GRVT Price Today & AI Analysis
Price
$0.2232
-5.33% 24h
Contract
Live0x46f2564e0fa8248d15125e7e54173cfbdef91be7At a $10M market cap, $GRVT would be $0.7483 (3.35x from today’s price)
Market cap calculatorIs GRVT a scam?
Unhosted check · Oct 29
No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, with a few things to know below.
Creator holds
- The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.
- The contract owner has not given up control.
- The liquidity could not be measured.
Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.
Ask Unhosted AI about GRVT
3 free answers a day
More tokens on BNB Chain
GRVT: holders, selling & liquidity
2026-07-30 13:15 UTC
Holder addresses
Top 10 supply share
Reported liquidity
- How concentrated is GRVT ownership?
- Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 10,734 addresses (2026-07-30 13:15 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
- Are large holders selling GRVT?
- This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
- Is GRVT liquidity falling?
- As of 2026-07-30 13:15 UTC, reported liquidity was $680,013.76. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations
Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-30 13:15 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.
Recent swap evidence
Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.
1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.
Ask Wick about this chartAdvanced charting powered by TradingView
Movement since report
report from Jul 30, 2026, 01:15 PM UTC
Market Cap
24h Volume
Liquidity
FDV
Holders
24h
Loading trading activity…AI Executive Summary
Risk
Sentiment
GRVT is a 55-day-old BNB Chain utility token (contract 0x46f2564e…) currently priced at $0.2836 with a $3.66M market cap, having suffered a devastating 44.2% price collapse within the past 24 hours. The token's holder base expanded by 10,722 wallets in a single day — representing virtually the entire holder count — a pattern strongly consistent with a mass airdrop event followed by immediate recipient selling. With no project description, no social presence, no OHLC history, and all top individual whales holding zero-cost-basis positions acquired via transfer rather than market purchases, the risk profile is very high. The only structural positive is that the deployer wallet has a 385-day history with no prior deployments, which weakly suggests this is not a repeat serial-launcher operation.
Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jul 30, 2026, 01:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.
Key points
- Near-total holder base materialized in a single 24-hour window, suggesting a mass airdrop rather than organic community growth
- All top individual whale positions were acquired via transfer/airdrop with zero-cost basis, creating asymmetric sell pressure with no downside for insiders
- Deployer wallet is 385 days old with no prior contract deployments, an unusual profile that distinguishes it from typical serial-launcher rug patterns but does not eliminate risk
GRVT AI Price Analysis
Low Confidence
Short-Term · 24h-7d
BearishGRVT has collapsed 44.2% in the past 24 hours, a catastrophic single-session drawdown that signals severe selling pressure rather than routine volatility. Sell transactions (42,013) outnumber buy transactions (20,415) by more than 2:1, and unique sellers (20,287) vastly outnumber unique buyers (2,145), indicating broad-based distribution rather than a handful of large exits. Until selling exhaustion is confirmed and price stabilizes, the short-term path of least resistance remains downward.
Medium-Term · 30d-90d
BearishThe holder trajectory tells a stark story: over 31 days of tracking, net holder growth is only +4 wallets (from 0 to 4 in the timeseries), yet the reported total of 10,734 holders appears to have been acquired almost entirely within the last 24–48 hours (24h change: +10,722, or 100%). This pattern — a sudden, near-instantaneous holder explosion followed by a 44% price crash — is consistent with an airdrop or token distribution event that triggered immediate mass selling. Without a clear use case, social presence, or smart-money accumulation signal, medium-term recovery prospects are weak. The 55-day-old token has no established price floor and no demonstrated demand base.
Bullish Factors
- Buy pressure remains marginally positive at 51.5% of volume ($3.88M buys vs $3.64M sells), suggesting some demand absorption even during the crash
- Binance Wallet holds 31.03% of supply — if this represents a legitimate exchange custody allocation, it signals institutional-level distribution infrastructure rather than a purely anonymous project
- The deployer wallet (0x25135153…) has been active since 2025-07-10 (385 days old) with zero prior contract deployments, which is consistent with a first-time legitimate project rather than a serial rug-pull launcher
Bearish Factors
- A 44.2% price collapse in a single 24-hour session is an extreme drawdown that typically signals either a coordinated dump, a failed token launch, or the unwinding of an airdrop distribution
- Unique sellers (20,287) outnumber unique buyers (2,145) by a ratio of nearly 9.5:1, indicating mass retail exit rather than a few large wallets repositioning
- All three top individual whales (11.48%, 3.17%, 2.70% of supply) acquired their positions via transfer or airdrop — none made market buys — meaning their cost basis is effectively zero and they face no loss from selling at any price
- The holder timeseries shows only +4 net holders over 31 days of organic growth, with 10,722 of 10,734 total holders appearing in a single 24-hour window, consistent with a mass airdrop dump event
- No project description, no social links, and an 'Uncategorized' classification leave the token with no identifiable value proposition to support a recovery narrative
Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.
GRVT call history
Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.
Token Info
- Chain
- BNB Chain
- Contract
- 0x46f2...1be7
- Total Supply
- —
- Decimals
- —
Key Risks
- Insider dump risk: Three top individual whales (17.35% combined supply) hold zero-cost-basis positions acquired via transfer/airdrop, with wallets activated in July 2026 — they can sell at any price and realize profit, creating persistent downward pressure with no natural floor
- Information vacuum: No project description, no social presence, and no identifiable team means investors cannot assess the project's legitimacy, roadmap, or probability of survival — the token is effectively an anonymous asset with no verifiable value proposition
- Airdrop liquidation overhang: 10,722 holders appeared in 24 hours during a 44.2% crash, suggesting the initial airdrop distribution is still being liquidated; the sell-off may not be complete if remaining airdrop recipients have not yet exited
Trading Insight
Despite buy volume marginally exceeding sell volume in dollar terms ($3.88M vs $3.64M), the transaction count and unique participant data paint an overwhelmingly bearish picture: sellers outnumber buyers 9.5:1 by unique wallet count, and sell transactions outnumber buys 2:1. This divergence — where buy volume holds up in dollar terms but seller count is massive — suggests a small number of buyers are absorbing a very large number of small retail sellers, which is not a sustainable demand dynamic.
AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
New reports on BNB Chain
Questions about GRVT? — whales, Twitter, risks, a fair entry







