LBM

Litebeam Price Today & AI Analysis

LBMBaseAnalysis as of Jun 12, 2026

Price

$0.044828

+0.00% 24h

Contract

Live
0x15b15fa54b629c634958e8bd639b2fc8af654974

Chain

Base

Holders

3.7K

Market cap

$48.28K

Liquidity

$10.40K

At a $1M market cap, $LBM would be $0.001000 (20.7x from today’s price)

Market cap calculator

Is LBM a scam?

Unhosted check · Oct 25

Re-checking

No red flags last time; the contract test has expired and is due to re-run.

  • The top 10 wallets hold a large share of the supply.
  • The contract owner has not given up control.
  • Control of the contract can be handed to another wallet.

The last contract test has expired and is waiting to re-run. Unhosted’s automated check, re-run in the background: a warning signal, not a guarantee either way. Taxes come from a test trade through one pool and can change if the owner changes them.

Ask Unhosted AI about LBM

3 free answers a day

What's Twitter saying?Whale activityWhat are the risks?Should I buy?

More tokens on Base

TTRDTRIDIUM$0.074545+0.0%MC $45.5KAAASIAASI$0.062588+0.0%MC $52SSKYAISKYAI$0.042581+0.0%MC $25.8KVVERVeraxum$0.000979+0.0%MC $62.7KSSMOLTINGsmolting$0.000552+0.0%MC $551.9KPaperPaperPapertrade$0.000102+920.2%MC $10.20M

Litebeam: holders, selling & liquidity

2026-06-12 13:17 UTC

Holder addresses

258

Top 10 supply share

Not available

Reported liquidity

$104,475.69
How concentrated is Litebeam ownership?
Top-10 ownership concentration is not available in this report. The saved holder count is 258 addresses (2026-06-12 13:17 UTC). A holder count alone does not establish how supply is distributed.
Are large holders selling Litebeam?
This report cannot establish whether large holders are selling: it does not include wallet-level holder balances over time matched to swaps. A complete buy/sell volume observation is not available in the saved inputs. A large swap alone does not identify a large holder, and a transfer alone does not prove a sale.
Is Litebeam liquidity falling?
As of 2026-06-12 13:17 UTC, reported liquidity was $104,475.69. At least two timestamped liquidity observations are needed to establish a change; this report does not have them.
Sources, observations & limitations

Source: inputs saved with the report generated 2026-06-12 13:17 UTC. Original provider retrieval times and historical samples were not recorded. Legacy zero placeholders are treated as unavailable. Holder addresses are not unique people. The provider’s top-10 share is not adjusted here for pools, exchanges, burn addresses or related wallets. Sniper classifications and wallet-level holder history are unavailable. Inspect token on the block explorer.

Recent swap evidence

Swap evidence is unavailable for this report.

Loading price chart…

1h chart read; Support, resistance, Fibonacci and RSI divergence are drawn on the chart once it loads.

Ask Wick about this chart

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Movement since report

report from Jun 12, 2026, 01:17 PM UTC

Market Cap

$1.51M

24h Volume

$185.86K

Liquidity

$104.48K

FDV

—

Holders

258

24h

Loading trading activity…

AI Executive Summary

Risk

Very high

Sentiment

Bearish

Litebeam (LBM) is a Base-chain token launched just 10 hours ago with a current market cap of approximately $1.51 million and $104,476 in liquidity on Uniswap v2. The project has no published description, no social presence, and an unverified smart contract scoring 40/100 on security assessment. On-chain forensics reveal that the three largest individual whale wallets — collectively holding 28.52% of supply — received their positions through insider allocation rather than open-market purchases, and the deployer wallet exhibits a disposable-deployer pattern. While 258 holders have accumulated in the first 10 hours, the structural concentration and insider-allocation profile make this a very high-risk asset.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Jun 12, 2026, 01:17 PM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Key points

  • Extreme insider concentration: 28.52% of supply held by wallets that received allocations at genesis without buying on the market
  • Unverified contract with a 40/100 security score on a token less than 10 hours old
  • Deployer wallet only 77 days old, zero prior deployments, funded by an unlabelled wallet — a textbook disposable-deployer fingerprint

Litebeam AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence

Short-Term · 24h-7d

Bearish

LBM is only 10 hours old and has already shed 24.7% in the past 4 hours, with sell transactions outnumbering buys 56-to-32 in that same window. The 4-hour sell dominance and the fact that the five largest recent on-chain swaps are all sells signal continued near-term distribution pressure. With no OHLC history to anchor support levels and 30% of supply sitting in dumpable individual-whale wallets, downside risk is elevated.

Medium-Term · 30d-90d

Bearish

The combination of an unverified contract, a 77-day-old deployer wallet with zero prior deployments funded by an unlabelled wallet, and three top individual whales who received supply via insider allocation rather than market purchases creates a structurally weak medium-term setup. Unless the project establishes verifiable utility, social presence, and contract verification, sustained selling from insider-allocated wallets is the most probable medium-term outcome. The 96% top-10 concentration with 30% dumpable supply leaves retail holders highly exposed.

