underdog

underdog Price Today & AI Analysis

underdog
BNB Chain·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 26, 2026

$0.053679

+0.00%24h
LiveContract:0xca515fecd3b952e56bece246aa1201e3cf124444Chain:BNB ChainHolders:282Market cap:$3.68KLiquidity:$3.42K

More tokens on BNB Chain

MEMECOIN

MEMECOIN

MEME

$0.0536880.0%
MC $3.7K
好运

好运

HY

$0.0535050.0%
MC $3.5K
Kareem

Kareem

Kareem

$0.0564371.4%
MC $6.4K
CS

CS

CZ vs Star

$0.0544630.0%
MC $4.5K
N

NOW

人生没有假如过去但可以把握现在

$0.0525010.0%
MC $2.5K
D

DEBIT

Teller

$1.653.2%
MC $165.18M

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about underdog

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since reportreport from Jul 26, 2026, 03:00 PM UTC
Market Cap

$70.17K

24h Volume

$1.02M

Liquidity

$26.09K

FDV

—

Holders

775

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

—

AI Executive Summary

Underdog (UNDERDOG) is a meme token launched approximately 1 hour ago on BNB Chain via the Four.meme launchpad, with a current market cap of $70,175 and only $26,094 in liquidity. The token has no project description, no social links, an unverified smart contract, and a security score of 61/100. Genesis forensics reveal that the entire 1 billion token supply was minted and redistributed through a chain of wallets before trading began, with multiple top holders receiving allocations via transfer rather than open-market purchases. The combination of extreme youth, thin liquidity, unverified contract, and pre-distributed supply to zero-cost-basis wallets places this token firmly in the very high risk category.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jul 26, 2026, 03:00 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: neutral
Launched only 1 hour ago via Four.meme on BNB Chain with all 775 holders acquired within that single hour
Multiple top individual whale wallets received supply via transfer at launch with zero cost basis, creating immediate dump risk
Unverified smart contract with no project description or social presence, offering no fundamental value proposition

underdog AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

At just 1 hour old, 'underdog' is exhibiting the classic pump-and-dump volatility pattern of a freshly launched meme token on BNB Chain via Four.meme. The -24% 1-hour decline following a 35% 4-hour spike signals that early recipients are already distributing into retail buying pressure. With only $26,094 in liquidity backing a $70,175 market cap, any sustained sell pressure will cause severe price impact.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

The medium-term outlook is bearish given the token's structural weaknesses: no verified contract, no project description, no social presence, and a deployer wallet with an unknown funding source. The holder trajectory data shows a declining trend with all 775 holders acquired within the past hour, which is consistent with a launch pump rather than organic community growth. Without a fundamental use case or community infrastructure, sustained price appreciation over 30–90 days is highly unlikely.

Bullish Factors
  • +Buy transactions (7,224) slightly outnumber sell transactions (6,865) in the 24h window, with buy pressure at 50.2% vs. sell pressure at 49.8%, indicating marginally more buying activity so far.
  • +The top holder (18.74%) is classified as a protocol/contract rather than a dumpable individual whale, meaning the largest single concentration is not an immediate sell risk.
Bearish Factors
  • -The token is only 1 hour old with a -24% price drop in the last hour alone, indicating the initial pump is already reversing sharply.
  • -Nine of the top 10 individual whale wallets acquired their positions via transfer rather than market buys, meaning 17.7% of dumpable supply was handed out at launch and has zero cost basis — these holders can sell at any price for profit.
  • -The unverified smart contract (security score 61/100, contract not verified) on a token with no description or social links is a critical red flag for rug-pull risk.
  • -Total liquidity of only $26,094 against a $70,175 market cap yields a liquidity-to-market-cap ratio below 40%, meaning even modest sell orders will cause extreme slippage.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

underdog call history

Full track record →
Jul 26bearish
24h-88.5%
7d-93.3%
30d-94.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBNB Chain
Contract0xca51...4444
Total Supply—
Decimals—

Key Risks

•Rug pull or liquidity removal risk: the unverified contract and unknown deployer funding source mean the pool provider could remove liquidity at any time, leaving holders unable to sell
•Zero-cost-basis insider dump: nine individual whale wallets holding a combined 17.7% of supply received their tokens via transfer at launch and can sell at any price for 100% profit, creating persistent downward pressure
•Token age and survivorship: the vast majority of Four.meme meme tokens launched at this scale lose 90%+ of their value within 24–72 hours as speculative interest fades and insiders exit

