NVDAB

NVIDIA Corp Price Today & AI Analysis

NVDABBNB ChainAnalysis as of Jul 29, 2026

Price

$217.37

+2.71% 24h

Contract

Live
0x02fca66c1d1afb4e2a7884261eb00f63598a7436

Chain

BNB Chain

Holders

146.6K

Market cap

$47.95M

Liquidity

$2.18M

At a $100M market cap, $NVDAB would be $453.29 (2.09x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is NVDAB a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

No red flags

No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks.

Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about NVDAB

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on BNB Chain

LABLABLAB$0.0466-0.6%MC $36.10MBULLABULLABULLA$0.0659-0.7%MC $26.21M779AU79AU$6.24+4.5%MC $1.25BBSBBSBBlock Street$0.1022+4.0%MC $26.25MMPLXMPLXMetaplex$0.0681+40.7%MC $32.11Mquqquqquq$0.001768+5.9%MC $1.77M

NVIDIA Corp: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-07-29 16:17 UTC

Holder addresses

3,511

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$190,787.43
How concentrated is NVIDIA Corp ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 3,511 addresses (2026-07-29 16:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling NVIDIA Corp?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is NVIDIA Corp liquidity falling?
As of 2026-07-29 16:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $190,787.43. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-07-29 16:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Jul 29, 2026, 04:17 PM UTC

Market Cap

$7.20M

24h Volume

$1.14M

Liquidity

$190.79K

FDV

—

Holders

3,511

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bearish

N4B is a 54-day-old BNB Chain token categorized as a Tokenized Stock / Real World Asset with a market cap of approximately $7.2M and a current price of ~$192. The token's most striking structural feature is that 73.73% of supply sits in a Binance-labeled wallet, compressing dumpable whale risk to just 5.7%, but also raising questions about whether the token has genuine decentralized distribution. The 31-day holder trajectory is declining (-729 net), the majority of holders received tokens via transfer rather than market purchase, and smart money activity is negligible in dollar terms — all pointing to weak organic demand. Without a verifiable project description or confirmed RWA backing, the token's classification-driven premium is speculative.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jul 29, 2026, 04:17 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • 73.73% of supply is held by a Binance-labeled wallet, an unusually high exchange concentration that suppresses dumpable-whale risk but raises questions about token distribution mechanics
  • Classified as Tokenized Stocks / RWA on BNB Chain — a high-growth narrative category — yet provides no project description or verifiable asset backing
  • 82% of holders acquired tokens via transfer (not swap), suggesting the holder base was largely distributed rather than organically grown through trading

NVIDIA Corp AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

N4B is showing consistent selling pressure across the 4-hour and 24-hour windows, with sell volume exceeding buy volume ($597K vs $540K) and sell pressure at 52.5%. The 31-day holder trajectory is declining (2,891 → 2,162, net -729), contradicting the noisy 24-hour holder spike, and the majority of holders acquired positions via transfer rather than market buys, suggesting limited organic demand. These combined signals point to continued near-term weakness.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The 31-day holder count decline of 729 wallets is the dominant medium-term signal, indicating sustained net outflows of participants rather than accumulation. With 82% of holders having acquired via transfer rather than open-market swaps, organic demand remains structurally thin, and the RWA/tokenized-stock category faces ongoing regulatory scrutiny that could further suppress interest. Unless the project delivers a concrete catalyst — such as a verified real-world asset backing or exchange listing — the medium-term trajectory favors continued price erosion.

Bullish Factors

  • Binance holds 73.73% of supply in what appears to be a custodial/exchange wallet, meaning this supply is not freely dumpable by a single insider and could represent institutional custody interest in the RWA category.
  • Dumpable supply is only 5.7% of total tokens (three individual whale wallets), meaning the realistic near-term sell-side overhang from non-exchange holders is structurally limited.
  • The token is classified under Tokenized Stocks / Real World Assets — a sector attracting significant institutional capital in 2025-2026 — which could attract thematic buyers if the project substantiates its RWA credentials.

