C

C-MEM Price Today & AI Analysis

CMEM
Base·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Jun 11, 2026

$0.063682

+0.00%24h
LiveContract:0x76b1967eec0ccaeb001bbbb2b40dc4badba31ba3Chain:BaseHolders:284Market cap:$36.83KLiquidity:$17.09K

More tokens on Base

STATED

STATED

useStated

$0.0618110.0%
MC $18.1K
CRAIG

CRAIG

Craig

$0.0648100.0%
MC $48.1K
AC

AC

Agent Conductor

$0.0762260.0%
MC $6.2K
SPLIT

SPLIT

Split

$0.0619130.0%
MC $19.1K
ENHANCED

ENHANCED

Enhanced OS

$0.0008060.0%
MC $8.1K
AERO

AERO

Aerodrome

$0.645219.6%
MC $1.27B

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about CMEM

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since reportreport from Jun 11, 2026, 04:03 AM UTC
Market Cap

$45.60K

24h Volume

$55.91K

Liquidity

$40.46K

FDV

—

Holders

76

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

—

AI Executive Summary

C-MEM (CMEM) is a newly launched token on Base (chain 0x2105) with no verified contract, no project description, and no social presence — all hallmarks of an early-stage speculative or meme-style launch. The token is fewer than 31 days old, has 76 holders, a $45,602 market cap, and $40,464 in Uniswap liquidity. It experienced a ~94% price surge in its first 24 hours of meaningful trading activity, followed immediately by a -24.4% retracement in the most recent 5-minute window, suggesting the initial pump phase may already be reversing. Given the 28/100 security score, unverified contract, and absence of any fundamental project information, this token carries very high risk and is unsuitable for most investors.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 11, 2026, 04:03 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: bearish
Extremely new token (≤31 days old) with 100% of its holder base acquired in that window — no established community or price history exists
67.54% of supply is held by the Uniswap liquidity pool contract, compressing the dumpable float to ~25% and partially limiting immediate sell pressure
Unverified smart contract with a 28/100 security score and zero project documentation creates maximum information asymmetry for buyers

C-MEM AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

CMEM launched within the last 31 days and has already posted a ~94% 24-hour gain, but the most recent 5-minute window shows a -24.4% retracement, signalling that early buyers are beginning to exit. With only 76 holders, a 28/100 security score, and an unverified contract, the token is highly susceptible to rapid sell-offs once initial momentum fades. The sell-transaction count (272) already exceeds buy transactions (203) over the same 24-hour window, reinforcing near-term downside pressure.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

Over a 30–90 day horizon, CMEM faces severe structural headwinds: no verified contract, no project description, no social presence, and a tiny 76-holder base that is entirely new (100% holder growth in 31 days means zero established community). Without a clear use case or development roadmap, sustaining price appreciation beyond the initial launch pump is unlikely. Continued distribution by the eight individual whales holding a combined ~21.5% of dumpable supply represents the dominant medium-term risk.

Bullish Factors
  • +Buy volume ($33,030) outpaces sell volume ($22,879) over 24 hours, representing a 59.1% buy-pressure ratio that shows net capital inflow on launch day
  • +Holder count grew from 0 to 76 in 31 days with an accelerating trajectory, indicating genuine early-stage demand accumulation
  • +67.54% of supply is locked in the Uniswap pool contract, meaning the actual dumpable float is only ~25% of total supply — limiting the maximum theoretical sell pressure
Bearish Factors
  • -Security score of 28/100 with an unverified contract is a critical red flag; unverified contracts can contain hidden mint, pause, or rug functions that cannot be audited
  • -Sell transactions (272) outnumber buy transactions (203) in the 24-hour window despite positive net volume, indicating a larger number of individual exit events relative to entries
  • -The -24.4% price drop in the most recent 5-minute window after a 94% 24-hour run is a classic post-pump distribution signal, consistent with early holders taking profits
  • -Eight individual whale wallets collectively hold ~21.5% of dumpable supply with no lock-up or vesting evidence, representing concentrated exit risk that could overwhelm the $40,464 liquidity pool

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

CMEM call history

Full track record →
Jun 11bearish
24h—
7d+31.0%
30d-20.9%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBase
Contract0x76b1...1ba3
Total Supply—
Decimals—

Key Risks

•Rug pull / exit scam risk: The unverified contract, anonymous deployment, transfer-based holder acquisition, and immediate whale distribution after launch are all consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump or rug pull setup. Investors could lose 100% of capital if liquidity is removed.
•Liquidity exhaustion: With only $40,464 in the pool and eight individual whales holding ~25% of dumpable supply, a coordinated or panic-driven sell-off could drain the pool and render the token untradeable at any meaningful price.
•Information vacuum: The complete absence of project documentation, social presence, and contract verification means investors have no basis for fundamental valuation and no recourse if the project is abandoned or fraudulent.

