螢火計劃

螢火計劃 Price Today & AI Analysis

螢火計劃BNB ChainAnalysis as of Aug 10, 2026

Price

$0.000835

-7.60% 24h

Contract

Live
0x3a232241605481d78e27857c0305937029ac7777

Holders

8.0K

Market cap

$835.05K

Liquidity

$47.09K

More tokens on BNB Chain

螢火計劃: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-10 21:16 UTC

Holder addresses

1,231

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is 螢火計劃 ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,231 addresses (2026-08-10 21:16 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling 螢火計劃?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is 螢火計劃 liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-10 21:16 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 10, 2026, 09:16 PM UTC

Market Cap

$576.77K

24h Volume

$0.00

Liquidity

—

FDV

—

Holders

1,231

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about 螢火計劃

Continue in chat

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

This unnamed token on BNB Chain (BSC) was deployed just 14 hours ago at contract 0x3a232241…, carries a market cap of approximately $576,775, and has accumulated 1,231 holders entirely within its first day of existence. The project has no published description, no social presence, an unverified smart contract, and a deployer wallet funded by an unlabelled source — all of which place it firmly in the highest-risk tier of new token launches. While 60.65% of supply sits in a burn address (reducing effective float), 43% of current holders received tokens via airdrop, creating immediate sell-side overhang. Without contract verification, a disclosed use case, or any smart-money participation on record, this token presents a speculative profile appropriate only for investors who fully accept the possibility of total loss.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 10, 2026, 09:16 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Burn address holds 60.65% of total supply, dramatically compressing the tradeable float relative to the nominal 1 billion token supply
  • Unusually rapid holder accumulation — 1,231 wallets in 14 hours — driven heavily by airdrop distribution (534 wallets, 43% of holders)
  • Deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8…) is 770 days old but recorded zero contract deployments in its earliest 100 transactions, an atypical profile that warrants scrutiny

螢火計劃 AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

At just 14 hours old with no OHLC price history to anchor any trend, the token's short-term outlook is dominated by structural red flags: an unverified contract, 534 airdrop recipients who received supply at zero cost and face no incentive to hold, and the two largest recent on-chain swaps being sells. The absence of any established price discovery mechanism means downward pressure from early recipients liquidating is the most probable near-term dynamic.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Over a 30–90 day horizon, survival depends entirely on whether the project can establish genuine utility, community, and liquidity — none of which are evidenced in the current data. The token has no description, no social links, no verified contract, and a deployer wallet funded by an unlabelled source with zero prior deployments on record. Without a credible development narrative emerging quickly, the base case is continued sell pressure and holder attrition.

Bullish Factors

  • 60.65% of total supply is held in a burn address, meaning the effective circulating supply is substantially reduced and genuine dumpable supply from individual whales is only ~2.04% (six wallets totalling roughly 2.04% of total supply)
  • 1,231 holders acquired within 14 hours indicates rapid initial distribution and some level of early market interest, with 648 wallets entering via active swap — a sign of at least partial organic demand

Bearish Factors

  • The contract is unverified (security score 57/100), meaning buyers cannot inspect the code for mint functions, hidden fees, or backdoors — a critical red flag for a brand-new token
  • 534 of 1,231 holders (43%) received tokens via airdrop at zero cost, creating a large cohort with no economic incentive to hold and high probability of immediate selling
  • The deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8…) was funded by an unlabelled wallet with no traceable origin, and recorded zero contract deployments in its first 100 transactions — consistent with a disposable or purpose-built deployer pattern
  • The two largest recent on-chain swaps are sells ($960 and $916), while the largest buy is only $397, indicating net distributional pressure in the token's earliest trading hours
  • No project description, no social links, and no category classification leave investors with zero fundamental basis for valuation

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0x3a23...7777
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug pull / exit scam risk: unverified contract, deployer funded by unlabelled wallet, zero prior deployments, and no public project identity create conditions where the deployer could drain liquidity or exploit hidden contract functions with no accountability
  • Airdrop dump risk: 534 wallets (43% of holders) received tokens at zero cost and face no holding incentive; coordinated or simultaneous selling by this cohort could collapse the price in a token with shallow liquidity
  • Information asymmetry risk: with no project description, no social channels, and an unverified contract, retail buyers are operating with near-zero information while the deployer and presale participants (PinkSale, 5%) have full knowledge of the project's intent and structure

Trading Insight

bearish

Early trading activity is skewed toward selling, with the two largest individual swaps being sells ($960 and $916) against a largest buy of $397. The presence of 534 airdrop recipients — who hold cost-free positions — creates persistent latent sell pressure that is likely to weigh on price in the near term.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Neutral

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

With only 14 hours of existence and no OHLC price history available, no technical trend can be derived from price data. The short-term is classified as sideways by default given the absence of directional price evidence, while the medium-term leans toward downtrend based on structural fundamentals: airdrop sell overhang, net sell-side dollar volume, and no catalysts to drive sustained buying. Any technical trend assessment will remain unreliable until several days of price history accumulate.

Momentum

Status

Neutral

No RSI, MACD, or other momentum indicators can be computed without OHLC history. The observable on-chain momentum — net sell-side dollar flow of $1,876 vs $838 in buys — is weakly negative, but the sample size of six transactions is too small to draw statistically meaningful momentum conclusions.

