溜溜梅

LLM Price Today & AI Analysis

溜溜梅
BNB Chain·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 15, 2026

$0.053099

+0.00%24h
LiveContract:0x66fd8b5752d9f696c73f044beea5a6ecd5f44444Chain:BNB ChainHolders:176Market cap:$3.10KLiquidity:$2.98K

More tokens on BNB Chain

娜塔莎

娜塔莎

黑娃捏捏

$0.0547421.4%
MC $4.7K
时间

时间

Time

$0.0530190.0%
MC $3.0K
何赵

何赵

何赵

$0.0540660.0%
MC $4.1K
�

🅿️

Pushin' 🅿️

$0.13360.0%
MC $133.58M
星星

星星

星星

$0.0556370.0%
MC $5.6K
quq

quq

quq

$0.0017790.0%
MC $1.78M

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about 溜溜梅

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since reportreport from Jun 15, 2026, 08:30 AM UTC
Market Cap

$132.26K

24h Volume

$299.58K

Liquidity

$35.53K

FDV

—

Holders

526

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

—

AI Executive Summary

LLM (溜溜梅) is a 3-day-old meme token deployed on BNB Chain via the Four.meme launchpad, with a market cap of approximately $132,257 and $35,533 in liquidity. The token has experienced a 131.6% price surge since launch, driven by speculative trading activity across 871 unique buyers and 723 unique sellers in its first 72 hours. However, the unverified contract, 49/100 security score, zero project documentation, and the fact that the three largest individual whale wallets received their supply via transfer at zero cost basis collectively paint a high-risk profile. The token exhibits the classic anatomy of a Four.meme launch-and-speculate cycle with no identifiable fundamental value proposition.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 15, 2026, 08:30 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: neutral
Extremely rapid holder growth — 519 new holders in 3 days from a base of 7, representing 99% of all holders joining within the token's lifetime
All top individual whale positions were acquired via transfer (not market buys), meaning the largest potential sellers carry zero cost basis
Deployer wallet (0x757eba15…) is 441 days old with zero prior contract deployments in its first 100 transactions, presenting an ambiguous profile — neither a clear serial launcher nor a verifiably organic creator

LLM AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

LLM (溜溜梅) has surged 131.6% within its first 72 hours of existence, a move characteristic of launch-day pump dynamics on Four.meme launchpads rather than organic price discovery. With no OHLC history to establish support, the token is trading in a vacuum of technical reference points, making a sharp mean-reversion highly probable as early recipients of transferred supply seek exits. The 48.9% sell pressure and six of the six largest notable trades being a mix of buys and sells in the $127–$609 range signals active two-way speculation, not conviction accumulation.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

Over a 30–90 day horizon, the structural outlook is bearish. The token has no verified contract, no stated use case, no social presence, and a security score of 49/100 — the hallmarks of a short-lifecycle meme token. Holder growth of 519 wallets in 3 days is impressive in raw numbers but is almost entirely concentrated in the launch window, and the three largest individual whales (2.51%, 2.22%, 1.92%) all received their positions via transfer rather than market buys, meaning they carry zero cost basis and face no friction to sell. Without a sustained narrative or community catalyst, the typical trajectory for Four.meme launches of this profile is rapid holder attrition and price decay.

Bullish Factors
  • +Holder count grew from 7 to 526 in 3 days (+519, +99% over the 31-day window), indicating rapid early adoption and genuine market interest in the launch
  • +Buy transactions (2,387) outnumber sell transactions (2,164) over 24 hours, and buy volume ($153,197) exceeds sell volume ($146,377), reflecting a marginally positive net flow of approximately $6,820
  • +The top-10 concentration is only 28% of supply, and the largest single holder is a protocol/contract at 13.01% — dumpable supply from individual whales is limited to 20.2% of total supply
Bearish Factors
  • -The contract is unverified and carries a security score of 49/100, meaning the code cannot be independently audited and may contain hidden mint, pause, or fee functions
  • -All three forensically examined top whale wallets (2.51%, 2.22%, 1.92%) acquired their positions via transfer with zero DEX swap history on this token — they hold supply at effectively zero cost basis and can dump without any break-even pressure
  • -The deployer wallet (0x757eba15…) was first funded by an unknown source, creating an opaque origin chain that prevents assessment of whether this is a repeat scam operator
  • -No project description, no social links, and a Four.meme meme classification mean there is no fundamental value floor — price is entirely sentiment-driven and subject to collapse once launch momentum fades

