半分永动金库

30秒永动销毁+裂变+二重销毁 Price Today & AI Analysis

半分永动金库
BNB Chain·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 14, 2026

$0.055937

-0.82%24h
LiveContract:0x1f7da8080b9fa7fba61d6bb05fc713b974fd7777Chain:BNB ChainHolders:6.1KMarket cap:$5.94KLiquidity:$3.75K

More tokens on BNB Chain

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about 半分永动金库

Movement since reportreport from Jul 14, 2026, 07:04 AM UTC
Market Cap

$116.90K

24h Volume

$68.59K

Liquidity

$29.36K

FDV

Holders

4.4K

Security

24H0 buys
0 sells0 traders

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

24h change

0

Top 10 hold

Top acquisition

AI Executive Summary

This is a 16-hour-old BNB Chain token with a Chinese-language name describing perpetual burn and fission mechanics, but its contract is unverified and no project description, team identity, or social presence exists. It launched at a market cap of approximately $116,896 and surged 154% within its first trading session, driven by 891 buy transactions and rapid holder growth from 19 to 4,403 wallets. However, 41% of holders received tokens via airdrop, the deployer was funded by an unlabelled wallet, and three of the top individual whales hold their positions via transfer rather than market purchases — all structural hallmarks of a high-risk speculative launch. The token carries a security score of 51/100 and exhibits multiple deployer and distribution patterns consistent with elevated rug or dump risk.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ranJul 14, 2026, 07:04 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: neutral
Explosive 16-hour launch with 4,403 holders acquired in a single day, almost entirely through airdrop and swap activity rather than organic community building
Unverified contract with Chinese-language branding claiming automated burn and fission mechanics that cannot be confirmed without code review
Deployer funded by an unlabelled wallet with zero prior contract deployments, a pattern associated with disposable deployer setups

30秒永动销毁+裂变+二重销毁 AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

This token is only 16 hours old and has already surged 154% in its first day of trading, a move almost entirely driven by launch-day speculation rather than organic demand. With no OHLC history to establish support, the price is highly vulnerable to rapid reversal as early recipients of airdropped and transferred supply — who hold 32.9% of dumpable supply — face zero cost basis. The 4h and 24h price change being identical confirms the entire price history is contained within a single trading session, making any continuation highly speculative.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

Without a verified contract, no published project description, no social presence, and a deployer funded by an unlabelled wallet, the medium-term outlook is bearish. The token's name and symbol are written in Chinese characters describing mechanical burn and fission mechanics, but no code verification exists to confirm any such mechanism operates on-chain. Sustained price appreciation over 30–90 days would require genuine utility adoption or community development, neither of which has any evidence here.

Bullish Factors
  • +Holder base grew from 19 to 4,403 within 16 hours, indicating rapid viral spread that could sustain short-term momentum if buy pressure continues
  • +Buy pressure stands at 54.1% ($37,090 buy volume vs $31,503 sell volume) over the first 24 hours, showing buyers have marginally outnumbered sellers in the launch window
  • +891 buy transactions vs 408 sell transactions in 24h, with 360 unique buyers vs 214 unique sellers, suggesting broader participation on the buy side than the sell side at launch
Bearish Factors
  • -The contract is unverified (security score 51/100), meaning the claimed 30-second perpetual burn and fission mechanics cannot be independently confirmed — the token name may be pure marketing
  • -32.9% of supply is held by individual whales who received their positions via transfer or airdrop (zero cost basis), creating immediate and costless dump risk with no lock-up evidence
  • -The deployer wallet (0xe2ce6ab8…) was funded by an unlabelled wallet (0x4deaae93…) and made 0 contract deployments in its first 100 transactions, consistent with a disposable-deployer pattern used in rug setups
  • -1,804 of 4,403 holders (41%) acquired tokens via airdrop, meaning a large portion of the holder base has no financial commitment and faces no loss from selling immediately
  • -Largest recent trades are sells ($481 and $404), while the largest buys are only $199 and $183, indicating the biggest individual actors are currently distributing, not accumulating

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

半分永动金库 call history

Full track record →
Jul 14bearish
24h+548.5%
7d-91.9%
30d-95.0%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBNB Chain
Contract0x1f7d...7777
Total Supply
Decimals

Key Risks

Rug pull risk: the unverified contract, unlabelled deployer funding source, and pre-launch insider allocations to unlabelled wallets create a structural setup where the deployer could drain liquidity or exploit hidden contract functions at any time
Zero-cost-basis dump risk: 32.9% of supply is held by individual whales who paid nothing for their tokens via transfer/airdrop — any of these wallets can sell their entire position at a 100% profit margin, and the $29,363 liquidity pool cannot absorb coordinated selling
Airdrop holder attrition: 1,804 of 4,403 holders (41%) received tokens for free and have no incentive to hold — as the launch excitement fades, mass selling by airdrop recipients could accelerate price decline

