Muse

Muse Price Today & AI Analysis

MuseBaseAnalysis as of Sep 22, 2026

Price

$0.045003

-49.96% 24h

Contract

Live
0xd35dcc8ec888b5af0bc52995ba818f7e25a81b07

Chain

Holders

4.5K

Market cap

$5.00M

Liquidity

$220.18K

More tokens on Base

Muse: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-22 15:15 UTC

Holder addresses

4,474

Top 10 supply share

8.00%

Reported liquidity

$220,010.00
How concentrated is Muse ownership?
As of 2026-09-22 15:15 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 8.00% of supply. It reports 4,474 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling Muse?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-22 15:15 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $13,604,229.00 in buys and $1,527.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Muse liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed -0.02%, from $4,603,297.00 (2026-09-22 13:00 UTC) to $4,602,147.30 (2026-09-22 15:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-22 15:15 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-22 13:00 UTC$4,603,297.00
2026-09-22 14:00 UTC$4,602,695.95
2026-09-22 15:00 UTC$4,602,147.30

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Sep 22, 2026, 03:15 PM UTC

Market Cap

$5.00M

24h Volume

$13.61M

Liquidity

$220.01K

FDV

Holders

4,474

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about Muse

Continue in chat

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

Muse is a brand-new token on Base (contract deployed 2 hours ago) trading on Velodrome, marketed as "your personal AI agent that gets things done" with no further documentation beyond a Twitter link. In its first hours of trading it has already fallen 49.97% while simultaneously reporting 100% buy-side volume dominance, an anomaly that raises questions about the reliability of the reported trading data. With $220,010 in liquidity against a $5.0M market cap and zero track record, this is a highly speculative, early-stage asset.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ranSep 22, 2026, 03:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Self-described AI-agent utility positioning within the crowded Base AI-agent token narrative
  • Only 2 hours old — essentially a live price-discovery event rather than an established market
  • Single disclosed social channel (Twitter), with no website, docs, or audit information provided

Muse AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

Muse fell 49.97% over both the 4h and 24h windows (identical because the token has only existed for 2 hours), a large real move rather than noise. This kind of collapse immediately after launch, combined with an anomalous 100% buy-side volume share, signals unstable price discovery rather than a dip worth buying.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Neutral

There is no 30d/90d (or even 7d) price history for Muse since the contract is only 2 hours old, making any medium-term directional call speculative rather than data-driven. The base expectation is continued high volatility until a longer trading history and deeper liquidity develop.

Bullish Factors

  • 913 buy transactions versus 767 sell transactions in the observed window, with reported buy pressure at 100% ($13,604,229 buy volume vs. $1,527 sell volume)
  • 4,474 unique holders were acquired within the first 2 hours, indicating substantial initial trading interest
  • Aggregate top-10 holder concentration of 8.0% is low relative to many freshly launched tokens

Bearish Factors

  • Price fell 49.97% in the token's first hours of trading despite the reported buy-volume dominance, an internally contradictory signal that undermines confidence in the reported price/volume data
  • Total liquidity of only $220,010 against a $5,002,326 market cap and a reported $13.6M in 24h volume implies high slippage risk and vulnerability to a liquidity pull
  • The contract is 2 hours old with no security, deployer, or launch-allocation data available to verify the fairness of the launch

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Muse call history

Full track record →

Sep 22bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Base
Contract
0xd35d...1b07
Total Supply
Decimals

Key Risks

  • The contract is only 2 hours old with no established trading history, audit, or track record
  • Price fell 49.97% within the observed trading window, indicating extreme volatility immediately after launch
  • Liquidity of $220,010 is thin relative to the $5,002,326 market cap and reported $13.6M volume, creating high slippage and liquidity-pull risk
  • Reported 100% buy-side volume dominance occurring alongside a ~50% price crash is a data anomaly consistent with wash trading, bot activity, or unreliable volume reporting

Trading Insight

bearish

Reported order flow shows overwhelming buy-side dominance (100% buy pressure, 913 buys vs. 767 sells), yet price still collapsed nearly 50% in the same window — a contradiction that suggests the volume figures may be distorted by bots, wash trading, or bonding-curve migration mechanics rather than reflecting genuine net demand. The actual price outcome is the more trustworthy signal and points to a bearish market resolution so far.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

The only real price signal available — a 49.97% decline over both the 4h and 24h windows — establishes a clear short-term downtrend since the token's launch. There is no genuine medium-term trend to assess yet because the contract is only 2 hours old, so 'sideways' here reflects an absence of history rather than an actual equilibrium.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

A near-50% single-session decline suggests short-term oversold conditions in the conventional sense, but standard momentum indicators (RSI, moving averages) are not meaningful for a token with only 2 hours of trading history, so this reading should be treated as directional context rather than a precise signal.

