FTR

flying tesla roadster Price Today & AI Analysis

FTRBNB ChainAnalysis as of Aug 14, 2026

Price

$0.047233

+37.27% 24h

Contract

Live
0xcc07fc68826580230a133c8c08bcab54b3c97777

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

628

Market cap

$72.33K

Liquidity

$15.22K

Ask Unhosted AI about FTR

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on BNB Chain

TSMBTSMBTSMC$451.37+0.0%MC $4.24MASPASPASPECTA$0.0112-1.2%MC $7.61M猫天天猫天天Alibaba Cat$0.042735+0.6%MC $27.3KCOWCOWCowcoin$0.0143+0.2%MC $14.30MMSFTonMSFTonMicrosoft (Ondo Tokenized)$516.63-1.0%MC $2.80Mquqquqquq$0.001609+3.2%MC $1.61M

flying tesla roadster: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-14 14:15 UTC

Holder addresses

761

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$39,722.08
How concentrated is flying tesla roadster ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 761 addresses (2026-08-14 14:15 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling flying tesla roadster?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is flying tesla roadster liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-14 14:15 UTC, reported liquidity was $39,722.08. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-14 14:15 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 14, 2026, 02:15 PM UTC

Market Cap

$149.28K

24h Volume

$912.30K

Liquidity

$39.72K

FDV

—

Holders

761

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

T4B is a BSC token (0xcc07fc68…) that launched approximately 1 hour ago with a total and circulating supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens, a current price of ~$348 per token, and a market cap of ~$149,278. The token has no published description, no social links, no verified contract, and a security score of 42/100, placing it firmly in the high-risk, speculative category. Early trading shows high transaction velocity but a slight net sell bias, while token genesis data reveals that multiple top whale wallets received supply via transfer rather than open-market purchases, indicating insider pre-allocation. The deployer profile and funding source raise additional red flags consistent with a disposable-deployer pattern.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 14, 2026, 02:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extremely early stage — only 1 hour old with 761 holders entirely acquired since launch, providing no historical price or trend data
  • Insider pre-allocation evident: three top whale wallets (combined ~7.66% of supply) received positions via transfer with no DEX swap history, not through market buys
  • Deployer wallet funded by an unlabelled wallet with zero prior contract deployments, fitting a disposable-deployer risk pattern

flying tesla roadster AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

T4B is only 1 hour old with no OHLC price history to establish a trend, making any directional call speculative. However, sell pressure marginally dominates at 50.8% sell vs 49.2% buy, sell transactions outnumber buys 4,343 to 3,804, and three of the top individual whale wallets received their positions via transfer rather than market buys — all of which lean bearish in the immediate term. The combination of an unverified contract, a security score of 42/100, and insider-allocated supply creates meaningful downside risk in the first 24–72 hours.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Without a verified contract, any project description, social presence, or established use case, T4B has no fundamental anchor to sustain price appreciation over 30–90 days. The deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8…) was funded by an unlabelled wallet and made zero contract deployments in its first 100 transactions, fitting a disposable-deployer pattern that historically correlates with short-lived tokens. Unless the team surfaces verifiable utility, verifies the contract, and builds community, the medium-term trajectory is structurally bearish.

Bullish Factors

  • High transaction velocity in the first hour — 3,577 buy transactions and 1,180 unique buyers within 60 minutes signals genuine early market interest rather than a ghost launch.
  • The largest single holder (13.51%) is classified as a protocol/contract, meaning that block of supply is structurally locked and not a near-term dump threat.
  • Dumpable supply from individual whales totals only 23.7%, which is moderate and limits the maximum single-event sell pressure.

Bearish Factors

  • Sell transactions outnumber buy transactions 4,343 vs 3,804 in the first hour of trading, and sell volume ($463,038) exceeds buy volume ($449,258), indicating net outflow from the outset.
  • Three of the top individual whale wallets (2.75%, 2.50%, 2.41% of supply) received their positions via transfer with no DEX swap history on this token — classic insider pre-allocation that can be sold into any price rise.
  • The deployer (0xe2ce6ab8…) was funded by an unlabelled wallet and recorded zero contract deployments in its first 100 on-chain transactions, a disposable-deployer pattern associated with elevated rug risk.
  • Security score of 42/100 with an unverified contract means the code has not been publicly audited and could contain hidden mint, pause, or fee functions.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

FTR call history

Full track record →

Aug 14bearish
24h-100.0%
7d—
30d-100.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0xcc07...7777
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: unverified contract, deployer funded by unlabelled wallet, circular genesis transfers, and zero project documentation collectively match the profile of tokens that are abandoned or drained within hours to days of launch.
  • Insider dump risk: three top whale wallets holding a combined ~7.66% of supply received positions via transfer at launch and have not executed any DEX swaps yet — they can sell into the current retail demand at any time, and the $39,722 liquidity pool cannot absorb large sells without catastrophic price impact.
  • Zero fundamental value anchor: with no use case, no verified contract, no team, and no community, there is no non-speculative reason for the token to hold value once initial trading momentum fades.

