OMOF

Only Memes Over Finance Price Prediction 2026

OMOF
Base·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Aug 10, 2026

$0.066318

+3.24%24h
LiveContract:0x2c181f09e167ae84f6b99e30eee5e6810cdc4ba3Chain:BaseHolders:227Market cap:$63.18KLiquidity:$16.68K

More tokens on Base

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about OMOF

Movement since reportreport from Aug 10, 2026, 02:00 PM UTC
Market Cap

$27.33K

24h Volume

$305.58K

Liquidity

$25.91K

FDV

Holders

137

Security

24H0 buys
0 sells0 traders

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

24h change

0

Top 10 hold

Top acquisition

AI Executive Summary

Only Memes Over Finance (OMOF) is a 3.8-month-old token on Base (0x2105) with no verified contract, no project description, and no declared category, trading at $2.733e-7 with a market cap of approximately $27,329. The token experienced a sharp price spike to $0.000002456 within its 4-day observable price history before collapsing to its current level, which sits at just 5% of that range. With only 137 holders — virtually all acquired in the last 24–30 days — shallow liquidity of $25,909, and a security score of 44/100, OMOF exhibits the hallmarks of a speculative micro-cap with high risk and limited fundamental backing. Smart money traders have extracted meaningful profits (up to +338%), but the structural indicators point to a token in post-pump distribution rather than organic growth.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ranAug 10, 2026, 02:00 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: bearish
Entire holder base of 137 wallets was onboarded in a single 24–30 day window, suggesting a coordinated launch event rather than organic community growth
78.6% of supply is held by the Uniswap pool contract, compressing the dumpable whale supply to 18.2% despite a 94% top-10 concentration figure
Six documented smart money traders have realized 134–338% gains, indicating the token has been actively traded by experienced participants despite its micro-cap status

Only Memes Over Finance Price Prediction

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Bearish

OMOF's 4-day OHLC history shows the price peaked at $0.000002456 and has since collapsed to $2.733e-7, sitting at just 5% of its observed range. The most recent daily closes ($1.633e-7 → $1.526e-7 → $2.813e-7 → $2.733e-7) show a brief recovery that is already stalling, with the 1h and 4h windows showing -4.85% and -5.92% declines respectively. With sell transactions outnumbering buys 1,831 to 1,060 over 24h and activity in the last hour reduced to just 2 buys vs. 4 sells, short-term momentum is deteriorating.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Bearish

With only 4 days of price history, no 7d/30d/90d trend data available, and the token sitting at 5% of its observed range after a sharp decline from the $0.000002456 peak, the medium-term outlook is bearish absent a significant catalyst. The token has 137 holders with 97% of that base acquired in the last 24–30 days, suggesting the holder base is almost entirely composed of recent entrants who bought into the spike and are now underwater. Sustained recovery would require meaningful new demand that is not currently visible in the on-chain data.

Bullish Factors
  • +Six smart money traders have realized gains of +134% to +338% on this token, with the top wallet booking +$2,669 (+313%) across 39 trades — demonstrating that profitable setups have existed and experienced traders are active.
  • +Buy pressure is marginally positive at 51% over 24h with $155,805 in buy volume vs. $149,773 in sell volume, indicating the 24h session was not a pure distribution event.
  • +78.60% of supply is locked in the Uniswap pool contract and is not dumpable, meaning the genuine dumpable supply from individual whales is only 18.2% — lower than the raw top-10 concentration figure of 94% would suggest.
Bearish Factors
  • -The token has crashed to 5% of its 4-day observed range ($1.526e-7–$0.000002456), indicating the initial pump has largely unwound and sellers have dominated the price structure.
  • -Sell transactions outnumber buy transactions nearly 2:1 over 24h (1,831 sells vs. 1,060 buys), and the imbalance is worsening in recent windows (4h: 7 sells vs. 2 buys; 1h: 4 sells vs. 2 buys).
  • -The contract is unverified and carries a security score of only 44/100, creating meaningful smart contract and rug-pull risk that suppresses institutional or informed retail demand.
  • -Holder growth of 97% in 24h/7d/30d all showing the same figure (133 holders) means the entire holder base was acquired in a single burst — likely during the price spike — with zero organic accumulation history before or after.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

