PACMAN

GME PACMAN Price Today & AI Analysis

PACMANBNB ChainAnalysis as of Aug 14, 2026

Price

$0.054623

-6.20% 24h

Contract

Live
0xbf2e376db3e7e7f11fb33f747d8918b0f5b87777

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

217

Market cap

$4.62K

Liquidity

$3.31K

More tokens on BNB Chain

ELIENELIENELIEN MUSK$0.053644-0.7%MC $3.6KAGENTAGENTFirst Agent Token$0.041474+0.3%MC $14.7KThere is no spoonThere is no spoonThere is no spoon$0.041151+0.4%MC $11.5K企飞企飞企飞$0.054189-0.1%MC $4.2KMEMECOINMEMECOINMEME$0.053297+1.1%MC $3.3Kquqquqquq$0.001609+3.2%MC $1.61M

GME PACMAN: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-14 03:15 UTC

Holder addresses

706

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$43,390.11
How concentrated is GME PACMAN ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 706 addresses (2026-08-14 03:15 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling GME PACMAN?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is GME PACMAN liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-14 03:15 UTC, reported liquidity was $43,390.11. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-14 03:15 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 14, 2026, 03:15 AM UTC

Market Cap

$256.23K

24h Volume

$306.91K

Liquidity

$43.39K

FDV

—

Holders

706

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about PACMAN

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

G9B is a 4-hour-old token on BNB Chain (BSC) with no disclosed category, use case, or project description, trading at $18.67 with a $256K market cap and $43.4K in liquidity. The token launched with coordinated insider supply distribution across at least five wallets at genesis, an unverified smart contract, and a deployer funded by an unlabelled wallet — all hallmarks of a high-risk speculative launch. While 706 holders and over 3,100 combined transactions in the first four hours demonstrate real market activity, sell pressure already exceeds buy pressure and the largest individual whale positions were received via transfer rather than purchased on the open market. Investors should treat this token as extremely high risk with no fundamental basis established.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 14, 2026, 03:15 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Launched with coordinated genesis distribution to at least five wallets before any public trading, indicating pre-planned insider allocation
  • 8.47% of total supply is held in a burn address, which is an unusually large burn allocation for a token this new and with no stated mechanism
  • Despite having no project description or category, the token generated over 3,100 transactions from more than 1,400 unique addresses within its first 4 hours, indicating aggressive promotion

GME PACMAN AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

G9B is only 4 hours old and has already posted a 21.86% price surge in its first trading window, a move typical of launch-day pump dynamics rather than organic demand. Sell pressure currently exceeds buy pressure (52.2% vs 47.8%), and the 24h sell volume of $160,199 outpaces buy volume of $146,716, suggesting early holders are already distributing. With no OHLC history to anchor support and multiple whale wallets holding positions acquired via transfer rather than market buys, the short-term path of least resistance is downward as launch-day momentum fades.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Without a verified contract, a disclosed use case, or any established community traction, G9B has no fundamental anchor to sustain its current $256K market cap beyond speculative momentum. The deployer wallet was funded by an unlabelled wallet and distributed supply to at least five addresses at genesis, a pattern consistent with coordinated insider seeding rather than organic adoption. Unless the project discloses its purpose, verifies its contract, and builds genuine holder retention, the medium-term trajectory is erosion toward negligible value.

Bullish Factors

  • High launch-day transaction activity — 1,491 buys and 1,637 sells from 654 unique buyers and 778 unique sellers within 4 hours — indicates genuine market interest and broad initial distribution across 706 holders
  • 8.47% of supply is held in a burn address, permanently removing that portion from circulating supply and providing a modest deflationary floor
  • The deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8) has been active since July 2024 (774 days), suggesting it is not a freshly created disposable wallet, which marginally reduces the probability of an immediate rug pull