Volume Analysis

Buy

100%

Sell

0%

Volume Trend

Increasing

Volume is concentrated entirely in the token's first 2 hours post-launch, with 913 buy and 767 sell transactions recorded. The reported 100% buy-pressure split does not align with the simultaneous price collapse, which weakens confidence that this volume reflects organic, sustainable demand.

Recent Price Action

A sharp roughly 50% decline within the first hours of trading, occurring alongside data showing buy transactions vastly outnumbering sell volume in dollar terms.

This divergence between reported order flow and actual price outcome is atypical and, for a token this young, is more consistent with unstable initial price discovery, bonding-curve migration effects, or bot-driven activity than with a genuine supply/demand-driven dip-buying opportunity.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A 49.97% price decline within the first hours of trading demonstrates extreme volatility typical of freshly launched micro-cap tokens with thin order books.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Total liquidity of $220,010 is thin relative to the $5,002,326 market cap and the reported $13.6M in 24h volume, implying meaningful slippage on moderate trade sizes and vulnerability to a sudden liquidity withdrawal.

  • ConcentrationMedium

    Aggregate top-10 holder concentration is 8.0% of supply, which is low by common market standards, but per-wallet classification (individual whale vs. protocol/exchange) is unavailable, so insider or coordinated allocations cannot be ruled out.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    No explicit securities-like features are disclosed, but AI-agent branding claiming autonomous 'agent' functionality could draw regulatory attention if marketed as performing financial actions on users' behalf; this risk is generic to the sector rather than specific evidence-based.

Key Risks

  • The contract is only 2 hours old with no established trading history, audit, or track record
  • Price fell 49.97% within the observed trading window, indicating extreme volatility immediately after launch
  • Liquidity of $220,010 is thin relative to the $5,002,326 market cap and reported $13.6M volume, creating high slippage and liquidity-pull risk
  • Reported 100% buy-side volume dominance occurring alongside a ~50% price crash is a data anomaly consistent with wash trading, bot activity, or unreliable volume reporting
  • No security score, holder-growth history, deployer profile, or launch-allocation forensics are available to verify a fair or clean launch

Mitigating Factors

  • Aggregate top-10 holder concentration of 8.0% is low relative to many comparable new token launches
  • Trading occurs on Velodrome, an established Base DEX, though this does not constitute an audit of the Muse token contract itself

Investor Suitability

Suitable only for highly speculative traders with a high risk tolerance who can absorb total loss of capital; unsuitable for risk-averse, income-focused, or long-term passive investors given the token's 2-hour track record and multiple unresolved data gaps.

Muse is an extremely early-stage, high-risk speculative token that launched 2 hours ago and has already fallen nearly 50% while showing an anomalous, buy-dominant volume profile. Any thesis here is driven by launch-day momentum and AI-agent narrative speculation rather than verifiable fundamentals or a meaningful track record.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

If the AI-agent narrative gains sustained attention and holder growth continues from the current 4,474 wallets, the token could see a short-term stabilization or bounce, particularly if liquidity is deepened beyond the current $220,010.

  • Continued holder growth signaling ongoing retail interest
  • Broader AI-agent token narrative momentum on Base lifting sentiment across the category

Base Case

Most likely, Muse continues to exhibit the high volatility typical of hour-old micro-cap launches, swinging sharply on relatively low true dollar depth as the market searches for equilibrium; without new catalysts, no durable directional trend should be assumed.

  • No major liquidity injection, exchange listing, or verified product update occurs in the near term
  • Trading activity remains dominated by early speculators and automated bots rather than organic long-term holders

Bear Case

Medium probability

The token continues to lose value as early participants and bots exit, thin liquidity fails to absorb sell pressure, and the unresolved buy/sell volume anomaly resolves toward further downside or a liquidity-removal event.

  • Liquidity of only $220,010 against a $5,002,326 market cap leaves the token vulnerable to sharp drawdowns from moderate-sized sells
  • Absence of any security, deployer, or launch-allocation transparency raises rug/insider risk

Analysis Details

Generated

Sep 22, 2026, 03:15 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-22 15:15 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.0000500232583966

Market Cap

$5.00M

24h Volume

$13.61M

Holders

4,474

Liquidity

$220,010.00

Data Sources

Codex DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)Daily OHLC price historyAggregate holder count and top-10 concentration

Limitations

  • Token is only 2 hours old, so no meaningful 7d/30d/90d price or OHLC history exists to establish reliable trend or support/resistance levels
  • Holder-growth history, whale-transaction data, smart-money cohort data, and contract-security/audit data were unavailable for this analysis
  • Per-wallet holder classification and launch-allocation (genesis/deployer) forensics could not be inspected, limiting insider-risk assessment to aggregate figures only

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track Muse