UMIA

Umia Price Today & AI Analysis

UMIA
Base·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Sep 2, 2026

$0.5752

-1.19%24h
LiveContract:0x56ab53b77f07da3af732150e8aec4783eb5bba7dChain:BaseHolders:1.3KMarket cap:$28.76MLiquidity:$1.58M

More tokens on Base

NVDAc

NVDAc

NVIDIA Corporation

$217.831.1%
MC $3.36M
AERO

AERO

Aerodrome

$0.47070.9%
MC $926.70M
PLAY

PLAY

Play

$0.03756.5%
MC $187.71M
MORPHO

MORPHO

Morpho Token

$2.613.6%
MC $78.36M
H

HYPE

HYPE

$81.372.8%
MC $1.84M

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about UMIA

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since reportreport from Sep 2, 2026, 03:15 PM UTC
Market Cap

$28.76M

24h Volume

$6.13M

Liquidity

$1.58M

FDV

—

Holders

1.3K

Security

—

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

—

AI Executive Summary

Umia (UMIA) is an 8-day-old token deployed on Base and trading on Uniswap at approximately $0.575, with a fully diluted market cap of ~$28.8M and total liquidity of ~$1.58M. The project has no published description, no token category, and no verifiable use case, placing it firmly in the speculative early-stage category. Trading activity is active — over $6.1M in combined 24h volume across 3,519 transactions — but the -7.5% hourly decline and a top-10 holder concentration of 54.9% introduce meaningful short-term risk. Investors should treat this as a high-risk, information-sparse asset until a clear project narrative and holder distribution data become available.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Sep 2, 2026, 03:15 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: neutral
Unusually high 24h volume-to-market-cap ratio (~21%) for an 8-day-old token, suggesting strong speculative interest
Fully diluted valuation equals market cap (50M total = 50M circulating), meaning no hidden unlock schedule exists
Active social presence (Twitter, Telegram, Website) despite the absence of any on-chain project description

Umia AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

UMIA is 8 days old and has posted a -7.5% decline over the past hour, which is a meaningful intraday signal even if the 24h figure of -1.2% appears modest. With no OHLC history to anchor support levels and a very young token still finding price discovery, short-term downside pressure is the more probable path. Buy pressure at 52.9% provides a marginal offset but is insufficient to reverse the hourly momentum.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

At only 8 days old with no established price history, no project description, and no category classification, UMIA lacks the fundamental narrative needed to sustain medium-term appreciation. The top-10 holders controlling 54.9% of supply represent a structural overhang that could weigh on price if any large holder decides to exit. Without a clear use case or community catalyst, the default trajectory for a newly launched, uncategorized token on Base is mean-reversion downward.

Bullish Factors
  • +Buy pressure of 52.9% across 2,024 buy transactions in 24h shows more buyers than sellers by count and volume, with net buy volume of approximately $355,000 over the period.
  • +Total 24h trading volume of ~$6.13M against a market cap of ~$28.8M represents a volume-to-market-cap ratio of roughly 21%, indicating active market participation for a token this young.
  • +Liquidity pool of $1.58M provides reasonable depth relative to the token's age, reducing immediate rug-pull risk from a pure liquidity standpoint.
Bearish Factors
  • -The -7.5% hourly price drop signals active selling pressure that the marginal buy majority has not been able to absorb, pointing to near-term downside continuation.
  • -Top-10 holders control 54.9% of the 50M total supply, and per-wallet forensics are unavailable, meaning the nature and intent of these concentrated positions cannot be assessed.
  • -No project description, no token category, and an 8-day age mean there is no established fundamental narrative to attract and retain long-term holders.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

UMIA call history

Full track record →
Sep 2bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBase
Contract0x56ab...ba7d
Total Supply—
Decimals—

Key Risks

•Concentration risk without forensics: 54.9% of supply in the top 10 wallets and no ability to classify those wallets means a coordinated or individual large-holder exit could collapse the price against a $1.58M liquidity pool.
•Information vacuum: No project description, no token category, and no smart-money or deployer forensics mean investors are making decisions with almost no fundamental information — a condition that historically favors insiders over retail participants.
•Volume concentration anomaly: The identical 4h and 24h transaction counts suggest all trading occurred in a single burst, raising the possibility of coordinated wash trading or an artificial volume spike designed to attract retail attention.

Trading Insight

neutral

Market sentiment is marginally net-positive by transaction count and volume — 52.9% buy pressure and 1,006 unique buyers versus 808 unique sellers — but the -7.5% hourly price move reveals that sellers are executing larger average trades, diluting the headline buy majority. The overall picture is a tug-of-war market with neither side in clear control.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bearish
Medium-Term (30d):
Neutral

No OHLC history is available for UMIA, so trend analysis relies solely on intraday price snapshots. The -7.5% hourly decline is the most directionally meaningful data point and establishes a short-term downtrend. The medium-term trend is classified as sideways by default given the absence of multi-day price history, not because the data supports a neutral reading.

Momentum

Status:
Oversold

A -7.5% move within a single hour on a token with only $1.58M in liquidity suggests momentum has shifted sharply to the sell side in the near term. Without RSI or MACD data derivable from OHLC history, this classification is based on the magnitude of the hourly decline relative to the token's liquidity depth.

