Babylon

Babylon Price Today & AI Analysis

Babylon
Base·AI Analysis
Analysis as of Sep 11, 2026

$0.061446

+1.26%24h
LiveContract:0x07b7917f0eb44607d6a994abc1e101addf883be7Chain:BaseHolders:18Market cap:$14.46KLiquidity:$3.48K

More tokens on Base

HOME

HOME

Home

$0.0054354.0%
MC $33.69M
SERV

SERV

OpenServ

$0.02023.7%
MC $1.77M
Fren Pet

Fren Pet

Fren Pet

$2.8811.9%
MC $20.46M
A1C

A1C

Sally

$0.100423.7%
MC $2.11M
SAPIEN

SAPIEN

Sapien

$0.07504.6%
MC $74.95M
NVDAc

NVDAc

NVIDIA Corporation

$219.341.1%
MC $3.71M

Advanced charting powered by TradingView

Continue in chat

Ask Unhosted AI about Babylon

What's Twitter saying?

Sentiment, KOL mentions, top tweets

Whale activity

Who is accumulating or distributing

What are the risks?

Red flags, security, concentration

Should I buy?

Bull case, bear case, entry / exit

Movement since reportreport from Sep 11, 2026, 06:45 AM UTC
Market Cap

$14.46K

24h Volume

$56.10K

Liquidity

$3.48K

FDV

—

Holders

18

24HLoading trading activity…

Holder Insights

Live

Total holders

—

AI Executive Summary

Babylon is a nano-cap ERC-20 token on Base trading on Uniswap with a market cap of just $14,456 and only $3,481 in liquidity. The contract is 9.5 months old but has accumulated only 18 total holders, no project description, and no social presence. Current trading shows balanced but very thin activity, and the combination of a tiny holder base, shallow liquidity, and missing fundamental/security information places this squarely in speculative, high-risk territory.

Figures cited above are from the market snapshot taken when this analysis ran — Sep 11, 2026, 06:45 AM UTC. Live values may differ; the key facts at the top of the page are current.

Risk: very_high
Sentiment: neutral
No project description, category, or social links were provided, leaving no verifiable use case or narrative
Extremely small holder base of 18 wallets despite 9.5 months of on-chain history
24h trading volume of roughly $56,101 dwarfs the $3,481 liquidity pool, an unusual turnover ratio worth flagging

Babylon AI Price Analysis

Low Confidence
Short-Term24h-7d
Neutral

The only price data available is a flat +1.26% change that is identical across the 1h, 4h, and 24h windows, which is noise rather than a trend signal. No daily OHLC history (7d/30d/90d) was provided, so there is no basis to call a directional short-term move.

Medium-Term30d-90d
Neutral

With no multi-day price history, no holder-growth trajectory, and only 18 total holders, there is no data-driven basis for a bullish or bearish medium-term call. The token's fate over 30-90 days will likely hinge on whether liquidity and the holder base grow at all from their current negligible levels.

Bullish Factors
  • +24h buy volume ($29,206) exceeds sell volume ($26,895), producing a net inflow of roughly $2,311 and a 52.1%/47.9% buy/sell pressure split
  • +Unique buyer (88) and unique seller (87) counts are almost identical, indicating no one-sided panic selling in the current window
Bearish Factors
  • -Total liquidity is only $3,481 against $56,101 in 24h combined volume — roughly 16x the pool size traded in a single day, which materially raises manipulation and slippage risk
  • -Sell transactions (399) outnumber buy transactions (174) by more than 2:1, suggesting broad-based small-size distribution even though buy volume is slightly higher

Disclaimer: This AI-generated prediction is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research.

Babylon call history

Full track record →
Sep 11neutral
24hpending
7dpending
30dpending

Calls are recorded the moment the analysis is generated and scored automatically against the market price 24h, 7d and 30d later — hits and misses alike, never edited.

Token Info

ChainBase
Contract0x07b7...3be7
Total Supply—
Decimals—

Key Risks

•24h volume of ~$56,101 against only $3,481 of liquidity is an extreme turnover mismatch that raises wash-trading and slippage concerns
•Only 18 total holders after 9.5 months on-chain indicates negligible organic adoption for a token of this age
•No project description, category, or social links exist, making independent verification of legitimacy or utility impossible
•Contract-security data is unavailable, so smart-contract risks (ownership, mint functions, honeypot mechanics) cannot be ruled out

Trading Insight

neutral

24h flow is close to balanced with a mild buy-side tilt (52.1% buy vs 47.9% sell pressure), producing a small net inflow of about $2,311. However, sell transactions (399) are more than double buy transactions (174), implying many small sell orders offset by fewer, larger buy orders.

AI-generated insight. Not financial advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trend Analysis

Short-Term (7d):
Neutral
Medium-Term (30d):
Neutral

The only price change data provided (+1.26% identically across 1h, 4h, and 24h) is within noise range and does not constitute a trend. No 7d/30d/90d OHLC history was supplied, so no medium-term trend can be established from data — this is reported as sideways due to genuine absence of trend evidence, not a hedge.

