fourclub

fourclub Price Today & AI Analysis

fourclubBNB ChainAnalysis as of Aug 10, 2026

Price

$0.054577

+2.77% 24h

Contract

Live
0x530227c569960ba0fa345f19cf743a477f147777

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

566

Market cap

$4.58K

Liquidity

$3.58K

More tokens on BNB Chain

immortalimmortalimmortal$0.054773+0.2%MC $4.8K爆爆金币国家电影总局刚刚过审的电影$0.053112-2.9%MC $3.1KMartianMartianMartian$0.057224-0.6%MC $7.2KGIRAFFESGIRAFFESThe Giraffes$0.059916+2.2%MC $9.9Ksiriussiriussirius$0.043618-2.5%MC $36.2KPpPOLYPaimon Polymarket SPV Token$10.36+3.7%MC $5.10M

fourclub: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-10 22:46 UTC

Holder addresses

838

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$65,477.69
How concentrated is fourclub ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 838 addresses (2026-08-10 22:46 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling fourclub?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is fourclub liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-10 22:46 UTC, reported liquidity was $65,477.69. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-10 22:46 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 10, 2026, 10:46 PM UTC

Market Cap

$518.31K

24h Volume

$1.52M

Liquidity

$65.48K

FDV

—

Holders

838

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about fourclub

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

fourclub (FOURCLUB) is a BNB Chain token launched 7 hours ago, purportedly tied to a 444-NFT collection with on-chain reward mechanics funded by protocol revenues distributed as bStocks. The token experienced a sharp post-launch pump followed by a steep 66.8% price decline over 4 hours, a pattern consistent with speculative launch volatility or a coordinated pump-and-dump. Critical red flags include an unverified smart contract, six insider wallets that received supply directly at genesis, three top whale wallets first active on launch day with no DEX swap history, and only $65K in liquidity backing a $518K market cap. At this stage the token is extremely high risk, with no track record, no audited contract, and active price deterioration.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 10, 2026, 10:46 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • NFT-backed borrowing and on-chain reward distribution via bStocks is a differentiated mechanic if the protocol is genuine
  • Deployer wallet is 770 days old with no prior contract deployments — atypical for a serial scam launcher
  • All 838 holders acquired tokens within the last 7 hours, making this one of the most nascent tokens possible to analyse

fourclub AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

fourclub is only 7 hours old and has already shed 66.8% of its value over the past 4 hours and 39.3% in the last hour, signalling a sharp post-launch dump in progress. The 897% 24h figure reflects the initial pump from zero, not a sustainable rally — the dominant trend since peak is strongly downward. With 94 unique sellers versus 58 unique buyers in the last hour, selling pressure is accelerating relative to buying.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The medium-term outlook is bearish given the token's structural red flags: an unverified contract, six insider wallets that received supply directly at genesis via transfer (not market buys), and 31.5% of supply sitting in dumpable individual-whale wallets. Unless the NFT/bStock protocol mechanics attract genuine user adoption and liquidity deepens well beyond the current $65K, sustained price appreciation is unlikely. The project description references a 444-NFT collection and on-chain reward distribution, but no evidence of a live user base or protocol revenue exists at this stage.

Bullish Factors

  • 24-hour buy transaction count (5,172) exceeds sell count (4,366), and buy volume ($769K) marginally outpaces sell volume ($746K), indicating net inflow on the day despite the price decline.
  • The deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8) has been active since 2024-07-01 — 770 days — with no prior contract deployments in its first 100 transactions, suggesting this is not a serial disposable-deployer pattern.
  • The two largest holders (18.64% and 6.32%) are classified as protocol/contract addresses, meaning that combined ~25% of supply is not freely dumpable whale risk.

Bearish Factors

  • Price has collapsed 66.8% in 4 hours and 39.3% in 1 hour — a classic post-launch pump-and-dump trajectory from a token that is only 7 hours old.
  • Six wallets (0xd7d967, 0xe50f88, 0xa01526, 0xeca682, 0x3763f8, and the deployer 0xe2ce6ab8) received a combined ~150M tokens directly from the deployer at genesis before any trading, constituting undisclosed insider allocations.
  • The three largest individual whale wallets (3.36%, 3.11%, 2.88%) all show zero DEX swap history on this token — their positions were handed to them via transfer, not purchased, and all three wallets were first active on launch day (2026-08-10), a strong sybil/insider signal.
  • The smart contract is unverified, earning a security score of only 64/100, making it impossible for outside parties to audit the code for backdoors or malicious functions.
  • Total liquidity is only $65,477 against a $518K market cap — a liquidity-to-market-cap ratio of ~12.6%, meaning even modest sell pressure causes severe slippage and price impact.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

fourclub call history

Full track record →

Aug 10bearish
24h-33.0%
7d—
30d-99.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0x5302...7777
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Insider dump risk: six wallets received ~150M tokens (15% of supply) via genesis transfers with zero cost basis; any coordinated sale into the $65K liquidity pool would be catastrophic for price
  • Unverified contract: without source code verification, the contract may contain hidden mint, pause, or liquidity-drain functions that could be triggered at any time
  • Post-launch price collapse already underway: the 66.8% 4-hour decline and 39.3% 1-hour decline suggest the pump phase has ended and distribution is accelerating — late buyers face severe mark-to-market losses

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite marginally positive 24-hour buy/sell ratios by count and volume, the intra-hour data tells a deteriorating story: in the last hour, unique sellers (94) outnumber unique buyers (58) by 62%, and the price has fallen 39.3% in that window. The 24-hour aggregate figures are dominated by the early pump phase and mask the current distribution dynamic.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

The only meaningful price history available is the intraday data from this 7-hour-old token. The 4-hour price decline of 66.8% and 1-hour decline of 39.3% define an accelerating downtrend with no sign of stabilisation. There is no medium-term OHLC data to assess, but the structural conditions — insider supply overhang, shallow liquidity, unverified contract — are consistent with continued downward pressure.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

A 66.8% decline in 4 hours and 39.3% in 1 hour places the token in deeply oversold territory on any short-term momentum measure. However, oversold conditions in a token with active insider distribution and no fundamental support do not reliably produce bounces — the oversold reading reflects selling velocity, not an imminent reversal signal.

