O

Optimus Price Today & AI Analysis

OPTIMUSBNB ChainAnalysis as of Jul 31, 2026

Price

$0.041757

-1.47% 24h

Contract

Live
0xc31da60f29f40d2d03025a3e47a9e5d625f17777

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

230

Market cap

$17.57K

Liquidity

$7.63K

At a $1M market cap, $OPTIMUS would be $0.001000 (56.9x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is OPTIMUS a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 29

Not checked

This contract has not been tested for honeypots or taxes yet.

Launch wallets hold

0.83%6 bundlers still holding

The honeypot and tax test has not run on this contract yet, so no red flags here does not mean a clean contract. Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about OPTIMUS

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on BNB Chain

Ccacrypto adoption$0.053911-1.3%MC $3.9KDEMODEMODemo Agent$0.053602-1.6%MC $3.6K修理工小猫修理工小猫修理工小猫$0.056700+1.1%MC $6.7Kimmortalimmortalimmortal$0.053328-1.1%MC $3.3K真真武真武$0.053287-0.2%MC $3.3KPPREDICTPredict.fun$0.0571+228775.3%MC $57.11M

Optimus: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-31 10:00 UTC

Holder addresses

489

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$35,370.63
How concentrated is Optimus ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 489 addresses (2026-07-31 10:00 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Optimus?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Optimus liquidity falling?
As of 2026-07-31 10:00 UTC, reported liquidity was $35,370.63. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-31 10:00 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Jul 31, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC

Market Cap

$137.55K

24h Volume

$480.24K

Liquidity

$35.37K

FDV

—

Holders

489

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

T4B is a BSC-based token (BEP-20) that is exactly 1 hour old at the time of this analysis, with a market cap of approximately $137,550 and total liquidity of $35,371. The token launched with 1 billion total supply fully circulating, and all 489 current holders acquired their positions within the first hour — 488 via swap and 1 via transfer. The contract is unverified, no project description or social presence exists, and the deployer was funded by an unlabelled wallet, collectively presenting a very high-risk profile consistent with speculative or potentially disposable token launches. Multiple top whale wallets received supply via transfer rather than open-market purchases, indicating pre-distributed insider allocations.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jul 31, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Entire holder base of 489 wallets was established within a single hour of launch, an unusually rapid distribution pattern.
  • The largest holder (12.66%) is classified as a protocol/contract and is not a dumpable-whale risk, but the next nine individual whale holders collectively control 14.99% of dumpable supply.
  • Deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8…) has a 760-day history but zero contract deployments in its earliest 100 transactions, suggesting this is not a serial professional launcher but the funding source remains unlabelled.

Optimus AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

T4B is only 1 hour old, with sell pressure marginally dominating at 50.8% and sell transactions outnumbering buys (2,658 vs 2,376 in 24h). The token launched with all 489 holders acquiring positions within the first hour, and the slight net outflow suggests early recipients are already distributing. With no price history to anchor support and multiple whale wallets that received supply via transfer rather than market buys, downward pressure is the more probable near-term direction.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Without a verified contract, no project description, no social presence, and a deployer funded by an unlabelled wallet, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The token's entire holder base was established in a single hour, and the top individual whales all received their positions via transfer rather than open-market purchases, creating a structural overhang of pre-distributed supply. Sustained price appreciation would require organic demand that has not yet materialized.

Bullish Factors

  • High transaction activity for a 1-hour-old token: 2,376 buys and 985 unique buyers in the first hour suggest initial market interest.
  • Dumpable supply is relatively contained at 20.9% (individual whales), with the largest single holder being a protocol/contract at 12.66% that is not a sell risk.

Bearish Factors

  • Sell transactions (2,658) and unique sellers (1,056) exceed buy transactions and buyers in the same window, indicating net distribution pressure from launch.
  • All three audited whale wallets (2.16%, 2.02%, 1.99% of supply) received their positions via transfer with no DEX swap history, confirming pre-distributed insider allocations rather than market conviction.
  • Contract is unverified and no project description or social links exist, removing any fundamental basis for valuation.
  • Deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8…) was funded by an unlabelled wallet (0x4deaae93…), a disposable-deployer pattern associated with elevated rug risk.
  • Total liquidity of only $35,371 against a $137,550 market cap yields a liquidity-to-mcap ratio below 26%, meaning even modest sell pressure will cause severe price impact.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

OPTIMUS call history

Full track record →

Jul 31bearish
24h-100.0%
7d-100.0%
30d-100.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0xc31d...7777
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: Unverified contract combined with an unlabelled deployer funding source and multi-hop genesis transfers are hallmarks of disposable token launches designed to exit-scam retail buyers.
  • Insider dump risk: At least 20.9% of supply (and potentially up to ~35% including the unaudited 0x3811f2… genesis recipient) is held by wallets with zero cost basis that can sell at any price for profit.
  • Liquidity collapse risk: The $35,371 liquidity pool is insufficient to absorb coordinated selling; a rapid exit by even two or three whale wallets could reduce the token price by 50%+ before retail can react.

Trading Insight

bearish

Market sentiment is marginally bearish, with sell pressure at 50.8% versus buy pressure at 49.2% — a near-balanced but net-negative split. The 1-hour transaction data shows 1,488 sell transactions versus 1,253 buys, with unique sellers (599) slightly exceeding unique buyers (618 buyers in the 1h window), confirming that distribution is modestly outpacing accumulation since launch.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

With only 1 hour of price history and a consistent -0.92% decline across both the 4-hour and 24-hour windows (which are identical given the token age), the only measurable trend is a mild downtrend from the launch price. There is no multi-day OHLC data to establish a medium-term trend, so the medium-term classification reflects the bearish structural setup — pre-distributed supply, unverified contract, and net sell pressure — rather than chart-derived momentum.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

With less than one hour of trading data and no RSI, MACD, or moving average history computable, momentum indicators are not meaningful. The marginal -0.92% price decline from launch is within normal noise for a newly launched token and does not constitute a momentum signal in either direction.

