DOS

DAPPOS Price Today & AI Analysis

DOSBNB ChainAnalysis as of Aug 10, 2026

Price

$0.2160

-3.78% 24h

Contract

Live
0xb0f09ea9ae0515c3551080d4a745c8115aa30e37

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

27.5K

Market cap

$43.20M

Liquidity

$348.59K

More tokens on BNB Chain

CLOCLOYei Finance$0.0590-1.4%MC $7.62M牛来牛来牛来$0.1010-6.8%MC $101.04MGENIUSGENIUSGenius$0.3560+4.4%MC $119.39M$BANANA$BANANABanana For Scale$0.008106+5.4%MC $81.06MSTARSTARStarpower Network$0.0377+10.6%MC $7.01MPpPOLYPaimon Polymarket SPV Token$10.36+3.7%MC $5.10M

DAPPOS: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-10 16:30 UTC

Holder addresses

1,222

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$60,682.89
How concentrated is DAPPOS ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,222 addresses (2026-08-10 16:30 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling DAPPOS?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is DAPPOS liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-10 16:30 UTC, reported liquidity was $60,682.89. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-10 16:30 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 10, 2026, 04:30 PM UTC

Market Cap

$4.31M

24h Volume

$3.91M

Liquidity

$60.68K

FDV

—

Holders

1,222

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about DOS

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Neutral

DAPPOS (DOS) is a 10-day-old BNB Chain token with no published description, category, or social presence, currently trading at $0.399 after an 81.3% single-day price spike. The token's on-chain forensics reveal a deployer wallet funded by Gate.io with no prior deployment history, and three top whale wallets holding a combined 53.1% of supply that was received via direct insider transfers on or shortly after launch day — not purchased on the open market. With only $60,683 in liquidity, 96% supply concentration in the top 10 holders, and a security score of 54/100, the token exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics typical of speculative micro-cap launches. The trading activity is real — over 35,000 transactions in 24 hours across 1,519 unique buyers — but the structural setup heavily favors insiders over retail participants.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 10, 2026, 04:30 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extreme insider concentration: three wallets received 53.1% of total supply via direct deployer transfers before any public trading, giving them a zero-cost basis at any market price
  • Disposable-deployer fingerprint: the mint wallet is 10 days old, funded from Gate.io, and has no prior deployment history — a pattern consistent with single-use launch wallets
  • Severe liquidity-to-market-cap mismatch: $60,683 in pool liquidity supports a $4.3M market cap, creating a ratio of ~1.4% that makes large exits structurally impossible without catastrophic price impact

DAPPOS AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

DAPPOS (DOS) has surged 81.3% in the past 24 hours, but this move is occurring on only $60,683 in liquidity against a $4.3M market cap — a structurally fragile setup. With 59.2% of supply held by dumpable individual whale wallets, all of which received their positions via transfer rather than market buys, the risk of a sharp reversal is elevated. Sell transactions (19,348) already outnumber buy transactions (16,406) over 24 hours, signaling distribution pressure beneath the surface.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The medium-term outlook is bearish given the token's structural vulnerabilities: a deployer wallet only 10 days old funded by Gate.io with zero prior contract deployments, three top whales holding a combined 53.1% of supply via insider transfers rather than open-market purchases, and no project description, social presence, or category classification. Holder growth of 99% in 24 hours and 100% in 7 days sounds impressive but reflects a base of near-zero holders just days ago, not organic community building. Without a verifiable use case, meaningful liquidity, or transparent team, sustaining the current price level over 30–90 days is unlikely.

Bullish Factors

  • 24-hour buy volume of $1.96M against a $4.3M market cap indicates genuine short-term trading interest and liquidity turnover well above what the pool depth alone would suggest
  • Unique buyer count (1,519) exceeds unique sellers (1,376) over 24 hours, and the 1-hour window shows 255 unique buyers vs. 230 unique sellers, suggesting fresh retail demand has not yet fully exhausted itself
  • The contract is verified on-chain, which is a baseline transparency requirement that some comparable micro-cap tokens fail to meet

