GBRAIN

Gbrain.io Price Today & AI Analysis

GBRAINBaseAnalysis as of May 21, 2026

Price

$0.063415

+1.37% 24h

Contract

Live
0x1a976053579eff8f33edefa1a3a255c2c7a8bba3

Chain

Holders

270

Market cap

$34.15K

Liquidity

$15.21K

Ask Unhosted AI about GBRAIN

Continue in chat

More tokens on Base

Gbrain.io: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-05-21 05:00 UTC

Holder addresses

795

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$131,008.85
How concentrated is Gbrain.io ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 795 addresses (2026-05-21 05:00 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Gbrain.io?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Gbrain.io liquidity falling?
As of 2026-05-21 05:00 UTC, reported liquidity was $131,008.85. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-05-21 05:00 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from May 21, 2026, 05:00 AM UTC

Market Cap

$275.11K

24h Volume

$1.73M

Liquidity

$131.01K

FDV

—

Holders

795

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

GBRAIN is an unverified utility token on Uniswap with extreme characteristics typical of speculative microcap projects: explosive recent price action (1001% surge), minimal liquidity ($131K), severe holder concentration (47% in top 10), and complete absence of project fundamentals or community presence. The token exhibits classic pump-and-dump patterns with rapid holder growth (93% in 24h) and extreme volatility (-44% in 5 minutes). This is a high-risk speculative asset with significant rug pull potential and minimal intrinsic value indicators.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — May 21, 2026, 05:00 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Unverified smart contract with 36/100 security score - highest risk category
  • Extreme holder concentration with 83% supply in top 100 wallets - structural instability
  • No project fundamentals, roadmap, or social presence - speculative only

Gbrain.io AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

GBRAIN exhibits extreme volatility with a -44.4% 5-minute decline following a 1001% surge over the past hour, indicating classic pump-and-dump dynamics. The token is in a highly unstable state with more sellers (5,815) than buyers (3,256) over 24 hours despite 51.7% buy pressure by volume, suggesting retail capitulation after initial hype. Price discovery is incomplete and highly manipulated by low liquidity ($131K) relative to trading volume ($1.73M in 24h).

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

Without project fundamentals, verified contracts, or community presence, GBRAIN faces severe headwinds over 30-90 days. The 47% supply concentration in top 10 holders creates structural instability, with likely continued distribution pressure as early holders take profits. Token viability depends entirely on speculative demand, which historically dissipates rapidly in this category.

Bullish Factors

  • 51.7% buy pressure by volume indicates more capital flowing in than out ($894.6K buys vs $835.9K sells)
  • Rapid holder growth (741 new holders in 24h, 93% increase) shows continued retail interest and network expansion
  • Positive net inflow of $58.7K in 24h volume suggests accumulation phase despite sell transaction count
  • Low current price ($0.0000028) creates potential for explosive percentage gains if project gains traction

Bearish Factors

  • Security score of 36/100 with unverified contract creates critical smart contract risk and potential rug pull vulnerability
  • Extreme concentration risk: top 10 holders control 47% of supply, top 100 control 83%, leaving only 17% for retail - classic pump-and-dump structure
  • No project description, roadmap, or social presence indicates either pre-launch stage or abandoned project
  • More sell transactions (5,815) than buy transactions (3,256) despite volume buy pressure suggests whales accumulating while retail distributes
  • Massive 1001% price surge followed by -44% 5-minute crash indicates unsustainable pump with imminent dump phase
  • Shallow liquidity ($131K) relative to 24h volume ($1.73M) creates extreme slippage risk and price manipulation vulnerability
  • Transaction data identical across 1h, 4h, and 24h periods suggests data anomaly or stalled trading activity

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Token Info

Chain
Base
Contract
0x1a97...bba3
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: 47% concentration in top 10 holders combined with unverified contract creates extreme rug pull vulnerability. Early investors could exit simultaneously, crashing price 80-95%.
  • Liquidity trap: Shallow $131K liquidity means large positions cannot exit without massive slippage. Retail holders could become trapped if price crashes and liquidity dries up.
  • Pump-and-dump pattern: Current price action (1001% surge, -44% crash) matches classic pump-and-dump pattern. Continued distribution by whales likely to result in 70-90% decline from peak.
  • Contract vulnerability: Unverified code could contain hidden functions allowing minting, pausing, or stealing funds. No audit trail or transparency regarding contract modifications.