Trading Insight

bearish

Despite positive net buy volume ($33,030 vs $22,879 in sells), the transaction count skew — 272 sells versus 203 buys — reveals that more individual wallets are exiting than entering, a divergence that typically precedes price deterioration. The sharp -24.4% 5-minute retracement after a 94% daily run further confirms that early participants are distributing into buy-side liquidity. Overall sentiment is bearish on a forward-looking basis despite the headline 24-hour gain.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bearish
Medium-Term (30d):
Neutral

The short-term trend has turned negative: after a 94% 24-hour surge (which itself represents the entire price history), the most recent 5-minute candle shows a -24.4% decline, marking the first observable reversal. Medium-term trend is classified as sideways given the token has no multi-week price history to establish a directional bias. The absence of OHLC data prevents any technical level analysis.

Momentum

Status:
Overbought

A 94% single-day price increase on a token with $40,464 in liquidity and 76 holders is a textbook overbought condition. The immediate -24.4% retracement in the 5-minute window confirms momentum exhaustion. Without historical RSI or MACD data, this assessment is based purely on the magnitude of the price move relative to the token's size and liquidity depth.

Volume Analysis

Buy 59.1%Sell 40.9%

Volume Trend: Decreasing

All 24-hour volume ($55,909 combined) is concentrated in a single 4-hour burst, with the 1-hour window showing 155 buys and 217 sells — a sell-heavy ratio that suggests volume is now tilting toward distribution. The buy-to-sell volume ratio (59.1% buys) remains positive in dollar terms, but the transaction count ratio (42.7% buys by count) is negative, indicating the volume trend is deteriorating as the launch pump subsides.

Recent Price Action

Vertical launch pump followed by sharp reversal: +94% over 24 hours (all within a 4-hour window), then -24.4% in the most recent 5-minute interval. This is a classic 'pump and dump' or 'launch and fade' pattern common in new low-liquidity tokens.

This pattern typically indicates that initial buyers (often insiders or snipers) are distributing into retail demand generated by the price spike. The reversal beginning within hours of the peak is a high-probability signal of continued downside unless new catalysts emerge.

Holder Metrics

Total Holders76
24h Change+76
Growth Rate+100%

The 100% holder growth figures across 24h, 7d, and 30d windows simply reflect that this token did not exist before the current 31-day window — every holder is new. While the accelerating growth trajectory (0 to 76 in 31 days) is technically positive, the absolute base of 76 holders is extremely small and provides no evidence of organic community formation beyond the initial launch cohort.

Holder Distribution

Top 10 Holders87%
Top 100 Holders100%
Retail Holders0.0%
Concentration Risk:
High

While the raw top-10 concentration of 87% appears critical, 67.54% of that is the Uniswap liquidity pool contract — a non-dumpable protocol holding. Stripping out the protocol contract, the dumpable supply is ~25%, held across eight individual whale wallets. This is still a HIGH concentration risk: eight wallets controlling 25% of supply in a $45,602 market cap token with $40,464 liquidity means any single whale exit could move the price by 3–5% in isolation, and coordinated exits could be devastating. Zero retail supply participation means there is no distributed holder base to absorb selling pressure.

Whale Activity

Sentiment:
Distributing

The largest recorded trades are sell-side: $1,829 sell by 0x6e95d1, $1,213 sell by 0x79f659, and $935 sell by 0x4776fa. The largest buy is $490 by 0x6e95d1 (the same wallet that sold $1,829 — a net reduction). Buy-side trades are small ($490, $328, $327), indicating no large new capital entering the token.

  • •SELL $1,829 by 0x6e95d1 — largest single trade recorded; same wallet re-bought only $490, confirming net distribution
  • •SELL $1,213 by 0x79f659 and SELL $935 by 0x4776fa — two additional whale wallets exiting, with no corresponding large buys from new participants

The notable recent trade data paints a clear distributing picture: the three largest trades are all sells, totaling $3,977, while the three largest buys total only $1,145. The dominant wallet (0x6e95d1) is actively reducing its position. This whale distribution pattern, occurring immediately after a 94% price spike, is a strong bearish signal for near-term price action.

Smart Money Indicators

Confidence:
Low
Profit-Taking Risk:
High

Smart-money profitable-trader cohort data is unavailable for CMEM. No realized PnL metrics exist to assess whether sophisticated traders are positioned long or short.

Without smart-money data, the only proxy for early-buyer behavior is the observable trade history, which shows net distribution by the largest wallets. The high profit-taking risk rating is based on the 94% price appreciation in a single day combined with active sell transactions from the top wallets — conditions that historically precede accelerated profit-taking.

Liquidity Analysis

Total Liquidity$40,464
Depth:
Shallow
Slippage Risk:
High

At $40,464 in total liquidity against a $45,602 market cap, the liquidity-to-market-cap ratio is ~89% — unusually high, but this is because 67.54% of supply is in the pool. Despite this ratio, the absolute dollar depth is extremely shallow: a $4,000 sell order would represent ~10% of total pool liquidity and cause significant slippage. Any whale exit from the ~25% dumpable supply would be severely constrained by this thin pool, amplifying downside price impact.

Overall Risk:
Very High
92/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

A 94% price increase followed by a -24.4% reversal within hours demonstrates extreme intraday volatility. With only $40,464 in liquidity and 76 holders, even small trades cause outsized price movements. This level of volatility is among the highest observable in crypto markets.

