SMIND

Sandboxed Mind Price Today & AI Analysis

SMINDBaseAnalysis as of Jun 30, 2026

Price

$0.086018

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0x581d62eec31260042837e54ee92599d57ce66d36

Chain

Base

Holders

418

Market cap

$6.00

Liquidity

$0.00

Ask Unhosted AI about SMIND

Continue in chat

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Base

clawrouterclawrouterclawrouter$0.062961+0.0%MC $29.6KTTRAVIXTRAVIX$0.3440+0.0%MC $3.44MCAVEMANCAVEMANCAVEMAN$0.062536+0.0%MC $25.4KMITHRAMITHRAMITHRA$0.000364+0.0%MC $90.9KCCATAPULTCatapult$0.062757+0.0%MC $27.6KXDPXDPDoppler$0.0232-22.6%MC $231.73M

Sandboxed Mind: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-30 16:01 UTC

Holder addresses

765

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$76,815.75
How concentrated is Sandboxed Mind ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 765 addresses (2026-06-30 16:01 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Sandboxed Mind?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Sandboxed Mind liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-30 16:01 UTC, reported liquidity was $76,815.75. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-30 16:01 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Jun 30, 2026, 04:01 PM UTC

Market Cap

$122.93K

24h Volume

$530.45K

Liquidity

$76.82K

FDV

—

Holders

765

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Neutral

Sandboxed Mind (SMIND) is a 2-hour-old token on Base (chain 0x2105) with a $122,931 market cap and $76,816 in liquidity, having surged 540.96% from its launch price in its first trading session. The token exhibits multiple high-risk characteristics: an unverified contract, a deployer wallet created minutes before launch and funded by an unlabelled wallet, and 98.4% of holders receiving tokens via transfer rather than open-market purchase. Smart-money data is unavailable, and the project has no description, no social presence, and no stated use case, making fundamental valuation impossible at this stage. The token should be treated as a highly speculative, very-high-risk instrument until verifiable project information and a verified contract are published.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 30, 2026, 04:01 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extreme launch-day price action: +540.96% within 2 hours of contract creation, with 1,455 buy transactions already recorded
  • Near-total transfer-based holder distribution: 753 of 765 holders received tokens via transfer, not market purchase, indicating pre-arranged allocation
  • Disposable-deployer fingerprint: deployer wallet is 2 hours old, has no prior deployments, and was funded by an unlabelled wallet

Sandboxed Mind AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

SMIND launched just 2 hours ago and has already posted a 540.96% gain in its first trading session, a move characteristic of launch-day speculation rather than organic price discovery. With 753 of 765 holders acquiring positions via transfer rather than market buys, the token's distribution was pre-arranged before public trading began. The combination of a 2-hour-old contract, unverified code, and insider-allocated supply makes a sharp mean-reversion highly probable in the near term.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Without a verified contract, any public project description, social presence, or identifiable use case, SMIND has no fundamental anchor to sustain its launch-day valuation over a 30–90 day horizon. The deployer wallet was created only 2 hours before the token and was funded by an unlabelled wallet, a classic disposable-deployer pattern that historically correlates with short-lived projects. Unless the team surfaces verifiable utility and achieves contract verification, the medium-term trajectory is likely continued price erosion as early transfer recipients exit.

Bullish Factors

  • Buy pressure stands at 52.7% ($279,773 buy volume vs. $250,680 sell volume) in the first 2 hours, indicating more capital entering than exiting at launch
  • 901 unique buyers versus 462 unique sellers in the 24h window suggests broad initial interest rather than a single coordinated pump
  • The largest single whale position is held by Uniswap's pool contract (38.95%), which is protocol-locked liquidity and not a dumpable position, keeping effective dumpable supply at 23.5% of total supply