Bearish Factors

  • Three individual whale wallets collectively hold 53.1% of supply (positions #1, #2, and #5) and all acquired their tokens via direct transfer from the deployer — not through market buys — meaning their entire position is pure profit at any price and can be dumped without warning
  • The deployer wallet (0x0358add0…) was created on 2026-07-31, is exactly 10 days old, has zero prior contract deployments in its first 100 transactions, and was funded by Gate.io — a classic disposable-deployer pattern associated with elevated rug risk
  • Total liquidity of only $60,683 against a $4.3M market cap creates a liquidity-to-market-cap ratio of roughly 1.4%, meaning even modest whale sells will cause severe price impact and slippage for any holder attempting to exit
  • Top 10 holders control 96% of supply, with dumpable supply (individual whales) at 59.2% — retail holders own approximately 1% of supply, leaving virtually no organic community base to absorb selling pressure

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

DOS call history

Full track record →

Aug 10bearish
24h-4.3%
7d—
30d-46.5%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0xb0f0...0e37
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Insider dump risk: three whale wallets holding 53.1% of supply received their tokens via direct deployer transfer with zero cost basis — any decision to sell will be pure profit for them and potentially catastrophic for retail holders given the $60,683 liquidity pool
  • Disposable deployer: the mint wallet (0x0358add0…) is 10 days old, funded from Gate.io, and has zero prior deployments — this profile is consistent with a wallet created specifically for this launch and potentially abandoned after distribution, with no accountability mechanism
  • Fundamental vacuum: with no project description, no social presence, no audit, and no category classification, there is no verifiable reason for the token to hold any value beyond speculative momentum, which can evaporate instantly in micro-cap markets

Trading Insight

neutral

Despite the dramatic 81.3% 24-hour price surge, buy and sell pressure are nearly identical at 50.2% and 49.8% respectively, and sell transaction counts (19,348) exceed buy counts (16,406) — indicating that the price move was driven by a smaller number of larger buys rather than broad accumulation. The 1-hour window shows a slight tilt toward buyers (749 buys vs. 611 sells, 255 unique buyers vs. 230 unique sellers), suggesting residual momentum, but this is insufficient to override the bearish structural picture.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bullish

The available price data shows consistent positive returns across the 5-minute (+2.8%), 1-hour (+3.1%), 4-hour (+0.9%), and 24-hour (+81.3%) windows, establishing a clear short-term uptrend by the only metrics available. However, this trend is entirely based on a 10-day price history with no OHLC swing data to validate support or resistance, and the 81.3% single-day move represents an unsustainable acceleration that historically precedes sharp corrections in micro-cap tokens. The medium-term trend classification as uptrend is a mechanical observation of the data, not an endorsement of continuation.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

An 81.3% single-session gain on a token with $60,683 in liquidity and no fundamental backing is a textbook overbought signal. The near-equal buy and sell dollar volumes confirm that the price has been pushed to a level where sellers are matching buyers in dollar terms, and the higher sell transaction count suggests retail participants are already taking profits or cutting losses at elevated prices.

Volume Analysis

Buy

50.2%

Sell

49.8%

Volume Trend

Increasing

Combined 24-hour volume of approximately $3.9M on a $60,683 liquidity pool represents a pool-turnover ratio exceeding 64x in a single day. While raw volume appears high relative to market cap ($4.3M), this figure is inflated by the shallow pool — the same liquidity is being traded through repeatedly. The 4-hour window shows 14,584 transactions (6,890 buys + 7,694 sells), suggesting the elevated activity is sustained rather than a single spike, but the underlying liquidity constraint means this volume cannot be interpreted as deep institutional interest.

Recent Price Action

Vertical price acceleration over a 24-hour window (+81.3%) with near-perfectly balanced buy/sell dollar volumes and sell transactions outnumbering buy transactions — a pattern consistent with a coordinated pump where price is being supported by fewer, larger buy orders absorbing high-frequency retail selling.

In micro-cap tokens with insider-allocated supply and minimal liquidity, this pattern typically precedes a sharp mean-reversion once the supporting buy orders are withdrawn. The absence of OHLC history means there are no established technical levels to anchor a recovery if selling pressure intensifies.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    An 81.3% single-day price move on a 10-day-old token with no OHLC history and $60,683 in liquidity represents extreme volatility. The shallow liquidity pool amplifies price swings in both directions, and the absence of established technical levels means there is no reliable floor if selling pressure emerges.

  • LiquidityHigh

    At $60,683 in total pool liquidity against a $4.3M market cap (1.4% ratio), the token is effectively illiquid for any position exceeding a few thousand dollars. Whale exits — even partial ones — would cause catastrophic price impact, and retail holders may find it impossible to exit at quoted prices during a sell-off.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an uncategorized BNB Chain token with no disclosed jurisdiction, team, or use case, DAPPOS faces standard DeFi regulatory uncertainty. The lack of documentation makes compliance status unknowable, though the token's micro-cap size reduces its immediate regulatory profile.

