THERE IS NO MEME Price Today & AI Analysis
Price
$0.043359
+0.00% 24h
Contract
Live0x6543b829b6615e3c20b219b6a049e9c5ddd3b877At a $1M market cap, $NOMEME would be $0.001000 (29.8x from today’s price)
Market cap calculatorIs NOMEME a scam?
Unhosted check · Oct 23
No scam signals in Unhosted’s checks, with a few things to know below.
- The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.
Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.
Ask Unhosted AI about NOMEME
3 free answers a day
More tokens on Base
THERE IS NO MEME: holders, selling & liquidity
2026-09-09 22:15 UTC
Holder addresses
Top 10 supply share
Reported liquidity
- How concentrated is THERE IS NO MEME ownership?
- Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 619 addresses (2026-09-09 22:15 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
- Are large holders selling THERE IS NO MEME?
- This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
- Is THERE IS NO MEME liquidity falling?
- As of 2026-09-09 22:15 UTC, reported liquidity was $30,188.00. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations
Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-09-09 22:15 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.
Recent swap evidence
Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.
1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.
Ask Wick about this chartAdvanced charting powered by TradingView
Movement since report
report from Sep 9, 2026, 10:15 PM UTC
Market Cap
24h Volume
Liquidity
FDV
Holders
24h
Loading trading activity…AI Executive Summary
Risk
Sentiment
NOMEME is a brand-new ERC-20 token on Base, deployed only 2 hours ago and trading on Uniswap at $0.000191139685381 with a $191,122 market cap and just $30,188 in liquidity. The token shows active but highly volatile trading, with 1,932 combined buy/sell transactions in its first day and a modest tilt toward buyers, but it lacks any project description, social links, category classification, or security audit data. Given its extreme youth, thin liquidity, and total absence of fundamental or security information, this token sits firmly in speculative, high-risk territory typical of newly launched meme tokens.
Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Sep 9, 2026, 10:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.
Key points
- Contract is only 2 hours old, meaning there is essentially no track record to evaluate
- No project description, categorization, or social links were provided, leaving the token's purpose entirely undefined
- Aggregate top-10 holder concentration (17.4%) is comparatively low for a token this fresh, though individual wallet identities cannot be verified
THERE IS NO MEME AI Price Analysis
Low Confidence
Short-Term · 24h-7d
NeutralNOMEME launched only 2 hours ago, so the 4h and 24h figures (both showing a 2479% move) simply reflect the token's initial price discovery since inception rather than a real multi-day trend. Intraday action is extremely choppy, with a +14.9% swing over the last 5 minutes immediately following a -14.8% move over the prior hour, indicating a token still finding equilibrium with no established direction.
Medium-Term · 30d-90d
NeutralThere is no 30-90 day price history to assess a medium-term trend since the contract was only created 2 hours ago. Any medium-term view at this stage would be speculative rather than data-driven, given the complete absence of a track record.
Bullish Factors
- 24h buy volume ($408,012) exceeds sell volume ($377,625), producing a net inflow of roughly $30,387 and 51.9% buy pressure
- Unique buyers (944) outnumber unique sellers (580) by over 60% in the first hours of trading, suggesting active new demand rather than early sell-off
- Aggregate top-10 holder concentration of 17.4% is relatively low for a token this new, where launches often see 40%+ concentration in early wallets
Bearish Factors
- Extreme short-window volatility: -14.75% over the last hour immediately followed by +14.88% over 5 minutes, indicating an unstable, thinly-traded market
- Liquidity of only $30,188 against a $191,122 market cap (a ~16% liquidity-to-cap ratio) means even moderately sized trades can cause significant slippage or price impact
- Zero operating history: the contract is 2 hours old with no security audit data, no verified holder-growth trend, and no social presence to validate legitimacy
- The headline 2479% 4h/24h change is an artifact of measuring from a near-zero launch price, not evidence of sustainable demand
Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.
NOMEME call history
Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.
Token Info
- Chain
- Base
- Contract
- 0x6543...b877
- Total Supply
- —
- Decimals
- —
Key Risks
- Extremely young token (2 hours old) with no operating history or track record to evaluate
- Thin liquidity of $30,188 relative to market cap creates high slippage and manipulation risk
- No available security audit, contract verification, or project documentation of any kind
- No social presence or stated use case, making it impossible to evaluate the project's legitimacy or intent
Trading Insight
Trading data shows a modest but consistent lean toward buyers, with 51.9% buy pressure in volume terms and a much larger gap in transaction counts (944 unique buyers vs. 580 unique sellers). This pattern is consistent with fresh speculative interest rather than distribution, though the sample window is only hours old.
AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
New reports on Base
Questions about NOMEME? — whales, Twitter, risks, a fair entry





