N

Nesa Price Today & AI Analysis

NESBNB ChainAnalysis as of Jun 24, 2026

Price

$0.002170

-16.58% 24h

Contract

Live
0x3131f6b80c26936ab03f7d9d29eb4ddf36ac3fb5

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

6.9K

Market cap

$1.98M

Liquidity

$23.69K

More tokens on BNB Chain

SCI6900SCI6900上证综合指数6900$0.056373-4.3%MC $6.4KCZBULLCZBULLCZ Bull$0.041406+1.9%MC $14.1KXchangetheWorldXchangetheWorldExchange the World$0.059016-1.0%MC $9.0KAAOBAll on BINANCE$0.042000-0.3%MC $20.0K扶扶桑扶桑$0.059403-5.3%MC $9.4Kquqquqquq$0.001621-5.2%MC $1.62M

Nesa: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-24 13:31 UTC

Holder addresses

7,931

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$1,460,307.84
How concentrated is Nesa ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 7,931 addresses (2026-06-24 13:31 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Nesa?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Nesa liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-24 13:31 UTC, reported liquidity was $1,460,307.84. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-24 13:31 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Jun 24, 2026, 01:31 PM UTC

Market Cap

$278.76M

24h Volume

$24.67M

Liquidity

$1.46M

FDV

—

Holders

7,931

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about NES

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

Nesa (NES) is a 30-day-old BNB Chain token with a $278.8M fully diluted valuation, $1.46M in liquidity, and no verified contract, public description, or social presence. The token experienced an 18.2% price drop in the past 24 hours against a backdrop where sell transactions outnumber buys by more than 2:1 and 98% of holders joined within the last 7 days predominantly via transfer rather than market purchase. The deployer profile — 29 deployments in its first 100 transactions, funded by an unlabelled wallet — matches a serial-launcher pattern, and the top holder controls 89.43% of supply through a protocol/contract address whose nature cannot be independently verified. The combination of unverified contract, opaque tokenomics, concentrated supply, and aggressive sell-side activity places this token in a very high risk category.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 24, 2026, 01:31 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extreme supply concentration: a single protocol/contract address holds 89.43% of total supply, making the token's price entirely dependent on the behaviour of that one entity.
  • Mass transfer-based holder onboarding: 7,564 of 7,931 holders received tokens via transfer (not swap), indicating a coordinated distribution event rather than market-driven adoption.
  • Serial-deployer fingerprint: the mint recipient wallet (0x1cfd6a81…) is 64 days old, was funded by an unlabelled wallet, and deployed 29 contracts in its first 100 transactions — a pattern atypical of legitimate project launches.

Nesa AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

NES has shed 18.2% over the past 24 hours, a sharp directional move that dominates the short-term picture. The 5-minute and 1-hour bounces of 6.3% and 4.5% respectively look like dead-cat relief after a steep drop rather than a genuine reversal, especially given that sell transactions (58,990) outnumber buy transactions (25,386) by more than 2:1 over the same window. Until selling pressure normalises and the transaction imbalance closes, further downside or choppy consolidation is the more probable near-term path.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The token is only 30 days old, has no verified contract, no public project description, and 98% of its current holder base joined within the last 7 days — a pattern consistent with a coordinated distribution event rather than organic adoption. The deployer wallet ran 29 contract deployments in its first 100 transactions and was funded by an unlabelled wallet, raising serial-launcher concerns. Without a verifiable use case, exchange listing, or smart-money participation, the medium-term trajectory leans bearish unless concrete fundamentals emerge.

Bullish Factors

  • Dumpable supply is only 4.5% of total — the five individual whale wallets (1.32%, 1.05%, 0.69%, 0.42%, 0.39%) collectively hold a modest share, limiting immediate large-scale sell-side pressure from identifiable individuals.
  • Total liquidity of $1.46 million is meaningful for a 30-day-old token and provides some buffer against catastrophic slippage on moderate-sized trades.
  • Buy volume ($12.64M) marginally exceeds sell volume ($12.04M) over 24 hours, giving a 51.2% buy-pressure reading that shows at least some demand absorption at current prices.
  • Holder count grew from 143 to 7,931 over 31 days — an accelerating trajectory that, if driven by genuine interest rather than airdrop farming, signals broadening awareness.