OMOF call history

Full track record →
Aug 10bearish
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBase
Contract0x2c18...4ba3
Total Supply
Decimals

Key Risks

Unverified contract with 44/100 security score: the inability to audit the source code means hidden malicious functions (rug mechanisms, mint functions, blacklists) cannot be excluded — this is a binary risk that could result in total loss
Post-pump price structure with 88.9% decline from the observed high and accelerating sell-side transaction dominance (1,831 sells vs. 1,060 buys in 24h, worsening to 7:2 in the last 4h) suggests continued downward pressure
Entire 137-wallet holder base was onboarded in a single burst event with no prior organic community — if the speculative catalyst fades, there is no established holder base to provide price support, and the token could return to near-zero activity

Trading Insight

bearish

While the 24h buy/sell volume split is nearly balanced (51%/49%), the transaction count imbalance — 1,831 sell transactions vs. 1,060 buy transactions — reveals that sellers are far more numerous and active than buyers. Activity has dropped sharply in recent windows (just 2 buys and 4–7 sells in the last 1–4 hours), suggesting the initial trading frenzy is fading and the token is entering a low-liquidity drift phase.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Bearish
Medium-Term (30d):
Bearish

The 4-day daily close sequence ($1.633e-7 → $1.526e-7 → $2.813e-7 → $2.733e-7) shows a brief recovery on day 3 that is already reversing on day 4, with the current price sitting at just 5% of the observed range high of $0.000002456. The 1h (-4.85%) and 4h (-5.92%) declines confirm the short-term trend is down. With no 7d, 30d, or 90d trend data available, the medium-term assessment is based solely on the post-peak collapse structure visible in the 4-day window.

Momentum

Status:
Oversold

The price has fallen from a peak of $0.000002456 to $2.733e-7 — an 88.9% decline from the observed high — and now sits near the range low of $1.526e-7. Daily volatility of 42% (standard deviation of daily returns) reflects extreme price instability. While the oversold position could attract speculative bounces, the absence of fundamental catalysts and declining transaction activity reduce the probability of a sustained reversal.

Volume Analysis

Buy 51%Sell 49%

Volume Trend: Decreasing

The 24h period recorded 2,891 total transactions and ~$305,577 in combined volume, but this has collapsed to just 9 transactions in the last 4 hours. The rapid deceleration from a high-activity launch window to near-zero activity is a classic post-pump volume fade, indicating that the speculative catalyst driving initial trading has dissipated.

Recent Price Action

Post-pump collapse with a failed recovery attempt: price spiked to $0.000002456, collapsed to near the range low, briefly recovered to $2.813e-7 on day 3, and is now declining again at $2.733e-7 with accelerating sell-side transaction dominance.

This pattern — sharp spike followed by rapid mean reversion to near the range low — is characteristic of speculative micro-cap tokens where initial buying exhausts itself quickly. The failed recovery attempt on day 3 that could not hold gains into day 4 is a bearish continuation signal.

Holder Metrics

Total Holders137
24h Change+133
Growth Rate+97%

The 97% holder growth in 24h/7d/30d all showing the same 133-wallet figure reveals that virtually the entire holder base was onboarded in a single burst event — the token had approximately 4 holders before this event. While the raw growth rate appears impressive, it reflects a one-time speculative influx rather than sustained organic community building, and the subsequent price decline suggests many of these new holders are already underwater.

Holder Distribution

Top 10 Holders94%
Top 100 Holders100%
Retail Holders0.0%
Concentration Risk:
High

While the headline 94% top-10 concentration appears critical, 78.6% of that is held by the Uniswap pool contract — a non-dumpable protocol position. The genuine dumpable supply from individual whale wallets totals 18.2%, which is elevated for a 137-holder token. With retail holders at ~0% of supply and the top 100 wallets holding 100% of supply, there is no meaningful retail distribution base, making the token highly susceptible to whale-driven price movements.

