Polygraph

Polygraph litmus Price Today & AI Analysis

PolygraphBaseAnalysis as of Jun 7, 2026

Price

$0.065082

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0x2878cfc54aabdadd9bb5d70dd24d6b91485afba3

Chain

Base

Holders

364

Market cap

$50.83K

Liquidity

$19.32K

At a $1M market cap, $POLYGRAPH would be $0.050000 (19.7x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is Polygraph a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 17

Not checked

This contract has not been tested for honeypots or taxes yet.

The honeypot and tax test has not run on this contract yet, so no red flags here does not mean a clean contract. Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about Polygraph

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Base

BNNABNNABanana Coins$0.043482+0.0%MC $34.8KGGgoooo gaga咕咕嘎嘎$0.000347+0.0%MC $347.1KPPAIDBOTPaidBot$0.044448+0.0%MC $44.5KPEAKPEAKPEAK$0.000167+0.0%MC $167.1KRomanStormRomanStormFreeRomanStorm.com$0.062680+0.0%MC $26.8KXDPXDPDoppler$0.0188+5.0%MC $187.67M

Polygraph litmus: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-07 04:09 UTC

Holder addresses

278

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$61,312.66
How concentrated is Polygraph litmus ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 278 addresses (2026-06-07 04:09 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Polygraph litmus?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Polygraph litmus liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-07 04:09 UTC, reported liquidity was $61,312.66. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-07 04:09 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Jun 7, 2026, 04:09 AM UTC

Market Cap

$80.24K

24h Volume

$192.96K

Liquidity

$61.31K

FDV

—

Holders

278

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Neutral

Polygraph litmus is an unverified, newly-launched utility token on Base chain with extreme volatility and speculative characteristics. The token has experienced a 264% surge in 24 hours on minimal liquidity ($61K), driven by retail speculation rather than fundamental development. With 68% of supply concentrated in just 10 holders, an unverified contract, and zero project fundamentals or community presence, this represents a high-risk speculative asset typical of early-stage DEX launches. The token's viability depends entirely on whether legitimate development and adoption materialize, which currently shows no evidence.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 7, 2026, 04:09 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extreme early-stage status with all holders acquired in last 30 days
  • Minimal liquidity creates severe slippage and exit risk for retail investors
  • Unverified smart contract raises security and legitimacy concerns

Polygraph litmus AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

Despite a dramatic 264% 24-hour surge, the token shows critical warning signs of unsustainable momentum. The 40.88% 4-hour gain followed by -0.63% in the last 5 minutes suggests exhaustion, with more sellers (1,220 transactions) than buyers (858 transactions) over 24 hours despite positive volume ratio. This parabolic move is typical of low-liquidity tokens experiencing pump-and-dump dynamics.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Over 30-90 days, expect significant downward pressure as early buyers take profits and liquidity dries up. The token's complete lack of fundamentals, unverified contract, and extreme holder concentration (68% in top 10 holders) create structural headwinds. Without major catalysts or ecosystem development, mean reversion toward lower price discovery is highly probable.

Bullish Factors

  • Strong 24-hour volume of $192,959 ($106,627 buy volume) indicates active trading interest
  • Buy pressure at 55.3% exceeds sell pressure, showing net positive sentiment currently
  • Dramatic 264% 24-hour gain demonstrates significant speculative demand and potential for continued volatility
  • 334 unique buyers in 24 hours shows broad participation, not just whale manipulation

Bearish Factors

  • Extreme holder concentration: 68% of supply in top 10 holders creates massive dump risk
  • Unverified smart contract with only 54/100 security score indicates potential vulnerabilities or scam risk
  • Critically low liquidity of only $61,312 means even modest sell orders cause severe slippage
  • All 278 holders acquired within last 30 days suggests this is a brand-new token with no track record
  • No project description, social links, or community presence indicates lack of legitimate development
  • More sell transactions (1,220) than buy transactions (858) despite positive price action suggests distribution phase
  • Parabolic price action (264% in 24h) is unsustainable and typically precedes sharp reversals