Bearish Factors

  • The 24-hour price decline of 18.2% is a hard directional signal: sellers are in control and the magnitude far exceeds noise.
  • Sell transactions (58,990) outnumber buy transactions (25,386) by 2.3:1 over 24 hours, with unique sellers (21,068) dwarfing unique buyers (2,265) by nearly 9:1 — a deeply asymmetric distribution pattern.
  • 98% of all holders arrived within the last 7 days (7,790 of 7,931), and 7,564 of 7,931 holders acquired their tokens via transfer rather than open-market swap, strongly suggesting a mass airdrop or coordinated distribution rather than organic buying.
  • The deployer wallet (0x1cfd6a81…) executed 29 contract deployments in its first 100 transactions and was funded by an unlabelled wallet — a serial-launcher, disposable-deployer pattern associated with elevated rug risk.
  • The contract is unverified (security score 55/100), no project description exists, and no social links are available — the absence of any verifiable fundamentals is a critical red flag for a token with a $278M fully diluted valuation.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

NES call history

Full track record →

Jun 24bearish
24h-15.2%
7d-36.4%
30d-14.4%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0x3131...3fb5
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Unverified contract with serial-deployer origin: the inability to inspect the source code of a contract holding 89.43% of supply means a rug pull or hidden drain function cannot be excluded — this is the primary existential risk.
  • Mass distribution disguised as holder growth: 7,564 of 7,931 holders received tokens via transfer in a single day, suggesting a coordinated airdrop or distribution event that inflates holder metrics while setting up a large number of recipients to sell into any liquidity.
  • Zero fundamental anchoring: with no project description, no social presence, no verified contract, and no documented use case, the $278.8M FDV has no verifiable basis — the token is priced entirely on speculation and momentum, both of which are currently negative.

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite buy volume marginally exceeding sell volume in dollar terms (51.2% vs 48.8%), the transaction count tells a starkly different story: unique sellers (21,068) outnumber unique buyers (2,265) by nearly 9:1, meaning a small number of buyers are absorbing supply from a very large number of sellers. This divergence — high dollar buy volume from few wallets versus high transaction sell volume from many wallets — is consistent with a distribution phase where a concentrated holder or coordinated group is supporting price while retail exits.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

The only reliable price signal available is the 24-hour change of -18.2%, which establishes a clear short-term downtrend. No multi-day OHLC data exists to assess a medium-term trend independently, but given the token is only 30 days old and is currently in a sharp single-session decline with no historical support levels established, the medium-term trend is also classified as downtrend by default. The brief 5-minute (+6.3%) and 1-hour (+4.5%) upticks are insufficient to reverse the dominant bearish momentum.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

An 18.2% single-session decline with a 2.3:1 sell-to-buy transaction ratio suggests the token is in an oversold condition on a very short-term basis, which explains the minor 5-minute and 1-hour bounces. However, oversold conditions in tokens with structural distribution patterns can persist or deepen rather than self-correct, so oversold status alone is not a buy signal here.

Volume Analysis

Buy

51.2%

Sell

48.8%

Volume Trend

Increasing

The $24.67M combined 24-hour volume represents a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 16.9:1, which is extraordinarily high. While elevated volume during a price decline can sometimes signal capitulation and a potential bottom, the 9:1 unique-seller-to-buyer ratio suggests this volume is driven by mass retail exit rather than institutional accumulation. The largest single swap in recent notable trades was $1,283, confirming the volume is composed of a very high number of small transactions.

Recent Price Action

Sharp 18.2% decline over 24 hours followed by a minor dead-cat bounce of 4.5-6.3% in the most recent 1-hour and 5-minute windows, with no established historical price structure to reference.

This pattern — steep decline followed by a brief relief bounce — is common in distribution phases and does not reliably indicate a trend reversal without confirmation from sustained volume recovery and a closing of the buyer/seller transaction imbalance.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    An 18.2% single-session price decline on a 30-day-old token with no OHLC history and no established support levels indicates extreme price volatility. The thin liquidity ($1.46M) amplifies price swings on any meaningful order flow.

  • LiquidityHigh

    A liquidity-to-FDV ratio of ~0.52% and a volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~17:1 over 24 hours means the pool is severely stressed. Any large holder attempting to exit will face significant slippage, and a coordinated sell could drain the pool rapidly.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an uncategorised BNB Chain token with no documented project, NES faces standard DeFi regulatory uncertainty. The mass transfer-based distribution could attract scrutiny as an unregistered securities offering in certain jurisdictions, though no specific regulatory action is known.