Trading Insight

bearish

Market sentiment is marginally bearish: sell pressure stands at 50.8% vs buy pressure at 49.2%, and sell transactions (4,343) outnumber buy transactions (3,804) in the token's first hour of existence. The near-parity suggests the market is not in panic mode, but the consistent sell-side edge across both transaction count and volume points to early holders — likely insiders — distributing into retail demand.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Neutral

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

With only 1 hour of trading history and no OHLC data available, it is impossible to establish a meaningful price trend. The token has not yet formed any swing highs or lows from which support or resistance can be derived. All trend classifications here reflect the absence of data rather than a genuine sideways market structure.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

No RSI, MACD, or other momentum indicators can be computed without historical OHLC data. The marginal sell-side edge in transaction counts and volume is the only available momentum proxy, and it is too weak to classify as oversold or overbought.

Volume Analysis

Buy

49.2%

Sell

50.8%

Volume Trend

Stable

All volume data collapses into a single ~1-hour window, so no multi-period volume trend exists. The $912,296 total 24h volume against a $149,278 market cap is a 6x+ turnover ratio, characteristic of speculative launch-day activity rather than organic sustained demand.

Recent Price Action

The token launched at an unknown price and currently trades at ~$348. Sub-1% moves across the 1h, 4h, and 24h windows are noise given the token's age and cannot be interpreted as a pattern.

No actionable pattern can be identified from a single hour of price data. The apparent price stability may reflect market maker activity or thin liquidity rather than genuine equilibrium.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    With only 1 hour of price history, no OHLC baseline, and a volume-to-market-cap ratio exceeding 6x, price volatility is structurally extreme. Any shift in insider selling behavior could move the price by 50%+ given the shallow liquidity.

  • LiquidityHigh

    The $39,722 liquidity pool is shallow relative to the $149,278 market cap and the $912,296 in 24h volume. Large exits will face severe slippage, and liquidity could be withdrawn by the deployer at any time given the unverified contract.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an uncategorized BSC token with no disclosed team or jurisdiction, T4B faces the standard regulatory uncertainty applicable to anonymous DeFi tokens, including potential classification as an unregistered security in various jurisdictions.

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: unverified contract, deployer funded by unlabelled wallet, circular genesis transfers, and zero project documentation collectively match the profile of tokens that are abandoned or drained within hours to days of launch.
  • Insider dump risk: three top whale wallets holding a combined ~7.66% of supply received positions via transfer at launch and have not executed any DEX swaps yet — they can sell into the current retail demand at any time, and the $39,722 liquidity pool cannot absorb large sells without catastrophic price impact.
  • Zero fundamental value anchor: with no use case, no verified contract, no team, and no community, there is no non-speculative reason for the token to hold value once initial trading momentum fades.

Mitigating Factors

  • The deployer wallet is 774 days old, which is atypical for purely disposable wallets and may indicate some reputational stake in the deployment.
  • The 13.51% protocol/contract holding is structurally locked and cannot be sold into the market, providing a modest supply-side buffer.

Investor Suitability

T4B is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of newly launched, unverified tokens, can afford to lose 100% of any capital deployed, and are actively monitoring positions in real time. It is entirely unsuitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with BSC memecoin and launch-phase dynamics.

T4B presents a high-risk, speculative micro-cap launch with no verifiable fundamentals, an unverified contract, and clear insider pre-allocation signals. The investment thesis is almost entirely momentum-dependent: the token either sustains early trading velocity and attracts enough new buyers to absorb insider supply, or it collapses once that momentum fades.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Early trading velocity (8,147 transactions, $912K volume in the first hour) attracts viral attention, the deployer publishes a credible project narrative and verifies the contract, and the 761-holder base grows rapidly. Insider wallets hold rather than dump, allowing price to appreciate as new retail capital enters the shallow liquidity pool.

  • Sustained high transaction velocity drawing organic community attention and new holder growth
  • Deployer takes steps to verify the contract and publish project documentation, reducing perceived risk

Base Case

T4B experiences a sharp initial price spike driven by launch-day speculation, followed by a rapid decline as early holders take profits and insider supply enters the market. The token stabilizes at a fraction of its launch price with a small residual holder base, similar to the majority of uncategorized BSC launches.

  • Insider wallets begin distributing supply within the first 24–48 hours as is typical for transfer-allocated positions
  • No verifiable project fundamentals emerge to attract sustained institutional or retail interest beyond the initial speculative wave

Bear Case

High probability

Insider wallets (23.7% dumpable supply) begin selling into retail demand within hours, the $39,722 liquidity pool is overwhelmed, price collapses 70–90%+, and the token is abandoned with no further development. This is the modal outcome for tokens matching this risk profile.

  • Pre-allocated insider wallets selling into the open market with no lock-up or vesting constraints
  • Failure to publish any project documentation or verify the contract, leading to loss of retail confidence

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 14, 2026, 02:15 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-14 14:15 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$348.027275587879842078

Market Cap

$149.3K

24h Volume

$912.3K

Holders

761

Liquidity

$39,722.08

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BSC)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis tier classification)Trading volume and buy/sell pressure metricsSmart contract security scoringToken genesis and deployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet acquisition method lookupNotable recent DEX swap data

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history exists — the token is only 1 hour old, making all technical analysis and price target generation impossible; all trend and momentum assessments are based on transaction-level data only.
  • Smart-money (profitable trader cohort) data is unavailable, removing a key signal for assessing whether informed capital is accumulating or distributing.
  • No project documentation, team identity, or use case is available, making fundamental valuation impossible and forcing the analysis to rely entirely on on-chain behavioral signals.

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Questions about FTR?