Bearish Factors

  • Sell volume ($160,199) exceeds buy volume ($146,716) in the first 4 hours of trading, with sell transactions (1,637) outnumbering buy transactions (1,491), confirming net outflow from the token
  • Three of the top individual whale wallets (2.65%, 1.89%, 1.71% of supply) acquired their positions via transfer rather than market buys, meaning they received supply at or near genesis and face zero cost basis — creating immediate dump risk on 6.25% of supply
  • The contract is unverified (security score 42/100), meaning the source code cannot be audited and hidden mint, pause, or fee functions cannot be ruled out
  • The deployer (0xe2ce6ab8) was funded by an unlabelled wallet (0x4deaae93), a disposable-deployer funding pattern that raises rug-pull risk, and distributed supply to at least five addresses within the genesis block before any trading began

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

PACMAN call history

Full track record →

Aug 14bearish
24h-100.0%
7d—
30d-100.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0xbf2e...7777
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Unverified smart contract with a 42/100 security score — the deployer may retain hidden privileged functions that could be used to mint additional supply, freeze trading, or drain liquidity without warning
  • Three top whale wallets holding a combined 6.25% of supply acquired their positions via transfer at genesis with zero cost basis — they can profitably exit at any price, and wallet 0xf2c134 was first active just 6 days before launch, a strong insider/sybil signal
  • Deployer (0xe2ce6ab8) was funded by an unlabelled wallet and distributed supply to five addresses in the genesis block before public trading — this coordinated pre-distribution pattern is consistent with a pump-and-dump setup where insiders seed wallets to simulate organic distribution

Trading Insight

bearish

Market sentiment is marginally bearish, with sell pressure at 52.2% and sell volume exceeding buy volume by approximately $13,483 in the first 4 hours of trading. The high transaction counts from a relatively small number of unique participants (654 buyers, 778 sellers) suggest some wallets are executing multiple trades, which is consistent with bot activity or coordinated trading around a launch pump.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

The only price data available is a 21.86% gain over the token's first 4 hours of trading, which reflects launch-day pump dynamics rather than a sustained trend. There is no multi-day OHLC history to establish a medium-term trend, so the medium-term classification defaults to sideways pending price history development. The short-term uptrend is fragile given that sell pressure already exceeds buy pressure.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

A 21.86% price increase within the first 4 hours of a token's existence, driven by $307K in volume against only $43K in liquidity, is a classic launch-pump momentum signature. Without sustained buy pressure to maintain this level, momentum indicators would typically signal overbought conditions and a mean-reversion risk.

Volume Analysis

Buy

47.8%

Sell

52.2%

Volume Trend

Stable

All observed volume is concentrated in a single 4-hour window since launch, making trend assessment impossible. The volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 7:1 is extremely elevated for a micro-cap token and suggests speculative churn. The 1-hour window shows 1,038 buys and 1,126 sells from 518 and 554 unique participants respectively, indicating the trading pace has not materially slowed within the launch session.

Recent Price Action

Single-session launch pump of 21.86% with no prior price history, accompanied by high transaction counts and a net sell imbalance in the most recent hour (1,126 sells vs 1,038 buys).

This pattern — a sharp initial price spike on launch day followed by sell transactions beginning to outnumber buys — is consistent with a 'pump and distribute' dynamic where early insiders or bots drive initial price discovery while gradually offloading supply to retail participants.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A 21.86% price move in 4 hours on a token with $43K liquidity and no price history indicates extreme volatility. With no OHLC floor established and insider wallets holding zero-cost-basis supply, downside moves of 50-90% are plausible within days.

  • LiquidityHigh

    $43,390 in total liquidity against $256K market cap and $307K in 4-hour volume creates severe slippage risk. Any coordinated exit by top holders would drain liquidity rapidly and make orderly selling impossible for retail participants.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an anonymous, uncategorized token with no disclosed team or jurisdiction, G9B faces standard regulatory uncertainty applicable to all unregistered crypto assets on BSC. No specific regulatory flags beyond baseline apply, but the anonymous structure means there is no accountable entity if issues arise.