Volume Analysis

Buy

49.2%

Sell

50.8%

Volume Trend

Stable

All observed volume ($480,236 combined) was generated within the first hour of the token's existence. The near-equal buy ($236,474) and sell ($243,762) volumes suggest a roughly balanced but slightly sell-dominant market. The high transaction count relative to holder count is a strong indicator of bot-driven volume, which artificially inflates the apparent trading activity and should not be interpreted as organic demand.

Recent Price Action

The token launched and has declined approximately 0.92% from its initial price within the first hour, with the 5-minute change at 0% suggesting the decline has temporarily stabilized at current levels around $314.51.

A sub-1% decline from launch price in the first hour is not a technically significant pattern on its own. However, the stabilization at 0% over 5 minutes following a consistent hourly decline may reflect temporary equilibrium between bot buy and sell orders rather than genuine price discovery.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    The token is 1 hour old with no price history, shallow liquidity of $35,371, and a market cap of $137,550. At this liquidity depth, even small sell orders produce outsized price moves, and the presence of multiple zero-cost-basis whale wallets means volatility to the downside is asymmetrically likely.

  • LiquidityHigh

    A $35,371 liquidity pool supporting a $137,550 market cap creates a 25.7% liquidity ratio. Exiting any position of meaningful size will incur severe slippage, and a coordinated whale exit could drain the pool rapidly, leaving retail holders unable to sell at any reasonable price.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As a BEP-20 token on BNB Chain with no documented use case, T4B faces standard regulatory risks applicable to unregistered crypto assets in jurisdictions with active enforcement. The lack of a project identity or team disclosure increases regulatory exposure if the token is later scrutinized.

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: Unverified contract combined with an unlabelled deployer funding source and multi-hop genesis transfers are hallmarks of disposable token launches designed to exit-scam retail buyers.
  • Insider dump risk: At least 20.9% of supply (and potentially up to ~35% including the unaudited 0x3811f2… genesis recipient) is held by wallets with zero cost basis that can sell at any price for profit.
  • Liquidity collapse risk: The $35,371 liquidity pool is insufficient to absorb coordinated selling; a rapid exit by even two or three whale wallets could reduce the token price by 50%+ before retail can react.

Mitigating Factors

  • The deployer wallet has a 760-day on-chain history, which is atypical for purely disposable rug-pull wallets that are usually created days before launch.
  • The largest single holder is a protocol/contract (12.66%) rather than an individual wallet, meaning the dominant supply position is not immediately sellable.

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of newly launched, unverified tokens and are prepared to lose their entire investment. It is not suitable for retail investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone allocating more than a negligible speculative position.

T4B presents a highly speculative profile with no documented fundamentals, an unverified contract, pre-distributed insider supply, and shallow liquidity. The investment thesis is almost entirely dependent on whether the token develops a genuine use case and community — neither of which currently exists. The structural setup favors insiders over retail participants.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The project team reveals a legitimate use case, verifies the contract, and builds a community that drives organic demand. The high initial transaction volume (5,034 transactions in the first hour) converts into sustained retail interest, liquidity deepens, and the token appreciates from its current $314.51 price as the project gains visibility.

  • Contract verification and publication of a credible whitepaper or project roadmap
  • Organic community growth via social channels that have not yet been established

Base Case

T4B trades sideways to down over the coming days as initial bot-driven volume fades, retail interest wanes without a project narrative, and the token gradually loses liquidity. It neither collapses immediately nor appreciates meaningfully, eventually becoming illiquid as holders lose interest.

  • No major insider dump occurs in the immediate term, preventing a catastrophic price collapse
  • No project documentation or community emerges to catalyze genuine demand

Bear Case

High probability

Insider wallets with zero-cost-basis positions begin selling into retail demand, the shallow $35,371 liquidity pool is rapidly drained, and the token price collapses. The unverified contract may contain hidden functions that accelerate this outcome. Retail holders are left with illiquid positions at a fraction of entry price.

  • Zero-cost-basis whale wallets (20.9% dumpable supply) selling into any price appreciation
  • Unverified contract potentially containing owner-controlled liquidity removal or trading restriction functions

Analysis Details

Generated

Jul 31, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-31 10:00 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$314.509927287179664290

Market Cap

$137.6K

24h Volume

$480.2K

Holders

489

Liquidity

$35,370.63

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis tier classification)Trading volume metrics (24h buy/sell data)Smart contract deployment and genesis transfer forensicsDeployer wallet historical activity analysisWhale wallet DEX swap history lookup

Limitations

  • Token is only 1 hour old — no OHLC price history exists, making technical analysis and price target derivation impossible; all trend assessments are based on structural/on-chain evidence rather than chart data.
  • Smart-money profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable for this token, preventing assessment of early buyer positioning or realized PnL patterns.
  • The 0x3811f2… wallet that received 20.14% of supply at genesis was not included in the whale wallet intel audit, leaving a significant portion of supply with unknown behavioral profile.
  • High transaction-to-holder ratio suggests potential bot or wash-trading activity that may be artificially inflating volume metrics, making volume-based signals unreliable.

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

New reports on BNB Chain

All new tokens →

PPREDICTPREDICT.FUNBearish亮剑人生亮剑人生亮剑人生Bearish火龙果火龙果火龙果BearishSHOPINXSHOPINXShopinXBullish币币安baby币安babyBearishMMSCMetaSwapBearishLLATILatitudeBullishGGANGGangBearish

Questions about OPTIMUS?