Whale Activity

Sentiment:
Distributing

The largest recent on-chain swaps show wallet 0x1f9a21 executing a $946 buy followed by a $940 sell and $937 sell in close succession — a round-trip pattern. Wallet 0x4d68d0 sold $936, and wallet 0xbdbebd bought $496 while 0x43375c sold $484. All notable trades are in the sub-$1,000 range, consistent with the token's shallow $25,909 liquidity pool.

  • 0x1f9a21 executed a $946 buy immediately followed by $940 and $937 sells — a rapid round-trip suggesting either wash trading or a failed scalp attempt
  • 0x4d68d0 sold $936 — the largest clean sell in the notable trades window, representing approximately 3.6% of total pool liquidity in a single transaction

The notable trade data shows a distribution-dominant pattern: of the 6 largest recent swaps, 4 are sells and only 2 are buys. The round-trip behavior of 0x1f9a21 is anomalous and may inflate reported volume. Combined with the 1,831 sell vs. 1,060 buy transaction count over 24h, whales and active traders appear to be net sellers at current levels.

Smart Money Indicators

Confidence:
Medium
Profit-Taking Risk:
High

Six smart money wallets have realized profits ranging from +$1,466 to +$2,669 on this token, with return rates of +134% to +338%. The top performer (0x17d47c) executed 39 trades for +$2,669 (+313%), suggesting active swing trading rather than a simple buy-and-hold. These wallets appear to have traded the initial spike successfully.

The presence of six profitable smart money traders with realized gains of 134–338% confirms that the token's price spike created genuine profit opportunities. However, the fact that these gains are already 'realized' means these wallets have largely exited their profitable positions — they are not currently providing buy-side support. The high profit-taking risk stems from any remaining unrealized positions these wallets may hold, as they have demonstrated willingness to sell aggressively.

Liquidity Analysis

Total Liquidity$25,908.90
Depth:
Shallow
Slippage Risk:
High

With only $25,909 in total liquidity against a 24h trading volume of ~$305,577 — a volume-to-liquidity ratio of approximately 11.8x — the pool is being turned over nearly 12 times daily, indicating extreme liquidity stress. Any trade above a few hundred dollars will incur significant slippage, and a coordinated sell of even 5–10% of the dumpable 18.2% whale supply could drain the pool substantially. The shallow liquidity is the primary mechanical risk for any position in this token.

Overall Risk:
Very High
88/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

Daily volatility of 42% (standard deviation of daily returns) over the 4-day observable history is extreme. The price has already moved from $1.526e-7 to $0.000002456 and back — a 16x range — within 4 days, indicating that position sizing must account for near-total loss scenarios.

Liquidity
High

Total liquidity of $25,909 against a 24h volume of ~$305,577 creates a volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~11.8x. Trades above a few hundred dollars will experience material slippage, and exit liquidity for larger positions is severely constrained.

Concentration
High

While 78.6% of supply in the Uniswap contract is non-dumpable, the remaining 18.2% dumpable supply held by individual whales — concentrated across 9 wallets — is high relative to the token's $25,909 liquidity pool. A coordinated exit by even 2–3 whale wallets could overwhelm available liquidity.

Smart Contract
High

The contract is unverified with a 44/100 security score. Without source code review, the presence of owner-controlled functions (mint, pause, blacklist, fee changes) cannot be ruled out. This is the single highest-severity risk factor for the token.

Regulatory
Medium

As an uncategorized token with no declared utility on a public EVM chain, OMOF faces standard regulatory uncertainty applicable to unregistered crypto assets in most jurisdictions. No specific regulatory red flags beyond the baseline are identified from available data.

