Is Magic Internet Money (MIM) a scam?

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks. Checked Oct 29, 2026. This is Unhosted’s automated risk check, a warning signal rather than a guarantee either way.

How concentrated is Magic Internet Money ownership?

Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 684 addresses (2026-08-01 18:15 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.

Are large holders selling Magic Internet Money?

This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.

Is Magic Internet Money liquidity falling?

As of 2026-08-01 18:15 UTC, reported liquidity was $33,271.82. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

What is Magic Internet Money (MIM) and what does it do?

Magic Internet Money (MIM) is a cryptocurrency token. Visit our token page for detailed analytics, holder information, and trading data.

What is the current price of Magic Internet Money (MIM)?

The latest available price of Magic Internet Money is $3.4747e-6 USD. The reported 24-hour change is +0.00%. This is a saved or indexed observation, not a live execution quote.

What is the market cap of Magic Internet Money?

Magic Internet Money has a market capitalization of $3.48K USD. Market cap is calculated by multiplying the current price by the circulating supply.

Is Magic Internet Money (MIM) a good investment?

Investment decisions should be based on your own research and risk tolerance. Our AI risk assessment currently rates Magic Internet Money as very high risk. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct thorough due diligence before investing.

How many addresses hold Magic Internet Money?

Magic Internet Money currently has 471 holder addresses as of our latest on-chain snapshot.

What is the liquidity of Magic Internet Money?

Magic Internet Money has a total liquidity of $3.12K USD across decentralized exchanges. Higher liquidity generally means lower slippage when trading.

Magic Internet Money Price Today & AI Analysis

MIMBNB ChainAnalysis as of Aug 1, 2026

$0.0₅3475

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live

0xae590a4ae4de039226283d9bb4a03cc87c157777

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

471

Market cap

$3.48K

Liquidity

$3.12K

At a $1M market cap, $MIM would be $0.001000 (288x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is MIM a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 29

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks.

Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about MIM

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets Whale activityWho is accumulating or distributing What are the risks?Red flags, security, concentration Should I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

More tokens on BNB Chain

BbPaybPay$0.0₁₄5935+0.0%MC $0

GrassTouch Grass$0.0₅5655+0.0%MC $5.7K VVRAXCommander Vrax$0.003872+0.0%MC $3.87M

neegyneegy$0.0₅2565+0.0%MC $2.6K

agentic moneyagentic money$0.0₅7145+0.0%MC $7.1K PPREDICTPredict.fun$0.1043-26.1%MC $104.26M

Magic Internet Money: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-01 18:15 UTC

Holder addresses

684

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$33,271.82

How concentrated is Magic Internet Money ownership?: Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 684 addresses (2026-08-01 18:15 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Magic Internet Money?: This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Magic Internet Money liquidity falling?: As of 2026-08-01 18:15 UTC, reported liquidity was $33,271.82. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.

Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-01 18:15 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 1, 2026, 06:15 PM UTC

Market Cap

$147.67K

24h Volume

$521.88K

Liquidity

$33.27K

FDV

—

Holders

684

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

This token, branded 'Magic Internet Money' (MIM) on BNB Chain, is exactly 1 hour old and exhibits multiple high-severity red flags consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme. The contract is unverified, the deployer was funded by an unlabelled wallet, and the top individual whale wallets received their supply via transfer before any public trading began — indicating insider pre-allocation. The token name directly copies the established MIM stablecoin brand, a common tactic to attract confused or speculative buyers. With only $33,272 in liquidity, a $147,666 market cap, and no project fundamentals whatsoever, this token carries extreme risk of total capital loss.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 1, 2026, 06:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

Brand impersonation: the name 'Magic Internet Money' and ticker 'MIM' directly copy the well-known Abracadabra.money stablecoin, creating deliberate confusion
Insider pre-distribution confirmed: the top three individual whales each hold 2-3% of supply acquired via transfer with zero DEX swap history, meaning they were handed tokens before trading opened
Extreme age: at 1 hour old, this token has no price history, no community, no verified contract, and no demonstrated utility — it is in the highest-risk phase of its lifecycle

Magic Internet Money AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

This token is only 1 hour old and has already exhibited a -46% price collapse in the most recent 5-minute window after an initial pump of ~294% within the first hour — a textbook pump-and-dump trajectory. With no OHLC history, no verified contract, and multiple top individual whales holding positions acquired via transfer rather than market buys, the short-term outlook is strongly bearish. The near-equal buy/sell pressure (50.7% vs 49.3%) masks the fact that early insiders are likely distributing into retail buy orders.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

With no project description, no social presence, an unverified contract, and a deployer wallet funded by an unlabelled wallet, there is no identifiable fundamental basis for medium-term price appreciation. The token name 'Magic Internet Money' is a direct copy of the established MIM stablecoin brand, suggesting an attempt to mislead buyers. Without any utility, community, or development roadmap, the most probable medium-term outcome is near-total value loss as initial liquidity drains.