Bearish Factors

  • The deployer wallet (0x8a4498fb…) was first active only 2 hours ago, has zero prior contract deployments in its earliest 100 transactions, and was funded by an unlabelled wallet — a textbook disposable-deployer pattern associated with elevated rug risk
  • 753 of 765 holders (98.4%) received their tokens via transfer rather than market swap, meaning the vast majority of the holder base was pre-allocated before public trading, not organic buyers
  • The top three individual whales (0xe93509…, 0x65ea6d…, 0x9b360e…, holding 3.03%, 2.46%, and 2.31% respectively) all show no indexed DEX swaps — their positions were handed to them at launch, creating 23.5% of dumpable supply with zero cost basis
  • The contract is unverified (security score 52/100), meaning the code governing funds cannot be independently audited by the public
  • No project description, no social links, and no category classification leave the token with zero identifiable fundamental value proposition

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

SMIND call history

Full track record →

Jun 30bearish
24h+41.9%
7d-52.6%
30d-52.6%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Base
Contract
0x581d...6d36
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: the deployer wallet is 2 hours old, funded by an unlabelled wallet, has no prior deployment history, and the contract is unverified — all hallmarks of a disposable deployer that may exit with liquidity
  • Zero-cost-basis insider dump: the top three individual whales (totalling ~7.8% of supply) received tokens via transfer before trading began and can sell their entire position at 100% profit at any price, with no on-chain signal preceding the exit
  • No fundamental value anchor: with no project description, no social presence, no verified contract, and no disclosed use case, there is no information-based reason for the current $122,931 market cap to be sustained

Trading Insight

neutral

Raw transaction counts lean bullish — 1,455 buys versus 884 sells and 901 unique buyers versus 462 unique sellers — but the 52.7% buy pressure is only marginally above equilibrium, and the volume gap ($279K buys vs. $250K sells) is narrow enough that a modest shift in seller behavior could flip net flow negative. The 4-hour and 24-hour transaction counts are identical, confirming all activity occurred within the last 4 hours since launch, so there is no multi-day trend to extrapolate.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bullish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

The only observable price trend is the 540.96% launch-day spike, which reflects initial price discovery from near-zero liquidity rather than a sustained uptrend built on accumulation. There is no multi-day OHLC history to establish a medium-term trend, so the medium-term classification defaults to sideways pending further data. The -2.0% move in the last 5 minutes, against a +0.78% 1-hour reading, suggests the initial momentum is already fading.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

A 540.96% move within 2 hours of launch on thin liquidity is a textbook overbought condition. The 5-minute price decline of -2.0% while the 1-hour figure remains positive indicates the peak may have already been reached, and momentum indicators would be expected to show extreme readings if calculable from a longer data series.

Volume Analysis

Buy

52.7%

Sell

47.3%

Volume Trend

Stable

All volume is concentrated in a single 2-hour launch window, making trend classification meaningless. The $530K total volume is approximately 6.9x the $76.8K liquidity pool, indicating that each trade carries high price impact. The 1-hour window accounts for 1,263 of 2,339 total transactions (54%), suggesting activity is not decelerating yet but the sell proportion is rising.

Recent Price Action

Vertical launch spike followed by early signs of deceleration: +540.96% over the first 2 hours, with the most recent 5-minute candle printing -2.0% while the 1-hour remains positive at +0.78%.

This pattern — a near-vertical launch spike with early 5-minute softening — is commonly associated with speculative launch pumps where initial buyers begin taking profits. Without a verified contract or project fundamentals, there is no fundamental catalyst to sustain the elevated price level.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

88/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A 540.96% price move within 2 hours of launch on $76.8K of liquidity demonstrates extreme price sensitivity. With no OHLC history and shallow liquidity, future price swings of 50–90% in either direction within a single session are plausible.

  • LiquidityHigh

    The $76,816 liquidity pool is shallow relative to the $530K in trading volume already processed. Large exits will face severe slippage, and the deployer's ability to remove liquidity (given the unverified contract) cannot be ruled out.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an anonymous, uncategorized token with no disclosed team or jurisdiction, SMIND faces the standard regulatory uncertainty applicable to all unregistered crypto assets, with no specific additional regulatory exposure identifiable from available data.