Trading Insight

neutral

Despite a near-even buy/sell split (50.2% buy pressure vs. 49.8% sell pressure) and roughly balanced volumes ($509,209 buys vs. $506,157 sells), the -24% price drop in the last hour reveals that sell-side pressure is winning on price impact. The high transaction counts — over 14,000 combined buy and sell transactions in 24 hours for a 1-hour-old token — suggest bot activity or coordinated trading rather than organic retail participation.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bearish
Medium-Term (30d):
Bearish

With no OHLC history available, trend assessment relies on the available price performance windows. The token spiked +35% in its first 4 hours but has since reversed -24% in the last hour and -13.9% in the last 5 minutes, indicating the initial pump has peaked and a downtrend is now in progress. There is no medium-term price history to assess, but the structural setup — thin liquidity, zero-cost-basis insider supply, and no fundamental catalyst — points to continued downward pressure.

Momentum

Status:
Overbought

A 35% price spike within the first hour of launch on a meme token with $26K liquidity and no fundamentals is a textbook overbought condition. The subsequent -24% hourly reversal confirms momentum has shifted decisively to the downside, with the 5-minute -13.9% move suggesting accelerating sell pressure.

Volume Analysis

Buy 50.2%Sell 49.8%

Volume Trend: Stable

All volume data reflects the token's single hour of existence, so no meaningful trend can be established. The $1,015,366 total volume at a 14.5x market cap ratio is consistent with launch-day bot activity and speculative flipping rather than sustained organic demand.

Recent Price Action

Sharp initial pump (+35% in 4 hours) followed by rapid reversal (-24% in 1 hour, -13.9% in 5 minutes), forming a classic 'pump and dump' price structure on a micro-cap meme token.

This pattern on a freshly launched Four.meme token with pre-distributed insider supply typically indicates the initial pump phase is exhausted and the distribution phase — where early recipients sell into retail buyers — is underway.

Holder Metrics

Total Holders775
24h Change+775
Growth Rate+100%

All 775 holders were acquired within the token's 1-hour lifespan, so the 100% 24h/7d/30d growth figures simply reflect the token going from zero to 775 holders since launch. The holder trajectory is already classified as 'declining,' meaning the rate of new holder acquisition is slowing — a bearish signal for a token this young, as it suggests the initial wave of speculative interest is fading.

Holder Distribution

Top 10 Holders31%
Top 100 Holders73%
Retail Holders27.0%
Concentration Risk:
Medium

While the top 10 holders control 31% of supply, the largest single position (18.74%) is a protocol/contract that is not dumpable. The genuine dumpable supply — held by individual whales who received tokens via transfer at launch — is 17.7%, which represents a medium concentration risk. The top 100 holders controlling 73% of supply with only 27% in retail hands is typical for a brand-new meme token but limits organic price discovery.

Whale Activity

Sentiment:
Distributing

The largest recent on-chain swaps are modest in absolute terms: the biggest buy was $400 (0xeb91f8…) and the largest sells were $193 and $184 (0x56c27d… and 0x3d99d3…, with 0x56c27d… executing two sells totaling $377 and 0x3d99d3… executing two sells totaling $359). No single whale has executed a large liquidation event yet, but the pattern of multiple small sells from the same wallets suggests systematic distribution.

  • •BUY $400 by 0xeb91f8… — largest single buy in the notable trades window
  • •SELL $193 + $184 by 0x56c27d… — same wallet executed two sells totaling $377, consistent with staged distribution

The notable recent trades show no large individual whale liquidations, but the repeat-seller pattern (two wallets each executing multiple sells) is consistent with early recipients systematically offloading their zero-cost-basis allocations in small tranches to minimize price impact. This distribution behavior, combined with the -24% hourly price drop, suggests the sell-side is winning despite near-balanced transaction counts.

Smart Money Indicators

Confidence:
Low
Profit-Taking Risk:
High

Smart-money data is unavailable for this token. No profitable-trader cohort data exists.

Smart-money data is unavailable for this token. Given that multiple top holders received supply via transfer at launch with zero cost basis, any sale by these wallets constitutes 100% profit — making profit-taking risk structurally high regardless of smart-money signals.

Liquidity Analysis

Total Liquidity$26,094
Depth:
Shallow
Slippage Risk:
High

At $26,094 in total liquidity against a $70,175 market cap, the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio is approximately 37%. This is extremely shallow — a sell order of even a few thousand dollars will cause significant price impact and slippage. The thin liquidity pool also makes the token vulnerable to liquidity removal by the pool provider, which could render the token untradeable.

