WCT

WalletConnect Price Today & AI Analysis

WCTBaseAnalysis as of Aug 6, 2026

Price

$0.0404

-0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0xef4461891dfb3ac8572ccf7c794664a8dd927945

Chain

Base

Holders

2.6K

Market cap

$99.18K

Liquidity

$32.26K

More tokens on Base

GGITHUB1SGITHUB1S github.com/conwnet/GITHUB1S$0.045383+4.1%MC $53.8KCASSIECASSIECassie$0.063500+1.2%MC $35.0KPRIVVVATEPRIVVVATEPRIVVVATE$0.043358+32.4%MC $33.6K$$COBIEThe UpOnly Bull$0.000154-25.4%MC $153.7KQRQRQR coin$0.051292-8.3%MC $129.2KVVVVVVVenice Token$32.26+21.5%MC $1.55B

WalletConnect: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-06 19:15 UTC

Holder addresses

2,584

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

Not available
How concentrated is WalletConnect ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 2,584 addresses (2026-08-06 19:15 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling WalletConnect?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is WalletConnect liquidity falling?
Liquidity is not available in the saved inputs. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-06 19:15 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Ask Unhosted AI about WCT

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since report

report from Aug 6, 2026, 07:15 PM UTC

Market Cap

$6.72M

24h Volume

$0.00

Liquidity

—

FDV

—

Holders

2,584

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

High

Sentiment

Bearish

This token is deployed on Base (chain 0x2105) and is associated with the WalletConnect Network — a real, established web3 infrastructure protocol powering 15M+ monthly connections across 300+ chains. At 16.4 months old with a market cap of approximately $6.72M, the token has experienced a severe 90-day price decline of 48.1% and currently trades near multi-month lows at $0.03608. The holder base of 2,584 is modest and contracting slightly on a 30-day basis, while on-chain trading activity is extremely low in dollar volume. The security score of 59/100 and the anomalous gap between market cap and FDV ($6.72M vs. $104,290) are notable concerns that require further investigation before any investment consideration.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 6, 2026, 07:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Association with the WalletConnect Network, a real and widely-used web3 infrastructure layer with verifiable on-chain utility and significant growth metrics
  • Extremely low dumpable supply (7.6%) due to the majority of top-holder concentration residing in protocol/contract addresses rather than individual wallets
  • Anomalous market cap vs. FDV discrepancy ($6.72M market cap against $104,290 FDV) that is structurally unusual and demands independent verification of tokenomics

WalletConnect AI Price Analysis

Medium Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

The token is sitting at just 4% of its 90-day range ($0.03451–$0.07580), with the 30-day trend down 17.2% and the 90-day trend down 48.1%. Recent daily closes have compressed tightly between $0.03552 and $0.03636, suggesting a brief consolidation near multi-month lows rather than a genuine reversal. The marginal 7-day gain of +0.2% is noise against the dominant downtrend.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

With the 90-day decline at -48.1% and price pinned near the bottom of its range, the medium-term path of least resistance remains downward unless a structural catalyst reverses selling pressure. The 30-day holder count has declined by 26 (-1%), reinforcing that conviction among existing holders is eroding. A sustained reclaim of the $0.07580 major resistance would be required to shift the medium-term thesis to neutral.

Bullish Factors

  • Price is at 4% of the 90-day range, meaning the token is near its deepest support zone ($0.03451), which historically limits further downside in the near term
  • WalletConnect Network reports 15M+ monthly connections and 240% growth over the past 12 months, indicating genuine underlying protocol utility
  • Dumpable supply is only 7.6% of total supply — the top 10 concentration (69%) is dominated by protocol/contract addresses, meaning coordinated whale dumps are structurally limited
  • Smart money traders remain active and profitable: 0xcf57bf achieved +$4,837 realized PnL (+34%) across 93 trades, showing the token is tradeable with positive expected value for skilled participants