Liquidity
High

Total liquidity of $40,464 is extremely shallow. A coordinated exit by even two or three of the eight individual whale wallets (holding ~21.5% of supply combined) would exhaust available liquidity and cause catastrophic price impact. Exit slippage for any position above $1,000 is likely to be severe.

Concentration
High

While 67.54% of supply in the Uniswap contract is non-dumpable, the remaining ~25% dumpable supply is concentrated in eight individual whale wallets. In a $45,602 market cap token, each whale holds positions worth $500–$1,500 — small in absolute terms but large relative to liquidity. The transfer-based acquisition of 53/76 holders also raises concerns about undisclosed insider allocations.

Smart Contract
High

The contract is unverified (source code not published) and scored 28/100 on security assessment. Without source code verification, it is impossible to rule out owner-privileged functions including minting, blacklisting, liquidity removal, or fee manipulation. This is the single highest-severity risk factor for CMEM.

Regulatory
Medium

As an uncategorized token on Base with no documented project, CMEM faces standard regulatory risks applicable to all unregistered crypto tokens. The lack of documentation and anonymous deployment could attract additional scrutiny if the token gains scale, though at current size it is unlikely to be a regulatory priority.

Key Risks

  • •Rug pull / exit scam risk: The unverified contract, anonymous deployment, transfer-based holder acquisition, and immediate whale distribution after launch are all consistent with a coordinated pump-and-dump or rug pull setup. Investors could lose 100% of capital if liquidity is removed.
  • •Liquidity exhaustion: With only $40,464 in the pool and eight individual whales holding ~25% of dumpable supply, a coordinated or panic-driven sell-off could drain the pool and render the token untradeable at any meaningful price.
  • •Information vacuum: The complete absence of project documentation, social presence, and contract verification means investors have no basis for fundamental valuation and no recourse if the project is abandoned or fraudulent.

Mitigating Factors

  • •67.54% of supply locked in the Uniswap pool contract is non-dumpable, limiting the maximum theoretical sell pressure to ~25% of total supply
  • •Net buy volume ($33,030) exceeded sell volume ($22,879) over the 24-hour window, indicating some genuine demand-side interest at launch

Investor Suitability

CMEM is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who specialize in micro-cap speculative launches, fully understand the risks of unverified contracts, and are prepared to lose their entire investment. It is not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone who cannot afford to lose 100% of their position. Maximum position sizing should reflect the very high probability of total loss.

CMEM is a high-risk speculative launch token with no documented fundamentals, an unverified contract, and early signs of whale distribution following a 94% launch-day pump. The investment thesis is almost entirely momentum-based, with the bear case significantly outweighing the bull case given the structural risks present.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

A legitimate project team emerges, verifies the contract, publishes a roadmap, and builds a community around the C-MEM brand. The accelerating holder growth trajectory continues, liquidity deepens, and the token establishes itself as a recognized meme or utility token on Base. The 94% launch-day performance attracts attention from crypto influencers, driving a second wave of buying.

  • +Contract verification and project documentation published within 7 days of launch
  • +Organic community growth beyond 200 holders with active social media presence
Base Case

The initial pump fades over 48–72 hours as early buyers complete their distribution. Price stabilizes at a significantly lower level (likely 50–80% below the 24-hour peak) with minimal trading activity. The token persists on-chain but becomes illiquid and effectively dormant, with no new development activity.

  • •No new project documentation or community development emerges to create sustained demand
  • •Whale wallets continue gradual distribution without triggering a complete liquidity collapse
Bear Case
High

The launch-day pump fully reverses as the eight individual whale wallets continue distributing into any remaining buy-side demand. The unverified contract is exploited or liquidity is removed by the deployer, resulting in a near-total loss of value. The token joins the large majority of micro-cap Base launches that fail within 30–90 days.

  • -Continued whale distribution evidenced by the current sell-heavy transaction count and the largest wallet's net position reduction
  • -Absence of any fundamental project development to sustain demand beyond initial speculative interest

Analysis Details

GeneratedJun 11, 2026, 04:03 AM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.000000453510779343
Market Cap$45.6K
24h Volume$55.9K
Holders76
Liquidity$40.5K

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Base chain, Uniswap PoolManager)
Holder distribution analytics (31-day daily timeseries)
Trading volume metrics (24h buy/sell volume and transaction counts)
Smart contract security assessment (28/100 score, verification status)
Notable recent trade data (largest on-chain swaps)
Top holder classification (protocol contracts vs. individual wallets)

Limitations

  • •No OHLC price history available — all technical analysis is based on single-day percentage changes only; no support/resistance levels can be computed
  • •Smart-money (profitable trader cohort) data is unavailable — early buyer positioning and realized PnL cannot be assessed
  • •Unverified contract means hidden tokenomics, fee structures, or privileged functions cannot be identified or ruled out
  • •Token is fewer than 31 days old with only 76 holders — all statistical patterns are based on an extremely small sample size and may not be predictive

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. CMEM in particular exhibits very high risk characteristics including an unverified smart contract, extreme price volatility, and thin liquidity. Always conduct your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Track CMEM