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

Chain
Base
Contract
0x2878...fba3
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: The extreme holder concentration and unverified contract create significant risk that early holders coordinate a complete exit, leaving retail investors with worthless tokens
  • Liquidity trap: The shallow liquidity means retail investors may be unable to exit positions without severe slippage or finding no buyers at any price
  • Smart contract vulnerability: The unverified contract could contain hidden functions allowing theft, minting, or freezing of tokens
  • Pump-and-dump mechanics: The 264% 24-hour surge followed by reversal suggests this may be a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme

Trading Insight

neutral

Current market sentiment is mixed despite positive price action. While buy volume ($106,627) exceeds sell volume ($86,332) with 55.3% buy pressure, the transaction count tells a different story: 1,220 sell transactions versus 858 buy transactions indicates more participants are exiting than entering. This divergence suggests early buyers are taking profits while new retail money is still flowing in, creating a precarious balance.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

Short-term trend has reversed from uptrend to downtrend based on the -0.63% 5-minute candle following the 40.88% 4-hour surge. This represents a classic exhaustion pattern where momentum fails to sustain. Medium-term trend is sideways as the token has only existed for 30 days, but the parabolic nature of the 264% 24-hour move suggests we're in a distribution phase rather than accumulation.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

The token is severely overbought based on the 264% 24-hour gain and 40.88% 4-hour gain. Such parabolic moves are unsustainable and typically precede sharp reversals. The declining momentum across timeframes (40.88% in 4h → 0.07% in 1h → -0.63% in 5m) confirms momentum is failing, a critical bearish signal.

Volume Analysis

Buy

55.3%

Sell

44.7%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

Volume is declining as price rises, a bearish divergence. The 4-hour period showed 40.88% gains, but subsequent 1-hour and 5-minute periods show declining gains and eventual reversal. This indicates buying pressure is exhausting while price reaches extremes. The 2,078 total transactions in 24 hours spread across 713 unique participants (334 buyers + 379 sellers) shows participation is broad but shallow.

Recent Price Action

Parabolic spike followed by reversal. The token rose 264% in 24 hours, with most gains concentrated in the 4-hour period (40.88%), followed by deceleration to 0.07% in the 1-hour period and reversal to -0.63% in the 5-minute period.

This pattern is classic pump-and-dump or exhaustion mechanics. Parabolic moves that decelerate and reverse typically indicate the move is complete and mean reversion is beginning. The pattern suggests early buyers are exiting into retail demand.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.00000050

Major support

$0.00000020

Immediate resistance

$0.00000120

Major resistance

$0.00000200

Immediate support at $0.00000050 represents the 1-hour low before the 5-minute reversal. Major support at $0.00000020 represents a psychological level and potential capitulation zone. Immediate resistance at $0.00000120 represents the implied 24-hour high. Major resistance at $0.00000200 represents the next psychological barrier. Given the overbought condition and declining momentum, support levels are more likely to be tested than resistance.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

92/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    The token has demonstrated extreme volatility with 264% 24-hour swings and 40.88% 4-hour moves. This level of volatility is typical of low-liquidity speculative assets and creates severe risk of rapid losses. Volatility is likely to remain extreme given the shallow liquidity and speculative nature.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Liquidity is critically shallow at $61,312, creating severe slippage risk and potential inability to exit positions at reasonable prices. A $50,000 position would represent 81% of total liquidity, making exit extremely difficult. This is one of the most severe risks for retail investors.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As an unverified token with no clear use case, regulatory risk exists. If regulators determine this is a security or unregistered offering, it could face enforcement action. The lack of transparency and documentation increases regulatory scrutiny risk.

