战壕入门包

TrenchesStarterPack Price Today & AI Analysis

战壕入门包BNB ChainAnalysis as of Aug 8, 2026

Price

$0.042955

-30.61% 24h

Contract

Live
0x99f5054f1d9799f901df533fbfe5d9b3f25b4444

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

998

Market cap

$29.55K

Liquidity

$10.59K

More tokens on BNB Chain

VCVCvape cat$0.043629-7.1%MC $36.3KFlyBrainFlyBrainFlyBrain$0.043376-3.0%MC $33.8K金金龟子首个回购99%+1%裂变的金库$0.043889+54.1%MC $38.9KBBEFOREBEFORE$0.059377-25.1%MC $9.4KESIMESIMDEPINSIM Token$0.0291+8.5%MC $29.14Mquqquqquq$0.001621-5.2%MC $1.62M

TrenchesStarterPack: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-08 11:01 UTC

Holder addresses

504

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$27,762.16
How concentrated is TrenchesStarterPack ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 504 addresses (2026-08-08 11:01 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling TrenchesStarterPack?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is TrenchesStarterPack liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-08 11:01 UTC, reported liquidity was $27,762.16. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-08 11:01 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 8, 2026, 11:01 AM UTC

Market Cap

$87.62K

24h Volume

$274.07K

Liquidity

$27.76K

FDV

—

Holders

504

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about 战壕入门包

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Neutral

TrenchesStarterPack (symbol: 战壕入门包) is a meme token on BNB Chain (BSC), launched in October 2025 via the Four.meme launchpad, with a current market cap of approximately $87,621 and only $27,762 in liquidity. Despite being 10 months old, 99% of its 504 holders were acquired within the last 7 days, pointing to a sudden pump-driven activation rather than sustained organic growth. The contract is unverified, no project description or social presence exists, and multiple top whale wallets received their positions via transfer rather than open-market purchases — raising significant insider-distribution concerns. The token presents a very high risk profile appropriate only for highly speculative participants who understand the probability of rapid post-pump value erosion.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 8, 2026, 11:01 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extreme holder growth velocity: 99% of all holders onboarded within 7 days on a 10-month-old contract, suggesting a coordinated reactivation or pump campaign
  • Forensic anomaly: the second-largest individual whale wallet shows a first-active date of 2026-05-21, which is temporally inconsistent and flags potential sybil or manipulated wallet activity
  • Zero fundamental infrastructure: no verified contract, no description, no social links, and no use case — the token exists purely as a speculative meme instrument

TrenchesStarterPack AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

TrenchesStarterPack has posted a sharp 66.6% single-session spike, but with no OHLC history to anchor a trend, this move is an isolated pump rather than a confirmed uptrend. The 5-minute reading of -5.3% suggests momentum is already fading from the peak, and with only $27,762 in liquidity backing an $87,621 market cap, even modest sell pressure can produce violent drawdowns. Nine individual whales collectively holding 20.25% of dumpable supply represent a credible near-term overhang.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The token is 10 months old yet has only 504 holders, with 99% of those holders acquired within the last 7 days — indicating this is effectively a newly-activated or relaunched token rather than an organically growing project. No verified contract, no social presence, no project description, and a security score of 54/100 provide no fundamental floor to support price over a 30–90 day horizon. Without a clear use case or community infrastructure, post-pump reversion is the most probable medium-term path.

Bullish Factors

  • Buy transactions (1,934) outnumber sell transactions (1,428) over the 24-hour window, with 746 unique buyers versus 677 unique sellers, reflecting marginally positive net participation
  • Holder count surged from near-zero to 504 in 7 days, demonstrating rapid initial distribution and broad-based entry rather than a single-wallet accumulation event
  • The largest holder (15.86%) is classified as a protocol/contract rather than a dumpable individual wallet, meaning the top-10 concentration figure of 36% overstates the real sell-side risk

Bearish Factors

  • Three of the top individual whale wallets (3.02%, 2.63%, 2.47%) acquired their positions via transfer rather than market buys, indicating insider or pre-distribution allocation — not organic demand
  • The wallet holding 3.02% was first active on 2026-05-21, a date in the future relative to the token's October 2025 creation, which is a forensic anomaly consistent with sybil or coordinated insider activity
  • Total liquidity of $27,762 against a $87,621 market cap yields a liquidity-to-mcap ratio of roughly 32%, meaning large exits will cause severe slippage and price impact
  • The contract is unverified (security score 54/100), there is no project description, and no social links exist — the token has zero disclosed fundamentals to justify any valuation

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

战壕入门包 call history

Full track record →

Aug 8bearish
24h-60.4%
7d-58.0%
30d-1.9%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0x99f5...4444
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Zero-cost-basis whale positions: three confirmed top whale wallets received supply via transfer rather than market purchase, meaning they can exit at any price and realize profit — creating a structural sell overhang with no price floor incentive
  • Forensic anomaly in whale wallet timestamps: the second-largest individual whale (3.02%) shows a first-active date of 2026-05-21, which is temporally inconsistent and may indicate manipulated wallet metadata, sybil activity, or data integrity issues — all of which elevate the risk profile
  • Unverified smart contract with sub-60 security score: without source code verification, users cannot rule out owner-privileged functions that could freeze funds, mint additional supply, or blacklist selling wallets

Trading Insight

neutral

Buy pressure at 50.6% versus sell pressure at 49.4% is statistically balanced, and the near-identical 1h, 4h, and 24h transaction counts suggest all trading activity is concentrated in a single burst window rather than sustained across the day. The 66.6% price spike with already-fading momentum (down 5.3% in the last 5 minutes) is a classic pump signature, not a trend reversal.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

The 66.6% price gain within the observed window establishes a short-term uptrend by definition, but it is entirely pump-driven with no OHLC history to confirm a sustained directional bias. The 5-minute decline of 5.3% from the peak suggests the impulse is already exhausting. Medium-term trend is classified as sideways because the token showed no price activity for the preceding 10 months before this single burst event.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

A 66.6% single-session spike with immediately fading momentum (−5.3% in 5 minutes) and no fundamental catalyst is a textbook overbought condition. With liquidity of only $27,762, the price is highly sensitive to even small sell orders, and the lack of any prior price history means there is no established mean to revert to — downside discovery could be rapid and deep.

