A

Allium Price Today & AI Analysis

ALLIUMBaseAnalysis as of Aug 14, 2026

Price

$0.2297

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0xe024146ebae59f54a1cbd27007f2eb40cce3cf6e

Chain

Base

Holders

1.3K

Market cap

$2.30M

Liquidity

$52.00

Ask Unhosted AI about ALLIUM

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Base

ARLOARLOArlo$0.045594+5.5%MC $55.9KDUELSDUELSDUELS$0.042838+0.0%MC $28.4KOOpenDesignOpenDesign$0.061575+0.0%MC $15.8KAAXOBOTLAXOBOTL$0.069723+0.0%MC $43.8KSNRSNRSonarbot$0.063099+0.0%MC $31.0KXDPXDPDoppler$0.0213-29.0%MC $212.56M

Allium: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-08-14 14:30 UTC

Holder addresses

1,223

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$185,283.28
How concentrated is Allium ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 1,223 addresses (2026-08-14 14:30 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Allium?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Allium liquidity falling?
As of 2026-08-14 14:30 UTC, reported liquidity was $185,283.28. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-08-14 14:30 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Aug 14, 2026, 02:30 PM UTC

Market Cap

$950.06K

24h Volume

$71.47K

Liquidity

$185.28K

FDV

—

Holders

1,223

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bullish

ALLIUM (ALLIUM) is a 7-hour-old token on Base (chain 0x2105) with no published description, no verified contract, and no social presence, currently trading at $0.095 with a $950K market cap after an 847% launch-day surge. The token genesis reveals a structured pre-launch distribution: the deployer received the full 10M supply, forwarded 6.6M to an intermediary wallet, which then distributed 300K each to at least four additional wallets before any public trading began. The deployer wallet itself was created at the exact moment of launch and was funded by an unlabelled wallet, fitting a disposable-deployer pattern. With 31.2% of supply in dumpable individual-whale hands, an unverified contract, and 99% of supply concentrated in the top 100 holders, this token carries very high structural risk despite its explosive opening-session price action.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Aug 14, 2026, 02:30 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Structured pre-launch insider allocation: 6.6M of 10M tokens were routed through an intermediary wallet to at least four recipient wallets before any public trading, indicating coordinated insider positioning
  • Anomalous exchange-wallet holdings: four major CEX-labelled wallets (OKX, Bybit, Binance, Coinbase) each hold exactly 3% of supply in a 7-hour-old unverified token — a pattern that warrants independent verification before being treated as a listing signal
  • Near-total supply concentration: the top 100 holders control 99% of supply, leaving approximately 1% for retail participants, which creates extreme price manipulation risk in either direction

Allium AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

ALLIUM is only 7 hours old and has already surged 847% in its first trading session, driven almost entirely by a launch-day buy frenzy with 93.7% buy pressure. Tokens exhibiting this kind of vertical launch move with no established price history, an unverified contract, and heavy insider pre-allocation almost universally retrace sharply once early recipients begin distributing. The structural setup — 939 holders acquired via transfer (insider distribution) versus only 284 via swap (genuine market buyers) — strongly favors a near-term sell-off.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Without a verified contract, no public project description, no social presence, and a deployer wallet that is itself only 7 hours old and funded by an unlabelled wallet, there is no fundamental foundation to sustain the current $950K market cap over a 30–90 day horizon. The 31.2% dumpable supply held by identifiable individual whales — several of whom received tokens via pre-launch transfer rather than market purchases — represents a persistent overhead distribution risk. Unless the team discloses a credible use case and verifies the contract, the medium-term trajectory is continued price erosion.

Bullish Factors

  • Extreme buy-side dominance in the first trading session: 371 buy transactions versus 106 sells, with $66,993 in buy volume against only $4,477 in sell volume, indicating strong initial retail demand
  • Rapid holder accumulation: 1,223 holders acquired within 7 hours suggests genuine grassroots interest beyond the insider circle
  • Four major exchange-labelled wallets (OKX, Bybit, Binance, Coinbase) each hold 3% of supply — if these represent legitimate exchange custody rather than spoofed labels, it could signal an imminent CEX listing catalyst