Trading Insight

neutral

On-chain transaction counts lean bullish with a 2.2:1 buy-to-sell transaction ratio and 54.1% buy pressure, but the dollar-value gap between buy and sell volume is narrow ($37,090 vs $31,503), and the largest individual trades are sells. The sentiment score is near-neutral because the volume imbalance is modest and the largest actors are distributing, offsetting the transaction count advantage.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bullish
Medium-Term (30d):
Neutral

The short-term trend is technically an uptrend given the 154% price gain in the token's only trading session, but this is entirely a launch-day spike with no prior baseline. Medium-term trend is classified as sideways because there is insufficient price history to establish a directional bias — the token has existed for 16 hours and has no OHLC data beyond the current session.

Momentum

Status:
Overbought

A 154% gain in a single trading session on a newly launched token with no verified fundamentals is a textbook overbought condition. The 5-minute gain of 6.1% and 1-hour gain of 1.2% suggest the initial spike is decelerating, which is consistent with post-launch momentum exhaustion.

Volume Analysis

Buy 54.1%Sell 45.9%

Volume Trend: Stable

All volume data reflects a single 16-hour window, so no multi-session trend can be established. The $68,593 combined volume against $29,363 in liquidity represents a pool turnover ratio above 2x in one day, indicating highly speculative activity. The 54.1% buy pressure is marginally positive but insufficient to signal strong directional conviction.

Recent Price Action

Vertical launch spike: the token opened trading and gained 154% within its first session, with the 5-minute and 1-hour gains (6.1% and 1.2% respectively) showing deceleration from the initial surge. The 4h and 24h figures being identical confirms the entire move occurred in one continuous session.

Launch-day vertical spikes of this magnitude on unverified contracts with airdrop-heavy distributions frequently precede sharp retracements once early recipients begin selling into the initial excitement. Deceleration in the most recent 1-hour window may signal the peak of the launch pump.

Holder Metrics

Total Holders4,403
24h Change+4,403
Growth Rate+100%

The 100% holder growth figure reflects the fact that all 4,403 holders were acquired in the token's 16-hour existence — the timeseries shows growth from 19 (likely the deployer and initial allocation recipients) to 4,499 net. While the velocity is impressive, the quality of this growth is questionable given that 41% of holders received tokens via airdrop rather than purchasing them, suggesting the holder count may overstate genuine community interest.

Holder Distribution

Top 10 Holders40%
Top 100 Holders86%
Retail Holders14.0%
Concentration Risk:
High

The top 10 holders control 40% of supply, but 12.59% is in a protocol/contract and 9.67% is in a burn address — neither of these is dumpable. The remaining 17.74% across 8 individual whales, plus additional individual whales outside the top 10, yields a dumpable supply of 32.9%. With retail holding only 14% of supply and the top 100 controlling 86%, the distribution is heavily concentrated. Concentration risk is rated high rather than critical because the two largest positions are non-dumpable.

Whale Activity

Sentiment:
Distributing

The largest recent on-chain swaps are sells: $481 by 0x504884… and $404 by 0x4ce4af…, while the largest buys are $199 by 0x026a79… and $183 by 0x63a42b…. This asymmetry — where the biggest individual actors are selling at roughly 2.4x the size of the biggest buyers — is a distributing signal at the whale level despite the aggregate buy pressure being marginally positive.

  • SELL $481 by 0x504884… — largest single trade in the dataset, a sell
  • SELL $404 by 0x4ce4af… — second largest trade, also a sell

While transaction counts favor buyers (891 vs 408), the largest individual trades are sells, suggesting that the buyers are predominantly small retail participants while the larger actors are taking profits or distributing airdropped supply. This divergence between transaction count and trade size is a classic distribution pattern in newly launched tokens.

Smart Money Indicators

Confidence:
Low
Profit-Taking Risk:
High

Smart-money data is unavailable for this token — no profitable-trader cohort data has been indexed.

Smart-money data is unavailable, so no conclusions can be drawn about professional trader positioning. However, the structural setup — zero-cost-basis whale positions acquired via transfer/airdrop, an unverified contract, and a 154% launch-day spike — creates inherently high profit-taking risk regardless of smart-money signals.

Liquidity Analysis

Total Liquidity$29,363
Depth:
Shallow
Slippage Risk:
High

With only $29,363 in liquidity against a $116,896 market cap, the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio is approximately 25%. This is shallow for a token of this size, meaning even moderate sell orders will cause significant price impact. The pool has already been turned over more than twice in 16 hours, and any coordinated exit by whale holders could drain liquidity rapidly and cause a price collapse.

Overall Risk:
Very High
88/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

A 154% price move in 16 hours on a token with $29,363 in liquidity and no price history demonstrates extreme volatility. The shallow liquidity pool means price can move violently in either direction with relatively small order sizes.

