, 2026, 02:30 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-30 14:30 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$Unknown

Market Cap

$116.81M

24h Volume

$0

Holders

51,028

Liquidity

Not available

Data Sources

On-chain holder distribution analyticsTransaction acquisition methods (swap vs transfer)Holder growth metrics (24h, 7d, 30d)Smart contract security scoringToken supply and circulation dataHolder tier classification (whales, sharks, dolphins, fish, octopus)

Limitations

  • No historical price data available - prevents technical analysis and trend assessment
  • No trading volume data - prevents liquidity assessment and volume trend analysis
  • No project description or documentation - prevents fundamental analysis of use case and value proposition
  • No social media or community data - prevents community strength assessment
  • No recent whale transaction data - prevents assessment of current whale sentiment and movements
  • No exchange listing data - prevents assessment of trading venues and liquidity sources
  • No audit or security review data - prevents detailed smart contract risk assessment
  • Transfer-based acquisition data is historical - does not reflect current trading patterns

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or solicitation to buy or sell. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile, speculative, and carry substantial risk of total loss. The extreme concentration and lack of transparency in this token create risks that are difficult to quantify and potentially catastrophic. Always conduct your own thorough research, verify all claims independently, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This analysis is based on available on-chain data and may be incomplete or inaccurate. The author assumes no liability for investment losses resulting from reliance on this analysis.

Questions about $NGP?