Volume Analysis

Buy

31%

Sell

69%

Volume Trend

Stable

Total observable swap volume across six transactions is approximately $2,714 in the token's first 14 hours. Sell volume ($1,876) accounts for roughly 69% of total swap volume versus buy volume ($838) at 31%. This sell-heavy ratio in the earliest trading window is a bearish volume signal, though the absolute dollar amounts are too small to indicate institutional-scale activity.

Recent Price Action

No candlestick or OHLC pattern is available. The token has been trading for only 14 hours with six recorded swaps, all of modest size ($131–$960). Price discovery is in its earliest stage.

The absence of price history means there are no established support or resistance levels, no trend lines, and no chart patterns to analyze. The token is in a pure price-discovery phase where liquidity depth and airdrop recipient behavior will be the primary determinants of near-term price direction.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    At 14 hours old with only six recorded swaps and no price history, the token has no established price floor or ceiling. Shallow liquidity means even small sell orders can cause outsized price moves. The 534 airdrop recipients represent a latent supply overhang that could trigger sharp downward volatility at any time.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    BNB Chain tokens with no disclosed jurisdiction, anonymous deployers, and PinkSale presale mechanisms face standard DeFi regulatory uncertainty. The use of an unlabelled funding wallet for the deployer adds opacity that could attract regulatory scrutiny in jurisdictions with strict KYC/AML requirements for token issuers.

Key Risks

  • Rug pull / exit scam risk: unverified contract, deployer funded by unlabelled wallet, zero prior deployments, and no public project identity create conditions where the deployer could drain liquidity or exploit hidden contract functions with no accountability
  • Airdrop dump risk: 534 wallets (43% of holders) received tokens at zero cost and face no holding incentive; coordinated or simultaneous selling by this cohort could collapse the price in a token with shallow liquidity
  • Information asymmetry risk: with no project description, no social channels, and an unverified contract, retail buyers are operating with near-zero information while the deployer and presale participants (PinkSale, 5%) have full knowledge of the project's intent and structure

Mitigating Factors

  • 60.65% permanent burn reduces the effective supply and limits the maximum theoretical dilution from insider selling to the remaining ~39.35% of tokens
  • Deployer wallet age of 770 days (since 2024-07-01) provides some minimal accountability signal compared to a wallet created hours before launch

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand and accept the risk of total capital loss, who are allocating only a negligible fraction of their portfolio, and who are actively monitoring on-chain activity for exit signals. It is entirely unsuitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire investment.

This token presents a highly asymmetric risk profile: the potential upside from early entry into a legitimate project is real but unquantifiable given zero disclosed fundamentals, while the downside risks — rug pull, airdrop dump, and liquidity collapse — are concrete and well-evidenced. The investment thesis, such as it is, rests entirely on the hope that the project will disclose a credible use case and verify its contract before the airdrop sell overhang overwhelms demand.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The deployer publishes a credible project roadmap and verifies the contract within the next 48–72 hours, the PinkSale presale structure proves to have locked vesting, and the 534 airdrop recipients are genuine community members who hold rather than sell. In this scenario, the compressed effective supply (post-burn ~393.5M tokens) and growing holder base could support price appreciation from the current $576,775 market cap.

  • Contract verification and publication of a whitepaper or project documentation that establishes a credible use case
  • Airdrop recipients holding their positions, converting a zero-cost distribution into a genuine community base

Base Case

The token survives its first week but fails to establish a credible project identity or community. Airdrop recipients gradually sell, holder count declines from its launch-day peak, and the market cap drifts lower as sell pressure exceeds organic buying. The token persists as a low-liquidity, low-activity asset without achieving meaningful adoption.

  • No rug pull or contract exploit occurs, but no positive catalysts (verification, roadmap, partnerships) emerge either
  • Airdrop sell pressure is gradual rather than sudden, preventing a complete price collapse but sustaining persistent downward drift

Bear Case

High probability

The deployer exploits the unverified contract to drain liquidity or mint additional tokens, or the 534 airdrop recipients sell simultaneously into thin liquidity, collapsing the price. The PinkSale presale participants, holding 5% of total supply at a likely lower cost basis, also exit. Market cap approaches zero and the token becomes illiquid.

  • Unverified contract enabling hidden deployer functions (liquidity drain, minting, or trading restrictions) that are activated once sufficient liquidity has accumulated
  • Mass airdrop recipient selling combined with PinkSale participant exits overwhelming buy-side demand in a shallow liquidity environment

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 10, 2026, 09:16 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-10 21:16 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$Unknown

Market Cap

$576.8K

24h Volume

$0

Holders

1,231

Liquidity

Not available

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain / BSC)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)Token genesis and deployer wallet forensicsNotable recent swap dataSmart contract security assessment (score: 57/100)Supply concentration metrics (top 10/100 holder analysis)

Limitations

  • Zero OHLC price history available — no technical analysis, support/resistance levels, or trend indicators can be computed; all price-action analysis is based on structural on-chain signals only
  • No project description, whitepaper, or social presence available — fundamental valuation is impossible and the token's purpose, team, and roadmap are entirely unknown
  • Smart-money / profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable, preventing assessment of institutional or experienced-trader positioning
  • Liquidity pool size is not provided, making precise slippage and liquidity risk quantification impossible
  • Only six swap transactions are observable, making any volume or sentiment analysis statistically limited

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track 螢火計劃