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: the deployer wallet is 2 hours old, funded by an unlabelled wallet, has no prior deployment history, and the contract is unverified — all hallmarks of a disposable deployer that may exit with liquidity
  • Zero-cost-basis insider dump: the top three individual whales (totalling ~7.8% of supply) received tokens via transfer before trading began and can sell their entire position at 100% profit at any price, with no on-chain signal preceding the exit
  • No fundamental value anchor: with no project description, no social presence, no verified contract, and no disclosed use case, there is no information-based reason for the current $122,931 market cap to be sustained

Mitigating Factors

  • 38.95% of supply is held in the Uniswap pool contract, providing a structural liquidity floor that is not directly controlled by the deployer through standard wallet operations
  • Net buy inflow of ~$29,093 in the first 2 hours and 901 unique buyers suggest genuine market interest exists, which could support price if the project publishes credible fundamentals

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who specialize in high-risk, short-duration speculative positions, fully understand the mechanics of new token launches on Base, and are prepared to lose 100% of any capital deployed. It is not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with rug-pull risk patterns.

SMIND is a 2-hour-old token with no verified contract, no project fundamentals, and a deployer profile consistent with disposable-launcher patterns. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative — the bull case depends on the team surfacing legitimate credentials, while the bear case (which carries higher probability) is that this follows the typical lifecycle of an anonymous launch: a sharp initial pump followed by insider distribution and price collapse.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The anonymous team behind SMIND publishes a credible project description, verifies the contract, and establishes social channels, converting the speculative launch interest (901 unique buyers, $530K volume in 2 hours) into a genuine community. Sustained buy pressure above $279K/day and holder growth beyond 1,000 wallets could support price stabilization and further appreciation from current levels.

  • Contract verification and publication of a whitepaper or roadmap that establishes a credible use case
  • Continued net buy inflow with growing unique buyer counts sustaining the 52.7% buy pressure ratio

Base Case

SMIND experiences a gradual post-launch price decline as early transfer recipients take profits into the buy-side demand, with the token settling at a fraction of its launch-day high. The project neither rug-pulls immediately nor develops into a legitimate project, instead fading into inactivity over 30–90 days as trading volume dries up.

  • The deployer does not execute an immediate liquidity pull but allows organic price discovery to continue
  • No new fundamental catalysts (contract verification, project announcement) emerge to attract sustained buying

Bear Case

High probability

The deployer and pre-allocated insider wallets (holding 23.5% of dumpable supply at zero cost basis) begin selling into the launch-day liquidity, collapsing the price. The unverified contract may contain a liquidity-removal or fee mechanism that accelerates the exit. With no project fundamentals to attract new buyers, the token price returns toward its pre-launch level.

  • Zero-cost-basis insider wallets (0xe93509…, 0x65ea6d…, 0x9b360e… and genesis transfer recipients) selling into thin $76.8K liquidity
  • Deployer executing a liquidity removal or contract-level exit via unverified contract functions

Analysis Details

Generated

Jun 30, 2026, 04:01 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-30 16:01 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000122779246805303

Market Cap

$122.9K

24h Volume

$530.5K

Holders

765

Liquidity

$76,815.75

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Base chain, contract 0x581d62eec31260042837e54ee92599d57ce66d36)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)Trading volume metrics (24h and 4h buy/sell breakdown)Smart contract security assessment (score 52/100)Token genesis and deployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet behavioral lookup (DEX swap history)

Limitations

  • No OHLC price history exists — all technical analysis is based solely on the launch-day price move; no support/resistance levels, moving averages, or momentum indicators can be computed
  • Smart-money cohort data is unavailable, preventing analysis of profitable trader positioning
  • The unverified contract means the token's actual mechanics (fees, mint authority, blacklist) are unknown and cannot be factored into the risk model
  • Token is 2 hours old — all holder, volume, and price metrics reflect a single launch session with no baseline for comparison

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Questions about SMIND?