Bearish Factors

  • The 31-day holder timeseries shows a net decline of 729 holders (2,891 → 2,162), a -25% contraction in the participant base that signals sustained disengagement rather than accumulation.
  • 82% of all holders (2,886 of 3,511) acquired their positions via transfer rather than open-market swaps, indicating the holder count is largely synthetic and does not reflect genuine price-discovery demand.
  • Sell volume exceeded buy volume by $57K over 24 hours (52.5% sell pressure), and the 1-hour window shows 607 sell transactions vs 539 buys with sellers outnumbering buyers 378 to 232 — the most recent activity is the most bearish.
  • No project description is available, social links are unverified, and the security score is only 59/100, leaving fundamental value entirely unsubstantiated for a token claiming RWA backing.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

NVDAB call history

Full track record →

Jul 29bearish
24h+0.7%
7d+15.4%
30d+14.1%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
BNB Chain
Contract
0x02fc...7436
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Unverifiable RWA backing: The token claims Tokenized Stock / RWA classification but provides no project description, issuer identity, or asset documentation — if the classification is false or unregistered, the token has no fundamental value floor.
  • Transfer-dominated holder base: 82% of holders (2,886 wallets) received tokens via transfer with zero-cost basis, creating a large pool of holders with no financial commitment who may exit at any price, amplifying sell pressure.
  • Anomalous transaction concentration: ~99% of 24-hour transactions occurred in a single 4-hour window, which is consistent with bot activity, wash trading, or coordinated manipulation — artificially inflated volume metrics reduce the reliability of all trading-based signals.

Trading Insight

bearish

Trading sentiment is mildly bearish, with sell pressure at 52.5% and sell volume exceeding buy volume by roughly $57K over 24 hours. The 1-hour window is the most bearish slice — 607 sells vs 539 buys and sellers outnumbering unique buyers by 146 wallets — suggesting the selling is accelerating rather than fading.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

With no OHLC history available, trend direction is derived from the holder trajectory and volume flow rather than price chart patterns. The 31-day holder decline of 729 wallets and consistent net sell-side volume pressure across the 4-hour and 24-hour windows both confirm a downtrend in participation and demand. There is no technical evidence of a reversal or accumulation phase.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

Sell pressure has been dominant across all measured timeframes (4h and 24h), with sell volume exceeding buy volume and the most recent 1-hour window showing the highest seller-to-buyer ratio. Without RSI or MACD data (no OHLC available), momentum is inferred from order flow, which leans oversold in the short term but without a confirmed base to bounce from.

Volume Analysis

Buy

47.5%

Sell

52.5%

Volume Trend

Increasing

The near-identical 4-hour and 24-hour transaction counts (6,021/5,582 vs 6,061/5,651) indicate that virtually all of today's volume occurred in a concentrated burst within the last 4 hours. This spike-and-concentrate pattern is atypical of organic trading and may reflect bot activity, a coordinated event, or a liquidity incentive program. Elevated turnover (16% of market cap in 24h) without a corresponding price increase is a bearish divergence.

Recent Price Action

Price has declined -2.47% over 4 hours and -2.62% over 24 hours, with a minor 5-minute uptick of +0.46% that is statistical noise. The pattern is a slow, steady bleed with no sharp recovery attempts.

Gradual price erosion with sell volume exceeding buy volume and no OHLC-based support levels to reference suggests the path of least resistance remains downward until a structural catalyst emerges.

AI overall risk

High

Risk Score

72/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    With only $190.8K in liquidity against a $7.2M market cap (2.6% ratio), even moderate-sized trades cause significant price impact. The anomalous concentration of 99% of daily transactions into a 4-hour window suggests price can move sharply on coordinated activity.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Shallow liquidity of ~$190.8K means large exits are not possible without severe slippage. The three individual whale wallets holding 4.92% combined could not exit their positions without materially moving the price downward.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryHigh

    Tokenized stocks and RWA tokens are among the most heavily scrutinized asset classes by global regulators (SEC, MAS, FCA). Without verifiable issuer identity, legal jurisdiction, or asset backing documentation, N4B faces existential regulatory risk if it is operating without proper licensing.