Key Risks

  • Unverified smart contract with a 42/100 security score — the deployer may retain hidden privileged functions that could be used to mint additional supply, freeze trading, or drain liquidity without warning
  • Three top whale wallets holding a combined 6.25% of supply acquired their positions via transfer at genesis with zero cost basis — they can profitably exit at any price, and wallet 0xf2c134 was first active just 6 days before launch, a strong insider/sybil signal
  • Deployer (0xe2ce6ab8) was funded by an unlabelled wallet and distributed supply to five addresses in the genesis block before public trading — this coordinated pre-distribution pattern is consistent with a pump-and-dump setup where insiders seed wallets to simulate organic distribution

Mitigating Factors

  • The deployer wallet has 774 days of on-chain history, suggesting it is not a freshly created throwaway account, which marginally reduces the probability of an immediate exit scam
  • 8.47% of supply is held in a burn address, permanently removing it from circulation and slightly reducing the maximum theoretical sell pressure

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of sub-$500K market cap tokens with unverified contracts, can afford to lose their entire position, and are capable of monitoring on-chain activity in real time. It is not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with BSC micro-cap dynamics and rug-pull patterns.

G9B is a 4-hour-old anonymous token on BSC with no disclosed use case, an unverified contract, coordinated insider supply distribution, and net sell pressure from its first trading session. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative, resting on the possibility that launch momentum continues rather than any fundamental value. The bear case is substantially more probable than the bull case given the structural red flags present.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Launch momentum sustains beyond the initial 4-hour window as social media promotion drives new buyer inflow, holder count grows past 2,000 within 48 hours, and the project team publishes a whitepaper and verifies the contract — allowing the token to establish a price floor and attract DEX aggregator listings that bring incremental volume.

  • Sustained social media campaign driving new buyer inflow beyond the initial launch cohort
  • Contract verification and project disclosure that converts speculative interest into fundamental-based holding

Base Case

The token experiences a typical micro-cap launch cycle: initial pump fades over 24-72 hours, volume drops 80-90% from launch-day levels, holder count stabilizes or declines as early participants exit, and the token trades at a fraction of its launch price with minimal liquidity and sporadic volume — neither a complete collapse nor a sustained rally.

  • Insider wallets do not execute a coordinated dump but gradually distribute over days, preventing an immediate collapse while ensuring slow price erosion
  • No major catalyst (exchange listing, partnership announcement, viral social media moment) emerges to restart momentum

Bear Case

High probability

Launch-day momentum fades within 24-48 hours as insider wallets with zero cost basis begin distributing their positions into any remaining buy pressure, liquidity is progressively drained, and the token price collapses 70-95% from its launch-day high as retail holders are unable to exit due to slippage on the shallow $43K liquidity pool.

  • Zero-cost-basis insider wallets (27.4% dumpable supply) begin selling as launch momentum fades, with no price floor to arrest the decline
  • Unverified contract risk materializes — deployer exercises a hidden privileged function to extract liquidity or mint additional supply

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 14, 2026, 03:15 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-14 03:15 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$18.666589269529634265

Market Cap

$256.2K

24h Volume

$306.9K

Holders

706

Liquidity

$43,390.11

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain / BSC)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)Trading volume metrics (24h and 4h swap data)Smart contract security assessment (score: 42/100)Deployer wallet forensics (774-day wallet history, funding source analysis)Whale wallet intel (DEX swap lookup, acquisition method classification)Token genesis transfer analysis (first on-chain transfers and initial allocation)

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history exists — the token is only 4 hours old, making all technical analysis and price target derivation impossible; all trend assessments are based solely on the single 4-hour price window
  • Smart contract source code is unverified, meaning hidden functions, fee structures, and ownership controls cannot be assessed — this is the largest single analytical blind spot
  • Social media content (Twitter, website) has not been analyzed — project legitimacy signals from these sources are absent from this assessment
  • Holder tier thresholds (whale, shark, dolphin, fish, octopus) are Moralis-defined relative tiers with unpublished exact supply thresholds — dollar values and precise supply percentages cannot be attached to these labels

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track PACMAN