Bearish Factors

  • The 90-day price decline of -48.1% is a sustained, multi-month downtrend — not a short-term correction — with the token sitting at 4% of its range high of $0.07580
  • 30-day holder count has declined by 26 (-1%), indicating net holder attrition and weakening community conviction over the past month
  • Market cap ($6.72M) is dramatically higher than the fully diluted valuation ($104,290), which is an anomalous and potentially misleading tokenomics signal that warrants scrutiny
  • Recent on-chain swap activity is extremely low in dollar terms (largest recent trade was a $90 sell), indicating thin liquidity and minimal institutional interest at current levels

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

Chain
Base
Contract
0xef44...7945
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • The market cap ($6.72M) exceeding FDV ($104,290) is a structurally anomalous tokenomics configuration that is unexplained by the available data and could indicate a fundamental error, non-standard token mechanics, or misrepresentation — this is the highest-priority due diligence risk
  • Extreme illiquidity (largest recent trade: $90) means any attempt to exit a meaningful position could cause severe price impact, and the token may be effectively untradeable at scale
  • The sustained 90-day downtrend (-48.1%) with declining holder count (-26 over 30 days) reflects a market in structural decline, and without a clear catalyst, the path of least resistance remains downward toward the major support at $0.03451

Trading Insight

bearish

Recent on-chain swap activity is dominated by small sell transactions, with the largest recent trade being a $90 sell by wallet 0x723217, which executed multiple sell orders. Buy-side activity is present but smaller in size ($42 and $31 buys), reflecting weak demand at current price levels. The overall trading pattern suggests a market in distribution or disinterest rather than active accumulation.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Neutral

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

The short-term (7-day) price action shows a marginal +0.2% change with recent daily closes tightly clustered between $0.03552 and $0.03636, indicating a sideways consolidation at the bottom of the 90-day range. The medium-term picture is unambiguously bearish: the 30-day trend is -17.2% and the 90-day trend is -48.1%, with price sitting at just 4% of the period's high-low range. The consolidation near lows is more consistent with a pause in a downtrend than a base-building reversal.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

With price at 4% of the 90-day range and a 48.1% decline over that period, momentum indicators would be expected to read deeply oversold. The recent tight consolidation (daily closes ranging only $0.03552–$0.03636 over the last 7 sessions) suggests selling pressure has temporarily exhausted, but there is no confirming momentum signal of a reversal from the data provided.

Volume Analysis

Buy

38%

Sell

62%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

On-chain swap volume is extremely thin, with the largest recent trade at just $90. This declining and near-absent volume during a prolonged downtrend is a bearish continuation signal — it indicates a lack of buyer conviction rather than a capitulation bottom with high-volume support.

Recent Price Action

Tight consolidation range over the past 7 sessions ($0.03552–$0.03636) following a sharp decline from $0.03981 at the start of the observable window. The price has stabilized but with no upward momentum.

Tight consolidation at multi-month lows after a sustained downtrend typically represents either a base-building phase before a potential recovery or a brief pause before continuation lower. Without volume confirmation, the pattern leans toward the latter.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.03599

Major support

$0.03451

Immediate resistance

$0.03638

Major resistance

$0.07580

The immediate support at $0.03599 is the nearest OHLC-derived floor; a break below it opens the path to major support at $0.03451, the 90-day range low. On the upside, immediate resistance at $0.03638 is extremely close to current price ($0.03608), meaning even a modest uptick faces a ceiling. The major resistance at $0.07580 — the 90-day range high — is 110% above current price, representing the full recovery target and a very distant objective given current momentum.

AI overall risk

High

Risk Score

68/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    Daily return volatility of 3.7% (standard deviation) compounds to significant weekly and monthly swings. The 90-day price decline of 48.1% demonstrates that this token can lose half its value in a single quarter, and the shallow liquidity amplifies price impact from even small trades.

  • LiquidityNot assessed

    A liquidity observation is not available in the saved inputs.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As a utility token associated with a web3 infrastructure protocol operating across 300+ chains, this token faces the general regulatory uncertainty applicable to the broader crypto sector. No specific regulatory actions are identified in the available data, but the evolving global regulatory landscape for utility tokens remains a background risk.