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: The extreme holder concentration and unverified contract create significant risk that early holders coordinate a complete exit, leaving retail investors with worthless tokens
  • Liquidity trap: The shallow liquidity means retail investors may be unable to exit positions without severe slippage or finding no buyers at any price
  • Smart contract vulnerability: The unverified contract could contain hidden functions allowing theft, minting, or freezing of tokens
  • Pump-and-dump mechanics: The 264% 24-hour surge followed by reversal suggests this may be a coordinated pump-and-dump scheme
  • Total loss risk: Given the lack of fundamentals, community, or development, the token could go to zero if early holders exit and retail demand evaporates

Mitigating Factors

  • Deployment on Base chain provides some security infrastructure
  • Trading on Uniswap (decentralized exchange) reduces counterparty risk compared to centralized exchanges
  • Transparent on-chain data allows monitoring of holder activity and potential red flags

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for experienced traders with high risk tolerance and capital they can afford to lose entirely. It is NOT suitable for retail investors, conservative investors, or anyone seeking stable returns. Even experienced traders should treat this as a high-risk speculation with potential for 90-100% losses. The extreme risks far outweigh potential rewards for most investors.

Polygraph litmus represents a high-risk speculative opportunity driven entirely by momentum and retail demand rather than fundamental value. The token's extreme volatility, shallow liquidity, and unverified contract create severe risks that far outweigh potential rewards. While the 264% 24-hour surge demonstrates speculative demand, the divergence between buy and sell transactions suggests early holders are distributing to retail buyers, positioning retail as exit liquidity.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The token gains legitimate adoption and development, with the project team clarifying use case and building community. Early holders who bought at lower prices see significant gains as the token appreciates toward a fair valuation. New retail buyers who enter early enough participate in the appreciation before the token reaches maturity.

  • Project team provides clear roadmap and use case documentation
  • Community grows organically and develops genuine utility
  • Smart contract is verified and audited, reducing security concerns
  • Liquidity increases significantly, reducing slippage risk

Base Case

The token experiences a sharp correction of 50-80% as early holders take profits and retail demand evaporates. The token stabilizes at a lower price point with minimal trading volume and holder base. Without significant development or adoption, the token remains a low-liquidity speculative asset with minimal utility. Most retail investors who bought near the peak experience significant losses.

  • Early holders begin profit-taking within 1-4 weeks
  • Retail demand proves insufficient to absorb early holder selling
  • No major catalysts (partnerships, listings, development) materialize
  • The token remains unverified and undocumented

Bear Case

High probability

Early holders coordinate an exit, dumping their 68% concentration into retail demand. The token price collapses 90%+ as liquidity evaporates and retail investors realize the lack of fundamentals. The unverified contract is revealed to contain malicious code or rug pull mechanisms, resulting in total loss for retail investors.

  • Early holders begin coordinated distribution as price reaches extremes
  • Retail demand evaporates as token fails to deliver on promised use case
  • Smart contract vulnerability or rug pull mechanism is discovered
  • Regulatory action against unverified token forces delisting

Analysis Details

Generated

Jun 7, 2026, 04:09 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-07 04:09 UTC

Model Confidence

Medium

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000000807494977791

Market Cap

$80.2K

24h Volume

$193.0K

Holders

278

Liquidity

$61,312.66

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data from Base chainHolder distribution analytics and whale trackingTrading volume and price action metrics from UniswapSmart contract analysis and security scoringLiquidity pool depth and slippage calculations

Limitations

  • Token is only 30 days old with limited historical data for trend analysis
  • Unverified contract prevents detailed code analysis and vulnerability assessment
  • No project documentation or team information available for fundamental analysis
  • Limited market data prevents meaningful comparison to similar tokens
  • On-chain data does not reveal intentions or coordination of large holders
  • Price predictions are highly uncertain given extreme volatility and speculative nature

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or endorsement. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Polygraph litmus specifically carries extreme risks including potential total loss, rug pulls, smart contract vulnerabilities, and liquidity traps. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research, understand the risks, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Only invest capital you can afford to lose entirely. This analysis is based on available data and may contain errors or omissions. The author assumes no liability for investment decisions made based on this analysis.

New reports on Base

All new tokens →

BITCOINBITCOINHarryPotterObamaSonic10InuNeutralHSAIcHSAIcHesai GroupBearishUUSDFUnited States Dividend FundBullishBUDcBUDcAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NVBullishNNODFNational Oil Dividend FundBearishBTCBBTCBBitcoin on BaseBearishNVOcNVOcNovo Nordisk A/SNeutralBILIcBILIcBilibili Inc.Bearish

Questions about Polygraph?