Volume Analysis

Buy 52.9%Sell 47.1%

Volume Trend: Decreasing

The identical 4h and 24h transaction counts indicate activity was concentrated in a single burst, with the 1h window showing a significant drop to 272 total transactions versus the implied burst period. This volume decay pattern typically precedes price consolidation or further decline as speculative interest fades.

Recent Price Action

Sharp hourly decline of -7.5% following what appears to be a concentrated burst of trading activity, with the 24h net change of -1.2% masking the intraday volatility.

The divergence between the mild 24h change and the severe 1h drop suggests a rapid intraday reversal — a pattern often seen in newly launched tokens when early buyers begin taking profits or when a single large seller enters the market.

Overall Risk:
Very High
82/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

A -7.5% hourly price swing on an 8-day-old token with no price history demonstrates extreme intraday volatility. The token has not yet established any price floor or trading range, making large drawdowns possible at any time.

Liquidity
Medium

The $1.58M liquidity pool is moderate for a token of this age and market cap (~5.5% of FDV), providing some buffer against slippage on smaller trades. However, a large exit by any top-10 holder could rapidly drain this pool and cause severe price impact.

Concentration
High

The top 10 holders control 54.9% of the 50M supply. Per-wallet forensics are unavailable, so it is impossible to determine whether these are protocol contracts, exchange wallets, or dumpable individual positions. This uncertainty itself constitutes a high concentration risk.

Smart Contract
Medium

No contract-security data is available for this chain's data provider, so this is an uninformed default rather than an actual assessment. Investors should independently audit the contract on Base before trading.

Regulatory
Medium

As an uncategorized token with no stated use case on a public blockchain, UMIA faces the same general regulatory uncertainty applicable to all unregistered crypto assets, with no specific aggravating or mitigating factors identifiable from available data.

Key Risks

  • •Concentration risk without forensics: 54.9% of supply in the top 10 wallets and no ability to classify those wallets means a coordinated or individual large-holder exit could collapse the price against a $1.58M liquidity pool.
  • •Information vacuum: No project description, no token category, and no smart-money or deployer forensics mean investors are making decisions with almost no fundamental information — a condition that historically favors insiders over retail participants.
  • •Volume concentration anomaly: The identical 4h and 24h transaction counts suggest all trading occurred in a single burst, raising the possibility of coordinated wash trading or an artificial volume spike designed to attract retail attention.

Mitigating Factors

  • •Circulating supply equals total supply (50M), eliminating the risk of future dilution from unreleased team or investor allocations.
  • •Active social channels (Twitter, Telegram, Website) suggest the project intends to maintain a public presence, which creates some accountability compared to fully anonymous launches.

Investor Suitability

UMIA is suitable only for highly risk-tolerant, experienced crypto traders who can afford to lose their entire position. It is not appropriate for conservative investors, those unfamiliar with early-stage token dynamics, or anyone allocating more than a small speculative portion of their portfolio.

UMIA is a high-risk, information-sparse speculative asset in its first week of existence. The investment thesis is almost entirely dependent on undisclosed project fundamentals and the behavior of a small group of concentrated holders whose intentions are unknown. The risk-reward profile is asymmetric to the downside until more information becomes available.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

The project publishes a compelling use case that resonates with the Base ecosystem community, driving sustained organic buyer inflow that gradually dilutes the top-10 concentration and establishes a rising price floor. The $6M+ in 24h volume demonstrates that market interest exists and could be channeled into a sustained uptrend if narrative momentum builds.

  • +Publication of a clear, differentiated project narrative that attracts new holders and reduces concentration
  • +Sustained daily buy volume exceeding sell volume, supported by genuine utility adoption rather than speculation
Base Case

UMIA continues to trade in a volatile, speculative range over the next 30 days as the project attempts to build community and narrative. Price oscillates significantly without a clear directional trend, with volume gradually declining from the launch burst. The token survives but does not achieve meaningful price appreciation without a fundamental catalyst.

  • •No major holder exits in the near term, preserving the current price range
  • •The project publishes some form of documentation or roadmap that maintains minimal community engagement
Bear Case
Medium

One or more of the top-10 holders — whose acquisition method and intent are entirely unknown — begins distributing into the active market. Given the $1.58M liquidity pool and the 54.9% concentration, even a partial exit by a single large holder could cause a 30-70% price decline. The cooling volume trend and -7.5% hourly drop may be early signals of this dynamic.

  • -Concentrated holder exit into a relatively shallow liquidity pool
  • -Failure to establish a project narrative, leading to retail disengagement and volume collapse

Analysis Details

GeneratedSep 2, 2026, 03:15 PM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.575183888209
Market Cap$28.76M
24h Volume$6.13M
Holders1,305
Liquidity$1.58M

Data Sources

Codex DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)
Daily OHLC price history
Aggregate holder count and top-10 concentration

Limitations

  • •No OHLC price history is available, preventing computation of support/resistance levels, trend indicators, or volatility metrics beyond intraday snapshots.
  • •Holder-growth history, holder size-tier distribution, and per-wallet whale transaction data were unavailable for this analysis.
  • •Contract-security data (audit status, honeypot detection, ownership renouncement) is not available on this chain's data provider.
  • •Smart-money cohort and deployer forensics data were unavailable, preventing insider-risk and early-buyer assessment.
  • •No project description or token category is available, making fundamental valuation impossible.

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track UMIA