Volume Analysis

Buy

50.8%

Sell

49.2%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

Total 24-hour volume of approximately $1.515M is high relative to the $65K liquidity pool, indicating the pool has been cycled many times over. However, the 4-hour transaction count of 1,720 versus the 24-hour total of 9,538 shows volume is decelerating sharply as the launch excitement fades. Decreasing volume into a price decline is a bearish continuation signal.

Recent Price Action

Post-launch pump followed by accelerating distribution: price surged ~897% from launch then reversed sharply, losing 66.8% in 4 hours and 39.3% in the most recent hour. The 5-minute decline of 7.3% confirms the sell-off is ongoing at the time of analysis.

This pattern — rapid post-launch spike followed by cascading decline — is characteristic of either a coordinated pump-and-dump or a speculative launch with no sustained demand. The acceleration of the decline (each successive time window showing a larger percentage drop) suggests sellers are not finding sufficient buy-side absorption.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A 66.8% price decline in 4 hours on a 7-hour-old token with $65K liquidity represents extreme volatility. The thin liquidity pool amplifies every trade into outsized price moves, and the post-launch dump pattern shows no sign of stabilisation.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Total liquidity of $65,477 is critically shallow relative to the $518K market cap. Large holders attempting to exit will face severe slippage, and a coordinated sell by insider wallets holding 31.5% of dumpable supply could effectively drain the pool.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    The token's combination of NFT mechanics, borrowing, and yield distribution via bStocks could attract regulatory scrutiny as a potential securities offering in multiple jurisdictions. BNB Chain tokens with yield-bearing NFT mechanics have faced increasing regulatory attention globally.

Key Risks

  • Insider dump risk: six wallets received ~150M tokens (15% of supply) via genesis transfers with zero cost basis; any coordinated sale into the $65K liquidity pool would be catastrophic for price
  • Unverified contract: without source code verification, the contract may contain hidden mint, pause, or liquidity-drain functions that could be triggered at any time
  • Post-launch price collapse already underway: the 66.8% 4-hour decline and 39.3% 1-hour decline suggest the pump phase has ended and distribution is accelerating — late buyers face severe mark-to-market losses

Mitigating Factors

  • Deployer wallet is 770 days old with no prior contract deployments, reducing (but not eliminating) the probability of a serial scam operation
  • Two protocol/contract addresses hold ~25% of supply and are not dumpable, providing some structural floor to the concentration risk

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of sub-$100K liquidity launches, can afford to lose their entire position, and are actively monitoring on-chain activity in real time. It is not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with BNB Chain micro-cap token dynamics.

fourclub is a high-risk speculative launch with a novel NFT-yield mechanic that, if genuine, could attract a niche user base — but the structural evidence (insider allocations, unverified contract, active price collapse) overwhelmingly favours the bear case at this stage. The investment thesis hinges entirely on whether the protocol mechanics are real and whether the team can build a user base before insider supply is distributed into the market.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The 444-NFT collection launches successfully, protocol revenues begin flowing to bStock distributions, and the built-in marketplace attracts genuine trading volume. The deployer's 770-day wallet history reflects a legitimate team that delivers on the roadmap, the contract is verified and audited, and the 838 early holders become evangelists who attract broader adoption.

  • Successful NFT collection launch with verifiable on-chain protocol revenue
  • Smart contract verification and independent audit removing the unverified-contract risk premium

Base Case

The token stabilises at a fraction of its launch peak as speculative volume fades, retaining a small community of NFT enthusiasts. Price remains highly volatile and illiquid, with periodic pumps driven by NFT-related announcements but no sustained uptrend until (and unless) the protocol generates verifiable revenue.

  • Insider wallets do not immediately dump their full positions, allowing some price stabilisation
  • The NFT collection launches and generates at least nominal protocol activity, providing a fundamental narrative

Bear Case

High probability

The six genesis-transfer wallets gradually sell their zero-cost-basis positions into the thin $65K liquidity pool, accelerating the current price decline. The unverified contract is exploited or a hidden function is triggered, draining liquidity. The token follows the classic pump-and-dump trajectory to near-zero within days.

  • 31.5% dumpable supply held by insider-allocated wallets with zero cost basis and no lock-up
  • Unverified contract with unknown functions operating on a $65K liquidity pool

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 10, 2026, 10:46 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-10 22:46 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000518308430890469

Market Cap

$518.3K

24h Volume

$1.52M

Holders

838

Liquidity

$65,477.69

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis)Trading volume metrics (24h, 4h, 1h windows)Smart contract security assessmentDeployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet on-chain behaviour lookupToken genesis transfer analysis

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history exists for this 7-hour-old token, making technical support/resistance analysis impossible
  • Smart-money (profitable trader cohort) data is unavailable, preventing assessment of informed capital flows
  • The unverified contract cannot be audited, leaving smart contract risk partially unquantifiable
  • Project description is self-reported by the token creator and cannot be independently verified at this stage

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track fourclub