COSM

COSM Price Today & AI Analysis

COSM
BNB Chain·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jul 25, 2026

$0.0330

-15.65%24h
LiveContract:0x0d6ae45c96ec4df860300087462266e19140f6dcChain:BNB ChainHolders:431.5KMarket cap:$32.95MLiquidity:$27.15K

More tokens on BNB Chain

MARTIANS

MARTIANS

Martians

$0.04215825.0%
MC $21.6K
战略储备

战略储备

战略储备

$0.0002018.7%
MC $201.2K
ERA

ERA

Caldera

$0.06090.6%
MC $915.1K
MEMESTOCK

MEMESTOCK

MEMESTOCK

$0.04112438.5%
MC $11.2K
Niña

Niña

Flork Wife

$0.05690733.0%
MC $6.9K
D

DEBIT

Teller

$1.728.9%
MC $171.85M

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about COSM

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since reportreport from Jul 25, 2026, 07:15 PM UTC
Market Cap

$2.00B

24h Volume

$1.39M

Liquidity

$344.36K

FDV

—

Holders

29.0K

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

—

AI Executive Summary

COSM is a 2-day-old BNB Chain token (contract 0x0d6ae45c96ec4df860300087462266e19140f6dc) with no published description, no verified contract, and no social presence, currently trading at $2.00 after a 277% single-day price spike. The token's deployer wallet is only 3 days old, was funded by an unlabelled wallet, and has zero prior deployment history — a profile consistent with a disposable launcher. With 99.5% of supply held in a wallet labelled as a burn address and a $2 billion market cap supported by only $344K in liquidity, the token exhibits extreme speculative characteristics and multiple high-severity risk signals. Retail participation has been rapid — 29,028 holders in 2 days — but the structural and forensic evidence strongly suggests this is a high-risk speculative instrument rather than a legitimate project.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jul 25, 2026, 07:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: bearish
Extreme market-cap-to-liquidity disproportion: $2B FDV against $344K liquidity (~0.017% ratio) makes this one of the most illiquid large-cap-appearing tokens on BNB Chain
Deployer forensics match a disposable-launcher pattern: wallet created 3 days ago, zero prior deployments, funded by an unlabelled source — all within 15 hours of token launch
99.5% of supply transferred to a burn-address-labelled wallet at genesis, yet dumpable supply is flagged at 99.9% — a contradiction that cannot be resolved without contract verification

COSM AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

COSM is 2 days old and has posted a 277% 24-hour gain driven by an initial wave of 2,175 unique buyers, but the structural red flags — 99.5% of supply in a burn address, an unverified contract, a 3-day-old deployer wallet funded by an unlabelled source, and zero OHLC history — make a sharp mean-reversion the most probable near-term outcome. The 1-hour window already shows more sell transactions (170) than buys (129), signalling that early entrants are beginning to exit. Without any established price floor from historical OHLC data, downside is structurally unbounded.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

Over a 30–90 day horizon, COSM faces existential structural risks: the deployer wallet (3 days old, funded by an unlabelled wallet, zero prior contract deployments) matches a disposable-deployer pattern associated with short-lived projects. The token has no verified contract, no project description, no social presence, and a market cap of $2 billion against $344K in liquidity — a ratio that implies the price is almost entirely speculative froth. Sustained growth would require genuine utility development, community building, and contract verification, none of which are evidenced.