Bullish Factors

  • 24-hour holder count reached 258 entirely organically from zero, with 140 holders acquiring via swap — indicating some genuine market interest at launch.
  • Total liquidity of $104,476 provides a functional trading pool for a token this young, reducing immediate illiquidity risk for small positions.
  • The 24-hour net price change of +25.1% shows the token attracted early buying momentum before the 4-hour reversal, suggesting latent demand exists.

Bearish Factors

  • Three of the top individual whales (18.95%, 5.82%, 3.75% of supply) acquired their positions via transfer or airdrop — not market buys — confirming insider allocation; these wallets represent 28.52% of supply that can be sold without any cost basis.
  • The contract is unverified (security score 40/100), meaning the source code cannot be audited and hidden mint, pause, or fee functions cannot be ruled out.
  • The deployer wallet (0x1a540088…) is only 77 days old, recorded zero contract deployments in its first 100 transactions, and was funded by an unlabelled wallet — a classic disposable-deployer pattern associated with elevated rug risk.
  • The 4-hour window shows 56 sell transactions versus 32 buys, and all five of the largest recent on-chain swaps are sells ranging from $369 to $1,329, indicating active distribution by early holders.
  • Top 10 holders control 96% of supply with retail holding approximately 0%, leaving the price entirely at the mercy of a small number of wallets.

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

LBM call history

Full track record →

Jun 12bearish
24h-4.3%
7d+212.1%
30d-2.1%
Jun 12bearish
24h-32.9%
7d+149.0%
30d-19.6%

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

Chain
Base
Contract
0x15b1...4974
Total Supply
—
Decimals
—

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: unverified contract, disposable deployer (77-day-old wallet, zero prior deployments, unlabelled funder), and 30% insider-allocated dumpable supply create a high-probability scenario for a coordinated exit that collapses the price to near zero.
  • Insider dump risk: the three largest individual whale wallets (28.52% combined) received supply at genesis with no cost basis; the largest recent trades are all sells, suggesting distribution has already begun.
  • Zero fundamental support: no project description, no social presence, no team disclosure, and no use case means there is no narrative or utility to sustain price if speculative interest fades.

Trading Insight

bearish

The 24-hour buy/sell split is nearly even at 49%/51%, but the 4-hour window tells a more bearish story: 56 sells versus 32 buys with 42 unique sellers versus 19 unique buyers, indicating accelerating distribution as early holders exit. The five largest recent swaps are all sells, with the biggest being a $1,329 sell, reinforcing the distributional tone.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d)

Bearish

Medium-Term (30d)

Bearish

With only 10 hours of price history, trend analysis is severely limited. The available intraday data shows a -24.7% move over 4 hours following an initial pump, a classic pump-and-dump price shape. The 1-hour reading of -5.1% confirms the downtrend is ongoing. No multi-day OHLC exists to assess a medium-term trend, but the structural insider-allocation setup makes a sustained downtrend the base expectation.

Momentum

Status

Oversold

A -24.7% drop in 4 hours on a newly launched token with thinning transaction volume (only 10 transactions in the last hour) suggests the initial selling wave may be approaching exhaustion in the very short term. However, with 28.52% of dumpable insider supply still unreleased to the market, any technical bounce is likely to be met with further selling.

Volume Analysis

Buy

49%

Sell

51%

Volume Trend

Decreasing

Transaction activity has declined sharply from the launch burst — 505 transactions over 24 hours but only 10 in the last hour — indicating the initial speculative frenzy is dissipating. The volume-to-liquidity ratio of ~1.78x over 24 hours reflects high speculative turnover, not organic accumulation. Decreasing volume into a price decline is a bearish continuation signal.

Recent Price Action

Initial launch pump followed by a sharp -24.7% retracement over 4 hours, with the 24-hour net still positive at +25.1% due to the early spike. Transaction velocity is declining rapidly in the most recent 1-hour window.

This pump-and-dump intraday shape is common in newly launched tokens with insider-allocated supply. The early price spike attracts retail buyers while insiders establish exit liquidity; the subsequent sharp decline reflects insider distribution. The pattern is a strong warning signal for new entrants.

AI overall risk

Very high

Risk Score

89/100

Risk Breakdown

  • VolatilityHigh

    A -24.7% price move in 4 hours on a 10-hour-old token with no price history demonstrates extreme intraday volatility. The shallow liquidity pool amplifies price swings, and the insider-allocation structure means large coordinated sells can move the price dramatically.

  • LiquidityHigh

    The $104,476 liquidity pool represents only ~6.9% of market cap. With 24-hour volume already exceeding the pool size, any significant exit by a whale holding 18.95% or 5.82% of supply would cause severe slippage and could drain the pool, trapping remaining holders.

  • ConcentrationNot assessed

    Ownership concentration cannot be assessed without a measured supply distribution.