Bearish Factors

  • The deployer wallet (0x45c8c015…) was created at the exact moment of token launch (2026-08-14T07:33:19Z), has zero prior contract deployments, and was funded by an unlabelled wallet — a classic disposable-deployer pattern associated with elevated rug-pull risk
  • 76.8% of all holders (939 of 1,223) received tokens via transfer rather than market swap, indicating a pre-arranged insider distribution network rather than organic market adoption
  • The top individual whale (0x067c5b…, 10.89% of supply) and the second-largest individual whale (0xaf028e…, 5.01%) both received their positions via transfer with no DEX swap history on this token — they hold dumpable supply acquired at zero cost
  • The contract is unverified (security score 53/100), meaning the source code cannot be audited for hidden mint functions, blacklists, or rug mechanisms
  • Top 100 holders control 99% of supply, with retail holding only ~1% — the float available to genuine market participants is negligible, making the price highly manipulable

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

ALLIUM call history

Full track record →

Aug 14bearish
24h+130.9%
7d—
30d+141.7%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Base
Contract
0xe024...cf6e
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: the combination of a disposable deployer wallet (created at launch, funded by an unlabelled wallet, zero prior deployments), an unverified contract, and 31.2% dumpable supply in zero-cost insider hands represents a textbook rug-pull setup — the insiders can exit at any time with pure profit
  • Insider dump cascade: the top individual whale holds 10.89% of supply acquired via transfer at zero cost; a single decision to sell into the $185K liquidity pool would cause catastrophic price impact for retail holders who bought at the current $0.095 price
  • Information asymmetry: with no verified contract, no project description, no social channels, and anonymous deployer/whale wallets, retail buyers have no basis for fundamental valuation and are trading purely on price momentum — a condition that historically ends badly when momentum reverses

Trading Insight

bullish

Current market sentiment is strongly bullish on a raw flow basis — 93.7% of 24-hour volume is buy-side and unique buyers (179) outnumber unique sellers (48) by nearly 4:1. However, this sentiment is almost entirely a launch-day phenomenon driven by the novelty of the token and the momentum of the initial 847% move; it does not reflect informed conviction about the project's fundamentals.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

The short-term trend is technically an uptrend by definition — the token launched and immediately surged 847% in its first session. However, this is a launch-day vertical move with no consolidation, no established support structure, and no prior price history to anchor a trend assessment. The medium-term trend is classified as sideways because there is genuinely no multi-week data to establish direction; the token is 7 hours old.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

An 847% single-session move on a token with no prior history, driven by fragmented retail buys averaging well under $1,000 each, is a textbook overbought condition. The deceleration visible in the 1-hour window (54 buys, 5 sells) versus the implied peak activity earlier in the 4-hour window suggests momentum is already fading from its launch-day extreme.

Volume Analysis

Buy

93.7%

Sell

6.3%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

All 477 transactions occurred within the token's first 7 hours of existence. The 1-hour window accounts for only 54 buys and 5 sells — roughly 15% of total buy transactions — indicating that buying velocity has slowed materially from the initial launch surge. With $185K in liquidity and $67K in buy volume already absorbed, the pool has been significantly moved; further large buys will face increasing slippage.

Recent Price Action

Vertical launch spike: the token moved from its initial price to $0.095 in a single 4-hour window, representing an 847% gain with no pullbacks or consolidation visible in the available data.

Vertical launch spikes of this magnitude in unverified, no-description tokens with insider pre-allocation are a well-documented pattern in the memecoin/rug-pull lifecycle. They typically precede sharp retracements once the initial retail FOMO exhausts and insider holders begin distributing into the elevated price.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    An 847% move in the first 7 hours of existence with no price history, no established support levels, and decelerating buy momentum indicates extreme volatility. The thin $185K liquidity pool amplifies price impact in both directions.

  • LiquidityHigh

    At $185K total liquidity against a $950K market cap, the pool is shallow. A coordinated exit by any of the top individual whales holding dumpable supply could drain a significant portion of the pool, causing severe slippage for remaining holders attempting to exit.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an uncategorized token on a decentralized exchange with no disclosed team or jurisdiction, ALLIUM faces the standard regulatory uncertainty applicable to unregistered crypto assets. The pre-launch insider distribution structure could attract regulatory scrutiny if the token gains significant market attention.