Overall Risk:
Very High
91/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

A +35% spike followed by a -24% reversal within the token's first hour demonstrates extreme volatility. With only $26K in liquidity, even small trades cause outsized price swings, and the token could lose 80–100% of its value within hours if insider wallets begin liquidating.

Liquidity
High

Total liquidity of $26,094 is critically thin relative to the $70,175 market cap. Large sell orders will face severe slippage, and there is no guarantee the liquidity pool will not be removed by its provider, potentially trapping holders.

Concentration
Medium

Dumpable supply is 17.7%, held by individual whales who received tokens via transfer at launch with zero cost basis. While the largest single holder is a non-dumpable protocol contract, the nine individual whale wallets in the top 10 collectively represent a meaningful and immediate sell risk.

Smart Contract
High

The contract is unverified (security score 61/100), meaning hidden functions cannot be ruled out. The deployer was funded by an unknown source, and the full supply was pre-distributed through a chain of wallets before trading — a pattern consistent with coordinated launch setups.

Regulatory
Medium

As a meme token with no utility launched on BNB Chain, it faces the same general regulatory uncertainty applicable to all unregistered crypto assets. No specific regulatory red flags beyond the standard meme token classification.

Key Risks

  • •Rug pull or liquidity removal risk: the unverified contract and unknown deployer funding source mean the pool provider could remove liquidity at any time, leaving holders unable to sell
  • •Zero-cost-basis insider dump: nine individual whale wallets holding a combined 17.7% of supply received their tokens via transfer at launch and can sell at any price for 100% profit, creating persistent downward pressure
  • •Token age and survivorship: the vast majority of Four.meme meme tokens launched at this scale lose 90%+ of their value within 24–72 hours as speculative interest fades and insiders exit

Mitigating Factors

  • •The deployer wallet is 482 days old with no prior contract deployments, which is a less alarming profile than a freshly created disposable deployer wallet
  • •The largest holder (18.74%) is a protocol/contract rather than an individual whale, meaning the single largest supply concentration is not an immediate sell risk

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who specialize in micro-cap meme token speculation, fully understand the risks of unverified contracts and insider supply, and are prepared to lose their entire investment. It is entirely unsuitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing more than they can afford to lose completely.

Underdog is a 1-hour-old meme token with no fundamentals, an unverified contract, and pre-distributed insider supply — making it a high-risk speculative instrument with a structurally bearish setup. The only viable thesis is a short-term momentum trade, and even that is undermined by the already-reversing price action.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

The token gains viral traction on social media (e.g., Twitter/X or Telegram), driving a new wave of retail buyers that overwhelms insider selling pressure and pushes the market cap to $500K–$1M+ within 24–48 hours, consistent with successful Four.meme launches.

  • +Viral social media discovery driving rapid new holder acquisition
  • +Influencer promotion or organic meme spread creating sustained buy pressure
Base Case

The token experiences continued volatility over the next 24 hours as early recipients distribute their holdings, with price declining 50–80% from current levels as speculative interest fades and no new catalysts emerge to sustain buying pressure.

  • •No viral social media catalyst emerges to drive a second wave of retail buying
  • •Insider wallets with zero cost basis continue gradual distribution rather than a single large dump
Bear Case
High

Insider wallets with zero-cost-basis allocations continue systematic distribution into retail buyers, liquidity is removed or drained through slippage, and the token loses 80–100% of its current value within 24–72 hours — the most common outcome for Four.meme launches of this profile.

  • -Nine individual whale wallets selling their zero-cost-basis transfer allocations into any price recovery
  • -Thin $26K liquidity amplifying price impact of even modest sell orders, accelerating the decline

Analysis Details

GeneratedJul 26, 2026, 03:00 PM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data as of analysis timestamp; token age approximately 1 hour
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.000069553627659447
Market Cap$70.2K
24h Volume$1.02M
Holders775
Liquidity$26.1K

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain)
Holder distribution analytics (Moralis)
Trading volume metrics (DEX aggregator)
Smart contract analysis (security scoring)
Token genesis and deployer wallet forensics
Whale wallet behavioral analysis

Limitations

  • •No OHLC price history exists for this 1-hour-old token, making technical analysis and price target derivation impossible
  • •No smart money or profitable-trader cohort data is available, limiting insight into informed investor behavior
  • •The unverified smart contract cannot be analyzed for hidden functions or malicious code
  • •All holder and volume data reflects only the token's first hour of existence, making trend analysis statistically unreliable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track underdog