Bullish Factors

High transaction activity in the first hour — 3,172 buy transactions and 1,056 unique buyers — indicates significant initial retail interest that could sustain short-term price momentum if insider selling is delayed
Buy pressure at 50.7% marginally exceeds sell pressure, meaning net dollar flow is slightly positive at $264,756 buys vs $257,123 sells over 24h

Bearish Factors

The token crashed -46.3% in the most recent 5-minute window after a 293.95% 1-hour pump — a classic pump-and-dump price signature on a brand-new token
The top three individual whale wallets (3.15%, 2.21%, 2.10% of supply) each acquired their positions via transfer with no DEX swap history, confirming insider pre-distribution before any public trading
The contract is unverified, the deployer was funded by an unlabelled wallet, and no project description or social links exist — all hallmarks of a disposable launch
Total liquidity is only $33,272 against a $147,666 market cap, meaning the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio is ~22.5%, making large exits extremely slippage-prone and enabling rapid price collapse

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

MIM call history

Full track record →

Aug 1bearish@ $0.000137

24h-86.8%

7d-96.4%

30d-96.8%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain: BNB Chain
Contract: 0xae59...7777
Total Supply: —
Decimals: —

Key Risks

Rug pull risk: the unverified contract, insider pre-allocation via transfer, unlabelled deployer funding, and complete absence of project fundamentals collectively represent a near-complete rug pull risk profile — the deployer retains the ability to drain liquidity at any time if a liquidity removal function exists in the unverified contract
Insider dump risk: the top individual whale wallets hold 23% of supply acquired at zero cost via transfer; their combined holdings exceed the entire liquidity pool, meaning coordinated selling would wipe out all exit liquidity for retail holders
Brand impersonation fraud: the token name and ticker directly copy Abracadabra.money's MIM stablecoin, a tactic designed to mislead buyers into thinking they are purchasing a legitimate asset — this is a common scam vector and exposes buyers to total capital loss

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite superficially balanced buy/sell transaction counts, the -46% price drop in the last 5 minutes signals that sell-side pressure is overwhelming buy demand at the margin. The high transaction counts (3,300 buys, 3,156 sells in 24h) relative to the token's 1-hour age suggest bot-driven or coordinated trading activity rather than organic retail accumulation. The sentiment score reflects the sharp price reversal, insider distribution risk, and absence of any fundamental support.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

The only meaningful price signal available is the intra-launch trajectory: a 293.95% spike within the first hour followed by a -46.3% collapse in the most recent 5-minute window. This is a textbook pump-and-dump price pattern — a sharp vertical launch followed by rapid deterioration. With no OHLC history beyond this single session, both short and medium-term trends are classified as downtrend based on the confirmed price reversal from the intra-hour peak.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

A 293.95% gain within 1 hour on a token with $33,272 in liquidity represents extreme overbought conditions driven by low-liquidity price manipulation rather than genuine demand. The subsequent -46.3% reversal in 5 minutes confirms momentum has turned sharply negative. Without RSI or MACD data (no OHLC history), this assessment is based on the price action pattern alone.

Volume Analysis

Buy

50.7%

Sell

49.3%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

All recorded volume ($521,879 combined) was generated in the token's first hour of existence. The 1-hour transaction window (3,172 buys, 3,049 sells) accounts for nearly 96% of the 24h total, indicating volume is already decelerating sharply from the launch spike. This rapid volume decay following a price pump is a bearish signal consistent with post-pump distribution.