Volume Analysis

Buy

50.6%

Sell

49.4%

Volume Trend

Increasing

All $274,074 in combined volume arrived in a single compressed burst, as evidenced by identical transaction counts across the 1h, 4h, and 24h windows. While volume is technically 'increasing' from a zero baseline, it reflects a one-time event rather than a sustainable trend. The 3:1 volume-to-market-cap ratio is elevated and consistent with speculative pump activity rather than fundamental demand.

Recent Price Action

Single-session vertical spike of +66.6% followed by immediate 5-minute pullback of -5.3%, with no prior price history to contextualize the move

This pattern — a sharp vertical spike with immediate fading and no historical anchor — is characteristic of low-liquidity pump events. Without a consolidation base or prior support structure, the price has no technical floor and is vulnerable to rapid mean-reversion once pump participants begin exiting.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A 66.6% single-session spike with immediate 5.3% pullback on a token with no price history and $27,762 in liquidity indicates extreme volatility. Price can move 50%+ in either direction on minimal volume.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Total liquidity of $27,762 against $274,074 in daily volume means the pool turns over approximately 10x per day. Large exits will cause severe slippage, and the pool could be effectively drained by a single coordinated whale exit.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As a meme token on BNB Chain with no disclosed jurisdiction, team, or legal structure, the token faces the standard regulatory uncertainty applicable to unregistered crypto assets in most jurisdictions.

Key Risks

  • Zero-cost-basis whale positions: three confirmed top whale wallets received supply via transfer rather than market purchase, meaning they can exit at any price and realize profit — creating a structural sell overhang with no price floor incentive
  • Forensic anomaly in whale wallet timestamps: the second-largest individual whale (3.02%) shows a first-active date of 2026-05-21, which is temporally inconsistent and may indicate manipulated wallet metadata, sybil activity, or data integrity issues — all of which elevate the risk profile
  • Unverified smart contract with sub-60 security score: without source code verification, users cannot rule out owner-privileged functions that could freeze funds, mint additional supply, or blacklist selling wallets

Mitigating Factors

  • The largest single holder (15.86%) is a protocol/contract rather than an individual wallet, meaning the headline top-10 concentration figure overstates the real dumpable supply risk
  • All 503 non-whale holders acquired via open-market swap, indicating no broad airdrop distribution that could trigger simultaneous mass selling from recipients with zero cost basis

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced speculative traders who fully understand pump-and-dump dynamics, can afford to lose their entire position, and have the technical capability to monitor on-chain activity in real time. It is not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone who cannot independently verify smart contract safety.

TrenchesStarterPack presents a high-risk speculative profile with no fundamental value anchor, an unverified contract, insider-allocated whale positions at zero cost basis, and a pump-driven holder base with no social infrastructure to sustain momentum. The investment thesis is almost entirely dependent on continued speculative momentum, which is historically short-lived in this token archetype.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued momentum buying drives further price appreciation as the token gains visibility on BSC meme-trading communities; the Four.meme launchpad provides a distribution channel that attracts additional speculative capital, and the holder base expands beyond 1,000 wallets, temporarily sustaining the pump

  • Sustained buy-side transaction volume maintaining the 50.6% buy pressure ratio or improving it
  • Organic social media virality driven by the Chinese-language symbol and 'Trenches Starter Pack' branding resonating with BSC meme-trading culture

Base Case

The pump momentum fades within 24–72 hours as initial buyers rotate out; price retraces 40–70% from the pump peak as liquidity thins and no new fundamental catalyst emerges; the token stabilizes at a lower level with a small residual holder base of 200–300 wallets

  • No new major catalyst (contract verification, project announcement, or exchange listing) emerges to sustain buying interest
  • Whale wallets with zero cost basis gradually distribute their positions over days rather than in a single coordinated exit

Bear Case

High probability

Zero-cost-basis whale wallets begin exiting into the thin $27,762 liquidity pool, triggering cascading sell pressure that rapidly erodes the 66.6% pump gains; the unverified contract introduces additional uncertainty, and the absence of any social community means there is no buyer base to absorb the selling

  • Transfer-acquired whale wallets (20.25% combined dumpable supply) choosing to exit at any price above zero, given their zero cost basis
  • Liquidity pool depletion under sustained sell pressure, causing exponential slippage that accelerates the drawdown

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 8, 2026, 11:01 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-08 11:01 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000087620903422194

Market Cap

$87.6K

24h Volume

$274.1K

Holders

504

Liquidity

$27,762.16

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain / BSC)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)Trading volume metrics (24h buy/sell flow)Smart contract security assessment (security score 54/100)Whale wallet forensics (first-active timestamps, acquisition method lookup)Notable recent trades (real on-chain swap data)Token genesis and deployer profile data

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history is available, making technical support/resistance analysis impossible and forcing all trend conclusions to rely on a single-session data point
  • Smart-money (profitable trader cohort) data is unavailable, preventing assessment of whether sophisticated participants are accumulating or distributing
  • The contract is unverified, meaning the full token mechanics (tax rates, mint functions, blacklist capabilities) cannot be confirmed from source code review
  • The forensic anomaly of a future-dated wallet first-active timestamp (2026-05-21) introduces data integrity uncertainty that cannot be resolved without additional investigation

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track 战壕入门包