Liquidity
High

Total liquidity of $29,363 against a $116,896 market cap creates a 25% liquidity ratio. Large exits by any of the 32.9% dumpable-supply holders would cause severe slippage and could effectively drain the pool, trapping remaining holders.

Concentration
High

While 22.26% of the top-10 supply is in non-dumpable protocol/burn addresses, the remaining 32.9% dumpable supply is held by individual whales who received their positions at zero cost via transfer or airdrop. Two of the three profiled whale wallets were created in April 2026, just months before this launch, suggesting possible sybil or coordinated insider distribution.

Smart Contract
High

The contract is unverified with a 51/100 security score. Without source code review, the presence of owner-privileged functions (mint, blacklist, fee manipulation, liquidity removal) cannot be excluded. The deployer funded by an unlabelled wallet adds to this risk.

Regulatory
Medium

As an uncategorized BNB Chain token with no identified team or jurisdiction, regulatory risk is present but not specifically elevated beyond the baseline for anonymous DeFi tokens. The airdrop distribution model may attract scrutiny in jurisdictions with strict securities laws.

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: the unverified contract, unlabelled deployer funding source, and pre-launch insider allocations to unlabelled wallets create a structural setup where the deployer could drain liquidity or exploit hidden contract functions at any time
  • Zero-cost-basis dump risk: 32.9% of supply is held by individual whales who paid nothing for their tokens via transfer/airdrop — any of these wallets can sell their entire position at a 100% profit margin, and the $29,363 liquidity pool cannot absorb coordinated selling
  • Airdrop holder attrition: 1,804 of 4,403 holders (41%) received tokens for free and have no incentive to hold — as the launch excitement fades, mass selling by airdrop recipients could accelerate price decline

Mitigating Factors

  • The deployer wallet is 743 days old, which is atypical for purely disposable deployers and may indicate some reputational stake in the wallet's history
  • 9.67% of supply is held in a burn address, permanently reducing circulating supply if the transfer is legitimate

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced DeFi traders who fully understand the risks of unverified contracts, airdrop-heavy distributions, and anonymous deployers — and who are prepared to lose their entire position. It is not suitable for retail investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone allocating more than a negligible speculative amount.

The investment thesis for this token is almost entirely speculative: it rests on the possibility that the claimed burn mechanics generate genuine deflationary pressure and that the rapid holder growth translates into sustained demand. Against this stands a wall of structural red flags including an unverified contract, anonymous team, unlabelled deployer funding, and 32.9% zero-cost-basis dumpable supply.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

The contract is verified post-launch and the burn/fission mechanics prove functional, attracting a community of deflationary-token enthusiasts. The 4,403-holder base converts from airdrop recipients to active traders, buy pressure sustains above 54%, and the token establishes a price floor above its launch level.

  • +Contract verification confirming the claimed burn mechanics are real and non-exploitable
  • +Sustained buy pressure from new organic buyers exceeding airdrop-holder sell pressure
Base Case

The token experiences a typical post-launch retracement of 40–70% from its peak as airdrop holders sell and initial excitement fades, settling into low-volume trading with a small speculative holder base. Without contract verification or a project team emerging publicly, it gradually loses trading activity and liquidity.

  • No contract exploit occurs, but no genuine utility or community development emerges either
  • Airdrop-driven holder growth does not translate into sustained organic demand
Bear Case
High

Airdrop recipients and zero-cost-basis whale holders begin selling into the launch excitement, the shallow $29,363 liquidity pool is overwhelmed, and the price retraces the majority of its 154% launch gain within days. In the worst case, the deployer exploits an unverified contract function to drain liquidity entirely.

  • -32.9% dumpable supply with zero cost basis begins exiting as launch momentum fades
  • -Unverified contract enables deployer or insider exploitation of hidden functions

Analysis Details

GeneratedJul 14, 2026, 07:04 AM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data as of analysis timestamp
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.000116895973239536
Market Cap$116.9K
24h Volume$68.6K
Holders4,403
Liquidity$29.4K

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain)
Holder distribution analytics (Moralis)
Trading volume metrics (24h DEX swap data)
Smart contract security assessment
Deployer wallet forensics
Whale wallet behavioral analysis
Token genesis transfer records

Limitations

  • Token is only 16 hours old — there is no OHLC price history, no multi-day trend data, and no established support or resistance levels, making all price analysis highly speculative
  • The contract is unverified, meaning the actual on-chain mechanics (burn, fission, fee structures) cannot be confirmed and hidden functions cannot be excluded
  • Smart-money cohort data is unavailable, removing a key signal for assessing professional trader positioning
  • No project team, social channels, or documentation exist, making fundamental analysis impossible beyond on-chain forensics

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track 半分永动金库