Key Risks

  • Insider dump risk: three whale wallets holding 53.1% of supply received their tokens via direct deployer transfer with zero cost basis — any decision to sell will be pure profit for them and potentially catastrophic for retail holders given the $60,683 liquidity pool
  • Disposable deployer: the mint wallet (0x0358add0…) is 10 days old, funded from Gate.io, and has zero prior deployments — this profile is consistent with a wallet created specifically for this launch and potentially abandoned after distribution, with no accountability mechanism
  • Fundamental vacuum: with no project description, no social presence, no audit, and no category classification, there is no verifiable reason for the token to hold any value beyond speculative momentum, which can evaporate instantly in micro-cap markets

Mitigating Factors

  • The contract is verified on-chain, providing at minimum public code transparency and reducing the risk of hidden malicious logic going undetected by the community
  • The Binance Wallet holding at position #3 (16.45%) and protocol/contract positions at #4, #6, #8, and #10 represent non-dumpable supply that provides a structural floor on circulating sell pressure from the top-10 concentration

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of micro-cap, zero-documentation tokens with insider-allocated supply, are prepared to lose their entire investment, and are trading with position sizes small enough to exit within the $60,683 liquidity pool. It is not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford total loss of capital.

DAPPOS presents a high-risk speculative profile with no fundamental backing, dominated by insider-allocated supply and a disposable-deployer fingerprint. The only viable bull case is a continuation of momentum-driven retail buying before insiders begin distributing; the bear case — which the structural data strongly supports — is a sharp price collapse once the 59.2% dumpable supply overhang begins to move.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Retail momentum continues to drive price higher in the short term as the 81.3% 24-hour gain attracts attention from trend-following traders. If the project releases documentation, a use case, or social media presence that legitimizes the token, it could attract a broader buyer base and sustain elevated prices long enough for early retail buyers to profit.

  • Sustained retail FOMO from the 81.3% 24-hour price surge attracting new buyers before insider distribution begins
  • A credible project announcement that provides a fundamental reason to hold, converting speculative buyers into longer-term holders

Base Case

Retail trading activity gradually subsides as the initial pump momentum fades, buy pressure normalizes below sell pressure, and the price drifts lower over the coming weeks. Insiders may sell gradually rather than in a single dump, producing a slow bleed rather than an instant collapse, but the end result is a significantly lower price than current levels as the 59.2% dumpable overhang is absorbed by an insufficient retail buyer base.

  • Insider wallets begin partial distribution within the next 7–30 days as the token gains enough liquidity and visibility to make exits feasible
  • No legitimate project fundamentals emerge to attract institutional or sustained retail interest beyond the initial speculative wave

Bear Case

High probability

One or more of the three insider whale wallets (holding a combined 53.1% of supply at zero cost) begins selling into the current elevated price. Given the $60,683 liquidity pool, even a 1–2% supply liquidation would collapse the price by 50–80%. The absence of any project fundamentals means there is no narrative to sustain buyer interest once momentum fades, and the token returns to near-zero.

  • Insider whale distribution: 59.2% dumpable supply at zero cost basis creates an overwhelming structural incentive to sell at any price above zero
  • Liquidity exhaustion: the $60,683 pool cannot absorb meaningful selling, meaning price discovery will be violent and one-directional once distribution begins

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 10, 2026, 04:30 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-10 16:30 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.398868476370394243

Market Cap

$4.31M

24h Volume

$3.91M

Holders

1,222

Liquidity

$60,682.89

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder buckets and concentration metrics)Trading volume metrics (24h, 4h, 1h buy/sell breakdown)Smart contract analysis (security score, contract verification status)Token genesis and deployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet behavioral analysis (DEX swap history, acquisition method, wallet age)Liquidity pool depth data

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history is available for this 10-day-old token, making technical analysis of support/resistance levels impossible and limiting trend analysis to the available percentage-change windows only
  • Smart-money (profitable trader cohort) data is unavailable, preventing assessment of whether sophisticated traders are accumulating or distributing
  • No project documentation, whitepaper, or team information exists, making fundamental valuation entirely impossible and forcing the analysis to rely exclusively on on-chain behavioral signals
  • The token is only 10 days old, meaning all metrics (holder growth, volume trends, price performance) are based on an extremely short history that may not be representative of longer-term behavior

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track DOS