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

溜溜梅 call history

Full track record →
Jun 15bearish
24h-94.0%
7d-94.7%
30d-97.3%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBNB Chain
Contract0x66fd...4444
Total Supply—
Decimals—

Key Risks

•Zero-cost-basis whale dump risk: the top three individual whales (2.51%, 2.22%, 1.92%) received supply via transfer and can sell their entire positions as pure profit at any time, with $35,533 in liquidity providing minimal absorption capacity
•Unverified contract with 49/100 security score: hidden owner functions could allow minting, trading freezes, or liquidity extraction without warning — the deployer's unknown funding source compounds this risk
•Launch-burst trading pattern with no sustained organic activity: identical transaction counts across 1h/4h/24h windows indicate all trading occurred in a single burst, and without fresh volume entering the market, the current price has no active buying support

Trading Insight

neutral

Market sentiment is marginally positive by transaction count and volume metrics — 51.1% buy pressure versus 48.9% sell pressure — but the near-parity signals a speculative tug-of-war rather than directional conviction. The identical transaction counts across the 1h, 4h, and 24h windows strongly suggest all trading activity occurred in a single burst at or shortly after launch, with little to no organic trading in subsequent hours.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bullish
Medium-Term (30d):
Neutral

The short-term trend is technically an uptrend given the 131.6% price gain since launch, but this is entirely a launch-day event rather than a sustained directional move — the identical price performance across 1h, 4h, and 24h confirms the move happened in a single burst. Medium-term trend is classified as sideways because there is no multi-day OHLC history to establish a directional bias, and post-launch trading appears to have stalled.

Momentum

Status:
Overbought

A 131.6% gain in under 24 hours on a meme token with $35,533 in liquidity and no fundamental backing is a textbook overbought condition. The near-equal buy/sell pressure (51.1% vs 48.9%) following the initial surge suggests momentum has already exhausted and the token is in a distribution phase rather than a continuation phase.

Volume Analysis

Buy 51.1%Sell 48.9%

Volume Trend: Decreasing

All $299,575 in 24h volume appears to have been generated in a single launch-hour burst, as evidenced by identical transaction counts across 1h, 4h, and 24h windows. This front-loaded volume pattern is typical of coordinated launch events and suggests organic trading interest has not materialized post-launch. Decreasing volume following a sharp price spike is a bearish technical signal.

Recent Price Action

Vertical launch spike of 131.6% followed by apparent price stagnation — the 5-minute reading of +35.96% suggests some continued volatility at the micro level, but the 1h/4h/24h figures being identical indicates the macro move has completed

This pattern — a sharp vertical spike followed by flat action — typically precedes either a secondary pump if new buyers enter, or a gradual to sharp retracement as early holders and zero-cost-basis transfer recipients seek to realize gains. Without new catalysts or fresh liquidity, the latter is statistically more common for Four.meme launches.

Holder Metrics

Total Holders526
24h Change+486
Growth Rate+92%

Holder growth from 7 to 526 over 3 days is numerically impressive but must be contextualized: 99% of all holders joined within the token's 3-day lifetime, and 92% joined in a single 24-hour window coinciding with the launch event. This is a launch-burst pattern, not organic community building. The critical question is whether holder count continues to grow organically in days 4–30, or plateaus and reverses as is common with Four.meme launches.