Key Risks

  • Unverified contract with 44/100 security score: the inability to audit the source code means hidden malicious functions (rug mechanisms, mint functions, blacklists) cannot be excluded — this is a binary risk that could result in total loss
  • Post-pump price structure with 88.9% decline from the observed high and accelerating sell-side transaction dominance (1,831 sells vs. 1,060 buys in 24h, worsening to 7:2 in the last 4h) suggests continued downward pressure
  • Entire 137-wallet holder base was onboarded in a single burst event with no prior organic community — if the speculative catalyst fades, there is no established holder base to provide price support, and the token could return to near-zero activity

Mitigating Factors

  • 78.6% of supply is held in the Uniswap pool contract and is structurally non-dumpable, limiting the maximum immediate sell pressure from individual holders to the 18.2% dumpable supply figure
  • Six smart money traders have demonstrated the token can generate 134–338% returns in active trading conditions, confirming that profitable setups have existed and the token has genuine price discovery mechanics

Investor Suitability

OMOF is suitable only for highly experienced speculative traders who fully understand micro-cap meme token dynamics, can afford to lose 100% of their position, and have the technical capability to monitor unverified contracts for malicious activity. It is not suitable for retail investors, long-term holders, or anyone without deep familiarity with on-chain risk management.

OMOF is a high-risk speculative micro-cap with no verified fundamentals, an unverified contract, and a post-pump price structure sitting at 5% of its observed range high. The investment thesis is almost entirely speculative — dependent on renewed buying interest rather than any utility or fundamental value driver. The bear case is structurally stronger given current on-chain data.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

A second speculative wave driven by social media attention or smart money re-accumulation pushes the price back toward the mid-range of the observed $1.526e-7–$0.000002456 band. The six documented smart money traders who realized 134–338% gains re-enter positions, attracting copycat buying and expanding the holder base beyond 137 wallets.

  • +Smart money re-accumulation by the six wallets that have already demonstrated profitable trading of this token
  • +Viral social media catalyst that drives new buyer inflow beyond the current 137-wallet base
Base Case

OMOF consolidates in the $1.5e-7–$3.0e-7 range with very low trading activity as the initial speculative wave fully exhausts itself. The token remains a dormant micro-cap with 137 holders and no new development activity, similar to its apparent state for the first ~3.7 months of its existence before the recent spike.

  • No new social or fundamental catalyst emerges to drive a second buying wave
  • The unverified contract does not execute any malicious function, allowing the token to persist in its current state
Bear Case
High

Declining transaction velocity (from 2,891 transactions in 24h to 9 in the last 4h) continues, liquidity providers withdraw from the shallow $25,909 pool, and the price drifts back toward the range low of $1.526e-7 or below. An unverified contract risk event (e.g., owner function execution) could accelerate losses to near-total.

  • -Accelerating sell-side transaction dominance (7:2 sell-to-buy ratio in the last 4h) with no visible new demand catalyst
  • -Unverified contract with 44/100 security score creating persistent risk of a smart contract exploit or rug event

Analysis Details

GeneratedAug 10, 2026, 02:00 PM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$0.000000273292496892
Market Cap$27.3K
24h Volume$305.6K
Holders137
Liquidity$25.9K

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Base chain, Uniswap PoolManager)
Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tier classification)
4-day daily OHLC price history
Smart money realized PnL data (top profitable traders)
Notable recent on-chain swap data
Whale wallet behavioral intel (trade history, avg buy price, wallet age)
Smart contract security assessment (44/100 score, verification status)

Limitations

  • Only 4 days of OHLC price history available — 7d, 30d, and 90d trend metrics are unavailable, severely limiting technical trend analysis and making medium-term forecasts highly speculative
  • The contract is unverified, meaning smart contract risk cannot be fully quantified — hidden owner functions or malicious mechanics cannot be ruled out from on-chain data alone
  • No project description, whitepaper, or team information is available, making fundamental analysis impossible beyond tokenomics and on-chain behavior

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track OMOF