Key Risks

  • The market cap ($6.72M) exceeding FDV ($104,290) is a structurally anomalous tokenomics configuration that is unexplained by the available data and could indicate a fundamental error, non-standard token mechanics, or misrepresentation — this is the highest-priority due diligence risk
  • Extreme illiquidity (largest recent trade: $90) means any attempt to exit a meaningful position could cause severe price impact, and the token may be effectively untradeable at scale
  • The sustained 90-day downtrend (-48.1%) with declining holder count (-26 over 30 days) reflects a market in structural decline, and without a clear catalyst, the path of least resistance remains downward toward the major support at $0.03451

Mitigating Factors

  • Association with the WalletConnect Network — a real, high-usage protocol with verifiable on-chain activity — provides a fundamental use-case anchor that pure speculative tokens lack
  • Dumpable supply of only 7.6% means the risk of a coordinated large-scale sell-off from top holders is structurally limited, providing some downside protection from whale-driven crashes

Investor Suitability

This token may be suitable only for high-risk-tolerant investors with deep familiarity with Base chain micro-cap tokens, who have independently verified the market cap/FDV anomaly and the token's legitimate connection to the WalletConnect Network. It is not suitable for risk-averse investors, those requiring liquidity, or anyone allocating more than a small speculative portion of a diversified portfolio.

This token sits at the intersection of a real, growing web3 infrastructure protocol and a micro-cap on-chain token with severe liquidity constraints and a prolonged downtrend. The investment thesis hinges entirely on whether the token has a legitimate, verifiable utility within the WalletConnect ecosystem — a question the available data cannot definitively answer, particularly given the anomalous market cap/FDV relationship.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The WalletConnect Network's continued growth (240% YoY, 15M+ monthly connections) drives renewed demand for the utility token, attracting new holders and reversing the 30-day attrition trend. A protocol-level catalyst (new integration, governance announcement, or ecosystem incentive program) triggers a volume spike that breaks above the $0.03638 immediate resistance and targets a recovery toward the $0.07580 major resistance — a potential 110% upside from current levels.

  • Verified, legitimate utility integration between this token and the WalletConnect Network's active protocol infrastructure
  • Broader Base chain ecosystem growth attracting new capital to correlated utility tokens

Base Case

The token continues to trade in a narrow range near current lows ($0.03451–$0.03638) with minimal volume and slow holder attrition. The WalletConnect Network's protocol activity continues but does not translate into meaningful token demand at this stage. Price remains range-bound until a definitive catalyst or further deterioration resolves the current indecision.

  • No major protocol catalyst or negative event materially changes the supply/demand balance in the near term
  • The market cap/FDV anomaly is a data artifact rather than a fundamental tokenomics flaw, and the token continues to trade without a structural collapse

Bear Case

Medium probability

The market cap/FDV anomaly reflects a fundamental tokenomics problem or misrepresentation, and the token's connection to the WalletConnect brand is superficial rather than structural. Continued holder attrition and near-zero trading volume push price through the major support at $0.03451, with no liquidity floor to prevent further decline. The 90-day downtrend accelerates.

  • Failure to resolve the market cap vs. FDV discrepancy undermines investor confidence and confirms tokenomics irregularities
  • Continued holder count decline and absence of new buyer demand in an illiquid market accelerates price deterioration

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 6, 2026, 07:15 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-06 19:15 UTC

Model Confidence

Medium

Data Snapshot

Price

$Unknown

Market Cap

$6.72M

24h Volume

$0

Holders

2,584

Liquidity

Not available

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Base chain, contract 0xef4461891dfb3ac8572ccf7c794664a8dd927945)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder size buckets and concentration metrics)Daily OHLC price history (90-day window, used as primary trend signal)Smart contract security assessment (59/100 score, verified status)Smart money realized PnL data (top profitable traders of this token)Notable recent on-chain swap data (largest real swaps by dollar value)Whale wallet forensics (DEX swap lookup results for top individual holders)

Limitations

  • The anomalous market cap ($6.72M) vs. FDV ($104,290) relationship could not be resolved from available data and may indicate a data error or non-standard token structure that affects the reliability of market cap-dependent metrics
  • Liquidity pool depth data was not provided, limiting the precision of slippage and liquidity risk assessments beyond what can be inferred from recent trade sizes
  • The token's precise functional relationship to the WalletConnect Network protocol cannot be independently verified from on-chain data alone, making fundamental valuation uncertain

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track WCT