Key Risks

  • Unverifiable RWA backing: The token claims Tokenized Stock / RWA classification but provides no project description, issuer identity, or asset documentation — if the classification is false or unregistered, the token has no fundamental value floor.
  • Transfer-dominated holder base: 82% of holders (2,886 wallets) received tokens via transfer with zero-cost basis, creating a large pool of holders with no financial commitment who may exit at any price, amplifying sell pressure.
  • Anomalous transaction concentration: ~99% of 24-hour transactions occurred in a single 4-hour window, which is consistent with bot activity, wash trading, or coordinated manipulation — artificially inflated volume metrics reduce the reliability of all trading-based signals.

Mitigating Factors

  • Deployer wallet age of 1,597 days (active since March 2022) with no prior contract deployments in its first 100 transactions reduces the probability of a serial-launcher or disposable-deployer rug pattern.
  • Dumpable supply of only 5.7% means the realistic near-term sell-side overhang from non-exchange, non-protocol holders is structurally contained, limiting the magnitude of any single coordinated dump.

Investor Suitability

N4B is suitable only for high-risk-tolerance investors with deep familiarity with RWA token mechanics, BNB Chain DeFi, and the ability to independently verify the token's underlying asset claims. It is not suitable for retail investors seeking stable value, income, or verifiable asset-backed exposure without conducting extensive independent due diligence first.

N4B sits at the intersection of a high-growth narrative (RWA/tokenized stocks) and high structural risk (no documentation, declining holders, anomalous volume). The investment thesis is binary: either the RWA backing is real and verifiable — in which case the token could attract institutional capital — or it is not, in which case the token has no fundamental value anchor.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The project publishes verifiable documentation of its real-world asset backing, a regulated issuer is identified, and the Binance wallet relationship is clarified as custodial infrastructure for a legitimate tokenized product. Institutional RWA demand drives accumulation, the holder base stabilizes, and the token re-rates toward comparable RWA tokens.

  • Publication of verifiable legal and asset documentation confirming the RWA classification
  • Binance or another major exchange formally listing the token with KYC/AML-compliant access, converting the 73.73% custodial holding into accessible retail liquidity

Base Case

N4B trades sideways to slightly lower over the next 30-90 days as the declining holder trend continues and volume normalizes from its anomalous spike. The token retains a speculative RWA premium but fails to attract institutional capital without documentation, settling into a lower market cap range of $3M–$5M.

  • No major positive catalyst (documentation, exchange listing, institutional partnership) emerges in the near term
  • The Binance-held 73.73% remains dormant and does not enter circulation, preventing a catastrophic supply shock

Bear Case

High probability

The RWA classification is unsubstantiated or the project fails to deliver documentation. The declining holder trajectory continues, the three zero-cost-basis whale wallets begin distributing, and the shallow liquidity ($190.8K) amplifies price impact on the way down. The token loses 50-80% of its current value as speculative interest fades.

  • Continued absence of project documentation and verifiable asset backing erodes speculative premium
  • Transfer-acquired holders with zero cost basis exit en masse, overwhelming the thin liquidity pool

Analysis Details

Generated

Jul 29, 2026, 04:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-07-29 16:17 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$191.999163498969693364

Market Cap

$7.20M

24h Volume

$1.14M

Holders

3,511

Liquidity

$190,787.43

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (BNB Chain)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis)Trading volume metrics (24h, 4h, 1h windows)Smart contract security assessmentDeployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet behavioral analysisSmart money realized PnL tracking31-day holder timeseries

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history is available, preventing any technical level computation, RSI/MACD analysis, or chart-pattern identification — all technical signals are inferred from order flow and holder data only.
  • No project description, whitepaper, or verifiable RWA documentation is available, making fundamental valuation impossible and leaving the token's category classification unverified.
  • Smart money realized PnL figures are negligible (total <$240 across all tracked wallets), providing no meaningful signal about sophisticated investor conviction.

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

New reports on BNB Chain

All new tokens →

AAIArtificial InuBearishDEGENIUSDEGENIUSDEGENIUSNeutralDOGDOGDegen or GeniusBearishDDOGDegen or GeniusBearishHalloweenHalloweenHalloween gameBearishBinancb LegendBinancb LegendBinancb LegendBearishWHATSWAPWHATSWAPWHATSWAPBearishRIKIRIKIRikiBearish

Questions about NVDAB?