Holder Distribution

Top 10 Holders28%
Top 100 Holders77%
Retail Holders23.0%
Concentration Risk:
Medium

The top-10 holders control 28% of supply, but the largest single position (13.01%) is a protocol/contract that is not dumpable. Stripping that out, the nine individual whale positions in the top 10 collectively hold approximately 14.91%, and total dumpable supply across all individual whales is 20.2%. The top-100 controlling 77% with retail at only 23% indicates meaningful concentration, but the protocol contract's dominant position moderates the actual dump risk to medium rather than critical.

Whale Activity

Sentiment:
Distributing

The six largest notable on-chain swaps recorded are: a $609 buy by 0xa3ad08, a $340 sell by 0x9c2431, a $224 sell by 0xa9b029, a $215 buy by 0xa9b029 (the same wallet both buying and selling), a $175 sell by 0x773ba4, and a $127 sell by 0x00ddc2. Sell-side transactions outnumber buy-side 4:2 among the largest trades.

  • •Largest single trade: $609 BUY by 0xa3ad08 — the only trade above $500, suggesting limited high-conviction accumulation
  • •0xa9b029 both bought ($215) and sold ($224) in the notable trades window, indicating a flip/scalp behavior rather than directional conviction

Among the six largest recorded swaps, four are sells totaling $866 versus two buys totaling $824. The largest individual whale wallets (top 3 examined) hold zero-cost-basis positions via transfer and have not executed any DEX swaps on this token — they are sitting on unrealized gains with no demonstrated intent yet. The overall whale posture reads as early-stage distribution with scalpers active on both sides.

Smart Money Indicators

Confidence:
Low
Profit-Taking Risk:
High

Smart-money data is unavailable for this token — no profitable-trader cohort data has been indexed.

Smart-money data is unavailable, so no inference about early buyer positioning can be made. However, the structural fact that the top three individual whales received supply via transfer at zero cost basis means any sale by them is pure profit — the profit-taking risk from these wallets is inherently high regardless of smart-money signals.

Liquidity Analysis

Total Liquidity$35,532.90
Depth:
Shallow
Slippage Risk:
High

At $35,533 in total liquidity against a $132,257 market cap, the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio is approximately 26.9% — shallow for a token that processed $299,575 in 24h volume. A single whale exiting even 1% of supply (worth ~$1,323 at current price) would represent ~3.7% of the liquidity pool, causing meaningful slippage. Any coordinated exit by the 20.2% dumpable supply would be catastrophic to price given this liquidity depth.

Overall Risk:
Very High
87/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

A 131.6% price gain in under 24 hours on a 3-day-old token with $35,533 in liquidity is extreme volatility. The shallow liquidity pool means even modest selling pressure can cause double-digit percentage price drops. No OHLC history exists to establish volatility baselines.

Liquidity
High

Total liquidity of $35,533 against $299,575 in 24h volume (a ratio of ~8.4x) means the pool is being turned over multiple times daily, creating high slippage risk for any position of meaningful size. Exit liquidity for whale-sized positions is severely constrained.

Concentration
Medium

Dumpable supply is 20.2% held by individual whales who acquired positions via transfer at zero cost basis. While the raw top-10 figure of 28% includes a 13.01% protocol/contract that is not sellable, the remaining individual whale concentration still poses meaningful dump risk if coordinated exits occur.

Smart Contract
High

Unverified contract with a 49/100 security score. The source code is not publicly available for audit, and the deployer's funding source is unknown. Hidden privileged functions cannot be excluded, making this a high smart contract risk.

Regulatory
Medium

As a BNB Chain meme token with no KYC, no registered entity, and no disclosed team, this token operates in a regulatory gray zone. Increased scrutiny of meme tokens in major jurisdictions (US, EU, Asia) could affect trading platform availability, though the token's small size limits systemic regulatory attention.

