C

concrete Price Today & AI Analysis

CONCBaseAnalysis as of Sep 27, 2026

Price

$0.0797

+696.75% 24h

Contract

Live
0x67c958d79ea11830e145d3508103cfb2d5d7c620

Chain

Base

Holders

885

Market cap

$796.65K

Liquidity

$84.81K

More tokens on Base

CCOMPOSECOMPOSE github.com/docker/COMPOSE$0.002781+77.9%MC $2.78MHANDLHANDLHandlPay$0.002403-7.7%MC $1.31MBROKERBROKERBroker Cat$0.000254-23.5%MC $249.8KMAMOMAMOMamo$0.007593+2.9%MC $2.53M1F9161F916A Society For AI Agents$0.041051-2.6%MC $1.05Mboarboarboar$0.042204+444.4%MC $2.20M

concrete: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-09-27 13:30 UTC

Holder addresses

883

Top 10 supply share

29.65%

Reported liquidity

$79,903.00
How concentrated is concrete ownership?
As of 2026-09-27 13:30 UTC, the provider reports that the top 10 holder addresses hold 29.65% of supply. It reports 883 holder addresses in total. Addresses are not people; pool, exchange, burn and related addresses have not been independently classified here.
Are large holders selling concrete?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. As of 2026-09-27 13:30 UTC, the preceding 24-hour DEX volume was $52,854.00 in buys and $2,941.00 in sells. Those totals describe trading activity, not which holders traded. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is concrete liquidity falling?
Sampled USD liquidity changed +141.48%, from $33,088.53 (2026-09-27 10:00 UTC) to $79,902.64 (2026-09-27 13:00 UTC). This compares the earliest and latest available samples, which may cover less than 24 hours. USD changes can reflect asset prices as well as liquidity deposits or withdrawals.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: Codex token aggregates, hourly liquidity samples and recent DEX swaps. Token aggregates retrieved 2026-09-27 13:30 UTC; the provider may lag the chain. Buy/sell totals cover the preceding 24 hours. Observations are saved with this report and do not update live. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Saved liquidity observations

Observation (UTC)Liquidity (USD)
2026-09-27 10:00 UTC$33,088.53
2026-09-27 11:00 UTC$60,646.07
2026-09-27 12:00 UTC$74,624.46
2026-09-27 13:00 UTC$79,902.64

Recent swap evidence

Up to 10 recent swaps returned by the provider within the preceding 24 hours. This is a sample, not all trades or a ranking of large holders.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Sep 27, 2026, 01:30 PM UTC

Market Cap

$707.26K

24h Volume

$55.80K

Liquidity

$79.90K

FDV

—

Holders

883

24h

Loading trading activity…

Ask Unhosted AI about CONC

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweetsWhale activityWho is accumulating or distributingWhat are the risks?Red flags, security, concentrationShould I buy?Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bullish

CONC (concrete) is a Base-chain token deployed just 9 hours ago, currently trading at $0.0707 with a $707,256 fully diluted valuation and $79,903 in liquidity on Uniswap. The token has seen an explosive +607% price move since launch alongside heavy buy-side volume (94.7% of trades), but this must be interpreted as launch-phase volatility given the token's extremely short trading history. No security audit, holder distribution detail, deployer forensics, or genesis-transfer data are available, leaving significant unknowns for prospective investors.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Sep 27, 2026, 01:30 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extremely new token (9 hours old) with no established price history
  • Very strong short-term buy pressure (94.7% buy vs 5.3% sell volume)
  • No project description, social links, or category classification provided

concrete AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bullish

CONC has posted an extreme +607% move over the past 4h/24h window (the token only launched 9 hours ago, so this is effectively its entire trading history), backed by heavy buy-side dominance (94.7% buy volume vs 5.3% sell). Momentum is strongly positive but this is a brand-new, thinly-traded token, so the move should be read as early speculative price discovery rather than a stable trend.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Neutral

With only 9 hours of trading history, there is no 30d/90d price data to establish a medium-term trend. Any forecast beyond the immediate term is speculative given the token's age and the absence of OHLC history.