Momentum

Status:
Neutral

With no historical OHLC series, standard momentum indicators (RSI, moving averages) cannot be computed; the flat 24h price change offers no evidence of overbought or oversold conditions.

Volume Analysis

Buy 52.1%Sell 47.9%

Volume Trend: Stable

24h volume split is 52.1% buy / 47.9% sell, a near-balanced but slightly buy-tilted flow. The more notable feature is scale: combined 24h volume of $56,101 is about 3.9x the token's entire $14,456 market cap and roughly 16x its $3,481 liquidity pool, an unusually high turnover ratio for such a shallow pool that should be treated skeptically rather than as a bullish liquidity signal.

Recent Price Action

Price is essentially flat, up 1.26% with the identical figure reported across the 1h, 4h, and 24h windows, and no broader OHLC range data exists to place this move in context.

The lack of differentiated timeframe data combined with no historical range means no reliable directional pattern (breakout, reversal, consolidation) can be identified from the available technical data.

Overall Risk:
Very High
86/100

Risk Breakdown

Volatility
High

Although the reported 24h price change is small (+1.26%), the combination of a nano-cap market cap ($14,456) and razor-thin liquidity ($3,481) means any meaningfully sized trade could move price sharply, so realized volatility risk is high despite the calm snapshot.

Liquidity
High

Total liquidity of $3,481 is extremely shallow, and 24h volume of $56,101 (roughly 16x the pool) implies significant slippage risk for anything beyond very small trade sizes.

Concentration
Low

Aggregate data shows the top 10 holders control only 8.2% of supply, which is a low concentration figure; however, this comes from a total pool of just 18 holders, so the percentage should be read alongside the very small holder base rather than in isolation.

Smart Contract
Medium

No contract-security data (verification, ownership, honeypot checks) is available for this chain, so 'medium' is an uninformed default rather than an actual risk assessment.

Regulatory
Low

No specific regulatory red flags are evident from the available data; general regulatory uncertainty applies broadly to DEX-traded tokens without a defined jurisdiction or use case.

Key Risks

  • •24h volume of ~$56,101 against only $3,481 of liquidity is an extreme turnover mismatch that raises wash-trading and slippage concerns
  • •Only 18 total holders after 9.5 months on-chain indicates negligible organic adoption for a token of this age
  • •No project description, category, or social links exist, making independent verification of legitimacy or utility impossible
  • •Contract-security data is unavailable, so smart-contract risks (ownership, mint functions, honeypot mechanics) cannot be ruled out

Mitigating Factors

  • •Top 10 holder concentration is a comparatively low 8.2% of total supply based on available aggregate data
  • •24h buy and sell volumes are fairly balanced (52.1%/47.9%) with a small net inflow, showing no acute one-sided sell pressure in the current window

Investor Suitability

Suitable only for highly speculative traders who can tolerate total loss of capital; not appropriate for investors seeking verifiable fundamentals, adequate liquidity, or contract-security assurances.

Babylon is a nano-cap, extremely low-liquidity token with almost no verifiable fundamental information and a very small 18-wallet holder base. Any thesis here is dominated by structural risk rather than growth catalysts, and the balanced short-term trading flow does not offset the shallow liquidity and missing project data.

Scenario Analysis

Bull Case
Low

A pickup in retail attention or exchange listing activity drives new buyers and liquidity into the pool, expanding the holder base beyond its current 18 wallets.

  • +Current 24h flow shows a slight net buy bias (52.1% buy pressure, +$2,311 net inflow)
  • +Balanced unique buyer/seller counts (88 vs 87) show no active buyer exodus
Base Case

The token continues trading in a low-visibility, thin-liquidity environment with no clear trend, absent any new information, listings, or holder growth.

  • •No material change occurs in the 18-wallet holder base or $3,481 liquidity level in the near term
  • •No project description, roadmap, or social presence emerges to shift market attention
Bear Case
High

Liquidity remains stagnant or is withdrawn, and the tiny 18-holder base means a handful of exits could sharply reprice the token or leave it effectively illiquid.

  • -Liquidity of only $3,481 cannot absorb sizeable orders without severe price impact
  • -399 sell transactions versus 174 buy transactions in 24h shows broad small-scale distribution pressure

Analysis Details

GeneratedSep 11, 2026, 06:45 AM UTC
Data FreshnessReal-time on-chain data
Model Confidence
Low

Data Snapshot

Price$1.44563724277e-7
Market Cap$14.5K
24h Volume$56.1K
Holders18
Liquidity$3.5K

Data Sources

Codex DEX market data (price, volume, liquidity)
Daily OHLC price history
Aggregate holder count and top-10 concentration

Limitations

  • •Holder-growth history, whale-transaction records, and contract-security data were unavailable for this analysis
  • •No daily OHLC price history was available, preventing computation of technical support/resistance levels or multi-day trend confirmation
  • •Per-wallet holder distribution and smart-money cohort data could not be verified

How we keep this honest

Every directional call on these pages is recorded before the outcome is known and scored on our public prediction track record. We apply the same standard to others: our audit of 1,581 crypto YouTube predictions found bullish calls did worse than random timing, and our memecoin pump anatomy study measured what chasing a pump actually costs.

Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and risky. Always conduct your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Track Babylon