Trading Insight

bearish

Market sentiment is cautiously bullish by volume metrics (51.7% buy pressure) but bearish by transaction count and price action. The 1001% surge followed by -44% crash indicates exhaustion of buying pressure and transition to distribution phase. Retail holders are accumulating while whales distribute, creating a dangerous asymmetry typical of tokens destined for significant declines.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Neutral

Short-term trend is clearly downtrend following the -44% 5-minute crash after 1001% surge, indicating exhaustion of buying pressure and reversal. Medium-term trend is indeterminate due to token's nascent stage (24h old data pattern), but the extreme volatility and concentration suggest sideways consolidation before potential further decline as distribution completes.

Momentum

Status

Overbought

Momentum indicators suggest extreme overbought conditions following the 1001% surge. The rapid reversal (-44% in 5 minutes) confirms momentum exhaustion and transition to bearish phase. RSI would be severely overbought (>80) based on the price action, indicating high probability of continued downside as momentum mean-reverts.

Volume Analysis

Buy

51.7%

Sell

48.3%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

Volume trend shows concentration in initial pump phase with declining activity as price crashes. The $1.73M 24h volume against $131K liquidity indicates volume is front-loaded in the pump, with likely declining volume during distribution phase. This is typical of speculative tokens where volume peaks at euphoria and declines during capitulation.

Recent Price Action

Classic pump-and-dump pattern: 1001% surge followed by -44% crash in 5 minutes, indicating exhaustion and reversal. Price is now consolidating at lower levels with continued volatility.

This pattern is highly bearish and indicates the pump phase is complete. Typically followed by continued distribution and decline to 50-80% below pump peak as retail holders capitulate. The pattern suggests organized manipulation rather than organic price discovery.

Key Price Levels

Immediate support

$0.000001500

Major support

$0.000000500

Immediate resistance

$0.000004000

Major resistance

$0.000010000

Key levels are difficult to establish given the token's extreme volatility and short trading history. Immediate support at $0.0000015 represents 46% below current price and likely first capitulation level. Major support at $0.0000005 represents 82% decline from current levels and potential capitulation point. Resistance levels are speculative given the pump-and-dump dynamics.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

92/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    Extreme volatility with 1001% surge followed by -44% crash demonstrates price swings of 50%+ are common. This volatility is driven by low liquidity and speculative trading rather than fundamental factors. Investors should expect 30-50% daily swings as normal.

  • LiquidityHigh

    Critically shallow liquidity of $131K against $1.73M volume creates 13.2x ratio indicating extreme slippage. A $100K position would face 50%+ slippage. Exit liquidity is limited and large holders may struggle to exit positions without significant price impact.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    Speculative tokens with no clear utility face potential regulatory scrutiny as unregistered securities. Regulatory action could restrict trading or force delisting from DEXs. Anonymity of project increases regulatory risk.

Key Risks

  • Rug pull risk: 47% concentration in top 10 holders combined with unverified contract creates extreme rug pull vulnerability. Early investors could exit simultaneously, crashing price 80-95%.
  • Liquidity trap: Shallow $131K liquidity means large positions cannot exit without massive slippage. Retail holders could become trapped if price crashes and liquidity dries up.
  • Pump-and-dump pattern: Current price action (1001% surge, -44% crash) matches classic pump-and-dump pattern. Continued distribution by whales likely to result in 70-90% decline from peak.
  • Contract vulnerability: Unverified code could contain hidden functions allowing minting, pausing, or stealing funds. No audit trail or transparency regarding contract modifications.
  • Regulatory action: Speculative tokens with no utility face potential SEC/regulatory scrutiny as unregistered securities. Trading restrictions or delisting could occur.
  • Total loss risk: Token has no fundamentals, no community, no roadmap, and no use case. Total loss is possible and should be assumed as baseline scenario.

