F

FOUR Price Today & AI Analysis

FOUR
BNB Chain·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Sep 8, 2026

$0.042265

-84.11%24h
LiveContract:0xc0e2550b50d8249e4949a75d76cb55cac3b8ffffChain:BNB ChainHolders:379Market cap:$21.16KLiquidity:$8.21K

More tokens on BNB Chain

ARTX

ARTX

Ultiland

$0.12100.1%
MC $13.99M
PALU

PALU

Palu

$0.00152727.8%
MC $1.53M
CMC20

CMC20

CoinMarketCap 20 Index DTF

$164.090.7%
MC $5.89M
B

BNC1

BNC1

$0.04199762.2%
MC $20.0K
A

AIW3

AIW3

$0.04090.5%
MC $40.94M
D

DEBIT

Teller

$1.728.9%
MC $171.85M

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about FOUR

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since reportreport from Sep 8, 2026, 09:45 AM UTC
Market Cap

$21.16K

24h Volume

$301.54K

Liquidity

$8.21K

FDV

—

Holders

379

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

—

AI Executive Summary

FOUR is a BNB Chain token launched approximately 2 hours ago on PancakeSwap with a total and circulating supply of 1 billion tokens, a current market cap of $21,156, and only $8,213 in liquidity. Since launch, the token has shed 84.1% of its value, with the steepest leg occurring in the most recent hour (-57.6%), signalling an active and accelerating distribution event. No project description, social media presence, category classification, or use case has been provided, leaving the token entirely without fundamental support. Given its age, liquidity depth, price trajectory, and absence of verifiable project information, FOUR presents an extremely high-risk profile.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Sep 8, 2026, 09:45 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: bearish
Launched only 2 hours ago, placing it in the highest-risk phase of any token's lifecycle with no price history to analyse
An 84.1% price collapse within the first 4 hours of trading is the defining characteristic of this token's market behaviour
Liquidity of $8,213 is critically shallow relative to the $301,543 in combined 24-hour buy and sell volume, indicating severe slippage risk for any remaining holders

FOUR AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

FOUR has collapsed 84.1% in the past 4 hours and the same figure holds for the 24-hour window, indicating the crash is the dominant event of the token's entire 2-hour existence. With only $8,213 in remaining liquidity and sell pressure at 51.3%, there is no technical floor visible from available data to arrest further decline. The token is in active price discovery to the downside with no historical OHLC levels to anchor a recovery.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

At just 2 hours old with an 84% price collapse already recorded, a $21,156 market cap, and $8,213 in liquidity, FOUR has the profile of a token that has already experienced its primary distribution event. Without any project description, social presence, or identifiable use case, there is no fundamental basis for a medium-term recovery. Survival beyond days would require new capital inflows that current data gives no reason to expect.

Bullish Factors
  • +Buy transaction count (2,939 buys in 24h) exceeds sell transaction count (2,573 sells), suggesting a portion of market participants are still actively purchasing despite the price collapse.
  • +The top-10 holders control only 22.3% of supply in aggregate, which is a relatively low concentration figure that limits the mechanical selling pressure attributable to a small group of large holders.
Bearish Factors
  • -Price has fallen 84.1% in 4 hours — the steepest possible early-life signal — with the 1-hour decline alone at 57.6%, indicating accelerating rather than stabilising selling.
  • -Total liquidity stands at just $8,213 against a $21,156 market cap, meaning the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio is below 40%, making even modest sell orders capable of moving price catastrophically.
  • -The token is only 2 hours old with no project description, no social links, and no identifiable use case, providing zero fundamental support for the current price or any recovery.
  • -Launch-transfer forensics and deployer wallet history are both unavailable, meaning the fairness of the initial supply distribution cannot be verified — a material risk for a token this young.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

FOUR call history

Full track record →
Sep 8bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBNB Chain
Contract0xc0e2...ffff
Total Supply—
Decimals—

Key Risks

•Exit liquidity risk: with $8,213 in total liquidity and an 84.1% price collapse already recorded, holders face the real possibility of being unable to exit positions at any meaningful price if liquidity is removed or further depleted.
•Rug-pull or abandonment risk: the token is 2 hours old, has no project description, no social presence, and no verifiable deployer history — the combination of these absences is consistent with a disposable token designed for a single distribution event.
•Complete information asymmetry: launch-transfer forensics, deployer wallet history, whale wallet behaviour, and contract security data are all unavailable, meaning investors cannot assess who controls the token, how supply was initially distributed, or whether the contract contains malicious functions.

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite a higher raw count of buy transactions versus sell transactions, the 84.1% price decline and 51.3% sell pressure by volume confirm that sellers are dominating price discovery. The volume imbalance — $154,710 in sell volume versus $146,833 in buy volume — shows that sellers are transacting in larger average sizes, driving the price lower even as smaller retail buyers attempt to catch a falling knife.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bearish
Medium-Term (30d):
Bearish

With an 84.1% decline over 4 hours and a 57.6% decline in the most recent hour alone, the short-term trend is an unambiguous and accelerating downtrend. No OHLC history exists beyond the token's 2-hour lifespan, so medium-term trend assessment is extrapolated from the only available data: a token in freefall from its launch price with no evidence of stabilisation.

Momentum

Status:
Oversold

An 84.1% decline from launch in under 4 hours places momentum indicators in deeply oversold territory by any standard measure. However, oversold conditions in a token with $8,213 in liquidity and no fundamental support do not reliably signal a reversal — they can persist or worsen as liquidity is exhausted.