Bullish Factors
  • +Strong 24-hour buy-side dominance: 5,162 buy transactions vs. 2,826 sell transactions and 2,175 unique buyers vs. 1,052 unique sellers indicate broad initial retail interest
  • +Net positive buy pressure of 53.1% with $740K buy volume vs. $653K sell volume shows more capital entering than exiting over the full 24-hour window
  • +Rapid holder acquisition — 29,028 holders accumulated in 2 days — demonstrates viral distribution reach, however it was achieved
Bearish Factors
  • -The deployer wallet (0xb1c8a6d4) was created just 3 days ago, has zero prior contract deployments in its first 100 transactions, and was funded by an unlabelled wallet (0x96446a3f) — a textbook disposable-deployer pattern that significantly elevates rug-pull risk
  • -99.5% of total supply sits in a burn-address-labelled wallet, yet the dumpable supply figure is listed at 99.9%, meaning the burn is either unverified or the remaining individual whale wallets collectively control nearly all tradeable supply
  • -The contract is unverified (security score 50/100), meaning the source code cannot be audited and hidden mint, pause, or fee functions cannot be ruled out
  • -A $2.0 billion fully diluted market cap against only $344K in liquidity implies a liquidity-to-market-cap ratio of ~0.017% — catastrophically thin, meaning any meaningful sell pressure will cause extreme price impact
  • -The 1-hour transaction data has flipped bearish: 170 sell transactions vs. 129 buys, suggesting the initial buying wave is decelerating and distribution is beginning
  • -The holder trajectory timeseries shows a 'declining' trend signal despite the raw 24-hour count surge, and the 31-day net change is zero — indicating the growth is entirely concentrated in the last 48 hours with no organic baseline

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

COSM call history

Full track record →
Jul 25bearish
24h+39.0%
7d+27.7%
30d-97.2%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBNB Chain
Contract0x0d6a...f6dc
Total Supply—
Decimals—

Key Risks

•Rug-pull risk: the deployer wallet profile (3 days old, no prior deployments, unlabelled funding source) is a high-confidence disposable-deployer pattern; the project could be abandoned or liquidity withdrawn at any time without warning
•Burn address unverifiability: 99.5% of supply is labelled as burned, but without a verified contract this cannot be confirmed — if the burn address is controlled by the deployer, a single wallet holds effective control over the entire supply
•Liquidity collapse risk: at a 0.017% liquidity-to-market-cap ratio, any coordinated exit or loss of speculative interest will result in near-total price collapse with no liquidity to absorb sell orders

Trading Insight

bearish

While the full 24-hour window shows a modest buy-side edge (53.1% buy pressure, $740K vs. $653K sell volume), the most recent 1-hour data has inverted: 170 sell transactions vs. 129 buys, suggesting momentum is shifting to distribution. The 277% price spike has attracted 2,175 unique buyers, but with no verified contract and a deployer profile that raises serious concerns, the sentiment is structurally bearish despite the surface-level volume activity.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bullish
Medium-Term (30d):
Bearish

The short-term price action is technically an uptrend given the 277% 24-hour gain and positive 4-hour move (+6.5%), but this is entirely driven by a launch-day spike with no historical baseline. The medium-term trend is assessed as bearish because the holder trajectory timeseries is flagged as 'declining' and the 31-day net holder change is zero, meaning the apparent growth is a 48-hour anomaly with no sustained foundation. Without OHLC history, no meaningful trend structure can be established.

Momentum

Status:
Overbought

A 277% single-day move on a newly launched, unverified token with no fundamental backing is a classic overbought signal. The 1-hour data showing sell transactions exceeding buys (170 vs. 129) confirms that momentum is already decelerating from its peak, and mean-reversion pressure is building.

Volume Analysis

Buy 53.1%Sell 46.9%

Volume Trend: Decreasing

Volume is declining from the launch-day peak. The 24-hour total of approximately $1.39M in combined buy/sell volume is concentrated in the early hours; the 4-hour window shows a more balanced but lower-intensity trading environment, and the 1-hour window has flipped sell-dominant. This deceleration pattern is consistent with post-pump distribution rather than sustained organic demand.

Recent Price Action

Vertical launch spike followed by early-stage distribution: a 277% 24-hour gain with a positive 4-hour move (+6.5%) but a negative 1-hour move (-0.66%) and sell-dominant 1-hour transaction count.

This pattern — sharp vertical spike followed by declining buy momentum and increasing sell transactions — is characteristic of a pump-and-dump or speculative launch cycle. Without a verified contract or project fundamentals to anchor value, the price has no structural support.