  • Smart ContractNot assessed

    Contract or authority checks are not included in the saved provider observations.

  • RegulatoryMedium

    As a Base-chain token with no stated jurisdiction, team, or legal entity, LBM carries standard regulatory uncertainty applicable to unregistered crypto assets. The airdrop distribution to 86 wallets could attract securities-law scrutiny in certain jurisdictions depending on how the project is eventually marketed.

Key Risks

  • Rug-pull risk: unverified contract, disposable deployer (77-day-old wallet, zero prior deployments, unlabelled funder), and 30% insider-allocated dumpable supply create a high-probability scenario for a coordinated exit that collapses the price to near zero.
  • Insider dump risk: the three largest individual whale wallets (28.52% combined) received supply at genesis with no cost basis; the largest recent trades are all sells, suggesting distribution has already begun.
  • Zero fundamental support: no project description, no social presence, no team disclosure, and no use case means there is no narrative or utility to sustain price if speculative interest fades.

Mitigating Factors

  • The 57.5% of supply in protocol/contract addresses is not dumpable and effectively reduces the freely circulating supply available for immediate selling.
  • Liquidity is deployed on Uniswap v2 (non-custodial), so users retain self-custody of funds and can exit at any time without platform counterparty risk, subject to slippage.

Investor Suitability

This token is suitable only for highly experienced crypto traders who fully understand the risks of newly launched, unverified tokens with insider-allocated supply, and who are prepared to lose their entire investment. It is not suitable for retail investors, risk-averse individuals, or anyone allocating more than a negligible speculative position.

LBM presents a highly speculative, very-high-risk profile with no documented fundamentals, an unverified contract, and clear insider-allocation fingerprints. The investment thesis is almost entirely dependent on continued speculative momentum, which is already showing signs of exhaustion after 10 hours. The structural setup — disposable deployer, zero-cost-basis whale supply, no project information — is more consistent with a short-lived speculative token than a sustainable project.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case

Low probability

The project team publishes a credible whitepaper, verifies the contract, and establishes social channels that attract genuine community interest. Insider wallets lock their supply voluntarily, and the token finds a real use case that drives sustained demand beyond the launch window.

  • Contract verification and transparent team disclosure within the first 48-72 hours
  • Voluntary lock-up or burn of insider-allocated supply to reduce dump overhang

Base Case

LBM follows the typical trajectory of an undocumented launch token: an initial speculative spike attracts early buyers, insider wallets gradually distribute their allocations over days to weeks, volume and holder interest fade, and the price settles at a fraction of its launch-day high with a small residual holder base.

  • No project fundamentals or social presence emerge to sustain speculative interest beyond the initial launch window
  • Insider wallets distribute gradually rather than in a single coordinated exit, resulting in a slow price bleed rather than an instant collapse

Bear Case

High probability

Insider wallets begin systematically selling their zero-cost-basis allocations into retail buy pressure, the liquidity pool is progressively drained, and the price collapses toward zero. The unverified contract may contain functions that accelerate this outcome. With no project fundamentals to sustain interest, holder count reverses as early buyers exit at a loss.

  • 28.52% of supply in insider wallets with no cost basis and no documented lock-up, already showing sell-side activity in recent large transactions
  • Unverified contract with a 40/100 security score and a disposable-deployer profile leaving open the possibility of privileged contract functions

Analysis Details

Generated

Jun 12, 2026, 01:17 PM UTC

Saved observation

2026-06-12 13:17 UTC

Model Confidence

Low

Data Snapshot

Price

$0.001512065214923372

Market Cap

$1.51M

24h Volume

$185.9K

Holders

258

Liquidity

$104,475.69

Data Sources

On-chain transaction data (Base chain)Holder distribution analytics (Moralis holder tiers)Trading volume metrics (Uniswap v2 DEX data)Smart contract analysis (security score, verification status)Token genesis and deployer wallet forensicsWhale wallet behavioral analysis (DEX swap history)Notable recent trade data (largest on-chain swaps)

Limitations

  • Token is only 10 hours old — no OHLC price history exists, making technical analysis and price target derivation impossible; all trend observations are based on intraday data only.
  • Smart-money (profitable trader cohort) data is unavailable for this token, limiting the ability to assess informed investor positioning.
  • No project documentation, team information, or social presence is available, making fundamental analysis entirely absent — the token cannot be evaluated on anything other than on-chain mechanics.
  • Holder tier thresholds (whale, shark, dolphin, fish, octopus) are Moralis-defined relative size buckets with unpublished exact thresholds; dollar-value interpretations of these tiers are not possible.

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

New reports on Base

All new tokens →

BBRLABRLA TokenBearishSShadrShadr PrivacyBearishOONECOINone coinBearishShadrShadrShadr PrivacyBearishBBowSave BowBearishLIcLIcLi Auto Inc.BearishBRZBRZBrazilian Digital TokenBearishXXTOXTONeutral

Questions about LBM?