Bullish Factors

  • Buy transactions (312) vastly outnumber sell transactions (80) over 24h, with 123 unique buyers vs 43 unique sellers
  • Buy volume of $52,854 dominates sell volume of $2,941, a 94.7%/5.3% split indicating strong net demand pressure
  • 883 holders accumulated within 9 hours suggests rapid initial distribution and interest

Bearish Factors

  • A +607% move within the first hours of listing is characteristic of low-liquidity launch volatility, not sustainable price trend
  • Total liquidity is only $79,903, meaning even moderate sell orders could cause outsized price impact
  • No OHLC history exists, so there is no technical basis (support/resistance) to validate current pricing

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

CONC call history

Full track record →

Sep 27bullish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Base
Contract
0x67c9...c620
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Extremely short trading history (9 hours) provides no basis for trend validation or reliable technical analysis
  • Shallow liquidity ($79,903) creates high slippage risk and vulnerability to sharp price swings from moderate-sized trades
  • No project description, social presence, or security audit data exists, making fundamental due diligence impossible at this time
  • Aggregate top-10 concentration of 29.6% cannot be verified as benign or risky without per-wallet data

Trading Insight

bullish

Trading activity over the past 24h shows overwhelming buy-side dominance, both in transaction count (312 buys vs 80 sells) and volume ($52,854 vs $2,941). This pattern typically reflects strong initial demand during a token's launch phase, though such imbalances often normalize as early momentum fades.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

The short-term trend is sharply upward, driven by the token's launch-phase price discovery (+607% since inception). There is no medium-term trend to speak of since the token has existed for only 9 hours, which is insufficient to classify beyond the immediate uptrend.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

A +607% move in under a day combined with 94.7% buy-side volume dominance suggests momentum is stretched and vulnerable to a sharp pullback or profit-taking event, typical of newly launched tokens experiencing initial speculative demand.

Volume Analysis

Buy

94.7%

Sell

5.3%

Volume Trend

Increasing

Volume is concentrated almost entirely on the buy side ($52,854 buys vs $2,941 sells), with 312 buy transactions against just 80 sells in the last 24h, indicating strong but potentially unsustainable early demand.

Recent Price Action

A single, large upward price move (+607%) since token launch 9 hours ago, with no prior candles to compare against.

Such moves in freshly launched, low-liquidity tokens often reflect thin order books and early speculative buying rather than durable value discovery, and can reverse quickly if buy pressure fades.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A +607% price move within 9 hours of launch reflects extreme volatility typical of newly listed tokens with thin order books.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Total liquidity of $79,903 is shallow relative to the $707,256 FDV, meaning larger trades can cause significant slippage and price impact.

  • ConcentrationMedium

    Top 10 holders control 29.6% of supply in aggregate; without per-wallet classification this cannot be confirmed as whale risk versus benign contracts, but the concentration level itself warrants caution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an unclassified, undocumented token with no disclosed use case, CONC carries generic regulatory uncertainty common to newly launched DeFi tokens.

Key Risks

  • Extremely short trading history (9 hours) provides no basis for trend validation or reliable technical analysis
  • Shallow liquidity ($79,903) creates high slippage risk and vulnerability to sharp price swings from moderate-sized trades
  • No project description, social presence, or security audit data exists, making fundamental due diligence impossible at this time
  • Aggregate top-10 concentration of 29.6% cannot be verified as benign or risky without per-wallet data

Mitigating Factors

  • Strong organic-looking transaction count (883 holders, 312 buys vs 80 sells) suggests genuine retail interest rather than obvious wash trading
  • Trading occurs on Uniswap, a reputable and widely audited DEX infrastructure

Investor Suitability

Suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, speculative traders comfortable with total capital loss; not appropriate for conservative or long-term investors given the token's age, lack of fundamentals, and shallow liquidity.

CONC presents a high-risk, high-volatility speculative opportunity typical of a brand-new token in its initial hours of trading, with strong buy-side momentum but almost no fundamental or historical data to validate a longer-term thesis.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Continued strong buyer demand and holder growth could sustain upward momentum if the token gains broader visibility and liquidity deepens.

  • Sustained buy-volume dominance (currently 94.7%)
  • Rapid holder base growth from 0 to 883 in 9 hours

Base Case

Price likely experiences elevated volatility with a probable pullback from the initial launch spike as speculative momentum fades over the coming days, absent new catalysts.

  • No new fundamental information (audit, roadmap, partnerships) emerges to justify sustained valuation
  • Liquidity remains at current shallow levels

Bear Case

High probability

The launch-phase pump reverses sharply as early buyers take profits into thin liquidity, a common outcome for tokens with +600% moves in their first day.

  • Shallow $79,903 liquidity amplifying downside moves
  • Lack of any disclosed fundamentals, use case, or security audit to support valuation

Analysis Details

Generated

Sep 27, 2026, 01:30 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-09-27 13:30 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.0707255826689

Market Cap

$707.3K

24h Volume

$55.8K

Holders

883

Liquidity

$79,903.00

Data Sources

Codex DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)Daily OHLC price historyAggregate holder count and top-10 concentration

Limitations

  • Holder-growth history, whale-transaction data, and contract-security data were unavailable for this analysis
  • No OHLC price history exists for this 9-hour-old token, preventing computation of technical support/resistance levels
  • Smart-money/profitable-trader cohort data was not available
  • Token genesis, deployer, and whale wallet forensics could not be inspected

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track CONC