Holder Metrics

Total Holders29,028
24h Change+24,917
Growth Rate+86%

Despite the raw 24-hour holder count surge of 24,917 (86% growth), the 31-day holder trajectory timeseries is flagged as 'declining' with a net change of zero over 31 days — meaning all holder accumulation occurred in the last 48 hours with no prior organic base. This pattern is consistent with a coordinated launch push rather than genuine community growth, and the trajectory signal suggests holders may already be exiting.

Holder Distribution

Top 10 Holders100%
Top 100 Holders100%
Retail Holders0.0%
Concentration Risk:
Critical

The top 10 holders control 100% of supply and retail holds approximately 0% — this is the most extreme concentration profile possible. The dumpable supply is flagged at 99.9%, meaning nearly all tokens are held by wallets capable of selling. The single largest holder (99.5%) is labelled as a burn address, but without contract verification this cannot be confirmed; if it is not a true burn, a single entity controls virtually the entire supply.

Whale Activity

Sentiment:
Distributing

The largest on-chain swaps recorded are a $1,934 sell and $1,918 buy by the same wallet (0x0b99f0), a $1,200 sell by 0xcf1fcc, a $632 sell by 0xe6e822, a $564 buy by 0x5cf650, and a $562 sell by 0xaf8daf. All transactions are small relative to the token's stated market cap.

  • •0x0b99f0 executed a $1,934 sell followed by a $1,918 buy — possible wash-trading or rapid position flip
  • •Three of the five distinct wallets in notable recent trades are sellers ($1,200, $632, $562), outnumbering buyers 3:2 in the most recent large-swap activity

Whale-level activity is minimal in absolute dollar terms, with the largest single swap under $2,000 — consistent with a token where genuine large holders have not yet engaged or are waiting. The sell-skewed recent trade list reinforces the distribution signal seen in the 1-hour transaction data.

Smart Money Indicators

Confidence:
Low
Profit-Taking Risk:
High

Smart-money data is unavailable for this token; no profitable-trader cohort data has been provided.

Smart-money data is unavailable. Given the token is 2 days old with a 277% price spike, any wallet that acquired tokens at or near launch is sitting on significant unrealized gains, creating elevated profit-taking risk even without specific cohort data to quantify it.

Liquidity Analysis

Total Liquidity$344,362
Depth:
Shallow
Slippage Risk:
High

A $344K liquidity pool against a $2 billion stated market cap produces a liquidity-to-FDV ratio of approximately 0.017% — critically shallow. Any sell order of meaningful size will cause severe price impact and slippage, and a coordinated exit by even a small number of holders could collapse the price. This liquidity profile is a primary risk factor for anyone holding or considering a position.

Overall Risk:
Very High
94/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

A 277% single-day price move on a 2-day-old token with no OHLC history and no fundamental anchor represents extreme volatility. The token has no established price range, no support levels, and no historical mean to revert to.

Liquidity
High

$344K in total liquidity against a $2 billion market cap means the liquidity-to-FDV ratio is ~0.017%. Even modest sell pressure from a small number of holders could cause catastrophic price impact, and exiting a meaningful position at anywhere near the current price would be practically impossible.

Concentration
High

Dumpable supply is flagged at 99.9% — nearly all tokens are held by wallets capable of selling. The top 10 holders control 100% of supply, and the largest single holder (99.5%, labelled burn address) cannot be verified as a true burn without contract verification. If that wallet is not a genuine burn, a single entity controls virtually the entire supply.

Smart Contract
High

The contract is unverified (security score 50/100), the deployer is a 3-day-old wallet with no prior deployments funded by an unlabelled source, and no audit exists. Hidden functions including mint, pause, blacklist, or fee manipulation cannot be excluded.

Regulatory
High

Tokens exhibiting pump-and-dump characteristics — rapid price spikes, anonymous teams, no disclosed utility, unverified contracts — are increasingly subject to regulatory scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions. Participation in such tokens may carry legal risk depending on the investor's jurisdiction.