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: the combination of a disposable deployer wallet (created at launch, funded by an unlabelled wallet, zero prior deployments), an unverified contract, and 31.2% dumpable supply in zero-cost insider hands represents a textbook rug-pull setup — the insiders can exit at any time with pure profit
  • Insider dump cascade: the top individual whale holds 10.89% of supply acquired via transfer at zero cost; a single decision to sell into the $185K liquidity pool would cause catastrophic price impact for retail holders who bought at the current $0.095 price
  • Information asymmetry: with no verified contract, no project description, no social channels, and anonymous deployer/whale wallets, retail buyers have no basis for fundamental valuation and are trading purely on price momentum — a condition that historically ends badly when momentum reverses

Mitigating Factors

  • Strong initial buy-side demand (93.7% buy pressure, 179 unique buyers) demonstrates genuine retail interest that could sustain price if insider selling is delayed
  • The presence of four major exchange-labelled wallets holding 3% each, if verified as legitimate exchange custody, could indicate an imminent CEX listing that would provide additional liquidity and price support

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of newly launched, unverified tokens with insider pre-allocation, can afford to lose their entire investment, and are capable of monitoring on-chain activity in real time to detect early signs of insider distribution. It is not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with on-chain forensics and rug-pull patterns.

ALLIUM presents a high-risk, speculative launch-day trade with no fundamental underpinning. The bull case depends entirely on continued retail momentum and the possibility of a CEX listing catalyst; the bear case — which is structurally more probable given the deployer profile, insider distribution, and unverified contract — is a rapid price collapse as zero-cost insider holders distribute into retail demand.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The four exchange-labelled wallets (OKX, Bybit, Binance, Coinbase, each holding 3%) represent genuine exchange custody ahead of a coordinated multi-exchange listing announcement. A listing event drives a second wave of retail buying that absorbs insider selling pressure and sustains the price above current levels, potentially pushing market cap toward $2–5M.

  • Verified CEX listing announcement from one or more of the four exchange-labelled wallet holders
  • Contract verification and publication of a credible project roadmap that provides fundamental justification for the current valuation

Base Case

Buy momentum decelerates over the next 24–48 hours as the launch-day FOMO fades. Insiders begin gradual distribution into remaining retail demand, causing a slow price bleed from $0.095 toward a lower equilibrium. The token does not rug immediately but loses 60–80% of its launch-day peak value over the following weeks as the absence of fundamentals becomes apparent to the market.

  • Insiders choose gradual distribution over an immediate rug to maximize proceeds from the thin liquidity pool
  • No major catalyst (verified CEX listing, contract verification, project announcement) emerges to reset the fundamental narrative

Bear Case

High probability

The disposable deployer and pre-arranged insider distribution network follow the standard rug-pull or pump-and-dump lifecycle: insiders allow retail FOMO to drive the price up in the first 24–48 hours, then begin distributing their zero-cost transfer-acquired positions into the thin $185K liquidity pool. The price collapses 80–95% from current levels as liquidity is drained, leaving retail buyers with near-total losses.

  • 31.2% dumpable supply in zero-cost insider hands with no lock-up, vesting, or public accountability
  • Unverified contract with a disposable deployer funded by an unlabelled wallet — no reputational or legal deterrent to exit scam behavior

Analysis Details

Generated

Aug 14, 2026, 02:30 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-08-14 14:30 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.095006176634619730

Market Cap

$950.1K

24h Volume

$71.5K

Holders

1,223

Liquidity

$185,283.28

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Base chain, contract 0xe024146ebae59f54a1cbd27007f2eb40cce3cf6e)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis tier classification)Trading volume metrics (Uniswap v2 pool data)Smart contract security assessment (53/100 score, verification status)Token genesis and deployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet behavioral analysis (DEX swap history lookup)

Limitations

  • Token is only 7 hours old with no OHLC price history, making technical analysis and price target derivation impossible — all trend and momentum assessments are based on the single launch-day session only
  • Smart-money (top profitable trader cohort) data is unavailable for this token, removing a key signal for assessing informed investor positioning
  • The identities behind the deployer wallet, intermediary distribution wallet, and individual whale wallets are unknown — the full scope of insider coordination cannot be determined from on-chain data alone
  • The four exchange-labelled wallet holdings (OKX, Bybit, Binance, Coinbase at exactly 3% each) could not be independently verified as genuine exchange custody versus spoofed labels — this is a material uncertainty in the concentration risk assessment

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. ALLIUM exhibits multiple characteristics associated with high-risk token launches including an unverified contract, disposable deployer wallet, and pre-arranged insider distribution. Always conduct your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past price performance, including launch-day moves, is not indicative of future results.

Questions about ALLIUM?