Key Risks

  • Unverified contract with serial-deployer origin: the inability to inspect the source code of a contract holding 89.43% of supply means a rug pull or hidden drain function cannot be excluded — this is the primary existential risk.
  • Mass distribution disguised as holder growth: 7,564 of 7,931 holders received tokens via transfer in a single day, suggesting a coordinated airdrop or distribution event that inflates holder metrics while setting up a large number of recipients to sell into any liquidity.
  • Zero fundamental anchoring: with no project description, no social presence, no verified contract, and no documented use case, the $278.8M FDV has no verifiable basis — the token is priced entirely on speculation and momentum, both of which are currently negative.

Mitigating Factors

  • Dumpable supply from identified individual whale wallets is limited to 4.5%, meaning the known sell-side overhang from individuals is modest relative to total supply.
  • Binance and KuCoin wallet addresses appear in the top holders (1.49% and 0.23% respectively), which could indicate an exchange listing pipeline that would provide additional liquidity and price discovery infrastructure.

Investor Suitability

Given the very high risk score, unverified contract, serial-deployer profile, and complete absence of fundamentals, this token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risk of total capital loss, are allocating only amounts they can afford to lose entirely, and have conducted independent due diligence beyond this analysis. It is not suitable for risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone relying on the investment for financial goals.

NES presents a highly speculative profile: a 30-day-old, unverified BNB Chain token with a $278M FDV, no documented fundamentals, a serial-deployer origin, and a current 18.2% price decline. The bull case depends entirely on undisclosed catalysts materialising; the bear case is supported by the preponderance of current on-chain evidence.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The protocol/contract holding 89.43% of supply is a legitimate staking or vesting contract for a project that has not yet publicly launched. The Binance and KuCoin wallet holdings signal an imminent exchange listing, which drives price discovery, liquidity, and genuine retail demand. The project publishes a whitepaper, verifies its contract, and the holder base transitions from transfer-acquired to swap-acquired over the following 30-90 days.

  • Confirmed centralised exchange listing announcement from Binance or KuCoin, given their wallets already hold supply
  • Contract verification and publication of a credible project roadmap that justifies the current $278M FDV

Base Case

NES continues to trade with high volatility and declining price as the mass-distributed holder base sells into available liquidity. The token stabilises at a significantly lower price point if the protocol/contract address does not release additional supply, but fails to recover to current levels without a verifiable fundamental catalyst. The project either remains undocumented (slow fade) or eventually publishes information that either validates or invalidates the bull case.

  • The 89.43% protocol/contract address does not release additional supply into the market in the near term
  • No exchange listing or project announcement materialises within the 30-90 day forecast window

Bear Case

High probability

The unverified protocol/contract holding 89.43% of supply is controlled by the deployer and is used to gradually release tokens into the market. The mass transfer-based distribution was an exit-liquidity setup: tokens were distributed to thousands of wallets whose holders sell into the DEX pool, while the deployer or coordinating entity absorbs the liquidity. The 18.2% decline is the beginning of a sustained drawdown as the distribution completes.

  • Serial-deployer wallet pattern (29 deployments, unlabelled funder) combined with unverified contract and zero public project information
  • 9:1 unique-seller-to-buyer ratio and 95.4% transfer-based holder acquisition consistent with a coordinated distribution-and-dump structure

Analysis Details

Generated

Jun 24, 2026, 01:31 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-24 13:31 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.293032681273770801

Market Cap

$278.76M

24h Volume

$24.67M

Holders

7,931

Liquidity

$1,460,307.84

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain)Holder distribution analytics and size-bucket classificationTrading volume and buy/sell pressure metricsSmart contract deployment and deployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet acquisition method analysisToken genesis and initial allocation transfer recordsHolder trajectory 31-day daily timeseries

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history exists for this token, making technical analysis of support/resistance levels impossible and limiting trend analysis to the single 24-hour data point.
  • The unverified contract means the function of the 89.43% protocol/contract address — the most critical variable in this analysis — cannot be independently confirmed; all conclusions about it are inferences from observable on-chain behaviour.
  • Smart-money profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable, removing one of the most informative signals for assessing whether sophisticated participants are accumulating or distributing.
  • No project description, whitepaper, or social presence is available, making fundamental valuation impossible and forcing the analysis to rely entirely on on-chain and tokenomic data.

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track NES