Key Risks

  • •Rug-pull risk: the deployer wallet profile (3 days old, no prior deployments, unlabelled funding source) is a high-confidence disposable-deployer pattern; the project could be abandoned or liquidity withdrawn at any time without warning
  • •Burn address unverifiability: 99.5% of supply is labelled as burned, but without a verified contract this cannot be confirmed — if the burn address is controlled by the deployer, a single wallet holds effective control over the entire supply
  • •Liquidity collapse risk: at a 0.017% liquidity-to-market-cap ratio, any coordinated exit or loss of speculative interest will result in near-total price collapse with no liquidity to absorb sell orders

Mitigating Factors

  • •The 277% price gain has already rewarded early buyers, meaning some profit-taking has likely already occurred, partially reducing the overhang of unrealized gains
  • •High transaction count (7,988 in 24h) and broad holder distribution (29,028 holders) mean the token is not entirely illiquid at the micro-transaction level

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced speculative traders who fully understand the risks of unverified, newly launched tokens with disposable-deployer profiles, can afford to lose their entire position, and are capable of monitoring on-chain activity in real time. It is not suitable for long-term investors, risk-averse participants, or anyone who cannot independently verify smart contract code.

COSM is a 2-day-old, unverified BNB Chain token with no disclosed fundamentals, a disposable-deployer profile, and a $2 billion market cap supported by $344K in liquidity — the investment thesis is almost entirely speculative momentum, and the structural evidence strongly favors a bearish outcome. The only viable bull case is a continuation of the speculative wave before the inevitable mean-reversion.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

The speculative momentum continues for several more days, driven by viral social spread and FOMO from the 277% launch gain, attracting additional retail buyers before the wave exhausts itself. Early buyers who entered near launch could see further short-term gains if buy pressure is sustained.

  • +Continued viral retail interest in the token's price performance driving new buyer inflows
  • +Broader BNB Chain speculative cycle providing a rising-tide environment for new token launches
Base Case

The initial speculative wave peaks within 24–72 hours of this analysis, buy pressure continues to decelerate (as already evidenced in the 1-hour data), and the price retraces sharply from its launch high. The token persists at a fraction of its peak price with declining volume and holder attrition, eventually becoming inactive.

  • •No new catalysts (verified contract, project announcement, exchange listing) emerge to sustain buying interest
  • •The deployer does not execute an active rug but simply abandons the project as speculative interest fades
Bear Case
High

The deployer or a controlling wallet exits liquidity or dumps remaining supply, collapsing the price to near zero. Alternatively, even without a deliberate rug, the speculative wave exhausts itself as the 1-hour sell dominance accelerates, liquidity is insufficient to support the price, and the token fades to negligible value within days.

  • -Disposable-deployer forensics: 3-day-old wallet, no prior deployments, unlabelled funding — high-probability short-lifecycle project
  • -Critical liquidity thinness ($344K vs. $2B market cap) means price collapse requires only a small fraction of holders to exit simultaneously

Analysis Details

GeneratedJul 25, 2026, 07:15 PM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data as of analysis timestamp
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$2.002358263361889268
Market Cap$2.00B
24h Volume$1.39M
Holders29,028
Liquidity$344.4K

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain)
Holder distribution analytics (Moralis)
Trading volume metrics (24h, 4h, 1h windows)
Smart contract deployment forensics
Token genesis transfer analysis
Deployer wallet history and funding source analysis
Notable recent on-chain swap data

Limitations

  • •No OHLC price history exists for this 2-day-old token, making technical analysis of support/resistance levels impossible
  • •The unverified contract means tokenomics claims (including the burn) cannot be independently confirmed, and hidden contract functions cannot be assessed
  • •Smart-money cohort data is unavailable, limiting insight into the behavior of the most informed market participants
  • •The token has no published description, team, or roadmap, making fundamental valuation impossible
  • •The 31-day holder trajectory timeseries shows zero net change over 31 days with all growth in the last 48 hours, limiting the reliability of trend analysis

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track COSM