šŸ”§ Boring Tech, Big Secondaries, and Promptless AI: Brian Wong’s Playbook
TheRollupCo•
April 9, 2026

šŸ”§ Boring Tech, Big Secondaries, and Promptless AI: Brian Wong’s Playbook

Quick Take

  • Fund strategy: a bifurcated "barbell" across pre-revenue, sub-$15 million deals and $15+ billion secondaries — designed to shorten the return cycle to 5–7 years.
  • Core focus: "boring tech" picks-and-shovels, with a sharp crypto angle on the stablecoin application layer (neo-banks, FX, credit, payments to underserved corridors).
  • Macro caution: questions around public market capacity to absorb mega-privates and whether AI "outputs" justify the massive "inputs" of energy and chips.
  • AI shift: the rise of promptless, agentic systems could power a services renaissance — high-margin managed offerings rather than DIY software.
ā€œASKI is a boring tech fund — behind-the-scenes technologies powering everything else, used daily even if no one knows it’s there.ā€

šŸ”§ The Fund: Boring Tech, Barbell Returns

ASKI Ventures (a wink to the ASCII standard) targets infrastructure-like software — think Plaid/Stripe-style rails where trust and ubiquity matter more than brand. The approach is deliberate:

  • Stage barbell: ā€œAnything under 15 million valuation and anything over 15 billion is what we say.ā€ Early bets are pre-revenue; late bets are secondaries in large, durable franchises.
  • Why it matters: Venture duration has stretched. ASKI’s structure aims to "return around 5 to seven years" by coupling longer-dated early-stage with nearer-dated late-stage liquidity.
  • Strategic flywheel: Building relationships via secondaries can create M&A paths for the early portfolio. Late-stage platforms need capabilities, talent, and distribution — buying beats building when "five, six years of work" can be leapfrogged by AI ā€œin a month or two months.ā€

šŸ’µ Stablecoin Apps: Where the Exits Show Up

Within crypto, ASKI zeroes in on the application layer of stablecoins — not base-layer breakthroughs but tried-and-true financial services, rebuilt on-chain:

  • Products: payday loans, FX, business lending, neo-banking for the underbanked.
  • Exit logic: ā€œBig banks are not going to build a payday loan service on-chain.ā€ They will buy teams who’ve already solved for compliance, UX, and go-to-market. Expect ā€œquick flipsā€ and ā€œbase hits.ā€
  • Where it scales: emerging market corridors that leapfrogged legacy rails. Example cited: products addressing flows between Venezuela and the U.S. Adoption curves in Asia/Africa underscore the thesis — phone-first users treat money differently (even mobile minutes have functioned as currency), making stablecoin rails intuitive.

āš ļø Liquidity Math: Mega-Privates vs. Public Markets

On the AI megacaps, the fund’s stance is less about calling tops and more about liquidity mechanics. The pipeline — SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic — raises a simple question: can public markets absorb the float and post-lockup supply?

ā€œI want to run a different direction when everyone piles into OpenAI or Anthropic… valuations at 600 billion, 700 billion, trillion… everyone knows these companies at 23 trillion… you’re talking 9 to 10 trillion needed in this public market cycle.ā€

Even more fundamental: the inputs vs. outputs test — staggering capital and energy to procure chips vs. clear, compounding commercial outcomes.

ā€œAre the outputs really giving us that commercial use case that warrants those valuations?ā€

Recent fundraising chatter includes claims like ā€œAnthropic… $380 billion… now into the 700ā€ and ā€œOpenAI… 820 or 850 billion.ā€ The debate is not whether AI is transformative; it’s about timing, cash flows, and float.

šŸ“ˆ The Scale Problem in AI Venture

  • Expectations inflation: Funding rounds have grown so large that revenue targets skew unrealistic. One founder doing $20 million ARR after burning $32 million was told it’s not enough — a symptom of a distorted bar.
  • Tooling ubiquity: ā€œ100% of engineers right now… are using AI to write code; they’re really just proofreading it.ā€ Productivity rises; defensibility can fall. The edge shifts to distribution, embedded workflows, and data access.

šŸ¤– Services 2.0: Agents Make Services a High-Margin Business

After years of ā€œdon’t do services,ā€ the pendulum is swinging. With agentic AI, services can scale like software:

  • Be the service: Not just tooling — manage the outcome. Example: Nexa (agentic AutoCAD for construction) can walk users through work and even do it, blending SaaS with managed execution.
  • Vertical AI stacks: Think a stablecoin-native suite managing KYC, risk, reconciliation, tax, accounting — all orchestrated by agents. Fewer consultants; more automation; better margins.
  • Where this goes: ā€œThe biggest profit margin companies will be agents that help you put together agents.ā€ Orchestration is the product.

🧩 Promptless Is a Data Problem (and a Trust Problem)

Promptless systems — where AI prompts the user and executes in the background — depend on clean, well-permissioned data and robust orchestration. Animoca’s Minds is cited as an early agentic platform, with the broader lesson clear:

  • Data prep wins: ā€œThe best promptless is having the best access to the right data sources at the right time.ā€ Invest in data dictionaries, governance, and sovereignty.
  • Human-in-the-loop remains: ā€œIt’s still like an undergrad — a lot of knowledge; execution poor.ā€ Unchecked autonomy breaks; oversight is table stakes, especially where errors cascade (bonus calculations, compliance, or worse).

🧠 Human Moats: Trust, Discretion, and Real-World Feedback

  • AGI timelines: ā€œAGI is like a decade away… could be 10–20 years.ā€ Useful to remember as narrative heat pushes capital into compute and chips.
  • Analog snapback: Vinyl sales ā€œhit a recordā€ and surpassed CDs; members’ clubs and phone-free zones are booming. Offline trust still compounds faster than online reach. ā€œYou can’t look an AI in the eye.ā€
  • Dopamine and psychosis risk: LLMs are trained to please. Overuse can dull critical feedback loops. Actionable guardrails: AI ethics, deepfake detection, and bias auditing. Otherwise, the Overton Window drifts — the frog-in-the-pot effect.

šŸ› ļø Operator & Investor Playbook

  • Subsidize exploration: Pay for staff AI subscriptions and encourage structured trials.
  • Host an ā€œAgentic Dayā€: Cross-functional teams build agents toward a specific outcome.
  • Run mini hackathons: Pair engineers with non-technical owners to prototype managed services, not just features.
  • Teach the basics: Make LLM training, data hygiene, and reversion-to-mean literacy mandatory.
  • Don’t outsource judgment: Use AI for breadth; keep humans for discretion, ethics, and final checks. As noted: ā€œDon’t check the checking with AI — you do the checking.ā€

🧯 Founder Health Is a Strategy

ASKI funds gym memberships and therapy for portfolio founders to promote durability over burnout.

ā€œIf $10 million today meant you don’t wake up tomorrow, you’d never take it. That tells you what your morning is worth.ā€

Bottom Line

  • Boring beats bluster: Infrastructure-like software and stablecoin apps serving real corridors are best positioned for acquisition-driven outcomes.
  • Barbell with a bridge: Secondaries in durable giants can catalyze M&A for early bets — compressing fund timelines.
  • Services are back: Agentic, promptless execution turns managed outcomes into high-margin, scalable businesses.
  • Stay sober on AI: Funding scales and public float constraints matter; outputs must validate inputs.
  • Human edge endures: Data discipline, oversight, in-person trust, and ethical guardrails separate compounding franchises from commoditized tools.

More from TheRollupCo