Key Risks

  • •Zero-cost-basis whale dump risk: the top three individual whales (2.51%, 2.22%, 1.92%) received supply via transfer and can sell their entire positions as pure profit at any time, with $35,533 in liquidity providing minimal absorption capacity
  • •Unverified contract with 49/100 security score: hidden owner functions could allow minting, trading freezes, or liquidity extraction without warning — the deployer's unknown funding source compounds this risk
  • •Launch-burst trading pattern with no sustained organic activity: identical transaction counts across 1h/4h/24h windows indicate all trading occurred in a single burst, and without fresh volume entering the market, the current price has no active buying support

Mitigating Factors

  • •The largest single holder (13.01%) is a protocol/contract and is not dumpable, meaningfully reducing the effective concentration risk below what the raw top-10 figure suggests
  • •The deployer wallet is 441 days old rather than freshly created, which is a marginal positive signal compared to disposable-deployer patterns, though the unknown funding source limits this reassurance

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who specialize in high-risk meme token speculation, can afford to lose their entire position, and are actively monitoring on-chain activity for exit signals. It is entirely unsuitable for long-term investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone allocating more than a negligible fraction of their portfolio.

LLM (溜溜梅) is a high-risk, short-lifecycle meme token whose investment case rests entirely on continued speculative momentum — a fragile foundation given the unverified contract, zero-cost-basis whale positions, shallow liquidity, and absence of any project fundamentals. The bear case is structurally stronger than the bull case at this stage.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

The 溜溜梅 cultural meme resonates virally within Chinese-speaking crypto communities, driving a second wave of organic buyer demand that sustains and extends the launch-day price gains. Holder count continues growing beyond the launch burst, liquidity deepens, and the token achieves a listing on a mid-tier CEX that provides price discovery and legitimacy.

  • +Viral social media adoption of the 溜溜梅 meme theme in Chinese-speaking crypto communities driving organic demand
  • +CEX listing or aggregator feature that brings new liquidity and visibility beyond the Four.meme launchpad ecosystem
Base Case

The token trades sideways to down over the next 30 days as launch-day speculators gradually exit, holder count stabilizes or slowly declines, and price erodes 50–80% from the launch peak as the meme narrative fails to gain traction without social media infrastructure. The token survives but becomes illiquid and largely inactive.

  • •No major coordinated whale dump occurs immediately, allowing for a gradual rather than catastrophic price decline
  • •No viral social catalyst emerges to reignite speculative interest beyond the initial launch window
Bear Case
High

Zero-cost-basis whale holders begin exiting through the $35,533 liquidity pool, causing rapid price deterioration. The unverified contract is exploited or the deployer exercises hidden owner functions. Holder count plateaus and reverses as launch-day speculators exit, and the token follows the typical Four.meme lifecycle of rapid decay within 7–14 days of launch.

  • -Transfer-recipient whales (20.2% dumpable supply) selling into the shallow liquidity pool, causing cascading price drops and panic selling
  • -Absence of social presence and project documentation preventing any sustained community narrative from forming to attract new buyers

Analysis Details

GeneratedJun 15, 2026, 08:30 AM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data as of analysis timestamp
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.000137142763620614
Market Cap$132.3K
24h Volume$299.6K
Holders526
Liquidity$35.5K

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain)
Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)
Trading volume metrics (24h buy/sell data)
Smart contract analysis (security score, verification status)
Wallet forensics (deployer profile, whale wallet intel, token genesis transfers)
Holder trajectory timeseries (31-day daily data)

Limitations

  • •No OHLC price history exists for this 3-day-old token, making technical analysis and price target derivation impossible — all trend analysis is based on the single launch-day price event
  • •Smart-money / profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable, preventing assessment of whether sophisticated investors are accumulating or distributing
  • •The unverified contract cannot be analyzed for hidden functions, meaning smart contract risk is assessed from external signals (security score, deployer profile) rather than direct code review
  • •Identical transaction counts across 1h/4h/24h windows suggest a data anomaly or launch-burst concentration that limits the reliability of volume and transaction trend analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track 溜溜梅