Volume Analysis

Buy 48.7%Sell 51.3%

Volume Trend: Decreasing

The 1-hour window shows 732 transactions (354 buys, 378 sells) compared to 5,512 total transactions in the full 24h/4h window, suggesting transaction velocity is declining as the initial launch frenzy subsides. Sell transactions marginally outnumber buys in the most recent hour (378 vs 354), consistent with continued distribution pressure as early participants exit.

Recent Price Action

Vertical collapse from launch price: -84.1% in 4 hours with the decline steepening in the most recent hour (-57.6% in 1 hour). The 5-minute reading of -8.3% confirms selling pressure remains active at the time of analysis.

This pattern — a sharp spike at launch followed by rapid, sustained decline — is consistent with a pump-and-dump or rug-pull structure where early holders distribute into retail buying interest. The steepening of the decline in the 1-hour window relative to the 4-hour average suggests the sell-off is not decelerating.

Overall Risk:
Very High
94/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

An 84.1% price decline in 4 hours from a 2-hour-old token represents extreme volatility. The 5-minute reading of -8.3% confirms that large price swings are ongoing, and with only $8,213 in liquidity, even small trades produce outsized price movements.

Liquidity
High

Total liquidity of $8,213 is critically insufficient relative to the $301,543 in 24-hour trading volume. Any holder attempting to exit a meaningful position will face severe slippage, and the liquidity pool could be drained or removed entirely without warning given the token's age and lack of project accountability.

Concentration
Medium

The top-10 holders collectively hold 22.3% of supply, which is a moderate aggregate figure. However, per-wallet data is unavailable, so it is impossible to determine whether these are protocol contracts, exchange wallets, or individual insiders — meaning the true dumpable-supply risk cannot be precisely quantified.

Smart Contract
Medium

No contract security data is available on this chain's data provider. This is an uninformed default classification rather than an actual assessment — the true smart contract risk could be higher or lower, and the absence of an audit or verification record for a 2-hour-old token with no project documentation is itself a risk factor.

Regulatory
Medium

As an unclassified token with no disclosed use case, FOUR faces standard regulatory uncertainty applicable to all unregistered crypto assets on BNB Chain. No specific regulatory risk factors beyond the baseline are identifiable from available data.

Key Risks

  • •Exit liquidity risk: with $8,213 in total liquidity and an 84.1% price collapse already recorded, holders face the real possibility of being unable to exit positions at any meaningful price if liquidity is removed or further depleted.
  • •Rug-pull or abandonment risk: the token is 2 hours old, has no project description, no social presence, and no verifiable deployer history — the combination of these absences is consistent with a disposable token designed for a single distribution event.
  • •Complete information asymmetry: launch-transfer forensics, deployer wallet history, whale wallet behaviour, and contract security data are all unavailable, meaning investors cannot assess who controls the token, how supply was initially distributed, or whether the contract contains malicious functions.

Mitigating Factors

  • •The top-10 aggregate concentration of 22.3% is lower than many comparable micro-cap launches, which marginally limits the mechanical selling pressure from the largest holders as a group.
  • •The buy transaction count (2,939) exceeds the sell transaction count (2,573), indicating that some market participants continue to find value at current prices, providing a minimal demand floor.

Investor Suitability

Given the extreme volatility, critically shallow liquidity, complete absence of project fundamentals, 84.1% price collapse within 2 hours of launch, and multiple unverifiable risk factors, FOUR is unsuitable for any investor seeking capital preservation or risk-adjusted returns. Only individuals who fully understand the mechanics of micro-cap speculative tokens, can afford to lose their entire position, and have conducted independent due diligence should consider any exposure.

FOUR presents no identifiable investment thesis based on fundamentals, as the token has no disclosed use case, no community, and no project documentation. The only observable narrative is a speculative trading vehicle that has already experienced an 84.1% collapse in its first 2 hours, with the bear case being the dominant and most data-supported scenario.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

A previously unannounced project reveal or viral social media campaign drives a new wave of buyers into the token, temporarily reversing the price decline and establishing a higher trading range above current levels.

  • +Surprise project announcement that establishes a credible use case and attracts new capital
  • +Broader BNB Chain memecoin cycle that lifts speculative micro-caps indiscriminately
Base Case

The token stabilises at a fraction of its launch price with minimal trading activity, retaining a small number of holders but generating no meaningful volume or community development, effectively becoming dormant.

  • •Liquidity pool remains intact but is not replenished
  • •No new project information or social presence emerges to attract fresh capital
Bear Case
High

The token continues its current trajectory toward near-zero as liquidity is exhausted or removed, leaving remaining holders unable to exit. The absence of any project fundamentals, combined with the launch-day collapse pattern, results in the token becoming inactive within days.

  • -Liquidity removal by the pool provider, which would make the token untradeable
  • -Continued sell pressure from early holders distributing remaining positions into any residual buy interest

Analysis Details

GeneratedSep 8, 2026, 09:45 AM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.0000226536325806
Market Cap$21.2K
24h Volume$301.5K
Holders379
Liquidity$8.2K

Data Sources

Codex DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)
Daily OHLC price history
Aggregate holder count and top-10 concentration

Limitations

  • •No OHLC price history is available for this 2-hour-old token, preventing any technical level computation or trend confirmation beyond the launch-day price collapse
  • •Holder-growth history, holder size-tier distribution, and individual whale transaction data were unavailable for this analysis
  • •Contract security data, including audit status and contract verification, is not available on this chain's data provider
  • •Smart-money cohort and profitable-trader data were unavailable, preventing assessment of informed capital behaviour
  • •Launch-transfer forensics and deployer wallet history were unavailable, leaving initial supply distribution and deployer intent unverifiable

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track FOUR