Recent Price Action

Vertical pump followed by sharp reversal: +293.95% over 1 hour, then -46.33% in the most recent 5-minute window, with the current price at $0.0001367

This V-shaped pump-and-dump pattern on a brand-new token with insider pre-allocation is one of the highest-risk price action signatures in crypto markets. It typically indicates that insiders are selling into the retail-driven price spike, and the reversal phase often continues until liquidity is exhausted.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

96/100

Risk Breakdown

VolatilityHigh
A +293.95% pump followed by a -46.33% crash within the token's first hour demonstrates extreme volatility. With only $33,272 in liquidity, even small trades cause significant price impact, and the token's price can move tens of percent on individual transactions.
LiquidityHigh
Total liquidity of $33,272 is critically shallow relative to the $147,666 market cap and the $521,879 in 24h trading volume. Exit liquidity for any position larger than a few hundred dollars will face severe slippage, and the dumpable insider supply alone exceeds the entire liquidity pool.
ConcentrationNot assessed
Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.
Smart ContractNot assessed
Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.
RegulatoryHigh
The deliberate impersonation of the established MIM stablecoin brand may constitute securities fraud, trademark infringement, or market manipulation in multiple jurisdictions. Holders of a token involved in brand impersonation face potential regulatory scrutiny and the risk of exchange delistings or enforcement actions.

Key Risks

Rug pull risk: the unverified contract, insider pre-allocation via transfer, unlabelled deployer funding, and complete absence of project fundamentals collectively represent a near-complete rug pull risk profile — the deployer retains the ability to drain liquidity at any time if a liquidity removal function exists in the unverified contract
Insider dump risk: the top individual whale wallets hold 23% of supply acquired at zero cost via transfer; their combined holdings exceed the entire liquidity pool, meaning coordinated selling would wipe out all exit liquidity for retail holders
Brand impersonation fraud: the token name and ticker directly copy Abracadabra.money's MIM stablecoin, a tactic designed to mislead buyers into thinking they are purchasing a legitimate asset — this is a common scam vector and exposes buyers to total capital loss

Mitigating Factors

The deployer wallet has a 761-day on-chain history, which is longer than typical disposable deployers used in flash rug pulls — though this does not eliminate rug risk given the unverified contract
Buy/sell transaction counts are nearly balanced (3,300 vs 3,156), suggesting the dump phase has not yet been executed in full — retail buyers still have a narrow window to exit before insider distribution accelerates

Investor Suitability

This token is not suitable for any risk-averse investor. Given the convergence of red flags — brand impersonation, unverified contract, insider pre-allocation, minimal liquidity, and no project fundamentals — this token is suitable only for highly experienced traders who fully understand they may lose 100% of any capital deployed and who are treating any position as a pure speculative gamble with no fundamental basis.

There is no credible investment thesis for this token based on available data. The token exhibits the defining characteristics of a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme: brand impersonation, insider pre-allocation, unverified contract, and a price trajectory that has already begun its reversal phase. The bear case is overwhelmingly more probable than any bull scenario.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Against all available evidence, the token attracts a genuine community that builds utility around the MIM brand on BNB Chain, the deployer discloses the project and verifies the contract, and sustained organic buying pressure stabilizes the price above the launch level

Unexpected project disclosure and contract verification that establishes legitimate utility
Organic community formation driven by the recognizable MIM brand attracting speculative buyers

Base Case

The initial pump phase ends, trading volume collapses as bot activity ceases, insider wallets gradually distribute their pre-allocated supply into declining retail interest, and the token price drifts toward near-zero over days to weeks as liquidity thins and holder count drops

No legitimate project development or contract verification occurs, consistent with the absence of any disclosed fundamentals
Insider wallets follow the typical distribution pattern of gradually selling pre-allocated supply rather than executing a single large dump

Bear Case

High probability

Insider wallets that received pre-allocated supply via transfer begin selling into remaining retail buy orders, draining the $33,272 liquidity pool and collapsing the price by 80-100% from current levels; the deployer may also remove liquidity directly if the unverified contract permits it

23% dumpable insider supply exceeds total liquidity pool, making a full liquidity drain mathematically feasible from insider selling alone
Unverified contract may contain liquidity removal or mint functions that accelerate the collapse beyond what holder selling alone would cause

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 1, 2026, 06:15 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-01 18:15 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000136724010067611

Market Cap

$147.7K

24h Volume

$521.9K

Holders

684

Liquidity

$33,271.82

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis)Trading volume metrics (24h DEX data)Smart contract deployment and wallet forensicsToken genesis and initial transfer analysisWhale wallet behavior lookup (DEX swap history)

Limitations

No OHLC price history exists beyond the token's 1-hour lifespan, making technical analysis and price target computation impossible
The unverified contract cannot be analyzed for hidden functions, meaning the full scope of smart contract risk is unknown
Smart-money profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable for this token, limiting insider behavior analysis to structural evidence only
The token is 1 hour old — all metrics reflect an extremely compressed and potentially manipulated launch window rather than organic market behavior

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.