Mitigating Factors

  • Token deployed on established Uniswap DEX rather than custom exchange, reducing counterparty risk
  • On-chain transaction history provides transparency for holder analysis
  • Rapid holder growth indicates continued retail interest (though this is also a risk factor)

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable ONLY for highly sophisticated investors with high risk tolerance, deep crypto experience, and ability to lose entire investment. It is NOT suitable for: retail investors, risk-averse investors, long-term holders, or anyone investing money they cannot afford to lose. This is pure speculation and should be treated as such.

GBRAIN is a high-risk speculative microcap token exhibiting classic pump-and-dump characteristics with extreme concentration, unverified contract, and no fundamentals. The bull case depends entirely on continued retail FOMO and speculative demand, while the bear case (most likely) involves continued distribution by whales and 70-90% decline from peak. This is a pure speculation play unsuitable for most investors.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

Token gains organic adoption, project team delivers on roadmap (if one exists), community grows, and price stabilizes at higher levels. Retail FOMO continues and attracts institutional interest, driving price to $0.00001+ over 6-12 months.

  • Project team announces roadmap and utility
  • Contract verification and security audit completed
  • Active community building and social media presence established
  • Listing on major CEX (Binance, Coinbase) drives mainstream adoption

Base Case

Token consolidates at lower price levels ($0.000001-0.000002) as distribution completes and retail interest wanes. Project remains in limbo without clear direction or fundamentals. Token becomes a zombie token with minimal trading volume and eventual delisting. Price declines 60-80% from peak over 90 days.

  • No major project announcements or roadmap released
  • Whale distribution continues at current pace
  • Retail interest peaks and begins declining as price stabilizes
  • No major regulatory action or exchange listings occur

Bear Case

High probability

Whales complete distribution into retail buyers, price crashes 70-90% from peak to $0.0000005-0.0000008 range. Token becomes abandoned as project fails to deliver fundamentals. Retail holders capitulate and exit at losses. Token eventually delisted or becomes worthless.

  • Continued whale distribution into retail buying pressure
  • Lack of project fundamentals or roadmap announcement
  • Regulatory scrutiny or SEC action against speculative tokens
  • Retail capitulation as price crashes and liquidity dries up

Analysis Details

Generated

May 21, 2026, 05:00 AM UTC

Saved observation

2026-05-21 05:00 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.000002785062705385

Market Cap

$275.1K

24h Volume

$1.73M

Holders

795

Liquidity

$131,008.85

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (buy/sell counts, volumes, unique traders)Holder distribution analytics (whale, shark, dolphin, fish, octopus breakdown)Trading volume metrics (24h, 4h, 1h volumes and buy/sell pressure)Smart contract analysis (security score, verification status)Price action data (5m, 1h, 4h, 24h performance)Liquidity pool data (Uniswap PoolManager)

Limitations

  • Token is only 24 hours old (based on data patterns), limiting historical analysis and trend identification
  • No project fundamentals, roadmap, or team information available for fundamental analysis
  • Transaction data shows identical counts across 1h, 4h, and 24h periods, suggesting data aggregation anomaly or incomplete data
  • No social sentiment data, news, or community metrics available for sentiment analysis
  • Price discovery is incomplete and heavily influenced by low liquidity and speculative trading
  • Cannot verify if trading volume is organic or result of wash trading/manipulation
  • Limited ability to assess long-term viability given nascent stage and lack of fundamentals

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendation, or offer to buy/sell securities. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile, speculative, and risky. GBRAIN specifically carries extreme risk including rug pull potential, total loss risk, and regulatory risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research, understand the risks, and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The author assumes no responsibility for investment losses. Investors should assume they could lose their entire investment.

Questions about GBRAIN?